A Bitcoin chart with to scale measurements for you dirtbags:

Lord of bad charts Mat seems to of missed this one:

https://twitter.com/bbands/status/733009813815222273

Bullshit.  Your chart shows absolutely nothing.  There were 6 attempted shakeouts.  Your chart does not show any of them because shakeout attempts are not a function of an aggregate market.  You're just wildly guessing based on where margin is.  Just because you claim the Bitfinex guy went out of his way to stoploss hunt your 3 BTC trade eons ago, does not mean attempted manipulation is always succesful or profitable.

The price of BTC and Eth also seem to be somewhat inversely correlated.  The Eth manipulator is attempting to pump in order to exit Eth before May 28th comes when the DAO dumps and the ETH price craters.  Where the fuck is the ETH DAO located on your chart?  It doesn't exist.  Your chart is useless.

The Eth manipulator will dump, the BTC price will skyrocket, and your chart predicts none of that whatsoever.  Stop pretending you can predict markets when none of the actual important variables are located on your chart while you use TA so old that you have Mike Hearn's R3 orchestrated manipulation on it from January for fucks sake.

Lol yea right.  You mean in your dreams you pray they could get it that low so you can take out a long.  Unless the Chinese are extremely stupid, they wouldn't even attempt it in the first place when even more longs would pile on.  What the hell is the point?  To cross the halving finish line with double the amount of longs?  You make no sense.

Another day of herp de der, let's pretend like you can shake people out by dumping a huge amount of coins all at once even though it's completely impossible with the halving 50 days away.  The random Chinamen and other buffoons trying to manipulate just have 0 clue.  Everyone on earth knows if you actually wanted to sell, nobody dumps that many coins all in one go to cause slippage on purpose.  You just give your hand away right out of the gate that you're attempting to manipulate.

Unless the only point of that was to try and get $450 stoplosses, but that's still pointless.  Am I surrounded by idiots?  Every single one of these attempted shakeouts has been a colossal failure, yet they keep coming back to waste money trying it again for the 6th time.

You do know that MatTheCat, even by his own admissions, is the most failed trader on the entire forum, right?  9 times out of 10 whatever Mat says the opposite happens.  I have an entire thread dedicated to the study of MatTheCat.  It's like having someone step out of a clown car giving you advice on markets:

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1455386

BTCE hit $457 and OKcoin is $455 so the 3rd world exchanges are no longer behind the west for the first time in like a month.  Price is definitely going up.

Who the hell is cryptohunter?

You can use BTC as collateral to short Eth.

Eth scammers flooding the forum with spam topics as usual trying to find someone to dump on:

Haha, Eth shills claiming original poster is me.  The link in the original post does look absurdly shady, but sorry, it's not me.

You're getting desperate now to try and make this scamcoin go up when you spam the same thing over and over in every thread.  "Larimer's Bitch" LOL.  The only interaction I have with the Larimer's is me constantly trying to get them to change their coin because it's not anti-fragile enough amongst a million other issues.  Proof of stake just doesn't work in the long run though, so you can now get back on topic to the subject of this thread instead of trying to constantly divert attention away from Ethereum.

Anonymint has called Smooth a friend one day and idiot the next day (or something along those lines), so it's more like a 50/50 split between pro and negative bias for Monero.  Why does every thread have a Monero conspiracy in it?  All the noobs think Smooth controls the altcoin markets HAHA.

Wow, he's really spamming that everywhere thinking it makes me "look bad" when my quote clearly says Bitshares proves the idea of a DAO is a bad idea because it worked like shit in Bitshares.  I used to argue with that "2kool4skewel/decentralizeEconomics" guy about which proof of stake system was better between NXT or Bitshares.  Once you're able to put together the big picture of how all the elements come together between technicals and economics, it turns out both are useless just like all proof of stake systems.  This is why Nick Szabo says he wishes Eth would stay on PoW.

Many people have made the mistake of thinking proof of stake had some type of merit, whether it's Gavin Andresen, Vitalik, me, whoever.  Although Eth is stuck between a rock and a hard place because they held an IPO, so now their coin will automatically be considered a failure if they stay on PoW and leak mined coins forever.

I give him 48 hours before he starts posting again.

Nice crowd you got there:

I remember looking up the law and there were a few odd states in the middle of nowhere in the US that were exempted from some of the AML/KYC stuff that other states had the burden of.  Poloniex just happened to be in one of those states heh (Montana).

After this Ethereum pumper fails, the DAO implodes, and the SEC investigation begins:

75% premined, what a deal.

Enough to make $1 million by dumping 1/4th of one the (30?) dev shares so far...