Hey, thanks for the support! Indeed, our community is growing each minute, good things are bound to happen!


Thank you Gabriellla, appreciate the support  Stay REW!

Market conditions are extremely unfavourable right now as everyone is aware, but we are looking at all options to make sure we get to softcap. We are at 51% of our softcap as of now.

We believe strongly in this technology and the need for it. As we are getting closer to the ICO and the Beta, the pieces of the puzzle are coming together and we are working extra hard. As we previously stated, we will develop the Beta version of the project no matter what, because we want to show the world the possibilities that Review.Network will open.

Thanks for your support Kharz! It is very true that the market conditions are extremely unfavourable right now, but we are looking at all options to make sure we get to softcap. We are certain that we can make the company successful and that Review.Network will have a big impact on how commercial market works in the future. As we previously stated, we will develop the Beta version of the project no matter what, because we want to show the world the possibilities that Review.Network will open. As we are getting closer to the ICO and the Beta, the pieces of the puzzle are coming together and we are working extra hard. And to answer your previous question, we are at 51% of our softcap as of now. We believe strongly in this technology and the need for it.

Thanks for your support bakst2! We do indeed have an MVP, but it's not public yet! You can checkout the code at https://github.com/ReviewNetwork/RN-Prototype-Solidity and https://github.com/ReviewNetwork/RN-Prototype. We are aiming to make the company application MVP (for creating surveys) public, but the user's side of things we'll have a video showcasing it. Stay tuned!

Thanks cryprourlbull! That's right, we have team members who are experts in statistics and data analytics. We are working on designing the models for this. Review.Network platform will be global and decentralized - we don't have any plans for country discrimination

Yes, correct - users will have a reputation score that's based on their activity on the network - having reviews pass validation, upvoted, answering surveys without disputes... The score will also be used in other parts of the system, like protecting newly added products that have no reviews yet, so that only users above a certain reputation threshold are able to leave a review. The review sorting will take all kinds of metrics into account, and reputation is one of them.

Hi D1jay! Thanks for the feedback - that is a great question. Incentivized systems can be very efficient in increasing engagement, but if you don't combine positive incentives with negative ones, than the system won't be stable. If you are only rewarding people, they will naturally try to use the system to their advantage. So what you need is a way of either making "cheating" behaviour very expensive or punishing those who don't play by the rules. The design of such a system is challenging, but also very exciting - it combines the knowledge of token models, mechanism design, blockchain technology and economy.

Here's a few words about how Review.Network's token economy works in that regard:

- Review are not validated based on sentiment. This means that a positive and negative reviews are treated the same.
- To write a review, the user must stake a certain amount of tokens, as a way to show guarantees that what he's writing is correct. If a review is approved by the process of community validation, the writer (as well as the validators) get his stake back, plus a reward. If it's rejected, the writer loses his stake and it goes back into the platform's Review Rewards Pool (a token pool from which the rewards are distributed).
- Also, to reach a decision weather or not a review should pass validation, a consensus among the validators must be formed. This means that those who are in the majority get a token reward, while those who are in minority lose their stake. The process of voting is blind, meaning that validators don't know how other validators voted until all of them have voted.
- The validators will also be "validated", by the system automatically generating reviews that it knows if they should pass the validation or not, and then punishing the validators who are clearly cheating.
- On the side of market research surveys, companies will get an automatic risk assessment for each completed one. The risk assessment is generated based on statistical models, and includes things like answering differently formulated question asking the same thing inconsistently, or detecting common non-attention patterns like straight line or zig-zag answers, as well as other well known psychometry methods.

In short - token rewards make users want to use the system, but the risk of losing their staked tokens if they cheat keeps them honest.

Hi iwasneverhere! Yes, we do have multiple checks in place to prevent abuse. We are seeing a lot of bot activity and people trying to game the system ever since the beginning of the campaign, and we are handling them

Hey Rtalk! We have a bonus (plus a referral system) for our Beta signups. Over 70,000 people already registered, and after 100,000 we decrease the bonuses a bit, so if you haven't already, join now! Here is the link - https://beta.review.network/preregister

Hey ivsem! Thanks for your support we have a lot of exciting things planned so stay tuned!

Thank you for your suggestion! Absolutely, we are planning to add that soon