Rank- Legendary
Segwit BTC address- bc1qfn5vsd9nxu2npfescf44mzj67ah0lu7qsnfw30

Numbers from your imagination (separated by comma): 27, 53, 74.
Forum Username: Smartvirus
Bech32 address: bc1qfn5vsd9nxu2npfescf44mzj67ah0lu7qsnfw30

What was the largest bet I ever placed: I don’t intend to make that public, sorry.

What the result was: it was a in. I won on that bet and it was very refreshing and relaxing given that, I had almost lost close to that wager in the same day. How terrible was that!
So, it was typically a result of chasing my lose which is what no one should do. It defies gambling ethics and you find yourself gambling way more than you can afford to lose.

So I had lost a considerable amount of money on my previous bets and it was very unsettling for me, I wasn’t willing to let them go and I dared myself to taking yet another bet, doubled my stake and went for a 2 odd in the 1X2 market. It was a stake on Barcelona and I won.

Don’t try that though, one wrong move and your way up your head!

Well, that’s something that shouldn’t be but, you never can tell if you haven’t tried right?
For all we know, it could only read on the adjustable meter and once the bet is placed, it might automatically reject the transaction or rest to an acceptable minimum. That’s my best guess!

I have had to try a deposit way beyond maximum at any one time before and though the meter allowed me to set my parameters, it rejected on authorization. Same goes to placing a bet at one time. Did this using a local bookie and the stake was rejected.

Possibly, in the absence of a clear maximum stake which I’m not sure is none existent, the system would be there to limit what stake is acceptable within the maximum win. Let me read BC.Games T&C to verify on maximum stake.

Without any clear lines, I think this could apply in cases as stated in OP. Quote from BC.Games T&C.

Just to add and keep things a lot simple;

Archived accounts generally is based on the inactivity on such accounts and it isn’t restricted to accounts that were once active but even brand new accounts that may for some reason not have any activity on them for a long time could be archived too.

Ban on the other hand counts for someone whom has broken some vital forum rules and it might come in the form of a temporal ban which counts in a couple of weeks or months even, it could even apply to some of your forum spaces like the signature space and ban could be permanent too.

Ban evasion on the other hand comes in the form of, any activity from a banned user in other to access those services for which he was banned from participating in. That is, you got a permanent ban and you go ahead to create a new account, your evading ban but, it remains unknown until you’re caught.

Means to catching these:
You’re able to establish a clear trace from posting patterns, wallet address and other means available to you prove the inevitable. The penalty for ban evasion is having that new account banned. In essence, the ban of account isn’t just about the user but the person behind the user.

Oh yeah, found it. Kind of you cryptofrka, Ireland did me dirty with a red thus far, had double thoughts on that one.
Sure would keep up and clearly waiting on next season.

It’s a forum sub board inclusion suggestion and as such, I think meta is the right place for such thread and I feel it’s a good suggestion.

Although, I don’t think it would be best we have a sub board for this. A different approach could apply. A system of arrangement as it’s used in the other languages board which,
We could have a pinned posts right there on the service board.
Users who wants to have these and that charity programs or campaigns would have to keep it posted there and updated.

That way, it doesn’t get washed up by the various active paid options and one looking to participate don’t get to search for long.

I don’t think anyone would advertise a service that is against forum policy and not get temp ban at list. A fee have gotten this in the past for free giveaways, consenting to participate by application and participation. I think it would be very much applicable should any manager come up with a mixer. So, it ain’t really about the services here but, the participants and patterns to management.

One thing remains true though, when you’re brought to the scale or your participants so many times, it becomes a spoken truth that there is something there and should be looked up.

Easy man, lol… am sure you understand Yahoo62278 to mean it quite differently.
Managers have got the criteria to look out for in selections and times of the opener of a campaign, a few accounts increasingly becomes active, a few wakeups and all. You find them active and having turn overs of posts with some considerable quality but, once accepted, their true nature emerges.

As well as having to report these posts, a few managers have come up with the report to manager format for close observation, removal, blacklist and tagging of these users.

I think Yahoo62278 implemented a one merit earn per week qualification for users to retain spot in his campaign. As users whom tends to earn merits are more likely to be good posters. A few spammers might have their ways around this but, it’s where the rest of the forum comes in.

