I understand that he has been a trusted and even a very strong voice in the past with a lot of no bullshit frank talk in support of bitcoin, but that interview came off as overly emotional and he lost something before or during the interview, and he was having difficultles holding it together or coming off as reasonable.

You attached a week old youtube clip interview of Richard Heart rage quitting BTC.. and pumping ETH and pumping his new alt coin...

Just because he proclaims a bunch of whiny bullshit, just like Mike Hearn whined about a few things in early 2016, and Mike Hearns rage quit did not cause BTC to fall or fail, merely because he said it....

Similarly here with Richard Heart... he seems to be very emotional and there are a lot fo folks who are confused by his sudden change and sentiment that seems to be based on feelings (and perhaps bias) rather than actual fundamentals or logic.

Oh shit.... we cannot forget about tether... oh shit, oh shit....

You are such a fucking pain in the ass, PoolMinor.

Your whole point seems to be that you want to make a BTC price prediction; however, you cannot just come out and make your supposedly marvelous prediction like a normal person. Instead, you want to get some kind of credit and praise and begging and DRAMA regarding how amazing your are, and therefore, you are trying to suggest that you had been correct about some thing BTC related in the past that you saw in a past BTC price trned/prediction from a year and a half ago, and so therefore there is some kind of connection in your logic or the charts or some kind of smartness that you supposedly have about today that is connected with your previous supposed smartness? 

And, who gives a shit?

Why don't you just come out and say whatever it is that you want to say in engwish without having to couple your proclamations with cooing and aggrandizement?   because your desire for BTC price prediction praise really does not matter that much...

If you want to share information about your current prediction or trend, then tell us, what is it that you saying?  Buy, sell, hold or something else?

Or maybe you can just go off in a temper tantrum and say that you are NOT going to share your information because there are too many meanies in the WO thread.. and mostly blah blah blah.. ... hahahahahahahaha..

O..k.  come on sweet little PoolMinor, eat your broccoli, it tastes like chicken, and we know how you like chicken.  coo cooo coo.. poolminor is the greatest.. will you eat your broccoli.. sweetie pool minor?

You are still bringing it up, so what is the relevance, and what shit anyone give about it?  You talking about September 2016, too.   So make whatever point that you are wanting to make rather than attempting to play puzzle master.  


Edit: 

By the way, as I type, looks like our little dip brought prices down to $9499, and now we already touching upon upwards on $9,800 and seems to be heading back towards the $10k area... great, Great, GREAT... gonna get close, again?  $9,977 and beyond, here we come?  Supra $10k in the next 3-4 hours, perhaps?  I'm getting overly expecting?

You surely become defensive, easily, and without hardly a blink.  Is the interwebs such a challenging place for you?


Why are you giving me a puzzle in order to attempt to lord some supposed technical knowledge that you have over me?  You think that I give a shit about a DMI or if I would know one if I ran into it in a dark alley?  Probably, NOT, and why would I give a shit about some random piece of a puzzle that fits in a september 2016 slot, supposedly?  Is it relevant to anything at all related to current BTC prices or projecting future price performance, if that is what we might be speculating upon?

I don't give a ratt's ass about your supposed counter-assertion to my BTC price discussion point, unless you are capable of describing your point with some semblance of understandable engwish.

Surely, the shenanigans of tether must have caused that... if not Tether, there are surely other considerable fundamental problems with bitcoin that caused that, and we must be going to $1k for sure... amirite, toknormal?

I have already seen a pretty long pattern of the non-substantiated nonsensical posts coming out of the author of OP, so it remains difficult to have sympathy for folks who take those kinds of lacking in evidence, lacking of logic and attempts to place the burdens in the wrong places.  Trolls and sabatuers do that, too.

Sure it is possible, but really, we gotta expect a few bumps in the road, and some scare tactics too....

We have already pretty much come up straight up from $7,500 to nearly $10k, so that is 33% price rise.  From here, $12k is another 20% from our current price (and 60% from $7,500) but $15k is 50% from here and 100% from $7,500), so golly gee whiz, and I am doubtful that getting above $10k this time and shooting past is going to be as easy as it was the first time.

and look we got's ourselves a sharp downward candle as I type- but is this a short-lived downward candle (a fake out) or are we going to get back to further tests of $10k?... we might not be ready for supra $10k, yet.  Maybe another week or two will be easier to get above $10k?

Now I am starting to feel self-conscious.   

