Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
I am not entirely sure if I understood your question correctly, but here it goes: I thought it is possible to run multiple miner instances for multiple algos on a specific subset of cards just by using the right commands without sniffing software. In ccminer you do it with -d DEVICEID, where DEVICEID is the number of your CUDA devices you want to actively run. Did you try that? Or is that already causing the problems? I would not use that split software if you don't have to. I also suggest (depending on the algos you want to use) to try just the pure EWBF's miner and Palgin's ccminer mod (not the alexis mod). They are both more optimized for CUDA cards, especially 1080's. The newest release was just recently upgraded to CUDA 8 which should give you a slight performance increase. Always switching around in the pools is not something I favor. I rather mine a coin for a week and switch afterwards. At least with the pure split command you could mine 2 coins simultaneously with 1 rig, which is already sweet. Hope that helps
|
|
|
How reported hashrates on your miner are calculated and what the stratum server from suprnova gets are 2 totally different things! Just because your miner tells you you got 99 MH/s doesn't mean that you submit correct shares that are worth 99 MH/s (among other tings). The server actually estimates your hashrate based on submitted shares. It has no idea how much hashing power you have but calculates it based on your shares. Therefore, ususally the reported hashrate is not correct. In other words from the Alpereum website: Calculated Hashrate takes the amount of valid shares your miner has submitted over a period of time and uses a formula to convert this into a readable hashrate. This number can fluctuate, sometimes being lower or higher than your actual miner's output hashrate in the console. So in the end if you would average out your hashrate over a long sliding window (let's say 4h) you would probably have much better agreement between your miner's and the server sided hashrate. Furhtermore, difficulty fluctuates greatly. Whattomine and other sites only provide you with an estimate which is usually far from the real-time rewards you might get. Before you accuse a pool, inform yourself about the technology behind it instead of just questioning 2 numbers on your screen Hope that helps.
|
|
|
From my cryptopia ticket:
"Once the SIGT wallet is out of maintenance you will be able to withdraw your coins. The wallet team is working to make that happen as soon as possible. The 30 day withdrawal period will start from when we the SIGT wallet is back online and users are able to make withdrawals."
Thanks! That calms my nerves (a bit)
|
|
|
But is our balance on cryptopia is lost?
I also want to know. As we can't withdraw or trade, how can we get our Sigt back? This is a prime example why we should never deposit our funds on exchanges, except we want to trade immediately!
|
|
|
Just wanted to thank you guys for this pool and a 0% pool fee. Your pools are very high quality! Hope to also see more traffic on your exp pool Nice to hear that. The traffic on the pools is something we only can try to influence, but we are trying. Could you shed light on your future plans regarding pool sustainability (introducting a fee at some point)? What is actually the monthly cost of maintaining a high-performance pool like this?
The most is the time spended for community work, support and so on. At the moment, with many new miners and being one of the main pools for the launch of a new coin, the time spended into it was really very high. The servers itself are really expensive in our case, but the ressources were still there for our daily job. Thanks for clarifying. I thought it is quite expensive and time consuming to maintain such high performance servers.
|
|
|
Just wanted to thank you guys for this pool and a 0% pool fee. Your pools are very high quality! Hope to also see more traffic on your exp pool Could you shed light on your future plans regarding pool sustainability (introducting a fee at some point)? What is actually the monthly cost of maintaining a high-performance pool like this?
|
|
|
Thanks for the German translation bounty I am actually very curious how those liquid blocks will perform in action once you get lots of transaction / trading traffic!
|
|
|
MAGNATUM
Extrem schnelle Transaktionen
Evolutionäre Kryptowährung mit dynamischen Anpassungsmechanismen des Schwierigkeitsgrades, abhängig von der Auslastung des Netzwerks. Das Problem einer unendlichen Warteschlange wird somit umgangen. Skunkhash Raptor ____________________________________________________ Magnatum nutzt den sehr beliebten GPU-optimierten Skunkhash-Algorithmus, welcher sich von anderen schürfbaren Währungen absetzt. Raptor ist der Fingerabdruck des Entwicklers, welcher zudem genutzt wird um die Entwicklung des SkunkHash Algorithmus zu überwachen. | | Klassisches PoW
"Proof of work" erlaubt es, dass der Block "sauber" bleibt. Somit kann die Community im Wettbewerb die Validität der Transaktionen steuern und Angriffe auf das System werden dadurch schwierig. |
| Liquid Blocks
Der Intervall zwischen Blocks verringert sich proportional zu der Anzahl Transaktionen, welche die Netzwerkbandbreite erhöht, jedoch die Währungsemmisionen durch Reduktion von Block-Belohnungen konstant hält.