Especially, when you’ve got multitudes to manage and a high posts work load to evaluate, managers becomes a little sloppy on the job I think. Hence, having a minimal range of posts per week would make for efficient reviews too.

It’s said that, one who makes a lot of posts per day by weeks is more likely to spam than those that posts very little. This comes to play mainly when you’re posting to meet up with the set quota.

I only got to visit the website only today and what I could find is a broken website like you said, it really is broken and have got zero form up to this moment. How terrible could that be and I wonder how OP could make any promises or even compare it with any website at all!

@OP, the pattern you’ve chosen to tackle these reputation issues is a means to bury your formless website as it is. How do you even try to give any credibility to such. You really ought to stay calm and fix your website so, any visit would meet a functional website rather than the broken state which it is now as that ruins any hope of getting any % of gamblers on here from visits.

Your doing it wrong and it ain’t helping you @OP.

Seeking differentials in going against what is clear to your eyes have been some means I lost on good bets. It’s a chasing the odd or though, it’s of a different context here.
Of course I did put up some predictions in this round even though, am good to go for next season and I must say, am pleased to see, reading these on here that, some of my predictions as I could recall a few did play out.

Unfortunately, I can’t recall on all of them but, any means by which one could access the spreadsheet on my individual answers to this just for follow ups? Some of these was a cointoss like cryptofrka has said although, I did my findings and used what I had on them from statistics and who’s favorites to bookies.

I still fined the forum to have improved over the years given that, come the population as we’ve got now, it’s sure to have its dose of troubles too. Though, it doesn’t mean the forum isn’t great anymore, it still is. We have users confined in a niche that, you need to be well grounded to participate ot willing to learn else, you just wouldn’t fit in. I say this with particular reference to the technical discussion board.

While the early adopters was curious, interested about the technology, discussed it with each other and hoped to see it transformed to something great, they still do exists on the forum and a few new users still number in this capacity while, a lot of others just want to make turn overs after turn overs, milking the technology and giving nothing back. Not even some literal piece to improve on what’s available.
Instead, you find users looking out for the next AI to help their course!
Good thing we’ve got users dedicated to tracking these, report and neg tag as it applies. It’s been effective and the fight continues but, this is what happens when you have increased participation and a rapid development in technology.

All that doesn’t mean the forum isn’t great. Rules are still very effective and it’s toxic to law breakers still.

Something I appreciate you for the fee I do read from you, how you state your truth and make it look simple. Even when some would hope you wouldn’t accept the obvious since all that could be needed is just a statement but, that too could be discredited by the other party who holds the other end of the whip.

So, the maybe and the No, does go.

The light in which this is coming might not be so bright but as I see it, it was an open end discussion but, with the forum been a box full of intellects, dots would be connected, inferences would be made and some positive relativism would be generated as well as some negations. All you could do is accept what you will and clear up on the negations.

It’s largely what shouldn’t be as, it would confine what is acceptable, don’t give room for creativity and this could apply in a wide range too. Just a matter of getting few piece to make sense, a foe to case to case judgements.

This remains a strategy come up with campaign managers that ought to work, especially when the evidence is overwhelming but, I don’t know what the responses are like though, I’ve seen some managers action reports as they are received. I wouldn’t name names but yeah, it’s a nice way to handle spam and spammers too, even as you report them posts to moderators.

It’s what you get when them both aren’t equally match. It’s the UCL and hoping to see a worn out underdog come up with something spectacular against an inform and fit Real Madrid, we weren’t going to see that and we didn’t. It’s just Ancelotti’s play book over again. Observe the pressure in the first and dominate them in the second half.

Yeah, a win by aggregate. They pulled out a last minute trick like Sergio Ramos does for Real Madrid in the plus minutes when he played in that team. Only that, it was in the extra time with this one. Metz did great in holding them that long but, having to conceive with barely 4 minutes on the clock to a penalty shootout, lays waste all that effort from the 6th minute of regular time.
They impressed me but, sold the game cheaply at last.

