 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
It's been 30 min, how bout' an update?
It was updated to say 15 minutes now, so must be running a bit longer. |
|
|
|
ID Currency Status Other info
62 MRC waiting 47
Status: 29 confirmations, broadcast through 8 node(s)
Date: 2014/1/22 02:09
...
Hopefully you just sent a small amount as a test, that is what I did to make sure it works before I send more. |
|
|
|
How about adding coins that aren't on any exchanges yet?
You mean like microCoin (MRC)? which they already did... Or maybe Cryptonium (CRN)? which they already did... |
|
|
|
|
Just an FYI round 1305 still shows in my latest rounds list.
|
|
|
|
Got a website in the works? Helps on launch even if it just echoes what's in this announcement.
And if'n you gonna, i could do you some fox gfx used in the coin design.
Yeah a website soon after launch would be good, these days with so many coins, having a professional presentation and marketing will make people look past the possible pump n dump and give the coin more of a chance. |
|
|
|
Automatic redemptions pushed, as well as much less confusing auto redemption thresholds.
I like the less confusing auto-payout interface, though I often run my browser in a smaller window (make it around the size of 1280x1024 so I can multitask with other windows around it) and the text boxes are looking kind of funky. I have attached an example https://i.imgur.com/geinVJm.jpgWe'll get that fixed in a bit. Thanks for the heads up! EDIT: It is fixed now! Still seems somewhat off depending on how wide I make my window, it is almost like a 1px difference can make it messed up versus good looking still. I just took some screencaps and measured the width of the screen to see when this cutover point is, and it was fine looking at 1199px and not fine at 1201px, so 1200px seems to be the magical number where there is still an issue. I know you have designed the site to be reactive to the size of the window, and so it must have something to do with that. Image at 1201 pixels wide: https://i.imgur.com/xVlPtuY.pngImage at 1199 pixels wide: https://i.imgur.com/nWmP8fJ.pngNice detective work. I made some more tweaks, how does it look now? Seems like that fixed it, can't replicate the issue any longer. |
|
|
|
Automatic redemptions pushed, as well as much less confusing auto redemption thresholds.
I like the less confusing auto-payout interface, though I often run my browser in a smaller window (make it around the size of 1280x1024 so I can multitask with other windows around it) and the text boxes are looking kind of funky. I have attached an example https://i.imgur.com/geinVJm.jpgWe'll get that fixed in a bit. Thanks for the heads up! EDIT: It is fixed now! Still seems somewhat off depending on how wide I make my window, it is almost like a 1px difference can make it messed up versus good looking still. I just took some screencaps and measured the width of the screen to see when this cutover point is, and it was fine looking at 1199px and not fine at 1201px, so 1200px seems to be the magical number where there is still an issue. I know you have designed the site to be reactive to the size of the window, and so it must have something to do with that. Image at 1201 pixels wide: https://i.imgur.com/xVlPtuY.pngImage at 1199 pixels wide: https://i.imgur.com/nWmP8fJ.png |
|
|
|
Automatic redemptions pushed, as well as much less confusing auto redemption thresholds.
I like the less confusing auto-payout interface, though I often run my browser in a smaller window (make it around the size of 1280x1024 so I can multitask with other windows around it) and the text boxes are looking kind of funky. I have attached an example https://i.imgur.com/geinVJm.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Microcoin(MRC)/Bitcoin(BTC)
and
Particle(PRT)/Bitcoin(BTC)
|
|
|
|
On the "your latest round" id 1305 is constantly on the list even though i have participated about 100 rounds since then.
How about now? It is still on the list for me. |
|
|
|
How often are withdrawls made after trading? None of my balance is redeemable yet. Also am I correct in assuming that any round that ends with 0 blocks found means the algorithm decided to switch to a more profitable coin mid round?
I believe they said withdrawls from cryptsy have to be done manually and thy do it once a day, though looks like they may not have withdrawn in a day or two, but it is an alpha so things may be delayed some. |
|
|
|
|
On the "your latest round" id 1305 is constantly on the list even though i have participated about 100 rounds since then.
|
|
|
|
|
Pd5rTKqy2WmAKy8kAjhYhdczxAsUe5aBuz
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Here's something that would be a big deal for me:
On some profit-switching pools, I notice earnings wait until the end of the round to cash out - even if not waiting on a BTC exchange (I prefer to get the coins before waiting on an exchange).
It would be extremely beneficial if it could pay out the same way a typical PPLNS pool would: automatically at a minimum payout once earnings are confirmed. If this has already been discussed, forgive me, but I just thought of this and seeked out this thread to add this. This would maximize profitability, which waiting on a round to end doesn't.
Let me just double check this what you mean if it was mining say FastCoin, it finds 2 blocks at the start, the round is still going on when those blocks mature, so it trades them as soon as they mature, and not wait until the round ends and all blocks mature to be exchange? |
|
|
|
|
One feature that would be nice would be on the My Earnings page, when you sort it would sort all the data, not just the data that is being displayed on the current page (or at least a Show All Button so I can sort everything) Since right now trying to group everything that is trading vs being deposited vs etc. requires me to write things down. Maybe have a button to export the data to CSV (should be easy to do with setting the MIME Type and just outputting the table data)
|
|
|
|
<< me too please.
same user ID
Done. Could you activate me as well? at #38 in queue, same ID as here. |
|
|
|
|
Digibyte has a great team behind it. The active community and active developers are a great reason to support DGB
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
D9pu5EA6FkwtcieN27acjQ6NWreBvycNeT
|
|
|
|
|
with vardiff 2 instances with 2 workers is the best bet. even without vardiff it can be better if the cards are say a 7770 and a 280x since their hashrates are so far apart
|
|
|
|
|
