Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 06:44:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 85 »
21  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Rack Style Mining (AntRack) on: November 09, 2020, 04:39:33 PM
Welp compared to the moose this looks like a better way to move to maximize density and efficiency. Not that I'm worried bitmain would just fall off the map but they need to be transparent about their support life cycle for this.
22  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience NewPac / Terminus R606 (BM1387) Official Support Thread on: November 09, 2020, 04:22:35 PM
I'm using cgminer-windows-gekko-7f04144

just simple command with pool info and --gekko-newpac-freq 800

rn it's auto tuned down to 631mhz running 809gh/s since 11/4.

edit: w/r606
23  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ADVICE PLEASE -Which pool is best suited for miners not running 24/7? on: November 01, 2020, 04:42:29 PM
Worst possible choice - since it doesn't even allow miners ... ... ...

Is there any point spamming something that he can't mine on?

You want to mine our pool? DM me I'll get you set up. We've also been through this quite a bit though but to reiterate, I would rather not have a miner mining our pool not understanding risks then wasting their power on some sort of dumb "whattomine" expectation of returns. We'd just prefer not to waste a miners time nor ours managing unless it's worth the risk to them or we hit our base hr.
24  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ADVICE PLEASE -Which pool is best suited for miners not running 24/7? on: October 31, 2020, 07:05:15 PM
I could project earnings, but almost 1/2 the uptime on a couple s9 I would probably pps over pplns pools. I did a projection on earning for a TX miner with about 97.6% uptime, factored for them about 2PH loss but likely they're making up that revenue with their grind contracts.
25  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ADVICE PLEASE -Which pool is best suited for miners not running 24/7? on: October 31, 2020, 06:27:02 PM
I wonder how Laurentia pools slow decay would suit.
26  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: It is 2020 time for a new diff thread. on: October 31, 2020, 06:25:47 PM
Will be interesting to see what comes back online once relocation from hydro season powers back up.
27  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) on: October 24, 2020, 06:16:26 PM
I have 580 8GB, 1070 ti, 1080ti  on windows with no issues. 1080 ti is just under 39 mh/s. I tried phoenixminer and wasn't stable at all on my system and had lower hashrate than claymore on the green cards but increased on 580. 
28  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: It is 2020 time for a new diff thread. on: October 21, 2020, 11:11:21 PM
Good trend on tx fees, and market is up. Wonder how much older gear and/or higher kwh will come online if this keeps up.
29  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A10 series announced on: October 21, 2020, 11:05:57 PM
Are people still having trouble getting PSU replacements?
30  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: My new 300KW minipod... on: October 08, 2020, 08:06:45 PM
 Roll Eyes

I can't escape you Scott. Good work all around.
31  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Antminer E3 Firmware Upgrade on: September 23, 2020, 06:33:31 PM
This is the guide I found. https://cryptomining-blog.com/?s=bitmain+E3

The FW linked above is for s17 from what I saw.

Anyone have a screenshot of their "Overview" with a successful upgrade?
32  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: I am placing an order for bitmain s17 pro psu's on: September 18, 2020, 05:02:19 PM
APW9+ has been the unicorn mostly but both models have some sporadic inventory.
33  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Terminus R606 750GH (up to 1TH) quiet miner, now shipping on: September 08, 2020, 09:50:45 PM
That sounds pretty good.  I wouldn't go over 750Mhz though, per sidehacks suggestion.

Looks like it's hashing pretty well now. tunes to 700mhz on setting 7, overall average of 821gh/s running since 7:45 PM PST last night, current hour poolside is a bit over 900gh/s.

If you're using a brick, take it easy. If you've got a decent PSU on the PCIe connector, well, just don't burn the miner up. I've had test units run almost 900MHz.

Yea, it connected to my desktop's psu. 1600W.
34  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Terminus R606 750GH (up to 1TH) quiet miner, now shipping on: September 08, 2020, 12:06:49 AM
The old versions I have are 4.11.1 363d879 and 7f04144

Likely what vh gave me with the demo a little over a year ago now. Looks the like the second version above after I took "--gekko-noboost" out of the batch file is moves up closer to 800Gh/s far 25min in.

