Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 01:13:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
21  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: REALTIME MASTERNODE 90% PoS 10% on: June 25, 2018, 10:44:10 AM
Guys this is a scam!!!! Be aware

The coin has no info whatsover, the dev team on the web is fake, there is no real info about the coin, it´s use, technology or anything other than general information about cryptos and blockchain. They want to use FB and Google as advertisement haha when have you seen FB or Google advertising BTC/LTC/ETH or any other big crypto??  and they think FB and Google will advertise theirs??

It is a big scam, like many others, no contributions on github for a month on blockchain files and 8 days on other files, a no contributors to it, so where is the dev team it claims to have?

Furthermore I poster on Discord stating this very same post, and I have been kicked out of the Discord channel, very convenient dev... Try to delete this post Dev, come on.

This is a big Scam and you shouldn´t buy this coin. They are selling at 0.5 BTC to start a node... WTF... 1 week and it will be work 20$

Be careful and don´t fool for this scammers. They create coins everyday and people still thinks they will become millioners with masternodes

good luck for those who already bought coins. You are paying for a valuable education: not to get scammed again

just found this: he couldnt even upload the pic and his spanish isn´t the way I would have requested help ( i am Spanish) so that means a lot to me

Me puede explicar como es el paso a paso por favor, a mi no me funciona dado que la forma en la que aparece la URL a mi no me deja, muchas gracias
22  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ⚡⚡ SPEDO ⚡⚡ SPO ⚡⚡ MASTERNODES ⚡⚡ SKEIN ⚡⚡ on: June 24, 2018, 01:49:22 PM
The specifications of Spedo shown in the OP are very limited.
Is it Pow / Masternode or Pos/ Masternode?
Can I stake Spedo?
I ask the question because I can not buy enough coins to set up one masternode, so it will be great if I can stake my coins.

What are you doing men?? Do you really believe all this shit with no info??

I am willing to sell you my coin then for lets say 1 euros each, its goin to be revolutionary, will change eveything you know.

Come on guys... don´t feed scammers
23  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.1 (Linux / Windows) on: June 24, 2018, 12:48:44 PM
use EWBF in the mean time. It is the only one I know it supports 144,5 and 192,7

I am waiting for DSTM to update too

I have tried EWBF but always received rejected shares.
Do you know the setup of it?

I tried it and didn´t get a single rejected for over a long period, like 48 hrs.

Show your .bat file and will see if there something wrong. But could be the pool fault.
24  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ⚡⚡ SPEDO ⚡⚡ SPO ⚡⚡ MASTERNODES ⚡⚡ SKEIN ⚡⚡ on: June 24, 2018, 12:39:56 PM
Be carefull guys, high ROI and no info at all of the coin. Newbie posting only one post and loading images already. Looks like another scam that will go down in a couple of weeks.

I hope I am wrong, but there is no information whatsoever of what they are doing, whitepaper, dev team. I wouldn´t put money into it.

Seems a big scam
25  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 21, 2018, 09:25:18 AM
Hey justaminer

I think you need to have a look at the way you mine the dev fee. for that minute the miner is working for you, th eminer disconnects from the pool i am mining completely and dissapears for that min that makes the shares go down on the pool and we lose money.

Hey man. That's how devfee works in general - miner works for developer some small period of time, in our case hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork mines to my address 1 minute per every hour. It doesn't matter if miner mines to the same pool or it connects to different pool to mine devfee - either way your address doesn't receive hashrate during devfee time period.

It also happens randomly that the miner is working and submitting shares but is disconnected from the pool and takes a couple of seconds to reconnect.
I would appreciate if you could look into it and improve it for everyone

How exactly do you see that miner is disconnected from the pool and reconnect within just 2 seconds? No pool I know can show that miner disconnects/reconnects in realtime, all of pools' websites have big delay.



It is not how they work. I have been using DSTMand Bminer for months mining ZEC and when the miner is taking the dev fee the miner doesn´t diconnect from my pool and there is no drop on the hashrate either.

So you might want to have a look at real devs and learn from them, cos when your miner disconnects drops the hashrate on the pool and the payout too which is costing me money (apart from the one you take which I consider to be rasonable fair). So far I have stopped using it.

And it does disconnect from the pool everynow and then. X seconds ( doesn´t have to be 2) was just a way of explaining the fact that dissapears from the pool randomly and then it rapears again.

