Created a new VM with the latest Ubuntu Long term server 64-bit and also tried with an older version of Ubuntu server 64-bit...don't have the version numbers handy.  So if it's working with the latest Ubuntu 64-bit server Long Term support then I will try again. |
|
|
|
Well, it looks like the recent code changes are not being accepted by the miners or exchanges so they are not valid? How do we get out of this situation? Submit new code changes and then try to get them accepted by the miners and exchanges? It doesn't help that the current code does not compile.  |
|
|
|
cryptoparts actually updated his github as well it would seem. he merged my code
Great news...any progress on getting a Linux executable working or updating the code to be able to compile? I haven't been able to run the new version on Linux yet..  |
|
|
|
It appears that the litecoin side of p2pool was not set up to support segwit. I do not have the time to get it working and am not sure to what extent the code changes will be. It may be as simple as comparing the BTC side of /networks/bitcoin.py to litecoin.py and adding: SOFTFORKS_REQUIRED = set(['bip65', 'csv'])
MINIMUM_PROTOCOL_VERSION = 1600 ...but I have not tried at all. Anyone know of a good LTC pool?Edit: I apologize in advance for talking about anything other than Bitcoin in this thread but whatever.  |
|
|
|
I started getting this message with the main p2pool source (not jtoomim) today starting at around 9am pacific. Nothing I do will get it to work. Anyone have it working? Edit: Made sure I was running the latest version of litecoind and https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool |
|
|
|
few fixes to your problem (seems to be a problem with your boost, im on ubuntu 16 and didnt get an error) add this to the top of the file
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
around the boost/filesystem include. should fix your error.
Thanks Griffith...that did not work but I was able to compile successfully on Ubuntu 16. Copied the executable to Ubuntu 14 and got the following error: globalcoind: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
My daemon server is running Ubuntu 14 so I kind of need it to work there until I get around to upgrading it to 16. Does the Linux executable you posted work on U14? Will give that a try now... Edit: Nope..same error message with the Linux executable you posted. :/ |
|
|
|
Would be great to hear something from that new dev team.
We will update some good news soon, currently new dev working on fork problem and new full node will be ready...stay tune.. if you are very interested in following the dev work before the push request is made to the main globalcoin git, you can follow the dev work in the cryptounited github: https://github.com/CryptoUnited/GlobalCoinedit: if you want a reference, we also did the last update work for (THC) hempcoin edit: we have a full node syncing now for network support. i will post when it is online and you can add it to your config files. i will also put pool up for GLC sometime this week Have been waiting for CryptoParts to approve your pull request but have not seen any activity from him. If he does not approve your pull request in the next few weeks (certainly before April 1st) then I say we make your repository the new source. We can always switch it back to CryptoParts when he comes back if necessary. Oh oh...tried to compile from the source and got the following error: obj/walletdb.o: In function `copy_file':
/usr/include/boost/filesystem/operations.hpp:381: undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [globalcoind] Error 1 Any idea? For reference here are my build commands using Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS: sudo apt-get install build-essential
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8++-dev
sudo git clone git://github.com/CryptoUnited/GlobalCoin.git globalcoin
cd globalcoin
cd src
sudo make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- |
|
|
|
Would be great to hear something from that new dev team.
We will update some good news soon, currently new dev working on fork problem and new full node will be ready...stay tune.. if you are very interested in following the dev work before the push request is made to the main globalcoin git, you can follow the dev work in the cryptounited github: https://github.com/CryptoUnited/GlobalCoinedit: if you want a reference, we also did the last update work for (THC) hempcoin edit: we have a full node syncing now for network support. i will post when it is online and you can add it to your config files. i will also put pool up for GLC sometime this week Have been waiting for CryptoParts to approve your pull request but have not seen any activity from him. If he does not approve your pull request in the next few weeks (certainly before April 1st) then I say we make your repository the new source. We can always switch it back to CryptoParts when he comes back if necessary. |
|
|
|
addnode=www.cryptounited.io
New wallet works fine. Thanks, Griffith. Wow...awesome work Griffith! Any idea if CryptoParts is still active? |
|
|
|
Pool plz
Pool for mining GLC http://xpool.net/, Globalcoin will be in the top 5 leaders in terms of capitalization. do you know who runs that pool? cuz some of the links are broken and unresponsive. Can you elaborate? It works in Chrome...not so much in IE. |
|
|
|
|
Potwallet, even on the best PCs, takes a LONG time to sync! Get yourself a fast SSD in your new computer. That helps but even still it takes a while.
