Megaminer 6.3 - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher

[nitrobg]

Is there a way to display the most profitable coin on manual pools even if I'm missing the required wallet?

[Chosscoin]

I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

[tutulfo]

Ok, 48h hours later... test is finished... on the 3 Mixed Rigs we have for testing

and I got plenty of question and few remarks:

Claymore dual with NVDA doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 135 for the GTX 1070
Claymore dual with Amd  doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 14 for Rx 550, 35 for Rc 570 and 51 for RX 580




1) There is an easy way ( not script programming) to set up DCR for each board ? And also VCCC, MCCC etc? Because everybody have his own overclocking ( I just try to find the lowest power consumption, but some else may just look for performance)
2) Ideally will be wonderful, lets say to be able to change intensity in Claymore  Neoscript, and just Benchmark that one and not all the algos for AMD

3) Ideally will be wonderful to be able to choose on the fly one particular algo. Today for example, I don't know why , but in Ahashpool  for 2 hours Neoscript went Crazy for Nvda doubling the earning of the benchmark, well, I was there  and if I was able to "force" to use the AMD card on Neoscript, they will have better ROI than Dual mining.
Or  "pairing" benchmark result between groups" when the "live" performance of one group set a +X% ?

A simple yes/you can do it already solution is alreay in the discussion/NO /No way will be helpful

1) Edit N-ClayDual.json and A-ClayDual.json, you can add all points (lines) that you want for each algo, is very easy

2) In each line of point 1, you can set intensity adding command (-i Xxx for claymore ?) to each line, for example

 {"Ethash_Keccak|40":" -dcoin Keccak -dcri 40 -i 18"},

3) Now, this feature is not available but you can edit config.txt and delete all algo you dont want in @@ALGORITHMS_AMD

[tutulfo]

Is there a way to display the most profitable coin on manual pools even if I'm missing the required wallet?

Not yet....

[tutulfo]

I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

I never used blazepool then I cant estimate factor, I need somebody test and say....

[skablast]

Thank you for the answer, I will try then.
An easy one ?
No plan for a sort of remote monitoring ? I don't know something like  a Telegram bot that sent you: Up and runnning ? already up to xy % of today target ?

[tutulfo]

Thank you for the answer, I will try then.
An easy one ?
No plan for a sort of remote monitoring ? I don't know something like  a Telegram bot that sent you: Up and runnning ? already up to xy % of today target ?

Next will be an api to monitorize lan rigs.

[Chosscoin]

In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

[tutulfo]

In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

Check

* mine in nicehash (only)
* pool file is configured as PPS
* config.txt has PPS in 300
* not benchmarking

If this is the case, I think is not possible, but.....

[Chosscoin]

I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

I never used blazepool then I cant estimate factor, I need somebody test and say....

I have put it in 0.7 too, I do not know how I have to do the test to check the real profitability of Blazepool ...

[Chosscoin]

In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

Check

* mine in nicehash (only)
* pool file is configured as PPS
* config.txt has PPS in 300
* not benchmarking

If this is the case, I think is not possible, but.....

I've tried only with NiceHash, and it works fine, 300s.

I have rebooted MegaMiner with all the pools, and is mining in Zergpool. In the Zergpool file the reward appears as PPS, however the miner is waiting for 1800s

I do not understand what you mean by the Benchmark

Thanks


Edit

If I start with Zerpool only, it is also placed in 300 sec, but if I start with all the pools, then mine Zergpool in 1800s

If I remove Ahashpool from the configuration, then if it is placed in 300 sec with several pools

[Chosscoin]

If active MPH occurs the same, it is placed in 1800s for the rest of the Pools.

As it seems, when adding a single pool with PPLS, the configuration of 300s of the rest of the PPS pools is changed.

[tutulfo]

If active MPH occurs the same, it is placed in 1800s for the rest of the Pools.

As it seems, when adding a single pool with PPLS, the configuration of 300s of the rest of the PPS pools is changed.

True, when you mine in a group, maximum interval of group is taken.

[Chosscoin]

And I can do something to solve it?

I have disabled the PPLS until I see how it can be fixed.

[skablast]

Additional question as I am waiting while a second rig is completing the benchmarks:

I notice that the benchmarks for Neoscrypt  for Ahashpool and Zergpool are quite a lot.

I don't think that they are really necessary. Those two pools are "autoexchange pools"

So, whatever coin the benchmark is testing, by pointing at the 4223 port, the pool redirect it to the most convenient coin.

By extension: Zergpool and Ahashpool have 27 different algos, so 54 test maximum (but Megaminer doesn't support all of them and some of them are obviously Asic) and the benchmark is done.
Lets say 108 if you have mixed rigs,  Plus 20 if you have nanopool for zcash and etash/blake2/kekkak, etash.
total 130.
Instead I have 296 minimum combination and I already remove the Asic algos.

Sorry for the rant, but may be you can save 15 h benchmarking ... for next release.

Did I miss something ?


 

[tutulfo]

Additional question as I am waiting while a second rig is completing the benchmarks:

I notice that the benchmarks for Neoscrypt  for Ahashpool and Zergpool are quite a lot.

I don't think that they are really necessary. Those two pools are "autoexchange pools"

So, whatever coin the benchmark is testing, by pointing at the 4223 port, the pool redirect it to the most convenient coin.

By extension: Zergpool and Ahashpool have 27 different algos, so 54 test maximum (but Megaminer doesn't support all of them and some of them are obviously Asic) and the benchmark is done.
Lets say 108 if you have mixed rigs,  Plus 20 if you have nanopool for zcash and etash/blake2/kekkak, etash.
total 130.
Instead I have 296 minimum combination and I already remove the Asic algos.

Sorry for the rant, but may be you can save 15 h benchmarking ... for next release.

Did I miss something ?



 

Dual mining has a lot of benchmarks, one for each dcr.

There is one combo for pool/algo/miner/coin (if pool support) / power limit (if used)

Note one algo can be more than one time with different parameters, for example dcr value for dual mining, solver for ewbf, etc

There is one real benchmark (screen messages are not too clear) for algo/miner/power limit (that reach first position), this is the minimum number possible.

[Chosscoin]

This software mine Yescrypt?

[tutulfo]

This software mine Yescrypt?

is yescript profitable?


Answer is No in latest release, yes in latests master code.

[skablast]

Zergpool have halted a lot of Neoscrypt coin, including some of the ones used for benchmarking with Megaminer

[tutulfo]

Zergpool have halted a lot of Neoscrypt coin, including some of the ones used for benchmarking with Megaminer

Next release (available in master code) will change zergpool coin level to algo level to solve this one.

Thanks