I am not attacking you but if you want to take it personal go ahead. I am just hinting you to make improvements on that bit. Because of that ussuse the dev fee it is not 1.66% it is more because of what we lose on connection issues

Yes, I've been using DSTM for 3 weeks or so too. When it works, you can see in your firewall that it always has 2 connections - one to your pool and one to devfee pool. So yes, it doesn't reconnect to your pool and to devfee pool and save you some seconds, but dstm says his miner has 2% devfee. So 2% of mining time your GPUs work for developer of miner, and you still get 2% less of income, no matter how it is organized.

Also this is fork of hsrminer, so it improves original hsrminer. And the fork improved it a lot. I won't repeat about all added features, we are talking about devfee here. Original hsrminer always mines devfee to 1 pool - zpool.ca. If zpool isn't working, original hsrminer will stuck at devfee phase forever trying to reconnect to zpool and you will lose a lot of mining time. Also it has ineffective pool switching algo, and can waste up to 20-30 seconds before it would get work from pool after reconnect. My fork has 2 additional backup devfee pools, so it won't stuck and pool switching algo has been much improved, so no downtime after pool switching.

I have nothing against you, man. I'm just trying to understand how exactly do you see that miner disconnects from pool? Firewall or some other network tool on your rig or you check pool's website? Also can you tell how often it disappears from pool? If it disappears one time per hour - miner switches to other pool for devfee mining.

I can see it because I sit in front of the computer for hours and maybe 20/30 min on the pool site looking at the miner performance and pool performance and after refreshing the web it disappears, refreshing 2 or 3 times later it reappears again. Thats why I know it completely disconnects from the pool side.

I can not stay 24 hrs watching it but it happens randomly and I think it is not only when switching to your pool for dev fee. I have seen it happening twice on the same hour so I assume one is your fee and the other I don´t know.

I haven´t complained about the dev fee or anything. I only asked you to look at it and the way it works so you could improve it for everyones benefit, incluiding yours.
26  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.1 (Linux / Windows) on: June 20, 2018, 09:14:10 AM
use EWBF in the mean time. It is the only one I know it supports 144,5 and 192,7

I am waiting for DSTM to update too
27  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 20, 2018, 09:09:36 AM
Hey justaminer

I think you need to have a look at the way you mine the dev fee. for that minute the miner is working for you, th eminer disconnects from the pool i am mining completely and dissapears for that min that makes the shares go down on the pool and we lose money.

Hey man. That's how devfee works in general - miner works for developer some small period of time, in our case hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork mines to my address 1 minute per every hour. It doesn't matter if miner mines to the same pool or it connects to different pool to mine devfee - either way your address doesn't receive hashrate during devfee time period.

It also happens randomly that the miner is working and submitting shares but is disconnected from the pool and takes a couple of seconds to reconnect.
I would appreciate if you could look into it and improve it for everyone

How exactly do you see that miner is disconnected from the pool and reconnect within just 2 seconds? No pool I know can show that miner disconnects/reconnects in realtime, all of pools' websites have big delay.



It is not how they work. I have been using DSTMand Bminer for months mining ZEC and when the miner is taking the dev fee the miner doesn´t diconnect from my pool and there is no drop on the hashrate either.

So you might want to have a look at real devs and learn from them, cos when your miner disconnects drops the hashrate on the pool and the payout too which is costing me money (apart from the one you take which I consider to be rasonable fair). So far I have stopped using it.

And it does disconnect from the pool everynow and then. X seconds ( doesn´t have to be 2) was just a way of explaining the fact that dissapears from the pool randomly and then it rapears again.

I am not attacking you but if you want to take it personal go ahead. I am just hinting you to make improvements on that bit. Because of that ussuse the dev fee it is not 1.66% it is more because of what we lose on connection issues
28  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 20, 2018, 09:03:52 AM
the author writes - "HSR has real devfee of 2.08% - 2.75%", and in his HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer "lower devfee: 1 minute per hour" - how much is this in % Huh Explain, please???

It is not that difficult. 1 min every 60 works for the dev so 24 min per day works for the dev. That is a 1.66% devfee

29  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 18, 2018, 08:53:57 PM
Hey.

Any plans of implementing neoscrypt algo??
30  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 18, 2018, 07:49:26 PM
Hey justaminer

I think you need to have a look at the way you mine the dev fee. for that minute the miner is working for you, th eminer disconnects from the pool i am mining completely and dissapears for that min that makes the shares go down on the pool and we lose money. It also happens randomly that the miner is working and submitting shares but is disconnected from the pool and takes a couple of seconds to reconnect.

