|
But at the end of the day @quickseller, lightlord said nothing for ten weeks.
As has been said early in this thread, unless you really are on your death bed, then you should be making some sort of statement of intent to pay or not as the case may be.
|
|
|
|
Well... Well... Well... I'll process the campaign asap with a bonus, no later than 48 hours from this post.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just wondering what your thoughts are of DT1 users (regardless of whether or not they are plus or minus) who DT trust a user who has been banned for quite some time?
In the scenario I'm thinking of, a user in the past DT trusted another user, but over time that user is now banned.
Said DT1 user does from time to time modify their DT trust list, so it's not like they picked some random users and then years later have forgotten what they did.
Hypothetically speaking...
|
|
|
|
Narcissist?
I will tell you what is narcissistic.
You need to take a chill pill, Pal. No one has accused you of anything. |
|
|
|
|
The trust pages are updated once per week (only a narcissist would want an hourly, or even a daily update) the two examples I have quoted have information - if you know what to look for. In the case of your own trust list, you can review who you have previously trusted/distrusted, while in the other example I show that lightlord (the subject of this thread) is DT trusted by Zodiac1233.
If Zodiac1233 is an alt, then it's trust abuse... QED
|
|
|
|
|
From recollection, both signature campaigns (although paid in Bitcoin) are also calculated per post in Bitcoin too (in much the same way that coin mixing service was until very recently). Am I remembering this correctly?
With the price if Bitcoin rapidly rising over the last ten weeks. Lightlord etc might not be able to source enough Bitcoin with their funds at hand.
|
|
|
|
This is a good find. Most of his posts last year clearly show that he's part of the Bitvest team. Maybe a developer. What is disappointing is that he has also been offline since August 06, 2021 I don't know if there are any issues coming up on Bitvest and 777coin, but I would certainly stop using those sites as a precaution. What's even more interesting is their last post (in August 2020) reads in part: On June 17, 2020, an exploit was made against how we handle ETH contract deposits.
...
It was caught quickly, and the losses mitigated before any losses exceeding the size of our hot wallets occurred.
and then there's this: Seems my account has been permanently banned from discord. Not sure why.
Six days later, it's business as usual: Coincidentally, Zodiac1233 was Last Active: 2021-08-06, 12:43:39 (GMT +10 OR 02:43:39 GMT +0) - four hours prior to lightlord posting the above.
As far back as 25 Nov 2013 01:32:36 UTC with just 89 posts (and having registered on Date Registered: June 11, 2011, 03:43:58 AM GMT) Zodiac1233 was active in the 777coin campaign and had on their profile that they are from Canada - Archive [ 1a], [1b] I haven't delved into the spread sheet to see when Zodiac1233 joined that campaign - anyone? Also, can anyone confirm who other "owners" / "admin of the two sites are? I have concerns that these two were registered on the forum seventeen days apart: (and are "childhood friends") 2011-06-11, 13:43:58 Date Registered: Zodiac1233
2011-06-28, 22:03:49 Date Registered: lightlord
2021-08-06, 12:43:39 Last Active: Zodiac1233
2021-09-27, 01:01:07 Last Active: lightlord |
|
|
|
I only ask because I don't know how many weeks behind the various recipients are owed their back pay - I did see ten weeks in one post, is this correct? Also, another post made mention of a "bonus" being paid as a "late fee" - is this paid across the board?
This was the calculation I did a few posts back. CryptopreneurBrainboss can confirm whether this is correct. Based on the spreadsheet, the total amount overdue for the last 10 rounds is: 0.2359419 (Bitvest) + 0.1070795 (777Coin), or about $19,000 based on Bitcoin's current value (not including bonuses). Quite a bit, I must say.
Thanks for providing this information - although I'm prepared to accept the "benefit of the doubt" arguement for the last two or three weeks being described as "sick leave", I can't help but wonder why @lightlord said nothing in the intervening seven or eight weeks prior to that?? Or, in the preceding twelve or more months since the payments to participants slipped from weekly to semi weekly then every once in a while. |
|
|
|
|
I only ask because I don't know how many weeks behind the various recipients are owed their back pay - I did see ten weeks in one post, is this correct? Also, another post made mention of a "bonus" being paid as a "late fee" - is this paid across the board?
|
|
|
|
|
@CryptopreneurBrainboss - how much is currently owed at participants? And, how much would be owed to participants between now the the 31st of October this year? I'm just trying to get a feel for how much is owed to everyone involved in the two campaigns you manage. (I'm not after a line-by-line break down, just an overall figure).
|
|
|
|
For now the story is he's sick so please lets give him that benefit of doubt for couple of weeks.
