Thank you .
I have geocaching app in my list but I'm thinking that it's not the app to collect geocoin , is that true ?
The Geocoin App is not out yet, but you can do it through the browser at: http://geocoin.cash/ |
|
|
|
Hi I'm new to this .
One question I want to ask is will I find the coin at the geocache location and the amount of coin at each location ?
Thank you.
Yes I believe so. Yo, the coins with the big G on the map, are those already dropped? I might go looking for one.
Those are caches I think. Maybe the ones with the physical coins. |
|
|
|
GEO and MAPC ended as dead projects sadly, but on BTC there are similars so lets just stick there and ignore those money wasters
GEO isn't dead where do you get this shit. |
|
|
|
Greetings folks, I had a successful move over this past weekend and am still getting setup in the new place. Still need to setup internet and phone connections etc.
Once I'm back online and setup in my new place I will continue working through the remainder of the Facebook Share combination with the new Camera Perspective Controls logic.
Just wanted to keep y'all in the loop, still more to GEO!
Wait...are you a one man dev team? If so, what are your future plans with the coin once the app is launched? Seems to me any coin with serious considerations to be a long term success needs a nice team behind it as well as future plans/roadmap for real world integration. Otherwise this is gonna be the next pokemon fad, pump and dump and left to rot once ppl get bored of it. No fud, just being realistic. There are two devs. Even if there were only one, one dev teams are common. You are comparing it to an ICO where everyone and their mother are advisors. |
|
|
|
this mean you want open service live streaming, or you only download another porn site to youre site
not explain spefication coin, total suply coin, how much price in ico selling
Our service lets the content providers (performers) connect directly with their audience via peer-2-peer protocols, and payment be done in-app through Clitcoin. Coin specifications will be released later this week before the ICO. Thanks for checking us out! How is the peer-to-peer streaming done? |
|
|
|
Geo is rising. Should I buy more?
Geo is rising along with a bunch of other really low market cap coins because a pump group has announced a pump on a low market cap coin in 3 hours. So it's all speculation... Hint: it won't be geo because there is too much on the sell side. Hint: If a pump group has to announce that they will be "pumping" they probably have no BTC and just want to dump on the gullible. |
|
|
|
If you read the thread there are many updates, pictures, videos and progress reports. It is nowhere near dead. When a new block explorer was needed it was fixed within one day. Obviously the development isn't blazing fast either and the poloniex delisting was a huge blow, hence why it isn't worth more than what it is(2-3m marketcap). But I don't believe that 2-3m is anywhere near overvalued for this coin. Criticising the coin is fine but I think it's poor form of you to shill another coin so blatantly.
I'm not shilling another coin, I'm simply defending it because someone came to that thread spewing bullshit and FUD. And I found they are actually shilling for GeoCoin, despite the huge lack of activity on github. He doesn't represent the GEO devs at all, just like I hope you don't represent the Lomo devs. There can be more than one project attempting the same thing. That's right I don't represent any coin or dev. I don't mean anything against Geo Coin if it is legit, maybe it is, who knows. I just don't like it when people compare unfairly and spread misinformation. Believe what you want to believe, fine by me, but let's all hold devs/coins to the same standards of accountability. Both projects look interesting. Yes exactly, there will always be misinformation and its expected to have a few people FUDing or just confused, but its really not as damaging as it seems. The best thing is to just not be the one spreading BS. |
|
|
|
If you read the thread there are many updates, pictures, videos and progress reports. It is nowhere near dead. When a new block explorer was needed it was fixed within one day. Obviously the development isn't blazing fast either and the poloniex delisting was a huge blow, hence why it isn't worth more than what it is(2-3m marketcap). But I don't believe that 2-3m is anywhere near overvalued for this coin. Criticising the coin is fine but I think it's poor form of you to shill another coin so blatantly.