If you don't want to upgrade then find a wallet client that does not need to sync the entire blockchain. I don't know of any off the top of my head as I don't use them myself but I think this is recommended now for most users of Bitcoin due to the large blockchain.
|
|
|
|
I have not had any issues personally. I know others have complained that they lost out due to mining the losing side of a fork but that other chain has not created a block in well over a month last time I checked. When it was creating blocks there were large gaps (weeks) of no blocks on it. It never seemed (to me) to be a huge issue but I knew some would complain and since some of the exchanges were on it a mess was created. I personally thought someone would take advantage of this in some way but the market is so small it didn't really matter. Here is a list of good peers: addnode=167.114.103.43 addnode=216.177.81.87 addnode=46.164.133.3 addnode=78.250.193.138 Also, https://chainz.cryptoid.info/glc/ is updated and working on the winning chain. I suppose the biggest complaint is that people are saying the client is not choosing the correct chain for them. I suggest syncing from scratch. There is nothing inherently broken with GLC since it is basically a copy of the LTC code base from some time ago. It just has not been updated to the latest revision. Would not be too difficult for someone to do that but at this point I don't see it as absolutely necessary and I don't believe it would have avoided this situation. The real issue is the small hasrate and the fact that anyone could fork the chain with little effort.These are just my personal observations. I don't have much financial motivation either way. I have resisted commenting since I don't much care but something came over me. |
|
|
|
I have asked them to reconsider but so far no response.
And I am still out 20,000 coins+, a lot of mining for FASquared. Hard to trust a coin that fffs up that bad.
From my perspective there was clearly only one valid chain. It's too bad people decided to mine the wrong one. I feared this was going to happen...those who were mining the wrong chain...perhaps knowing it was the wrong one...complaining about loosing out. The other chain has not been mined for over 45 days last I checked. |
|
|
|
she could have dragged this thing out for years and eaten up 250000 in lawyer bills or more - so might as well just get it done and move ahead - though i get your sense of outrage - she gets a quarter mil when - in her divorce papers - she said she had reason to think he was gonna take the money and run - "abscond to china" to be with his "paramour" - something like that - i think she said in her divorce papers if i remember right - this was a couple months before crypsty got shut off - she probably had a better idea than anyone what paul was up to months before anyone else understood the totality of it
In Florida (where the house in question resides) it is almost impossible to force someone out of their house due to debt. It is a big win for the lawyers to have her give it up without much fuss. She could have lived in it for the rest of her life or taken out all the equity if she was not allowed to sell. If it was paid off (which I think it was?) she could have made out with the full value and let it default back to the bank. How much was it worth? $800K? She could have made out with $800K instead of $250K. |
|
|
|
Hey everyone...didn't know a new thread was started. Big buys lately...crazy.  |
|
|
|
Can a couple of you do me a favor and confirm the that this code is working. (install it on your dev environment and see that it is functional. It will take like 10 minutes) https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2poolIts xpool.net code, one of your pools. I dare say casinocoins only p2pool node. I have tried contacting the author of that repo and pool but to no avail just yet. p2pool nodes are important and i would like to see more p2pool nodes up please. Also whoever is in charge of updating the op and website. Could you bring all your links into december 2016 thanks. (some sites are non existant even) Hi there! Sorry for the delayed response. I am not actively involved in anything crypto these days. Everything I've done is in maintenance mode at this point but yes, the code is working. As far as your question about it connecting to the daemon...make sure there are available connections available. Try stopping the daemon for a bit then starting it back up. Also make sure you are using the right ports (--bitcoind-rpc-port 47970 --bitcoind-p2p-port 47950). Thanks, my dev enviro is ubuntu 16.04 lts and the cs client is the latest as of 3 days ago. I pulled your code and cant get it to connect to the node. Its giving that stupid ...taking a while. Common reasons for this include all of bitcoind's connection slots being used.... (apparently happens when the prefix is incorrect, as you may well already know.) My coin client config has all of the relevant and required settings. It connects to the coin daemon rpcport just fine. I've checked the pchmessage on the client code and it correlates to your prefix configs. So i have zero clue at this point what is my problem other then something in ubuntu 16.04 preventing a connection. Which is a long shot. Or the new client code preventing p2p communication. Also a long shot in my opinion. or I believe it could be to do with not being able to find your p2p node being that there is like only one of you on the entire network. I've attemtped to add your node but to no avail in terms of the p2pool working I tried to get a p2pool node up because i believe the project could do with a few more but i cant seem to do it in my environment and wondered if anyone could just take a few minutes to try and re-create my problem or prove that its not happening for them to. Using the newest client code and this p2pool code https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2poolThanks. P.S Any chance you could refresh your nodes (p2pool for casincoin and the client for it?) I did throw some hash at your node but it acted very strangely and wouldn't hash over 1kh/s. Payment for the hash i sent it did show up on the network ledger however. Here is my version info from the daemon...have not tried updating: "version" : 3000000,