I would appreciate if you could look into it and improve it for everyone
31  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 18, 2018, 07:06:55 PM

no, problem.

anyway, has anyone compared bminer and DSTM, and EWBF lately  ...on poll side of course...  really annoying is that bminer showing 5-10% bigger hashrate  on console that is on pool ( tested and discussion made a lot but that was older versions not v8).  
i' better prefer to show real thing.. so i can easily compare what is faster for my rig.   i mean i can understand that maybe at first it inflate hashrate to make people using it, but now when we all know what is it.. it will be better to fix console to real hashrate...

I wouldn’t say is not fixed. The problem is that you have to take off the 2% dev fee plus the 1% pool fee from the hashrate in the console to get the real one and still the hashrate in the pool is estimated based on your shares so not really accurate either.

For me the reason of not using it is because with DSTM I get less rejected shares and a more constant rate on the pool like pretty much a straight line whilst with Bminer is like a roller coaster jumping all over the place.

As I said before there are more profitable coins out there so not mining ZEC anymore unless the price goes up again  

What coins do you mine now? maybe you can share some experience with the community here and give Bminer team some idea about what coins should we support in Bminer.
also, it's a good point about the constant rate. I mean the rate may vary on different rigs. I will take a look at this problem as well.
then about the rejected shares, how many hours did you do the test?

Well, I have been mining RVN coin which is X16R algo. It is a profitable coin. Right now as I post with my 6 GTX 1070 Ti based on whattmine and crypt0-zone websites you can make 392 coins per day work 5.38 euros or 6.53 dollars net after paying electricity (obviously can changed based on pool hashrate, difficulty, rejected shares and price change).

Today I have moved to BTCZ which is making 6.30 euros or 7.65 dollars per day. I have to say that EWBF now is ahead of the game as he has released his new miner which can mine 144,5 and 192,7 new Equihash algos so you need to speed up a bit to catch up. I am sure you can do better than him. DSTM has not released anything new so only miner for 144,5 and 192,7 is EWBF.

For your info with EWBF and 6 GTX 1070 Ti 70% TDP, +200 clock and +700 mem I get between 227-237 sols/s so you have some references if you want to work on it. It comes with the usual 2% dev fee and no fee option.

Not advertising it but if you want to mine BTCZ is the only miner right now as far I know.

Neoscrypt coins are more profitable too the only problem I have found with those algos is that web information is not accurate and you always end up mining far less than expected. For neoscrypt ccminer klaus (open source) does around 7150 Kh/S and Hsrminer forked by justaminer does around 7555 with same settings but paying 1.66% dev fee.

Hope it helps and gives you some ideas

Looking forward to your new miner
32  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 13, 2018, 03:16:58 PM
just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

nope this is not me, v6 work perfecly for me, v7 has some bugs and v8 work ok.

dstm i never tested in way of rejected shares, only read what console outputs and its been 0.99% accpeted. so i guess 1% reject...  so far i dont know if this is ok or not.

My mistake then, Post looked exactly similar anyway I apologise

no, problem.

anyway, has anyone compared bminer and DSTM, and EWBF lately  ...on poll side of course...  really annoying is that bminer showing 5-10% bigger hashrate  on console that is on pool ( tested and discussion made a lot but that was older versions not v8).  
i' better prefer to show real thing.. so i can easily compare what is faster for my rig.   i mean i can understand that maybe at first it inflate hashrate to make people using it, but now when we all know what is it.. it will be better to fix console to real hashrate...

I wouldn’t say is not fixed. The problem is that you have to take off the 2% dev fee plus the 1% pool fee from the hashrate in the console to get the real one and still the hashrate in the pool is estimated based on your shares so not really accurate either.

For me the reason of not using it is because with DSTM I get less rejected shares and a more constant rate on the pool like pretty much a straight line whilst with Bminer is like a roller coaster jumping all over the place.

As I said before there are more profitable coins out there so not mining ZEC anymore unless the price goes up again  
33  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 13, 2018, 12:08:07 PM
just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

First of all I don´t blame the miner I comment about it and my performance with it so it can be improved which is something different like the post I did a couple of days ago about the rejected shares that you were not able to see and commented back. Hope you were able to see the green lines by now because realbminer did and is trying to look at it.

Second I can´t say anything about ewbf because I have never used that miner, always used DSTM miner and it has always been faster for me not on the console were Bminer is faster but on the pool side with more constant hashrate and less rejected shares. So I can only talk about what I have used that is why you never see me talking about ewbf.