Surely, it is "best practice" to get some of the details cleared up when asserting any facts that are found to be 100% completely and totally true through admission by failure to timely deny. b  b

What does any of this apparent hacking of the post count in your profile have to do with the fact that BTC HODLers (hopefully including ur selfie, even if you have been demonstrating hostility to yours truly) are either going to be RICHIE, soon, or at least less poorie... .?

Looks like we BTC peeps are about ready to test resistance at $10k  --- I don't know the odds of penetrating to the upside and staying there, but at least for the moment we are moving on up, as the Jeffersons might sing. getting closer, getting closer and Feeling good..... Feeling good.

Speak for yourself HairyMcBerry!!!!!    


Currently BTC prices are rising and therefore, I am only 50% more poor rather than my 10 days ago status of 70% more poor.


Therefore, I am feeling 40% better in a mere 10 days.  Go search for that kind of potion for your troubles in non-bitcoin places, and you won't be finding it.  

That's an interesting question because the persona of BMB asserted to teetering on the borderlines of relative richlandia - whether an actual physical or mental status, remains unclear.

 I don't recall Rosewater making any such claims of Richie (not referring to RichieT), except it appears that Rosewater was entering into quite a state of apparent delirium from what appeared to be a loss of societal status and perhaps having to return some prior forced drudgery.

Contrary to BMB claims, these online personas do not appear as the same peeps, to me....   NOW bring chubby ass Fatman into the mix, and perhaps we got's ourself another kind of three-some story, which might not be suitable for open discussion.

You could read the OP, perhaps, which has a link within one of the first few sentences informing that for ranking up from jr member to member status 60 activity points and 10 merit points are required.  

So, in essence, you need to get 10 merit points for member status, and to move from member to full member, you will need to get 100 merits.


Edit:  Ah haaaaa!!!!!! OmegaStarScream beat me to answering this question by  2 minutes and 9 seconds, give or take 7.3 seconds clicking time.

What,,


Wat


wa?




I didn't do nuttin....




hey...



Can you stop looking at me?





I'm completely and totally innocent.      


Wat?

Actually, there are now 50 votes, and none is under $8k... go figure?  We could not all be wrong, could we?

Where are all the fucking bears, did they all go to r/btc and abandon us in our bull-ish circle jerk?    

hahahahaha


Yep... a life long commitment to merit a troll.... hahahahahaha...   

It's like a one night stand that you regret, except it goes on the public ledger..   

Good luck with that.

Fair enough.  I am calculating all the matters including time and fees like you mentioned, and sure you are correct that the more that you get your back and forth orders to fill, then the more money you make; however, if the price goes running extensively in one direction without reversal (which does seem to happen frequently with bitcoin), then you will tend to make more money in those kinds of runs by having BIGGER increments between your orders.

Our discussion (and disagreement) back and forth on interval size has kind of demonstrated that there can be some individual variation that might not be known or understood exactly until practicing for a while and trying to figure out individual comfort level.  Probably, most people would like to make as much money as they can, but without really knowing the direction of the market, the interval sizes can cause considerable outcome variation that can also be tweaked to individual views of future BTC price volatility performance and also toyed around with a bit on the margins to play around with risk tolerance and gambling tendencies of individuals - even though I think that both you (jbreher) and I tend to be a bit more robotic and systematic with our approach, and find some advantage in sticking with a system that seems to be working for each of us.



Generally, I agree with you that loose could work, too, but let me clarify a little bit more about what I am getting at. 

When I suggest a style, I am attempting to share a style that had already worked for me, and therefore, I think that in the beginning, I am trying to get the person to practice a lot and to use small increments and also small amounts... and the more and more the orders fill, the more practice that the newbie gets in order to begin to tweak and to move the increments out further and further and to increase the amounts.

I know that previously, I had accused you of employing newbie techniques with my accusation that more experienced traders should be attempting to employ broader and larger increments.  So, yeah, I was forced to walk that statement back a little bit, and I do currently acknowledge that on a personal preference level you could work yourself from looser to tighter rather than my suggestion to work from tighter to looser.

In the end, individuals can hopefully get used to the whole matter and attempt to find a system that suits their preferences in terms of how much time they are spending on setting and resetting orders in comparison with how much benefit is coming from that activity in terms of either profits or providing volatility insurance.






I think that you are just saying this because Valentines Day has gotten to you.   




I repeat myself too that if there is a large run on the price in one direction, then you are likely in a better position to profit more from larger increments, but I agree that smaller increments would perform better when there is a lot of back and forth in the price.. so in that regard, if you believe that we are about ready to break in one direction or another, then it may do you better to set your increments larger.. but you could end up being wrong, and then if we are caught in a zone unexpectedly, which also happens, you may have done better with smaller increments.