He told you that? |
|
|
|
Dragons and Timelord won, Score was 22-35, Connacht came back in the last quarter but couldnt bridge the gap. They dont currently have a fantastic home record.
Are we talking about the same game? Super League Grand Final: Catalans Dragons 10-12 St Helens: Saints beat Catalans to win third Grand Final in a row https://www.bbc.com/sport/av/rugby-league/58859552I lost out on nitrogensports.eu on my modest bet for the Dragons to win. |
|
|
|
I’m happy to give lightlord neg trust if he doesn’t pay in the next 2-3 weeks.
Reading through the replies since my post of yesterday, I was going to give lightlord negative/distrust today, but I'll err on the side of caution and give them the benefit of the doubt as LFC_Bitcoin has done and wait until the 31st of October to proceed with that course of action, unless lightlord makes a statement prior to that date. Props to Foxpup and DarkStar_, by the way.
Neither of whom have participated in this thread - what is their connection? |
|
|
|
I have to disagree with you regarding Wilder. No need to learn a new strategy. His punching and footwork as also good. Remember that Fury also kisses the canvass twice means Wilder is doing great too. There's no lacking between them. Both are having equal strength. It's just that it now turned into a battle of determination and strong will on which Fury got it at the end.
I didn't catch who the person in the suit was that came into the ring and whispered in Wilder's ear during the preak between rounds, but I'm sure he was probably saying the same thing I do that Wilder had he not swung wildly would have landed some golden punches and would have had Tyson on the mat more than just the twice he found himself knocked down. On points, Tyson was always going to win being so far ahead. |
|
|
|
You're a moron ...
Whilst this thread has users who have differing opinions on who played the better game - each with our own interpretation on the game plays and strategies, I'm sure I speak for most if not all users here when I say your attack on me is neither respectful, nore welcome. Perhaps you should come back when you have learned some manors and can discus game play with respect for others. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've got to admit I found it unacceptable that the 777coin signature campaign went from weekly to fortnightly then started dragging on from their without any official explanation, or even response to repeated inquiries from more senior participants. I too found a new signature campaign and moved on - and I have sympathies to those who are still awaiting payment.
My advice to anyone looking to join ANY SigCamp: Choose more carefully which campaign you join - especially if it is well documented that the Campaign doesn't pay in a timely manor.
|
|
|
|
As expected Fury knocked out Wilder on a surprising round and maybe, Wilder have to change his style but we can't deny that there's a lot of knock down on this match.
Though I see a good matches before especially with Pacman on his last games, that could be more boxing compare to this match. Anyway, congrats to all the bettors here in favor to Furry, we won tonight! let's see if Fury will have another match this year, Cheers!
Yes, I'll definitely be putting money on Fury from now on (especially if he has a rematch with Wilder at a later date). I think Wilder needs to go back to basics and review the match and learn from his mistakes. Swinging wildly is probably his biggest blunder of the match. |
|
|
|
|
In the Queensland Cup, the North's Devils have beaten the Wynnum Manly Seagulls 16 - 10 in a very closely fought match.
I managed to hear the second half on the radio which was played at the Redcliffe Dolphin's Grounds this afternoon (in the past the Grand Final was played at Lang Park).
Wynnum were ahead 10 - 4 then with fifteen minutes from full time North's leveled ten all. The game got electric with both sides attempting to break away to score. Eventually North's scored and converted to take the lead 16 - 10 with five minutes of game play.
Wynnum came close to leveling with a minute to full time, but North's managed to hold them off to win their first Premiership for close to Thirty Years.
|
|
|
|
|
Fury will probably win again if that fight was anything to go by.
Wilder was worn out early and neither opponent could manage more than two punches before quickly moving away. It's been many years since boxers could actually go in for sustained punches four/six/eight punch combinations. Wilder needs to stop swinging wildly and actually throw punches that connect.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