Again, original demo usb 2.0 on my 10 year old laptop running windows10. freq 800, V setting 5.
35  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Terminus R606 750GH (up to 1TH) quiet miner, now shipping on: September 07, 2020, 07:46:13 PM
getting just shy of 1 th/s on each on setting 6 and 715-730 mhz...

This is on windows10?

With the latest cgminer I was only getting about 500+ Gh. The older cgminers are on my laptop so I plugged it in there. Will give it. A few hours and see. I have a couple old versions. We’ll see what works best. On the laptop and maybe try that one on the desktop since it’s attached to the psu there.
36  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Terminus R606 750GH (up to 1TH) quiet miner, now shipping on: September 07, 2020, 04:30:10 PM
I recall it running 800-900GH when I last had it running, I just don't have the batch file anymore. I do know it was running on cgminer 4.11.1 7f04144 at the time. Still yes, was very temperamental on windows 10.
37  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Terminus R606 750GH (up to 1TH) quiet miner, now shipping on: September 06, 2020, 08:15:55 PM
Nice! I just pulled out my pc for dusting and added my r606 tester we got pre launch and have it up and running.

It's a windowx os, wondering what setting people are using on this os.
38  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Laurentia Pool - BAD risk for miners on: September 05, 2020, 08:26:08 PM
Since this thread is on repeat every post I might as well just quote myself in reply. Maybe next time I'll simply do that entirely.

We can keep going around and around but the point of this thread is to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Stemming from your malice of ck predominantly. It's obvious, was expected, and as soon as we unlocked our thread you were first in line raring to go. So who is misdirecting, who's being deceptive?

We'll just let our service and whitepaper speak for itself, feel free to disagree with our take on mining and the pooled environment as it is presented. Your critique, from your perspective holds no weight being incredibly biased, maliciously motivated, and intentionally inflammatory. Still you wonder why everything you spout is ignored.

There's no need for me to defend our whitepaper. It's simply our perspective, you can take it or leave it as it is. Just like every other in existence. There's nothing to hide or change. So embrace, consider, or get on with your life.

This thread only exists because you can't handle any genuine interaction or achieve any sort of discourse, while still continuing to manipulate the situation. As -ck is the dev for the pool and wont interact with you.

Kano wants to pretend that we're hiding something when his posts were simply deleted because he can't interact anywhere near civilly and always has -ck in his crosshairs. If he could pose a genuine query to the pool thread he wouldn't have had to come here to throw a tantrum as we would love nothing more than to have genuine, thoughtful conversation and inquiry outside this grotesque atmosphere Kano enjoys marinating in.

The gain is for your ego Kano, which includes pumping your pool and self constantly. All you're doing is baselessly slandering reputations publicly now and for what? What you call no personal gain? Then why all of this if not a "white knight'? I'm a lair, a marketing guy, out to deceive people, blinding following. . . You keep altering your narrative to suit, that's fine. Ours is always the same. You literally have no argument and it shows now that you're slandering and name calling like a child who has nothing to comeback with.

We have a great product where no one is at more risk using our service than they would be anywhere else. If anything we've eliminated risk as much as we could for all parties. We're not in the business of losing clients money, we're not in business of extreme rent seeking services. If anything we have an extremely great track record of taking care of all our clients and being very transparent.

So call me what ever you like. I'll take anything you throw at me and continue to point out your hypocrisy in fud you wish to spread and baseless lies, an now attacking my character of late. This is your bed here, sleep in it or wake up and get on with your life. But likely you'll just get bored from someone who's happy to defend themselves in public and move on to your next victim poised for harassment.

So again. .. .Please feel free to make genuine inquiries to our pool operations in our thread, for technical questions ck is our lead but will handle what I can. Again, it's our organizational expertise, the server we both picked, ck's code and maintenance. If you want to support his, our, or both our work please reach out anytime.

Kano can deflect, slander, continue spreading fud. We'll just keep this mentally ill circus going as long as he likes till he grows up and learns to interact like an adult or like I mentioned move on to his next victim. Likely someone more meek and weak cause your ego is going to need an easy win. If anything maybe he might learn some iota of professionalism and that would be a net gain for everyone here.
39  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Laurentia Pool - BAD risk for miners on: August 29, 2020, 08:06:31 PM
If it was about money likely we'd have a higher fee, gone for a high rent seeking score like pps. Looked at generic devs who just want a paycheck as well.

