#Proof of authentication #Proof of participation:
- Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1818406
- Did you check our ANN thread? YES
- Are you going to participate in our bounty campaign? dont think so

interesting question spidevil. i had a similar in my mind. aside it looks promising for sure. good team from what i can see and couldnt find red flags, at least not on the first sight.

tnx for referring me spidevil :-P
#joined airdrop too

telegram : @chrismaes

people using bad language on others that didnt give them a reason for it quite often have bad motives. so what is your motive here, that you cant discuss properly?

i dont care if something makes me look smart or dumb, i am posting my opinion, nothing else. everywhere, everytime. you are yelling and using bad language at me for no reason. as a neutral watcher, i would know which person i would rather believe and which person i would ask myself, why is he/she acting  this way?

to add a little teaching here : a person CANT be scam. a person can be a SCAMMER, or SCUM. maybe you mixed something up there ... and while i am on it, learn to quote ... it aint that hard. maybe focus less on bad wording and more on "how to write and quote in a forum"



i know ronnie. i never said anything bad about him at all, did i?

but i can tell you a old story from my beginnings of trading (nemax times) and a friend i knew back then (i lost contact several years ago, but thats another story). this guy was a very good news/daytrader and had an own paid "report" as well (i dont know if he called it report, newsletter or whatever anymore, it is so many years ago). and i knew him irl, so we basically spoke man to man. he once told me that his good name in the business and the fact ppl were buying and using his report was the best thing that could ever happend, and with this, he raised his own profit big times. even if he suggested rather mediocre investments (and even the best investor does misstakes here and there or can fall to a bad project), the people paying still followed, jumped the train, pumped the price and the result was quite obvious :

1st, he hardly had bad suggestions. because due to subscribers following, the prices raised (some kind of self-fullfilling prophecy)
2nd, his name got better and better, as most of his suggestions raised
3rd, his profit got maximized too, cause he was able to push the prices with his mix of knowledge and many ppl behind him, buying what he suggested.
4th, if a project or suggestion failed, he was never blamed for it. because a good number of his subscribers (those acting fastest when buying themself at low prices) still made profits, and those who didnt, rather blamed themself then him
5th and last, he called his followers (but not in a "bad" meaning, more with some kind of "love") "my sheep" because they followed him just like sheeps follow their chief.

this is nothing bad at all. just as ronnie, my former friend didnt try to scam anyone or abuse his powers. what he sugested were stocks or trades that he believed in HIMSELF... but for himself, the situation was the best of all. while his followers were still buying and buying, he was out quite often already, and had done a double profit : for selling the informations and for selling the stocks themself.

anyway, time will tell on unity, but one thing mentioned in here was a bit wrong :

someone said that ronnie said this is his best pick in last 20 years. in fact he said "MAY be my best idea in 20 years". additionally he mentioned that, with a 50/50 chance, it might even raise 1000% more till end of feb (later he changed that chance to 60/40 and month to end of march). and this might indeed be possible, but his recommendation is a BIG factor for the raise itself (and it was last time, when uny raised big, as well)

now some newsletter guy is the argument why this coin is legit and recordbreaking, hmmm

you know how  this kind of newsletters work?

they recommend something, doesnt matter if it is a crypto or stocks or whatever, and before doing so, they are in, big, at low prices.
due to their subscribers and the rumor spread, ppl buy. result : the chart raises (logically). they can claim "my recommendation was good, it raised loads after i did" but this is happening BECAUSE of this rec and not because of the proof of quality.

i can only encourage anyone to trade/buy/sell based on own analysis and thoughts. newsletter or youtuber or whatever guys who recommend, should be watched and not forgotten, but look at this kind of informations carefully, always.


if i had 100k subscribers and i would recommend ANY random coin with some arguments, ppl would buy and it would raise, just by logics.

the fact that ronnie recommended uny in the past proofs this big time. it raised due to this, but dropped loads after, because it was a bullshit coin.

