If active MPH occurs the same, it is placed in 1800s for the rest of the Pools.

As it seems, when adding a single pool with PPLS, the configuration of 300s of the rest of the PPS pools is changed.

I've tried only with NiceHash, and it works fine, 300s.

I have rebooted MegaMiner with all the pools, and is mining in Zergpool. In the Zergpool file the reward appears as PPS, however the miner is waiting for 1800s

I do not understand what you mean by the Benchmark

Thanks


Edit

If I start with Zerpool only, it is also placed in 300 sec, but if I start with all the pools, then mine Zergpool in 1800s

If I remove Ahashpool from the configuration, then if it is placed in 300 sec with several pools

I have put it in 0.7 too, I do not know how I have to do the test to check the real profitability of Blazepool ...

In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

I have tested with Sniffdog, NemosMiner and MegaMiner.

I have tried Multi Algo switch, and also to mine only a single algorithm.

I have tried in a single pool and I have also tried looking for the benefit in several pools (Ahash, Zpool, Zerg, Blaze ...)

In all cases Nicehash is more profitable. All pools lie with estimates, and that is the problem. If the mining software uses this false data, we are earning less than NiceHash.

With the pools you earn less. NiceHash pays more. Whoever says otherwise, lies.

I'm testing this software

Is it normal for the benchmark to take so long?

Another question, each time it changes, the program tries to download 2 miners that never seem to download, ccminer_cuda9.exe from msvc2015 and ccminer xevan. Is there a problem with this?

Thank you

Please could you help me? Only I need mine in my Internal Nicehash Address when the NplusMiner choose NiceHash's Pool

Thanks

Good morning:

I am using this software, and I have a question for the developer:

Is it possible to change the BTC address of NiceHash, and put a different one to the rest of the pools?

I would like to mine in NiceHash in my internal Wallet, and put the external address only for the rest of the pools.

Another question:

Zergpool is reliable?

Anyone knows?

Hello:

Are payments in LTC better or the same as in BTC? How is the payment made? First change the coins to BTC and then to LTC? Are they switched to LTC directly?

Which method has the least fees and expenses for the miner? Payments in BTC or in LTC?

Thank you.


PD: I also want to ask, is the benefit made by SniffDog with the TimeTravel algorithm correct? Because the profits are not being paid.

Thank you very much for taking the time to answer me.

Regarding what happens to you with the HMQ algorithm, I have tried it and I get many rejected shares, for low difficulty, I have eliminated it.

Yes, I know, but my question is, why are they removed? Are they unstable? Are they not profitable?

Then I could add them without problems?

Thank you very much

So if there is no problem, why has Blazepool removed them in the Sniffdog update?

Thank you

Hello:

I have updated Sniffdog (your Blazepool version) and now you can only mine 7 algotithms with this software. Xevan and Tribus have disappeared.

Is there a problem with them?

I agree with you

As soon as I reach 0.01 I will go to not return. Yesterday I had an outstanding balance, today in the morning it was different. Mino for hours and there is no benefit.

A user of this same forum told me to turn off Sniffdog. I deactivated it and yesterday I was mining Neoscrypt all day with bad results too.

Yeah, the part you said "I use the Sniffdog"

I don't understad why are people using it w/o understanding how it hurts profit. The moment you start mining any coin, it needs time to get your actual speed and shares. And this is when the stupid script checks and sees some lucky block on another algo and switches to it, leaving you you with scraps.

Just don't use it. Put everything on neo (or whatever else has more speed) and leave it there.


This is absolutely useless:
   Verge (x17)      0.6577%   -   
   Groestl (groestl)      0.4712%   -   
   Lux (phi)      0.6402%   -   
   BitSend (xevan)      0.4046%   -   
   SibCoin (sib)      0.1726%   -   
   Bulwark (nist5)      1.2371%   -   
   Denarius (tribus)      0.937%   212.6 Mh/s   
   Stonecoin (neoscrypt)      0.3866%   10.1 Mh/s   
   MUNCoin (skunk)      2.5593%   -   
   Galactrum (lyra2v2)      0.1446%   -   
   SHIELD (lyra2v2)      0.6289%   -   
   SHIELD (x17)      2.2919%   -   
   SHIELD (blake2s)      0.3422%   -   
   Verge (blake2s)      1.0319%   -   
   Racecoin (lyra2v2)      1.9646%   -   

[/quote]


OK thanks. I'm going to do it as you say

Hello:

I've been in this pool for a short time, and everything was working fine. But today, I do not know what has happened, I've been all day with 12 1070ti mining here and has barely raised the BTC gained since this morning.

Is there a problem with the pool?

My address is 12h1ZoXK4q7qGbM4cZoNqcawTdbHaSceNw and I use the Sniffdog

OMG I am stupid.

Thanks you

Hi.

I am testing with 6 1070ti and Neoscript works perfectly with HSR. In addition, the results are very good.

The problem that I have, is that when I am using this software, I do not see the Windows window where it indicates the Hashes and the errors, I am undermining blindly.

Do you know how to solve this and that the mining window appears?

A greeting and great software good work.