 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
Ordered 4 for the team  Very cool. |
|
|
|
The features keep coming! Timezone support added You can now set your timezone and view your stats in your local time. All notification messages will also come with the correct timestamp. Enjoy! |
|
|
|
Our new international SMS delivery agent is integrated and tested!
We now support SMS delivery to the US, Canada and over 200 other countries! Miningmonitor.com - The best in worker monitoring, notifications, and analytics. |
|
|
|
Password reset is broken. Also getting miner down emails every 30 mins even though the miner that is being monitored rarely goes 60 seconds without a share and has never gone >120 seconds. Want to disable the notifications but forget the password and can't reset.
Password reset is fixed, and your reset email sent. Thanks for spotting that! |
|
|
|
Perhaps Tuesday is a good day for features!
Secondary SMS number Now, you can set a secondary SMS number for SMS notifications. Have a second person who you want to get notified if workers go down? Automagically they can get notifications also. Pool Wide Monitoring Have a lot of workers? Want to receive just one message when workers go down? Now you can! If ANY monitored workers for a pool go down, you can receive one sms/email telling you. You can also control the maximum number of notifications and how often you get them. Bitclockers Pool Support! Bitclockers is now supported by MiningMonitor.
We thank all of our users for their suggestions and support! |
|
|
|
Working on a modified version of pheonix, but it's very low on the Todo list.... Is there anything in there for solo mining ?
If I get that right,;
12 1 btc yearly account I get me total of 600 sms and can monitor 36 worker ?
12 x 50 Free SMS Credits
12 x 3 Monitored Workers
12 Pool Account
Minus the hassle of managing many accounts.
Well, you could... Or a single Platinum account for 10btc a year + 1 btc of SMS credits 700 SMS Unlimited Workers Unlimited Pools <edit>2 minute updates vs 10 minute updates</edit> And only have to manage a single account, and save a BTC/year off your proposed 12 accounts. |
|
|
|
Hey there. I went ahead and signed up. I noticed that the pricing when you create an account vs. when you upgrade is different. You should check that out. It turns out I picked the right package.
I would like to setup multiple text-message destinations; to more than one phone. If that's possible please send me a PM. I've got about 30 GPUs and I'd like to cover my bases by letting two people know when something goes wrong so that a restart can happen ASAP.
Thanks!
Thanks for spotting that! The buttons had been updated, but the text still had references to the older pricing. It's been fixed. PM sent to make sure I understand what you are asking about for the notifications. |
|
|
|
Jack, You're got a touch of precognition in you. Our original pricing was based off of Pingdom ( the service we use to monitor our servers ) , and was not quite right for mining.
MiningMonitor Pricing Finalized! Based on feedback from our users, the finalized pricing for MiningMonitor has been released. Major changes:The Silver account can now monitor 6 workers, double from before. Now the majority of the smaller miners can use a silver account and watch all of their workers. Gold Users can now monitor and get analytics for UNLIMITED workers and pools! Platinum is yearly only now. For 10btc you get 2 minute updates, 300 starting sms credits and refills of 200 sms for 0.5btc. For the price of the original Gold yearly account, you get much, much more! All existing paid members have been upgraded to the new limits!If you've been waiting to try out MiningMonitor.com now is the time to do it! |
|
|
|
New Features on a Sunday! Based on the requests of some of our users, we added the following new features: Quick Stats Bar Get an quick overview of your workers when you first login! See your monitored workers ( and if any are down ), combined hash rate, confirmed BTC sitting on your pool accounts, and the overall status of your notifications! Performance Tracking Notifications <EDIT>Picture to reflect failure count fix</EDIT> A new notification type! If your workers shares drop below a certain percentage of the average, you get a notification! Great for making sure that none of your workers are overheating! -- We pride ourselves on providing excellent customer support and giving YOU the features that you need to maximize your mining income. If your not a member, try us out today! MiningMonitor.com |
|
|
|
|
Backburn,
Sure... I'll take a look at adding it this week!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm...
I run 7 5830's, all at about 300mh/s , and all of them average out to around 250 shares per hour submitted.
