So today we are gonna know the exact launch time?

He said that he will give an update on sunday but seems that he is really bad at keeping any deadline :p

So i've read this whole discussion and seems that Soma is pushing some serious boundaries with acusing members posting in this thread being the dev with actually 0 proof.
Actually Somacoin isn't true that you launched a coin that you abandoned, that was mined by people, wasted resources on it, just refused to discontinue it in a friendly manner at least, you being an anon dev? I don't see any authority of you posting and discussing these shit whilist you are worse than empirecoin's dev whoever may that be.

Gpu mining is possible on cryptonote

Afaik there is no gpu miner for cryptonight that would support solo mining. I was trying to set it up with the CLI, the miner got connected to the daemon but there were some header errors that the miner was expecting from pool but the daemon obviously didnt provide it

Afaik rise was the first but that's in ico phase till 24 june. We'll see which will be ready earlier

Forget bter.
Bittrex, poloniex, hitbtc is hard to get on at this early phase unless there is some top notch innovation in the code
Yobit is a good place to start if they are supporting cryptonote coins

They should be if you are against premine scams mate one of them is just being traded at 10+ btc volume from the devs premine and it is completely enthusiasm around it lol

Back to ontopic. What you are saying is true we don't know what the dev is capable of yet but calling a project with big red letters as being a scam is more than exaggerated at this point

Soma i really don't understan your combat here there are tons of coins on bitcointalk with much bigger premine or hidden premine yet you are here where there is an absolutely acceptable premine and i don't see you in threads with 90% premine coins that are obvious scams

Well what would be the purpose of a decentralized market that cannot be shut down is untraceable and anonymous?
There were even rumours that lisk is going to be a silkroad 3.0 thanks to it's ecosystem so personally i am glad that the blackmarket will get a place outside lisk and does not poisons it

It seems so however it's nice to see that at least this is not an ico but the distribution is somewhat strange.
What about devs anonymity if this really is going to be a deepweb market based on lisk probably it is better for them to stay anonymous

It seems the coin is getting some attention diff, hash and miners are constantly increasing on pool, i am glad i started early as now is much harder to mine

Posting addresses in the thread will get the thread blocked is prohibited on bitcointalk lol

A strategy to work with would be burning at least 2 mill of the premine. Otherwise staking, buying or even mining is waste of any resource, and i would highly doubt that dev would burn those coins. The maximum possible is that he sends the coins to an address and claims that he dropped the private keys of it like already happened and then miraculosly those coins are getting sold at exchange

And how you got the 10 million supply? After 30 years of staking maybe there will be that supply but for your awareness the premine percent is calculated from the POW supply.
2,300,000 is the premine and
268,000 is the Pow supply

I never said that there are no problems, but there is no problem that would require a relaunch. Relaunch is needed when there is a problem with the chain or the client but those are working well. There is a problem with the pool but that is not a problem that would require a relaunch

I dont see why it should be relaunched. The coin and wallet itself is working fine, the only problem is that the pool payouts are not working.
That should be solved asap or if a third party would add the coin that would be fine too

Decred devs did not disclosed such a list either, just because of privacy protection. If they would release such a list they would break my privacy as i did not accepted when subscribing that my email address or even my btt account may be published. For me it is more than enough that in 1 month they did not achieved to distribute the whole amount that was dedicated for the distribution when other coins were getting 1000 "valid" applications in just 20 minutes. Those are the coins where you should look for fraud not those where in 1 month they got less than 1000 applications from the whole bitcointalk community. Couldn't be just easier from them to take the remaining 15 million instead of burning it?They had the possibility but still decided to burn it and that's a plausible thing.

Actual market conditions are prooving more than anything that the distribution was the fairest amongst the airdrop coins.

What you are asking is something that breaks the privacy protection terms and i would highly doubt that such a list will appear unless they want serious fud from those who do not agree with publishing their personal data

I am not very concerned about the additional delay still it is extremely unprofessional. A few weeks ago they assured us that no further delays will happen and here it comes another one. Bad for your reputation and extremely bad for the future of Lisk. No serious partners will consider a partnership with a team which can't keep their promisses.
All the people defending the delay are concerned ico investors wanting to keep a good overall perception about the coin but that is mostly lost at this point. I just want to say that this is not the path i put my investment in, and Max and his team should put their asses together to deliver their original promissions

So this Adam Matlack is a different Adam Matlack?