|
GMT = Give em' More Time?
|
|
|
|
|
I wish they'd use their "push" technology to push us a status update.
|
|
|
|
Probably no way to launch coin at time.  Best launch where I so 1st block was PrimeCoin, but even PrimeCoin has a problems to launch at time. Like what? |
|
|
|
|
No no... it's two hours... I promise.
|
|
|
|
|
The source... where's the source?!?!?
|
|
|
|
Full day on my i5-3570K @ 4.4Ghz and not a single block, ouch.
yep, same here. the vps have taken over again. never mind probably like xpm its far cheaper to just buy .5 btc worth of it right now and hold and see. I'm also going to buy some and hold. It's definitely going to appreciate. Especially once reward halves at block 60000 |
|
|
|
|
Dear owner of QuarkCoin.Org
Please update the logos and graphics on the website to the ones from the previous post.
|
|
|
|
Does QRK have a website yet?
QuarkCoin.Orgsite only launched yesterday, so much to come playing with logo ideas and speaking to developer we ran a logo competition here yesterday so that is temp. may stay forum be up in day or two moving fast... It's a good start, but the logos are not very good. You should seriously consider using one of these. |
|
|
|
|
Does QRK have a website yet?
|
|
|
|
|
This coin has become a joke.
|
|
|
|
This is starting to suck really hard.
Two big errors.
1) Releasing binary only - Booo.... MAN we need to review the source!
2) No linux binary? - Booo.... If so, then that would essentially be a windows premine.
I hope you reconsider and do the right thing.
xibeijan is right ! if for some reason you dont want to release sources, at least build linux sources - i can help with that yes, i am looking for someone trustworthy to compile for linux. if no one is found, i want to wait a week before releasing the sources, or atleast long enough for the network to be secured. i'm really worried about the source falling into the wrong hands. it's ok if i have to delay the release a few days while you figure out how to compile it. you have a high activity count, but i can't base my trust of you solely on that. if you could perhaps get a mod or highly respected/trusted member to vouch for you, i would feel alot better about sending you the sources. also, while we are on the subject, could you possibly crosscompile for mac, and if not, is their anyone else here who can/would be willing? How is anyone to trust your software without releasing the source code? Have you something to hide? I hear what your saying, but there is nothing malicious in the code. Kimoto didn't release the MEC sources, which is a smart move. prevents network from being vulnerable early on. if no one has the sources they can't alter the code and destroy it, and i like that. You don't sound confident in the code. Maybe the source will never be released. How can we know? If you are aware of security issues with the code, then you should not release it. How about releasing the source ahead of time (without the genesis block), say 1 hour, for review? Then folks can review the code and point out any bugs or security issues before it goes live. I don't know about other users, but I'm not running any binaries (even Linux) unless I can review the code for trojans, viruses, etc. |
|
|
|
I think that the "only processor" currency is not good, because botnet owners will receive a lot of coins (and they will dump). At the same time, there is no botnet with a lot of graphics cards.
Best option: only the processors first time, but in month maximum - appearance of GPU-mining.
That is a good point Fablio. essentially the main reason i decided to work with YAC over the more recent QRK. plus i really like the stake features of YAC, but i can't tell if they are just remnants of PPCOIN code(looks like it to me) or what the deal is with that. Everyone else, i will be answering your questions in due time. I must be on my way. Got a yard to mow and some data to review later. if every thing goes to plan i should switch from testnet over to mainnet this evening and release the coin. I plan on doing what kimoto did and making only the binary available initially... worked out good for MEC, don't see what it could hurt really. For simplicity sake, i will be providing 3 downloads: - windows installer package( created with click team installer) - example conf file - zipped binaries for those who don't trust the installer package. This is starting to suck really hard. Two big errors. 1) Releasing binary only - Booo.... MAN we need to review the source! 2) No linux binary? - Booo.... If so, then that would essentially be a windows premine. I hope you reconsider and do the right thing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
