https://heatbrowser.com/report.html has accurate numbers, and yes the monthly revenues does seem to be on the high side.

Then again, we have had to deal with stewieg's nonsense for all these months, so I think we have all earned the higher ROI.

The potential for HEAT needs to be put in the same perspective as the potential for ARDR, so while the current marketcap seems pretty good, really it can 10x from here and still earn 7%+ per year of an appreciating asset.

If the fiat side of the plans come together, then even the 10x price can just be a starting point. These are the things the deep pocket whales (like me) know, so good luck buying any large stake, only the people swayed by the mind of stewieg will be selling.

This is SuperNET 1.0 ecosystem, nothing is left to die. Only MGW is being phased out but it still gets DEX revshare. NXTventure will have its holdings distributed out. The other assets (not coins!) will be transferred to assetchains (which are actually coins) this summer.

SuperNET NAV is now around $20 (old.supernet.org/nav.php), about 4x the ICO price and right around the ICO price in BTC. With holdings worth $16 mil, it is expected to be able to fund development for quite a few years and my goal is to try to maintain the NAV as high as is practical while doing this.

Not sure why you think anything is dying, when it has more funds that ever and the tech is being released to start the revenue streams that will be dividended out later this year. crypto777 already has 17 BTC accumulated, but in relatively low value utxo so the txfee will eat up quite a bit of it until the btc fee market comes back to normal

All along I said that all the projects I am working on tie together into a single whole. Now I think more and more people are finally understanding what I meant years ago. I spend very little time marketing all the tech I am still working on, so you can blame me for not explaining it clearly and often enough.

And to all the people that said I was killing BTCD with the KMD ICO, when I said that we needed the funds for the notary nodes and that after the transition it will be a very good outcome for BTCD holders: BTCD is now 0.0115 (not a pump value but arbitrage floor) and $23. I believe that is ATH in USD

supernet.org has been redesigned, hopefully it can answer any questions you have

KMD does not need to stake. all eligible coins are accruing interest every block. this is not possible when staking which requires you to find a block to collect the interest.

here is what you have to do once you have coins in an address you control (with or without a wallet, just on the blockchain is enough)

Steps needed to do in order to earn interest:
1. You are already done, nothing else to do

The snapshot will be as of a specific block height, we will select this to be after the first friday of June. At this time there is no exact height, but as I said before we will announce more details as they become available.

It is likely that the block height is a multiple of 8000

conversion rate is still around 50, over the rest of the year it will decline to 48 or so. No idea why you think the rate is 25 to 1, also if it was 25 to 1, then the price would make sense to halve instead of double. But the conversion rate stays right around 50 the whole time.

you need to ask the traders on polo why they double the price one day and the next day it is back to the arbitrage price.

Current BTCD price of $16 appears to not be a bad outcome, but maybe I missed how it was $160+ before I got involved.

follow the directions for payout
the JUMBLR sharedrop will be after the next monthly payout
if you dont do a payout before first friday of June, you will miss out on JUMBLR sharedrop

instructions for payout are on the site

It seems nearly unanimous to burn.

Unless there are some voices to the contrary soon, a decision will be made about this so we dont have to worry about it.

I should also announce that there will be a sharedrop of JUMBLR soon. for every 20.2 KMD you have you will get 0.01 JUMBLR.

This is 5% of JUMBLR (50,000) allocated to 101 million KMD.

We are still working out the details, but it is expected that a KMD snapshot will be done within the next month and the JUMBLR distributed accordingly. There are only 1 million total JUMBLR so it is a rare coin and it receives the JUMBLR fees in addition to a DEX revshare.

Soon after the sharedrop, DEX trading of JUMBLR will be available using smartaddresses. More details will be announced as they become available.

To avoid dust transactions, a minimum of 20.2 KMD is required to participate in the snapshot. Also, if the KMD is on the exchange, then the exchange would get the JUMBLR and it would be up to the exchange to distribute it to their customers. This is why I raise this issue now so everyone has time to decide what to do. If you dont directly control your KMD address, you will likely not get any JUMBLR.

