|
Why does augmented reality need its own coin? Why can't bitcoin be used instead? Will there need to be coins for keyboards, mice, toasters etc?
|
|
|
|
Scammin' 2.0 - Electric Boogaloo  I'm sure the SEC will be excited and watching closely... |
|
|
|
Bet he hasn't withdrawn that 'ROI' from scrypt.cc
No, far better to take that profit and re-invest it straight back in to the scheme, then you'll make so much more. It's like compounding profit!!11!!1!!!eleventy!!!!
I don't get how the muggles can finally see that we weren't fudders or trolls at all and that the whole Hashlet/XPY scam was just a ponzi designed to keep them from withdrawing their funds and, ideally, to encourage them to keep buying in even deeper, yet they can't see that scrypt.cc is even more an obvious Ponzi scheme than Garza's .png sale.
Chances are he is well aware and is just making up the stories to gain referrals. Confront any of those "ROIed" customers and ask for numbers/TX IDs/etc - likely you'll get something like "oh but I made profit trading". indeed. the only way to ROI at these ponzi types is to not invest anything, get referrals and make them pay. And its exactly why i hate the gawtards and im happy they deserve everything from this. Ppl who still hold the bags are trying to get suckers to buy in..... Like the Dr. Cunt piece of shit. He only distance himself from Josh for his " image" to get more suckers. Basically that describes everyone who says..." I believe in paycoin". They all know its a scam but the only way to get anything back is to lurk more idiots in. Scumbags dont deserve sympathy. May their soul rest in hell. Then the new suckers who get dragged in have to do the same to try to recover their losses and you just end up with this feedback loop of a scam machine fucking over everyone in its sights. |
|
|
|
Anyone still trying to help these gawtards after page 1600 is also sorta nuts. I am only here now to see this meltdown and remaining gawtards getting hurt to hell so they will make better decisions in the future. As I see it, if these gawtards recover from this scam they will just get involved in another fuckup in the near future and we will have to deal with another 1800+ pages of evidence before some of them wake up.
No kidding:  Look at the signature. "Recoup your losses". Also this is one of the CoinStand customers. Bet he hasn't withdrawn that 'ROI' from scrypt.cc No, far better to take that profit and re-invest it straight back in to the scheme, then you'll make so much more. It's like compounding profit!!11!!1!!!eleventy!!!! I don't get how the muggles can finally see that we weren't fudders or trolls at all and that the whole Hashlet/XPY scam was just a ponzi designed to keep them from withdrawing their funds and, ideally, to encourage them to keep buying in even deeper, yet they can't see that scrypt.cc is even more an obvious Ponzi scheme than Garza's .png sale. Old habits die hard, they'll likely continue to burn money like this until they have none left to burn. |
|
|
|
|
Well this was a flop by the looks of it...
|
|
|
|
The lottery idea is a really interesting concept, will watch this one  |
|
|
|
|
You state major retailer adoption in your roadmap. Who are you in talks with for that, what is the current status of those talks and why is June 4th the day that this happens?
|
|
|
|
|
It makes no difference, they're both shitcoins so who even cares.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the reason that people hate coingen so much is because it's the same old cookie cutter crap with a different sticker on it. If all you're going to do for a relaunch is just cloning some random coin then it doesn't really make much difference if you use coingen or not, the end result is the same. Rather than launching a coin that you don't understand technically you'd be better off experimenting in a test environment, coming up with some new features and creating a coin that has new features that people want and value. If you want to create a coin like the hundreds of others that are dead after the first couple of weeks then continue as you were.
|
|
|
|
This certainly won't end in tears  |
|
|
|
The quantity of Fusion is limited. Mining becomes more difficult over time, less and less is produced. With increased usage and wider adoption of Fusion over time, the demand for Fusions will be increasing.
With a constant supply and increasing demand, the only factor in the equation that can budge is the price of Fusion – by going up.
Hence, assuming increased demand, the Fusion's price gradually increases during the long-term.
Yes, but you don't say how you will generate that demand. Of course it's basic economics that if demand goes up then the value will go up, but that's the same for every coin. You still need to offer something special to create that demand and therefore create that value, I don't see anything that can do that in the ANN. What is it? Also putting the source on github like every other serious coin would be a good idea... |
|
|
|
If its not for you DON'T invest , we are well aware of peoples thoughts on such projects, like i said you leap or you don't its up to you,
Two of our 3 man team are hero members on this very forum but due to possible conflicts in other areas of crypto we will not be releasing our ID until launch day.. Id, Wallet, Full roadmap
If you believe in the concept then by all means invest, if not thanks for looking and see you on the moon :p
They are hero members, but you won't tell who until the BTC is in. Not sure if you are serious saying things like these in the current alt situation where there are 2x the amount of scams than legit projects. Agreed, if they are in fact on this project I wouldn't see it as a conflict of interest to go public with that from now and use their position to push the coin, I'd see it as more of a concern that they weren't confident enough in the project if they didn't do that. |
|
|
|
Paycoin is worth 9 cents now. Cheap coins, omnomnom. BUY!  You're kidding right? It's still way over valued imo, the market cap is still above $1 million... Of course I'm kidding. I wouldn't touch that shitcoin with a 100 meter pole. I'm glad, I'd hate to see investors commit financial suicide by touching this shit. A better investment for those actually considering it would be just deleting your bitcoin wallet, it speeds things up  |
|
|
|
Paycoin is worth 9 cents now. Cheap coins, omnomnom. BUY! You're kidding right? It's still way over valued imo, the market cap is still above $1 million... |
|
|
|
|
What does isla stand for?
|
|
|
|
|
Why even bother? Nobody would touch this shit lol
|
|
|
|
This thread is starting to feel like shill city  |
|
|
|
if you look at coinmarketcap.com and check Xaurum coin, it has 1000 coins and a price of 0.56 btc.
LXY total coins are 500 coins with only 387.5 ICO coins , that means 1 LXY will be worth more than 1 btc (current price 200 satoshi)
In the real world it doesn't work like that, see Paycoin for a real world example. Sure you can make a coin insanely over valued like that for a very short period of time but the market will always correct it, like how the Paycoin market cap went from around $200 million to $2 million in months and even at that it's still way over valued in my opinion. Bitcoin's is going through the same. Way over valued. Indeed, Bitcoin is not immune to these pressures either. Pretending that they don't exist however is pure fantasy and a sure fire way to lose money. |
|
|
|
What makes this coin any different than all the other SHA-256 coins? It just seems cookie cutter.
Take it or leave it simple ! So that answer is nothing, it IS a cookie cutter shitcoin. All I was asking was for you to sell the idea of your coin to an investor like myself yet you're incapable of doing that or have no confidence in it, so I will indeed leave it and watch the chart plunge hard if it ever gets on an exchange |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
