I think everyone they're losing some rest from their investors in this delay and I have seen many investors want to sell their coins now as the price is more than ico rate.
It takes time to do the full audit - but it's a great thing that it's being done. The auditor doesn't know the company and it's people beforehand so it's not that easy. Then based on the result they'll probably change some people from the tech team. And finally they need to fix the technical problems that were discovered in the audit. This might require outside help as well. The given estimates of 3-4 weeks can still be low. Very often software dev projects can take 2-3 times the time originally estimated. 2.5x was actually an average - yes average - in one study I read about a few years back. So patience is required.
Just to add a little to this:
28th of October : ELECTRONEUM ANNOUNCE ADOPTION OF MONERO CODEBASE
8th of November: ELECTRONEUM WORKING WITH HACKERONE.COM
That's what looks like where the risk is/was. 2 code bases were still being evaluated a few days before launch so maybe the timeline was too tight for the launch.
Exactly! This is my first participation in the forum and how and I would frankly ask some questions:
Pq Electroneum? Other than their idea, what did they present with concrete? In my eyes, I´m not verified anything at all until now ... in fact, a spectacle of incompetence of people who do not understand absolutely nothing of the two essential pillars of any crypto: Security and advanced encryption.
I have an idea of the kind of vulnerability that must exist in the algorithm of that currency. If so, it responds to the delay of a technical opinion, even preliminary (hackerone). An algorithm defect will have a catastrophic effect ...
The guys were at least irresponsible to launch something without the least expertise.
-Mobile app does not work
-Simple account login does not work
-The promised product no one knows which is ...
Come on...
The only concrete thing is that someone earned 40 million USD
Show Posts