I am neutral on this. you are against it. Let us hear from some others before deciding. I am not advocating for or against this, I just want to have some flexibility in case it is needed as a contingency.

I am pretty sure that what you say is what will happen, but there are some advocates for using the polo listing BTCD has as having value.

If it isnt clear what to do, we will have a KMD stakeholder's vote on this. I think that will avoid any issues about justifying. Having a trading token that is a proxy is totally different than continuing development.

In any case for such a potentially controversial thing I will simply listen to what the stakeholders want.

It is possible that it will become necessary to stake with the BTCD as the non-swapped gets smaller and smaller as there might not be enough to keep the chain advancing.

Beyond the 1 year period, one idea in case KMD is still not listed on polo is to retain the existing swap mechanism and add a reverse swap mechanism so KMD can be converted to BTCD. That would then create a reverse arbitrage and we would have both a floor and ceiling price for BTCD which would effectively make BTCD 50x KMD especially if both directions of the swap were fairly frequent.

Now if you are saying that you can guarantee a direct polo listing or that a polo listing is not desired by this means due to the hairball theory, I can consider that point of view also.

It is hard to give a definite answer to a question that depends on future events beyond our direct control. I much prefer a direct polo listing than having to implement a reverse swap, but I must plan for various contingencies, dont i?

I am not aware of any other lite wallet that doesnt rely on a centralized website.

basilisk might appear as a normal litewallet, but remember that there is no centralized website, but rather a stake voted 64 notary nodes that makes it at least distributed.

I think we need to put things in proper perspective. Let us evaluate KMD based on native mode and whatever functionality basilisk mode has is a bonus. I do not think it makes sense to setup a centralized litewallet server officially, but if somebody wants to do it then they are certainly welcome to do so.

Our priorities are of course to stabilize the GUI and enable the more cutting edge features, like smartaddresses. It is strange that I do not see any questions about smartaddresses. I guess everybody fully understands what it is? However considering that the same question about how to get the 5% APR has been asked over fifty times, it seems hard to imagine how people are fully understanding what smartaddresses are.

I havent seen any stupid suggestions from you, but not sure what you mean by hierarchy + post.

The network was stressed during the week of hacker attacks, once the codebase was strengthened, the attacks appear to have shifted to user level with phishing websites and fake users promising fake returns in slack.

For the record, I never promised any 20x return on SuperNET. In fact, I said I didnt know how long it would take for SuperNET to be completed so SuperNET was sold at book value without any premium for being a growth instrument. After a very long bear market and paying for all the costs along the way, the book value is above the funds raised in the ICO, the trading price is also above the ICO price. Granted it isnt any giant ROI, but considering that we are not completed the roadmap yet it is not a bad interim value.

KMD was sold with only 10% reserved for the KMD team, which is on the low end of ICO's. Financially, it appears that like SuperNET we have a negative burn rate (meaning over time the funds available is growing), so we expect to be able to continue to pay for all development and notary costs for quite a long time. The only big financial issue is the challenge of dealing with the next bear market, whenever it arrives. We are already making plans regarding this to ensure the long term survival of KMD. The biggest troll attack against the ICO was how we could cap the maximum raised at 30,000 BTC. We never said it was a minimum, but it was spun into where we somehow required 30,000 BTC. The total amount raised was less than 10% of that, but it is enough to fund the notary nodes and a conservatively sized development team and a reasonable marketing expenditure. For those that believe good devs grow on trees and it is a matter of spending money to get them, please let me know where the good devs orchard is. Hiring quality devs is not any easy thing and to maintain fiscal responsibility I err on the side of not spending the funds, having the theory that once the money is spent you no longer have it.

KMD is up 2x to 3x in fiat terms (~50% in BTC) from ICO (depending on your bonus level), it isnt 100x and I apologize for that. I know I am not delivering on the 100x ROI promise that I didnt make.