That was yet another good call from the VAR team, not only did he bump into the goalkeeper, he tripped a defender afterwards with a slightly raised leg. It’s should be disallowed but, there is a little unrest in the stadium as fans are experiencing some indiscipline, throwing snacks at the St. Etienne player to impede a smooth corner kick.
Metz understand the risk with a 3:3 on aggregate game, one man down and St. Etienne trying to press forward. The pressure is gradually mounting and the game is very much open. One goal is all there is to save either team.

Am not so sure they fit the bill for league 1 next season. Not with how they’ve handled the game this far, although it doesn’t entirely depend on just one game but, with such an early red card from a VAR review, Metz is already one man down, you would expect St. Etienne to capitalize on this and be the dominant side in the game but, they go ahead to conceive two goals of which one was a penalty.
They managed to get a goal before the second half but, second half is in play now, I’ll like to see how they leverage the red card situation to their advantage.

@cryptofrka, should you want to stream the game, score808.tv have got a channel for live-streaming.

That was obviously going to be an easy pick as, there was no way Real Madrid, wasn’t going to convert this to another trophy season for them. With Toni Kroos and Luka Modric looking to get their last and make a long lasting final impression on the team and their career.
Real Madrid did it for you in the end, gave you that 3 points. Hope the round is won!

Lol… the mini champions league. Everyone Looking for yet another promotion to Division A really. I just want to get my head right in the game, it’s calling.

I wasn’t going to take any bets on the UCL finals, I think my best prediction was going to be a both team score but wait, it’s the UCL finals where both teams are going to play it safe, trying not to conceive any early goals, try to ware the other team out with one half only to attack in the second and that was what happened. It’s a card Dortmund shouldn’t have played against Real Madrid.
I was going to give them a first half result or at least for Real Madrid to have a goal in first half as they’ve always done with almost some consistency but, it’s the UCL final, you’ve got to hope for some change in the strategy. They had to bring all that attacking power to the second half and got 2 goals.
You chased the odds mate!

Ronaldo lost in with Al Nassr in the King’s cup while, Real Madrid wins yet another UCL, what does that say..,
His Mr. UCL alright, lol…

It’s great news with this promotion, having to have the red and white stripes back in the EPL to give me that both team score prediction market once more. They’ve really done good to fight their way back in and have to show so much courage as Newcastle.
This also goes a long way to put Sportsbet.io back at the front of the EPL promotions, congrats both y’all @Southampton @Sportsbet.io.

Already lost my bet days back in a multi but, Dortmund 0:2 Real Madrid was going to be another rogued one haven’t taken a both team score prediction.

Like you’ve almost noted, the casino is as prestigious as you’ve noted and no better way to entice its house without promotions. There is a lot of on going promotions in play, numbering about 5 or more if am not mistaken. If you notr on the home page, you’ll find a couple of floating adverts and even the top right column have got a promo icon to click and pick out options.

There is a loyalty Rakebake promo offering up to 20% of your wager, the 99 promo which offers you a chance to win $15k and to join the 99 exclusive club after having attained a daily 99mBTC requirement and a couple of other promotions. T&C applies so, you’ll be sure to go through that on the promotions of interest.

There were many talks on either Courtois was going to be featured in this UCL finals and Ancelotti didn’t want to spill but, only put out the possibilities and then surprised everyone by allowing Courtois to start. All the pre-match interviews was a means to get Courtois into his best which was very visible on the peach by the many saves he made for Real Madrid, never letting the Adeyemi have a one on one chance with him, running up at the attack just before it fully forms.

One player with a perfect touch all game was Toni Kroos, having both his German side and Spanish side to entertain, he indeed made every set piece he took spectacular. His free kicks were just a tip of the fingers away from goal, perfectly tipped right over the wall with just enough momentum, forcing Gregor Kobel the goalkeeper every time to come up with a near goal save.
He sort for to make a lasting picture of his last appearance and his Carvajal assist made it for him.

So many missed chances for Dortmund and I can say their inexperience at a game like this got the best of them. At least they got the silver wear but, it’s been a long walk for them.

Numbers from your imagination (separated by comma): 27, 53, 74.
Forum Username: Smartvirus
Bech32 address: bc1qfn5vsd9nxu2npfescf44mzj67ah0lu7qsnfw30