And finally, like many others I don´t give a shit about one miner or another don´t support any of them in particular don´t know the developers not friends why them so I just use the most convenient for me for what I want to get and like right now not using neither Bminer nor DSTM. Gave up on mining ZEC because the profit has drop like hell to 4.12 dollars/day for my rig and there are more coins out there to make bigger profits



Then I apologize to you. I just saw realbminer's posts.


No need, no harm made Wink
34  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 13, 2018, 11:28:27 AM
It took it 5 days but the transaction has finally arrived to my other exchange. As a first time experience, I will no longer use your exchange. Withdraw fees are really high, specially in BTC which is more than 10 times what other exchanges charge and on top of that it takes 5 days to get the transaction done...

You have a nice exchange with lot of functionality but it still needs a lot of improvements, specially fees and speed and that is what is most important. I am not happy paying high fees for low speed transactions thats not the point of the whole blockchain technology

Anyway, keep working hard on your proyect and I will check every now and then and If things get better I might give it anothe go.

Good luck!!
35  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 13, 2018, 10:33:53 AM
So manage to figure it out man and it seems to be working fine right now so you have another user though your advise wasn´t usefull I have to say.

It has nothing to do with the OC settings or the TDP, it was all about virtual memory. I had it set to 25000 MB so I changed it to 90000 MB and working like a rocket with 7610 kh/s with my 7 GTX 1070 Ti though after 5/10 min working it settles around 7545 kh/s
36  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 13, 2018, 10:01:46 AM

Hi man, please check that your gpus are not overclocked too much. You can try to reduce OC and/or use normal process priority version of the miner ( or specify -c 3 or -c 2 option with hp version).

Ok

Anyone knows stable OC for GTX 1070 Ti? I was using 70% TDP, +200 clock and +700 mem and seems to be crashing after 5 minutos.

Already used the -c 2 and still crashing after 5 min.

Are you sure is OC issue? Never had this problem before with these settings

I'm like 99% sure it's some hardware problem otherwise this topic would be full of same error reports. 70% tdp seems too low for me, it's neoscrypt algo and it eats a lot of gpu power. There is no point to reduce TDP much and increase clocks at the same time, because low tdp doesn't let gpu reach high core and mem clocks. Other reason can be power supply that is not providing enough power therefore gpus crash under high load.

If you are saying that mining stops after just 5 minutes, you can easily check if it's OC fault - just remove OC at all, reset gpus to default values and run miner for 5-10 minutes.

I´ll check

70% TDP is to reduce energy cost, the benefit is bigger on reducing TDP than mining 0.02 extra per hour that is the reason why. I have been mining skein, X16R, Ethash and Equihash with this settings, same OS and config and none of them crashed.

But I´ll play with it and figure it out
37  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 13, 2018, 09:48:10 AM
just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

First of all I don´t blame the miner I comment about it and my performance with it so it can be improved which is something different like the post I did a couple of days ago about the rejected shares that you were not able to see and commented back. Hope you were able to see the green lines by now because realbminer did and is trying to look at it.

Second I can´t say anything about ewbf because I have never used that miner, always used DSTM miner and it has always been faster for me not on the console were Bminer is faster but on the pool side with more constant hashrate and less rejected shares. So I can only talk about what I have used that is why you never see me talking about ewbf.

And finally, like many others I don´t give a shit about one miner or another don´t support any of them in particular don´t know the developers not friends why them so I just use the most convenient for me for what I want to get and like right now not using neither Bminer nor DSTM. Gave up on mining ZEC because the profit has drop like hell to 4.12 dollars/day for my rig and there are more coins out there to make bigger profits

38  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 13, 2018, 09:41:22 AM
just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

nope this is not me, v6 work perfecly for me, v7 has some bugs and v8 work ok.

dstm i never tested in way of rejected shares, only read what console outputs and its been 0.99% accpeted. so i guess 1% reject...  so far i dont know if this is ok or not.

My mistake then, Post looked exactly similar anyway I apologise
39  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0) on: June 12, 2018, 08:59:47 PM
just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...
40  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 12, 2018, 12:25:57 PM
Here you have the Address and only one transaction register in the blockchain




As It can be seen, It sais (U) on the amount for that address which is unspent though I made the transaction to cryptobridge and now the balance in my account in cryptohub is 0 RVN. Where is it gone?

And this is your email confirmation, which I obviously confirmed
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!