While I have visited Hawaii, I am not living there, nor do I plan to visit it anytime soon.

For BTCD, after it went up 60 fold from when I joined the coin, I did say it would take quite a bit longer for it to 60x again (total 3600x gain). I think we are a quadrupling away from the second 60x gain and for people still holding BTCD or who have converted to KMD at the original cost basis, the gains have been indeed quite good. (over 500x in a bit less than 4 years)

I know people would like to make easy money instantly without any hard thinking. For that you can always play the pump of the day lottery on polo. Unfortunately there is no guarantee you pick the right coin. Bittrex is now getting almost 15% the volume of poloniex, so it can easily support some very large marketcap coins (like WAVES) and there is no urgent need to be listed on poloniex. Of course, more liquidity is always welcome and if we do get listed, that would be a nice thing.

I am managing things as if it was a long term marathon, so things like long term financial viability are much more important than whether it will get pumped to an artificially high price for a short period of time in an unsustainable pump.

That being said, with about 20 coins in the 100 million USD+ marketcap, I would not consider KMD joining it to be any far fetched scenario. For all the issues via GUI, at the komodod level things have been very solid for over six months (ignore the hacker attack week!). If we imagined a solid GUI where people are using native mode (so there are no basilisk issues at all), then it would be a lot less tech support issues.

So the question is if we should disable basilisk mode to eliminate all basilisk tech support issues and force people to use native mode? Fundamentally, using basilisk mode means you are relying on nodes that are not your own and therefore it is less reliable. That means it isnt as reliable as running a native mode locally, so there will be times where it isnt working smoothly.

So if people can view KMD as komodod mode plus GUI with native mode plus GUI with basilisk mode, then the question is if the extra modes has negative value where we are better off disabling it.

I think we should reserve judgement until the revamped Agama is out and then if basilisk mode is still unreliable to strongly consider to force people to use only the native mode.

Did I mention that we are currently testing smartaddresses?

please use kmd.explorer.supernet.org

I think the average ICO price was around 10 cents

I think you are overthinking and overcomplicating it.

5% APR is paid on utxo that are more than 10 KMD and older than an hour.

That is the rule. So if you just spend a utxo, then both the destination and the change address are utxo that follows the rules.

Just spend funds (to yourself or anybody else) and the change address comes back and will start earning interest after an hour. At the rate of 5% per year. If you are actively using KMD, there is nothing really extra you need to be doing.

The rule is 5% APR is paid on the entire utxo that is more than 10 KMD and older than an hour. The one hour is subtracted from the age for interest calculations

it doesnt matter how many times you spend it or not, if a utxo is for more than 10 KMD, after an hour it starts earning 5% interest

due to fixed txfee regardless of tx size, there is a very slight bias in favor of larger utxo, meaning there is an incentive to combine many small utxo into bigger ones, especially if they are smaller than 10 KMD. This has the effect of reducing the total number of utxo and a smaller memory usage, though the difference wont really be noticeable for quite a while

yes, the ismine, iswatchonly is from the point of view of the notary node that fulfilled the request

if you queried about one of your addresses, it is quite unlikely that a random notary node will be able to spend it (ismine:true)

there are several other similar point of view logics that need to be applied to the returned output.

if you keep in mind you are getting pretty much the raw output of the corresponding command run on a random notary node, I think most of the fields will make more sense

only the 64 blocks during the free-for-all (every 2000 blocks) will follow any directly calculable difficulty. The rest of the blocks, the notary nodes are able to get a block using an easy diff.

the diff calc is based on the original zcash diff calc

every block, each utxo gains simple interest
in order to compound it, you need to spend it.
there is a one hour setback and with txfee, the optimum is maybe a daily tx. not sure.

an extra 0.1% per year or so can be gained by compounding

ok that makes sense.
any estimate of the SC per month per siafund?
it seems on the low side based on what i got