i still dont see anything behind it, and those things backed by arguments should make alarmbells ring. the things promised for uny are WAY to good (why would they back a token worth 0,002 in the start with 1 dollar each? it makes no sense. they  could have easier created a complete NEW one, instead of using an old token, that already was used for p 'n d / scam.

i believe you. problem is : Arbitrade could be scam, fake or whatever too. it is nothing that exist for real yet.. thats the problem. their homepage aint convincing me either, but that means nothing. the fact unity was used for "scam" in the past is enough to be very carefull here. if i got the mail of livecoin on 08.02. i would have invested FOR SURE (and sold already). but now? i would be very carefull.

noone denys that profit, even large one, can be done with this coin (or other "dubious" ones). but as a mid- or even longtherm investment, this coin is IMO the worst pick you can invest in. those that were in early had good reasons to do so (the news on 08.02. alone was enough to make sure there would be a nice raise from 0,002 to whatever).

first , as edited : i did a misstake above and mixed parts of "uny" with another token thats scamming right now. edited it out, so there are no missunderstandings left




from what i understood, they claimed that dignity is a new team? how can they use the cash of the original uny ico?


to back the 3b token of uny (soon dignity) they neeed gold worth 3b. sounds like much, much, very much, insane much mining will be needed


they said every token is backed up by real currency like gold. that doesnt sound like "maybe, in the far future, if all works out" to me.


i cant see much credibility here. the place where their office is meant to be seems not legit, many misstakes on their page, delays, they start with a big news on livecoin, instead of first getting their shit fixed. hmmmm.


i have no problems with this and believe you. arbitrade is nothing that would put anything special behind this, so whats the value of this claim? if you said creators of bitcoin are behind this, well ... that would be different. or any other big players or guys that raise credibility.

*edit* i mixed a part with another token. my bad

funny that someone claims the leaders are the same as arbitrade. arbing is exactly what WOULD be big time possible right now if this was legit. token price is 0,07 and the VALUE according to the "teams" clains is 1 dollar. SURE SURE Smiley

this is even more obvious then bitconnect and other similar scams where someone offered a deal that is just WAY to good to be true. no serious company would do this and no serious investor would believe in this kind of crap.



this alone should make everything clear. the value that needs to be there to actually back up the tokens would be MANY MANY billions of money. in gold, silver, platinum and palladium. who believes in this must really b e stupid ....

honestly guys, how can you actually believe this is NO scam/p 'n d?

just look at the history of this token. it was pumped with a news, dumped and then ignored.

where is the proof there is new ownership? there aint any because the old owners/devs where not even known.

now, this happens again. news comes, when the token is at 0,002 dollar. which means for 1 dollar you can get 500 of this token. the news says you will be able to trade it 1:1 to the new token dignity, which will be backed up by "real" funds - from what i understood, this value is CLAIMED to be 1 dollar.

so basically, when the news came, this "company" rebranding the coin says that a coin worth 0,002 dollar at this moment will be very soon worth 1 dollar. why would they give a shit token this value? and considering there is a max supply of 3b, where do this sick funds come from, to actually backup 3b tokens? really, EVERY alarm has to ring there, 24/7

surely it is possible to make money with this token (with some luck and esp if u bought it early, at 0,002 ), but if you believe the whole idea of the creators will work out, you will not be very happy in a few weeks.

i consider this project very hilarious.

- low volume on small exchange but marketcap of top25
- bought facebook likes
- a very funny "opening our office" video with 2 guys talking, one guy putting his backhead into the camera so it looks like if there are ppl autending, some fake sounds (claps etc), and voila.

imo a clearly scam.

wie schauts bei coinbase aus? die leute auf reddit scheinen sich nicht ganz einig zu sein, etliche meinen, es ginge ohne probleme, obwohl coinbase offiziell deutschland ja gar nicht "unterstützt"