I'm not shilling another coin, I'm simply defending it because someone came to that thread spewing bullshit and FUD. And I found they are actually shilling for GeoCoin, despite the huge lack of activity on github. He doesn't represent the GEO devs at all, just like I hope you don't represent the Lomo devs. There can be more than one project attempting the same thing. |
|
|
|
... Are you an investor in Geo but not Lomo? I'm just trying to understand your seeming favorability towards this GeoCoin. Here's the thing that I am concerned about. GeoCoin codebasse has not been touched for 3 years: https://github.com/onetimer/onetimerLoMoCoin was last updated about a week ago, and currently is in active development. Why should LomoCoin reach out to a developer who doesn't appear to care about their project? It seems GeoCoin is dead and only getting pumped for a cash grab. But I hope you can prove me wrong. I don't see the OP posting much in this thread as of late? I bought geo when I found out about it, a while back. I only found out about Lomo a few days ago and bought a small amount too. Geo has had active public comments by the devs for some time, as well as at least one person who is publicly identifiable and has stated they are associated with the coin and believe it to be genuine. Your posts are very pumpy and reek of something not quite right. I'm looking at Lomocoin, trying to get info, thoroughly interested in finding out if things are right, but you seem intent on avoiding facts and trying to pressure people into trusting. I do not speak for either side, and have what most people would call a fairly small amount invested, but do have some investment in both coins. I agree that there are problems with geocoin, and I have not hesitated to point out those problems when I see them. When I raise issues about geocoin, as I have in the past using several id's according to what passwords I remember etc, geocoin has more or less answered the questions, even if not 100%. Lomocoin has not done that as yet, but I am still open to supporting that coin if the devs make any honest effort aside from publicity aimed at getting more money from another ico. I apologize if my comments sound pumpy. I don't intend to sound that way. I just tend to invest based on code activity more than anything else. And just as a hint, that tends to be the reason for true rise in coins - just check github and you'll know what coin will go up next. I am simply trying to help where I think there is misinformation or lack of information due to the language barrier. I am very neutral in terms of coins in general, though I understand sometimes my comments may not appear to be. I enjoy providing insights and analysis. Nothing I have stated in that thread was false or exaggeration. I just prefer to follow actions rather than words. Actions show that LomoCoin code is actively being developed, but GeoCoin is not in the past 3 years. Nonetheless, I wish you the best of fortunes in your investments regardless. Not sure where you are getting that GEO hasnt developed anything in three years. You need to do your research. How's this for research? OP listed this as the project source code: https://github.com/onetimer/onetimer There's only ever been 1 single commit, 3 years ago, roughly at the time of this thread being posted. Please correct me if I am wrong. I do not mean to spread wrong information, but I am curious where the development has happened that you say is ongoing. Do you have proof of these code updates? That is the github for the open source blockchain yes. But the development isnt being done on the blockchain, its mostly on the geocaching application. The application and the website are not open source. When you research a simple obvious step is to look at the post histories of the devs, check the twitter etc. Even if you went to the geocoin.cash website you would see that development has clearly been ongoing. |
|
|
|
... Are you an investor in Geo but not Lomo? I'm just trying to understand your seeming favorability towards this GeoCoin. Here's the thing that I am concerned about. GeoCoin codebasse has not been touched for 3 years: https://github.com/onetimer/onetimerLoMoCoin was last updated about a week ago, and currently is in active development. Why should LomoCoin reach out to a developer who doesn't appear to care about their project? It seems GeoCoin is dead and only getting pumped for a cash grab. But I hope you can prove me wrong. I don't see the OP posting much in this thread as of late? I bought geo when I found out about it, a while back. I only found out about Lomo a few days ago and bought a small amount too. Geo has had active public comments by the devs for some time, as well as at least one person who is publicly identifiable and has stated they are associated with the coin and believe it to be genuine. Your posts are very pumpy and reek of something not quite right. I'm looking at Lomocoin, trying to get info, thoroughly interested in finding out if things are right, but you seem intent on avoiding facts and trying to pressure people into trusting. I do not speak for either side, and have what most people would call a fairly small amount invested, but do have some investment in both coins. I agree that there are problems with geocoin, and I have not hesitated to point out those problems when I see them. When I raise issues about geocoin, as I have in the past using several id's according to what passwords I remember etc, geocoin has more or less answered the questions, even if not 100%. Lomocoin has not done that as yet, but I am still open to supporting that coin if the devs make any honest effort aside from publicity aimed at getting more money from another ico. I apologize if my comments sound pumpy. I don't intend to sound that way. I just tend to invest based on code activity more than anything else. And just as a hint, that tends to be the reason for true rise in coins - just check github and you'll know what coin will go up next. I am simply trying to help where I think there is misinformation or lack of information due to the language barrier. I am very neutral in terms of coins in general, though I understand sometimes my comments may not appear to be. I enjoy providing insights and analysis. Nothing I have stated in that thread was false or exaggeration. I just prefer to follow actions rather than words. Actions show that LomoCoin code is actively being developed, but GeoCoin is not in the past 3 years. Nonetheless, I wish you the best of fortunes in your investments regardless. Not sure where you are getting that GEO hasnt developed anything in three years. You need to do your research. |
|
|
|
...