I don't expect everyone to fawn over what we're doing either. It would be nice if this could be more of a discussion than embarrassing ranting but I learned I can't control others along time ago and focus on what I'm doing/looking to achieve. I also could easily hammer, flame, and fud kano pool in retaliation. So consider the absence of that for a moment. 

I expect criticism, skepticism, but this is on another level. We knew this would happen and likely will continue to.

I'll put "the crap" we're going to do simply: Organize miners in a way to predict reward cadence and be paid directly from the network while looking push as much revenue we can directly to the users of our pool.
ckpool code and our support in organization is the best way we could achieve this.

If you don't agree with the whitepaper consider it an op-ed, and feel free to move along.
Still out of thousands of views we've only received minor critiques, outside Kano the Karen of btctalk. Which only solidifies the interpretation of the underlining motives of your relentless pursuit to discredit our, and more so, ck's work.

We can keep going around and around but the point of this thread is to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Stemming from your malice of ck predominantly. It's obvious, was expected, and as soon as we unlocked our thread you were first in line raring to go. So who is misdirecting, who's being deceptive? Maybe you're just being deceptive to yourself and your own motivations. idk, idc, but you're certainly all over the place and all over us.

I've directed you and others to reach out on our thread in an appropriate manner, reach out to ck directly on technicals. Which you like to twist and manipulate into being blind and following, in place of what it is, simply delivering the user experience side of service.

Our service is competitive in the current market, there's no negligence. If anything we're responsible and transparent enough to ensure every user knows exactly what they're getting into before hand. So more fud, more harassment, more malice, more slander, and still only specifically from you.

The case remains you'll flame anything ck touches, you pump yourself and your pool here consistently in almost every reply but are even consistent in this in every thread you touch on the forum. These are just very easy observations to make. Like calling me a "marketing guy" isn't deceptive or misdirection, calling Laurentia Pool negligent when no incidents have occurred, intentionally flaming our thread with accusations and assumptions. You have some weird interpretation of what it is to be a white knight if your true goal is expose some sort of wrong doing, which doesn't even exist.

I would love to have a genuine conversation with you about the pool, still because of our division of labor and expertise you are better off speaking with ck. So reach out to him if you really want to help the pool or others. Otherwise without an honest genuine effort there is clearly malice of intent/motive with every one of your posts and you simply can't deny that.

If people think we're being deceiving, disingenuous, then I wish them the best and can only say that's far from the truth.
40  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Laurentia Pool - BAD risk for miners on: August 28, 2020, 03:15:20 PM
Marketing guy? We don’t have copywriters or the such. How unsurprisingly assumptive of you to speak on what we do.

Link your site again and deflect this thread isn’t about you or your pool.

Again, this is your/Kano’s narrative.

All I communicated was the results of my and others testing. Of course the pool or miner software don’t know cause to them it doesn’t matter that a unit hashes just what it produces. which with a well operating device should be on/close to spec. And sorry I choose to convey and communicate in a manner that isn’t pompous, belittling, or assumptive of peoples intelligence. Maybe that’s what makes me a “marketing guy”, being able to communicate well to broad audiences respectfully?

Laurentia Pool statistics are like all other pools statistics which it seems you may need a refresh on the definition. They are accurate but like all, they will have variance within a tolerable range to give users insight into their operations performance.

1% is the variance that was monitored overtime. If you’d like to talk about decay I’d reach out to ck. The long decay though is optimal for our environment in a service aspect as if a commitment doesn’t decide to comeback they still have potential for reward next block allowing us to compete more inline with PPS but incentivize continued participation to retain maximum payout potential.

And yes because of the decay hr pool side will appear higher, that’s a bit obvious and known to those who are familiar. Still the pool will have a set hr every diffadj as organized and stats would be better displayed for the pool on our dashboard page.

But back to marketing all these CI’s and customs decelerations just like on Mad Men.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 85 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!