So if that's what the OP is talking about, then sure it's possible.
|
|
|
|
|
That snippet has the current PPS price of 0.00003262705594458 , if the difficulty goes up you'll have to change the PPS price.
|
|
|
|
PPS is consistant, and often in the short term pays higher. Prop is variable, but in the longer term pays better. If you have linux/mac you can see what the short term looks like by cutting and pasting the right column of your account screen into a text file.  And then running the following Perl snippet at the command line perl -e 'foreach(<>) { next if $_ !~ /\//; next if $_ =~ /s/;chomp $_; ($shares,$round) = split(/ \/ /,$_); $t += $shares; $r += $round; $a++;print "$shares - $round - $a $t $r\n";} print "PPS: " . $t * 0.00003262705594458 . "\n"; print "Prop: " . $t / $r * (50*$a*.97);print "\n$a"' < THEFILEYOUPASTEDINTO( yes, this is dirty... you could golf it into a much smaller string ) You get a result like: 652 - 1777330 - 1 652 1777330
237 - 668290 - 2 889 2445620
1938 - 5175963 - 3 2827 7621583
1395 - 3762791 - 4 4222 11384374
734 - 1905344 - 5 4956 13289718
402 - 1098795 - 6 5358 14388513
204 - 496501 - 7 5562 14885014
PPS: 0.181471685163754
Prop: 0.126859067784552
7
As you can see, over the last 7 blocks, it would have paid .06 more to be PPS for me. But over the long term, Prop starts to take the lead. |
|
|
|
|
For me at least, after a lot of fiddling, I found a solution to the rate hoping problem.
Im Using Linuxcoin 0.2a with a machine that has 2x5830 ( technically 3 machines, but all are running linux coin with identical hardware )
The problem is the aggression setting on the first card. While you lose a touch of speed off the first card, the second becomes rock steady.
Using pheonix I do something like:
Card 1 ( primary ):
DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOPS=true
Card 2 ( primary ):
DEVICE=1 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
Make sure you add in all your other standard options
This gives me 298mh/s on card one and 301 on card2 ... both rock steady and shares submitted / accepted averages out to be almost exactly the same ( indicating similar hashing rates With identical overclocking settings ( 1010mhz, 300mhz ram, 1.125v ))
|
|
|
|
|
The site must be a joke...
The last comment is by "Charles Ponzi" ... the person the Ponzi scheme is named for.
|
|
|
|
New Feature Friday! Based on feedback from early users, the following new features were added. Bitcoinpool.com Support ( Note, bitcoinpool support is in beta... seems ok, but not enough data to make sure that nothing flakey happens with the api responses resulting in custom filters needing to be added to massage the data ) Ability to turn Notifications on/off This also removes the "Notifications Unconfigured" message if you disable notifications Ability to hide the Zero-SMS message notice Thanks for the support and suggestions, keep them coming! Peter Azuolas Lead Developer MiningMonitor.com - Monitoring, SMS Notifications and Advanced Analytics |
|
|
|
Hmmm.... the free account is all but useless if you have more than one worker, right? I might consider buying the full account, but I sure wish there was a way to see at least the pool stats accurate for all of my workers combined in the free account.
I must have been making my changes while you wrote your message Give the new 3 day full trial a try. Peter Azuolas Lead Developer MiningMonitor.com |
|
|
|
I have 30 workers, there's no way for me to test this out for a month before committing the most expensive package? I don't see the value in monitoring one graphics card, even as a test. Why does it cost more PER worker? You only have to access the API page once every 20 minutes and store the data for each worker.
The free account is designed to allow an individual to "taste" the services we provide. It was based around the request of a tester to have an account for ( and I quote ) "the dude in his dorm that wants to know if his gaming box stops making him money while he is f*****g off down the hall" The cost is based on a per worker basis from the aspect of storage of their data, and the statistical "crunching" that must be done for each one. It's not bad idea to have a "full trial", so here is what I did: All paid accounts have a "provisional period" of 2 hours to allow for delays in getting confirmations of payments. A provisional account has 15 minute updates, and notifications turned off, but all other features of the account. I've extended the provisional status time window to three days to allow for a trial. The copy on the join page will be edited this afternoon. Thanks for the advice! The spot pirce is still based on MtGox ? Why isn't it based on TradeHill?
That was an oversight, and has been corrected. Thanks for pointing it out. Both the spot price and weighted averages are provided by Bitcoincharts.com , which we thank them for. I would be happy to evaluate this and share what I think about it if I could monitor my entire network for a week or two.
Thanks
Please give the new 3 day trial a go... I would think that 3 days is more then enough time to decide if there is value in the services we provide. Peter Azuolas Lead Developer MiningMonitor |
|
|
|
and thanks for sending my password clear text in the welcome e-mail
It is not uncommon for the initial "welcome" email to contain your username and password, especially for websites that do not keep credit card information. Assuming your email remains secure, your only concern with an emailed password is a "man in the middle" due to the fact that email is transmitted in plaintext. The password is stored in the database as a per user salted hash, so if you do a "password lookup" , it emails you a onetime key to login and be able to change it. Once again, this is vulnerable to a "man in the middle" , but given it's one time usability , less so. Seeing as how it was simply a design issue to include the password in the email, and this is a security conscious community, I removed it. Peter Azuolas Lead Developer MiningMonitor.com |
|
|
|
|