In terms of GPS spoofing it is already known to us and we will ban any users who are caught spoofing their GPS position immediately. To date there are 75 GeoCoin Hunters which were banned due to spoofing.
... 2) Some coins could be dropped with a requirement to add some info that could only be gotten from somebody at the actual site, sort of like with real geocaches a person physically proves they were at the site. ... ... As far as number 2, do you have an example of a requirement? I looked through geocaching sites when I was researching this coin, maybe Weifa can answer that better, but it seems like a person arrives physically at a geocache then places it somewhere else, and there is a record kept of a particular cache's traveling. If spoofing were an issue, and my honest guess is that it probably is not going to decrease as an issue, then it might be sensible to let a person attach a geocoin to a regular object. Example A person places a small object in a location and publishes coordinates, as is done with regular caches, but they put a written code, e.g. a string of letters on the object, that are needed to get the coins. A person arrives physically at the object, in addition to latlong provided by the wallet, maybe there can be some other code that has to be entered and is only available to somebody physically there. Of course that is not the ideal. But if the coin becomes popular of course a lot of people are going to geospoof and it seems sensible to discuss that possibility. a point to add If there are already people "banned for geospoofing" then the coin is not decentralized. Once the people who "ban" offenders step away then the coin does not stand, it is owned by spoofers. It is smarter to look for a solution that does not require an 'authority' to 'issue bans' to protect from some weakness in the coin. It would be cool to make the physical coins geowallets. Pure decentralization is not ideal for all blockchain applications. A project like this is novel and works best somewhere in between decentralized and centralized. |
|
|
|
...
In terms of GPS spoofing it is already known to us and we will ban any users who are caught spoofing their GPS position immediately. To date there are 75 GeoCoin Hunters which were banned due to spoofing.
Maybe others have ideas, here are some. 1) If a wallet needs to already have received geocoin before it can scoop any up it would prevent somebody creating a brand new wallet only to spoof. 2) Some coins could be dropped with a requirement to add some info that could only be gotten from somebody at the actual site, sort of like with real geocaches a person physically proves they were at the site. ... The devs are saying that they have a solution already in effect, and that does make sense otherwise the thousands of dollars on the map would be long gone. But here are a few thoughts on you ideas: Number one assumes that if anyone has any amount of GEO they will not attempt to spoof. Even if penalties are somehow enforced, the amount of GEO required to deter spoofing enough by making it uneconomical makes use of the app very difficult and unappealing. The barrier to entry would be enormous. As far as number 2, do you have an example of a requirement? |
|
|
|
...
I disagree. This is a geocaching type application, what better than a world map with coins on it to land on? Pictures are much more descriptive than words.
Two different issues. The page itself is great and gives a lot of information to people who are already using the app. But if a person who is not familiar with the coin lands there, they learn nothing, they leave and that's it. Maybe moving the sign up buttons below the map and a brief description? |
|
|
|
I just updated our landing page to use the new MapBox interface. Have a peek!  http://geocoin.cash You put a lot of work into that, but should it really be the landing page? The first page a stranger lands on leaves them confused and wondering what all those colors are about. First should be a page for the simplest non crypto types. Less than 500 words in big print with no word over two syllables. I disagree. This is a geocaching type application, what better than a world map with coins on it to land on? Pictures are much more descriptive than words. |
|
|
|
I think you need more details.  |
|
|
|
Really Carsen? Really? Go ahead and avoid this coin.
Yea I promised I would launch my own coin and stick with it, here it is. Enjoy. You are just a scammer. I bet you arent supporting this in 6 months. |
|
|
|
|
Really Carsen? Really? Go ahead and avoid this coin.
|
|
|
|
Is there a whitepaper?
Hello! A Whitepaper is currently in Russian and is available by reference https://globalenergy.network/whitepaper/. This is not the final version of Whitepaper, there will be updates. Since I don't speak Russian maybe you could explain more how the parallel blockchains work? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