| |
|
|
|
Finnally, a Ubiq pool that acutally works for me! I also get super nice pings (<50ms) from Switzerland Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
Thanks for the bounty Actually really nice that at launch a mining pool is already set-up, including working wallet and website. Already a good start Still, as others pointed out, what are your plans for making this coin different from others? Why scrypt and not something more GPU friendly? Is it because of the large coin supply you target?
|
|
|
Are you planning on adding more coins to your solo mining pool? Signatum would be nice Block reward is still 1250 which is worth also a lot of money!
|
|
|
OK cool, I am already running on your pool for an hour. Let's gamble a bit If you want, I can help you in improving your English translation on the landing page of your site? PM me if interested. For example, the "loock" button should be "Lookup" or "search miner" )) Its very good! thanks! please send on admin@zencoin.su what also need change! Lookup changed) Will do when I have more time
|
|
|
OK cool, I am already running on your pool for an hour. Let's gamble a bit If you want, I can help you in improving your English translation on the landing page of your site? PM me if interested. For example, the "loock" button should be "Lookup" or "search miner"
|
|
|
This is basically high risk, high reward? Or are the solo pools communicating somehow with each other to optimize the process?
communicating only for sinc to blockchain between nodes. Reward -about 10.65 ZEN finders for each block. On big distantion risk minimalize. And as practice shows, income is more at times. As a result, the block finds one card and the probability for each is the same, regardless of your capacity. And only increases with the increase in the total hash solo pool. Thanks for your response. I get that if you find a block it's 11Zen - 3% fee. Still, if I am a miner with a low hash-rate, my chances of finding a block are very low. Proportional payout on a conventional pool is still much better. Do you have a bit more statistics for your "pool"? How long has it been running? What is the average reward rate for someone with 1kSol? 1 block every 2-3 days? Can you explain how "probability for each is the same"? I though lower overall hashrate means lower probability of finding a block as I mine solo. I am still confused
|
|
|
This is basically high risk, high reward? Or are the solo pools communicating somehow with each other to optimize the process?
|
|
|
Don't waste your time or money mining/purchasing this coin. They use basic multichain technology that is very immature. Mining does not work properly (I tried Windows and Linux, both failed after more than 24h each, checking this sub with tips, trouble-shooting etc...nothing worked).
They do not have any dedicated dev, the only thing they have is a good looking online wallet.
Educate yourself about this coin and make your own decision if it is worth your time....
|
|
|
Just wanted to say that I am really impressed with the project and its progress (following it since June)! It is one of the very few with a dedicated and competent team, a clear roadmap, innovation and potential to become a heavily used/successful technology
|
|
|
I followed all the helpful comments on this forum and the supposed "miner" was running for 24h WITHOUT ANY sign of mined coins. I get it that it is based on multichain technology ( https://www.multichain.com/) but come on, your miner and guide are just not user friendly. I even have no clue how to send coins on Linux. The standard multichain commands do not work ( https://www.multichain.com/getting-started/). You did not even attempt at cleaning up the multichain console outputs. We just get the raw bare outputs...very much effort indeed. And that's the big issue for me: no documentation, no FAQ, no algo info, no info on GPU miner development. Sorry guys, but I will not invest any more time in this coin unless at least an effort is made in showing transparency and willingness to improve these issues. In my opinion stuff like this needs to be clear BEFORE launch! I am not a native English speaker, but I found A TON of grammatical mistakes on the online wallet and website. Please, get this stuff straight if you want to make an attempt of serious business... Not even the most beautiful wallet in the world will help this coin succeed if you don't get this stuff straight. Just my 2 Cents on this project after digging in a few hours
|
|
|
Anybody got the Ula-miner for Linux working? I cannot execute with ./ in command-line or otherwise. Any build instructions? Will try to compile and execute from github: https://github.com/Ulacoin/UlacoinLet's see... mv multichaind multichain-cli multichain-util /usr/local/bin Connect to server : multichaind ULC@ulacoin.com -daemon XXX@XXX:~$ multichaind ULC@ulacoin.com -daemon MultiChain Core Daemon build 1.0 beta 2 protocol 10008 MultiChain server starting Retrieving blockchain parameters from the seed node ulacoin.com ... Error: Couldn't connect to the seed node ulacoin.com - please specify port number explicitly.
PoW Algo?! Execute: $ multichaind ULC@Ulacoin.com:9999 -daemon That worked for me. I guess there is only a CPU miner as of now. Takes a while until blockchain is synced and you actually mine although the miner is using CPU resources. So far documentation and the "online-guide" is rather poorly done. But it's early days, so we need to be flexible and find out specifics for how to mine this coin ourselves
|
|
|
|