"protocolversion" : 80001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
Let me know if you want the binary...think you should be able to pull the source for this version from GitHub if it is not current. Forget the command but I can look it up if you like. getpeerinfo (daemon not accepting incoming...p2pool is though): {
"addr" : "108.61.10.90:47950",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1481940256,
"lastrecv" : 1481940257,
"bytessent" : 3761060,
"bytesrecv" : 27274092,
"blocksrequested" : 446,
"conntime" : 1479820547,
"version" : 80001,
"subver" : "/LTSV3:3.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1749512,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "85.214.144.157:47950",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1481940256,
"lastrecv" : 1481940257,
"bytessent" : 6043838,
"bytesrecv" : 17704867,
"blocksrequested" : 339,
"conntime" : 1480050837,
"version" : 80001,
"subver" : "/LTSV3:3.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1751518,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "5.135.99.148:47950",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1481940256,
"lastrecv" : 1481940257,
"bytessent" : 4595783,
"bytesrecv" : 6218386,
"blocksrequested" : 240,
"conntime" : 1481223724,
"version" : 80001,
"subver" : "/LTSV3:3.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1764902,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "184.185.216.85:47950",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1481940255,
"lastrecv" : 1481940256,
"bytessent" : 1986738,
"bytesrecv" : 5950043,
"blocksrequested" : 240,
"conntime" : 1481224034,
"version" : 80001,
"subver" : "/LTSV3:3.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1764902,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "81.169.131.31:47950",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1481940204,
"lastrecv" : 1481940255,
"bytessent" : 2100834,
"bytesrecv" : 7557764,
"blocksrequested" : 280,
"conntime" : 1481225712,
"version" : 80001,
"subver" : "/LTSV3:3.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1764933,
"banscore" : 0
},
I'm using Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS as CSC was not working with 16 when I last tried...dev said to use 14 but I think I saw some commits that tried to fix that. |
|
|
|
Can a couple of you do me a favor and confirm the that this code is working. (install it on your dev environment and see that it is functional. It will take like 10 minutes) https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2poolIts xpool.net code, one of your pools. I dare say casinocoins only p2pool node. I have tried contacting the author of that repo and pool but to no avail just yet. p2pool nodes are important and i would like to see more p2pool nodes up please. Also whoever is in charge of updating the op and website. Could you bring all your links into december 2016 thanks. (some sites are non existant even) Hi there! Sorry for the delayed response. I am not actively involved in anything crypto these days. Everything I've done is in maintenance mode at this point but yes, the code is working. As far as your question about it connecting to the daemon...make sure there are available connections available. Try stopping the daemon for a bit then starting it back up. Also make sure you are using the right ports (--bitcoind-rpc-port 47970 --bitcoind-p2p-port 47950). |
|
|
|
So is anybody successfully staking this coin? According to getstaking info my expected time keeps increasing?
I'm staking on the QT windows wallet, your interest ends up in the same wallet, look at your transactions and you should see incoming deposits. My question is, what is more efficient? Staking with the program open or closed? I just bought 10k pcs of this coin inside polo while price really fluctuating and its showed that i missed the ride now that the price is showing between 1500-1600 sat i just wondering if i stake this amount inside a wallet do i get good staking rewards i was thinking if this coin will go back to 2k before i will sell it just wanted to inquire here guys thanks in advance. If you stake you will receive 5% interest. Some folks have claimed that they had trouble with withdrawal of staked funds as the dev team works out the bugs. Best advice is to not invest more than you can afford to lose. That being said, do your DD. I see a wide infrastructure being built with POT, which will support the massive growth we all expect. As public sentiment continues to legalize, POT will be well positioned IMO I've been staking for weeks on the QT wallet, there doesn't seem to be any bugs here, all of my funds are available. Yes, I don't believe there are any issues...just people not understanding how staking works. I imagine he is refereeing to the time it takes from when you stake to when your balance is available again. All that is by design. |
|
|
|
- Consumer client IPs which do not accept inbound connects, perhaps due to the router being misconfigured
My desktop wallet (1.5.3 I think) does not have uPNP option compiled into it. Perhaps we would see more clients if a version was released with uPNP enabled and selected by default. Have not checked if 1.5.4 has this feature compiled in as I stopped using it for some reason I don't remember...think it was buggy with the built in block explorer or something. |
|
|
|
One of the chains is not getting mined for long periods of time. Check https://chainz.cryptoid.info/glc/ which is on the shorter chain to see it. If you click on "Overview" you will see that the shorter chain was not mined for very long periods of time. The longest being 10-13-2016 to 11-04-2016. Not one block during that time. The longest chain has been mined consistently I believe. Is the client on the longest chain having any issues getting stuck? If it is not having any issues and it is the longest chain having been continuously mined then I think it is obvious that it is the winning chain? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
