 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
The plastic housing is designed to channel or direct the airflow onto the GPU cooler and through the fins. With regards to mounting fans front or back it depends how you mount the (direction). you should not mount them blowing against each other. Mount on the back blowing forward and on the front sucking forward. That is what I did because of a big box around my rig. But if you have an open rig it is best to just mount some fans behind blowing air through your stack of GPUs.
|
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless whattomine shows nicehash frequently at no 1... must have a reason...
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 13 GPU (RX580) rig which today generates around 11 euro a day and consumes 1750 watt on the wall. My electricity cost is 0.06 euro per kw/h hence per day approx 2.50 euro per day. Leaves 8.50 euro per day or approx 255 euro per month. not that great but still profitable. lets hope for better times.
|
|
|
|
|
I can report that I was paid today. However no answer to any emails nor any communication from their side. Hence I have moved on to another pool.
|
|
|
|
|
I can report that dwarfpool paid me today early morning after a delay of one week. However no email was ever answered by them nor did they use any channel to inform their clients about any problems. There was no communication at all which sheds a bad light on them.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 13 GPU rig consisting of 2 MSI Armor OC RX580 8GB and 11 sapphire Nitro special edition RX580 8GB. The rig operates at 402 mh/s and consumes 1750 watt on the wall
|
|
|
|
|
There is a problem with windows upgrade to 180x. under settings and update you can uninstall any update within 7 days. and by all means you should absolutely disable any updates für both windows Nd gryphics drivers until you know for sure that the update does not kill your system. stay with windows 10 release 1709 and your system will be fine...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah now I see what you mean. yes it looks like they are paying something to certain miners. But not to others and no reply whatsover to any email queries.... That smells...
|
|
|
|
Same problem here. Weird thing is that payouts seens to be happening at the Ethereum main page.
what do you mean by ethereum mainpage ? Payouts are made by every pool and where you are registered. So if you are mining at dwarfpool (mining address) you are vetting paid by them and not by ethereum main page. |
|
|
|
|
No payout for over a week (neither automatic nor manual) and no reply to emails... I think, this pool is dead. Big scam.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. No payout for over a week and no reply to emails. Maybe this pool is dead? At least the reputation of Dwarfpool is dead...
|
|
|
|
|
Same here, no payout for almost a week now. Neither automated nor manual. Sent several emails to their admin address but no response whatsoever. without any communication their reputation seems to be going down the drain.
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem here. Mining on dwarfpool continues to work but no automatic nor manual payouts working. several emails sent to admin unanswered. I decided to point my rig to another pool until they solve their apparent problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid question I am sure... Is there a way to change the font color of the miner? Reason is quite simple, I monitor my rig remotely on my tablet and particularly the temp output is almost impossible to see...
|
|
|
|
Tried to use phoenix miner for the first time today, got 0,00 MHS for some reason
1: 0.000 MH/s (0) 2: 0.000 MH/s (0) 3: 0.000 MH/s (0) 4: 0.000 MH/s (0) 5: 0.000 MH/s (0) 6: 0.000 MH/s (0)[/b]
17604:04:37:32.720: main GPU1: 32C 0%, GPU2: 25C 70%, GPU3: 23C 75%, GPU4: 21C 75%, GPU5: 26C 95%, GPU6: 37C 60%
BAT: -pool stratum+tcp://daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353 -wal nicehashwallet -pass x -proto 4 -stales 0 -amd
any ideas appreciated!
Mind if I ask why you are mining on nicehash? I mean your earnings will be slightly less compared to any ethereum pool like nanopool and nicehash pays Bitcoin which is higher transaction fees.... |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me what "i'm from Red Army" means ?
Is that some video card I've never heard of ?
He probably meant he uses only amd cards. Didn't he talk about his 1060 rig? And what AMD card can produce 1600 mh/s? |
|
|
|
I disagree and the figures are the reason why I moved back to claymore. Phoenix on my 13 card rig was 397 mh/s and claymore 398.5 mh/s and then the big difference is dualmining and claymore gives me an additional 11699 mh/s on Decred.
decred is almost dead on gpu and if you are mining decred on your gpu then it means you are paying to mine it. The eth devfee 0.5-1% claymore gets from you by dual mining has higher profit than mining decred. So you are wasting electricity and profit. Either I mine ONLY ETH (my rig generates 399 mh/s) or I dualmine ETH (still 399 mh/s) plus DCR makes no difference to me. My electricity cost is 0.6 euro cts per kwh and whether single or dual mine does not change my power consumption on the wall.... Only difference is the dev fee between 1 and 2%. |
|
|
|
PhoenixMiner 2.7c compared to claymore 11.4 on eth solo mining is so much better, very stable and lowest devfee. Trust me, at moment, your hashrate will be bigger with this miner than claymore and this is not marketing.
I disagree and the figures are the reason why I moved back to claymore. Phoenix on my 13 card rig was 397 mh/s and claymore 398.5 mh/s and then the big difference is dualmining and claymore gives me an additional 11699 mh/s on Decred. |
|
|
|
Guys, I´d really appreciate an advice. I run several 6*rx470/480 rigs. Suddenly out of nowhere Claymore miner refused to start, it says:
OpenCL initializing...
01:20:14:573 1698 AMD Cards available: 6
01:20:14:583 1698 GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
01:20:14:586 1698 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:590 1698 GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0)
01:20:14:595 1698 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:599 1698 GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
01:20:14:604 1698 GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:608 1698 GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
01:20:14:612 1698 GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:618 1698 GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
01:20:14:622 1698 GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:626 1698 GPU #5: Ellesmere (Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 8:0:0)
01:20:14:630 1698 GPU #5 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
01:20:14:637 1698 POOL/SOLO version
01:20:14:641 1698 Platform: Windows
01:20:14:720 1698 start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
...and it hangs forever. After several restarts it may start working for a while, but sooner or later GPU0 (always gpu0) drops to 0,00 mhs and rig freezes.
ETH: job changed
01:18:27:078 190c new buf size: 0
01:18:27:084 190c ETH: 03/13/18-01:18:27 - New job from daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353
01:18:27:088 190c target: 0x00000001fffe0000 (diff: 2147MH), epoch 174(2.36GB)
01:18:27:093 190c ETH - Total Speed: 142.653 Mh/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
01:18:27:098 190c ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 28.468 Mh/s, GPU2 28.465 Mh/s, GPU3 28.449 Mh/s, GPU4 28.289 Mh/s, GPU5 28.982 Mh/s
01:18:31:640 1934 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 5ms
I tried different drivers, claymore versions (currently using V11.0), installed a HDMI plug on that card, reset OC to default settings. When I disable GPU0 from "device manager", miner starts working without any problems... so only disabling helps. And that´s on 4 out of 6 rigs. Any clues/ideas? Thanks a lot and sorry for such a long message.
Is that on one of your rigs or on all of them? have you tried swapping cards to see if it is a faulty card? I would say it is the card because I had a similar effect. For me one card was overclocked/undervolted too much and stalled and as a consequence the watchdog jumped in and restarted the miner... |
|
|
|
Switched to Phoenix miner after being years on Claymore. Phoenix is more lightweight, produces almost same hashrate and is more stable. Stale shares went drastically down. And Claymore had a huge problem for some of my rigs, it was switching between pools like crazy, constantly droping out the connection to main pool. Phoenix fixed this.
Does Phoenix support dualmining? |
|
|
|
|
