|
Is there still a 21 million LIMX limit?
|
|
|
|
While evan is going to move away from the masternode model (supposedly).
Is there any evidence of this? I've never heard anything about it. He said he is going to move the anonymization on to the protocol level so mixing at the masternode level is not needed anymore. Masternodes will however do the work of quorums i.e. instant transactions (which will be on by default iirc) and decentralized API. When and where did he say this? |
|
|
|
While evan is going to move away from the masternode model (supposedly).
Is there any evidence of this? I've never heard anything about it. |
|
|
|
Because I had answers or things to say about some of those questions. I did say above it "I'm not CryptoClub, but:" Disinformation is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. Please identify a specific example of me spreading disinformation relating to VNL. |
|
|
|
(I believe it is no longer the case that the source is not available, but I'm not positive.)
Why do you even comment without doing your research? You are no better than the 0 activity trolls in most threads. The project is open source, google: vanillacoin + github Was it hard? I believe the zero-time code is not yet open-source, right? |
|
|
|
Nice try, but your DISINFO is not going to work here.
P.S.
You skipped numbers - 1, 2, 5, and 9 - "Presumably" on purpose
Not really sure what DISINFO you mean; can you elaborate please? "1. Early on you mentioned getting your friend to do a code review on Vanilla...(This was pre ZeroTime back then)" It's not my friend; I don't really know about this. "2. You mentioned that your friend looked over the code and could see NO reason why it wasn't original with all the detailed code" I don't know about this as it wasn't my friend or me who were involved. "5. Did your friend then look over neutered code on git without even talking to IRC crowd and John...lets just go blind on this...lol" I don't know about this, but it doesn't really seem like IRC is the place for sensible discussion. I've seen logs and it's just like this thread -- Hypers or zombies caught in a cult of personality rabidly attacking anyone with questions or criticism, shouting "FUD FUD FUD!" with no clue of what they're talking about. And dev isn't much better in that regard. "9. I will continue to laugh at people like you who want to be crypto famous on twitter and facebook(barf) while standing on the skulls of others" Doesn't sound like you're very grateful to him for attempting to get a code review organised. Are code reviews of VNL code unwelcome? |
|
|
|
too much whales on VNL pumping and dumping playing with alot of BTC's
Even (IF) zero time will be released it is already calculated in price....
really sad that whales fuck up everything
You think a coin that has solved double spending and confirms under a second is valued right at 1m marketcap? hahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha what whales? The vol is like 50btc meanwhile Eth has a VOL over 5,000btc! We don't know that VNL has solved these issues yet. That's not FUD. Take VNL to any researcher in the field and ask them if VNL has solved the double-spending problem and whether zerotime is everything it's claimed to be. Their answers will all be "I don't know because I can't see the code. And isn't there a more detailed whitepaper?" How is this FUD? |
|
|
|
You still seem confused. Let me try once again to clarify. The code can be compiled to run on any of the systems you mentioned originally. I understand your concern is that you want to compile the iOS version so that you know you are getting the correct wallet not a manipulated one. What you seem to not be wanting to accept is that it CAN be compiled on iOS IF you happen to have the ability to do so but this would be a huge pain in the ass. What people actually do in practice is compile things on their workstations for whatever platform and then run it on the respective platform. Nothing that dev does aside from writing a compiler for your platform is going to make the process any easier.
Just to summarize once more, you can go ahead and compile it for whatever hardware you want, on whatever you are able to. The ability to compile it ON a certain device is not a limitation of the code.
OK great, but how is that different to other coins? The graphic claimed that no other cryptocurrency could do this. Another poster in this thread is claiming that he has done this with other coins. if you look back the person who runs that twitter took the time to respond to your concerns in this very thread. It's directly above the message of mine you quoted.
OK thanks, I didn't notice that from traumschiff. Would be good if you guys worked with the graphic creator to create and post a more accurate new infographic about VNL's unique features. I'm having trouble figuring out what the actual real features of this coin so far are, (and I don't trust zerotime yet,) but presumably there is something good happening if Polo are accepting VNL with only 1 confirmation. Would be good if there was some clear info about this out there. |
|
|
|
This does not make any sense. After talking to John "Who says I am anonymous" Conner, I have sold. I went to trouble to get someone to code review, and there is fake code? It was embarrassing, and I don't even grasp why anyone would do that. This might be the most amazing coin ever, but with him being anon and not wanting anyone else on the team, and being manic depressive, or autistic, or something, it will make things very difficult. Maybe he is a true genius, but these are very bad decisions and they cast too much reasonable doubt about the project. Why would he get more attention after he wasted people's time? That isn't how the world works.
1. Early on you mentioned getting your friend to do a code review on Vanilla...(This was pre ZeroTime back then) 2. You mentioned that your friend looked over the code and could see NO reason why it wasn't original with all the detailed code 3. There was never an official report released by "your friend" 4. Where is there fake code? The ZeroTime branch on git is from like a month ago. We all knew that John was still working on it and uploading content. 5. Did your friend then look over neutered code on git without even talking to IRC crowd and John...lets just go blind on this...lol 6. The ZeroTime code is on testnet right now...and there is a bounty to prove a double-spend attack 7. John has 50,000 lines of ZeroTime code to upload and is currently doing so on git 8. Don't character attack people that you don't know...it's rude 9. I will continue to laugh at people like you who want to be crypto famous on twitter and facebook(barf) while standing on the skulls of others I'm not CryptoClub, but: 3. There was never an official report released by "your friend"
Presumably his friend did not bother finishing a report, if he was writing one, as the code was revealed to be 'fake'. 4. Where is there fake code? The ZeroTime branch on git is from like a month ago. We all knew that John was still working on it and uploading content.
The fake code was on github: https://twitter.com/john_a_connor/status/629905689075253248I've never seen so many #shitcoin #liars ever. I post fake ZT code to call them out and it worked. Show me this non-exploit LOLZ. 6. The ZeroTime code is on testnet right now...and there is a bounty to prove a double-spend attack
The 'code' is not now on testnet per se, but the binaries. The code is not available. 7. John has 50,000 lines of ZeroTime code to upload and is currently doing so on git
50,000 lines sounds like a lot, but it should take less than 10 minutes to upload. 8. Don't character attack people that you don't know...it's rude
Looks to me like John A. Connor's being the rude one. Look at his tweets. |
|
|
|
it is an unofficial twitter with a grammatical error. Who cares? Go ahead and compile it on whatever you want. How is this an issue?
Well there's a lot of misinformation around about VNL and I wanted this cleared up. I didn't know whether it was true or not. Turns out it's not. Also it doesn't even seem that a gramatically-corrected version of the claim would be completely true, from what's been said in this thread. Doesn't anyone know who runs the @vanillanewsbits twitter so we can get him to clean up these mistakes? Often these kinds of news feeds for altcoins are ran by online friends of the dev or community leaders. |
|
|
|
But he showed a lot of so called experts were in fact scammy FUDers....you should be calling out them not a John Connor for exposing them....Personally I thought it was a great move. I would do something similar in his position if I had thought of it.
What do you mean? Who did JC expose as a scammy FUDder? |
|
|
|
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11. Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github. John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever. So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw. But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin. Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers. |
|
|
|
If you're not a developer, you will not be compiling it at any time. It's listed because it is something that is unique to this coin's code.
I am a developer, though not really a crypto developer. I would be interesting in hearing about what properties of this code make it compilable on platforms that other cryptocurrency wallets are not compilable on. I understand that VNL is apparently more energy-efficient in some way? One wouldn't expect that to affect compilation though! The code is a complete rewrite of bitcoin and peercoin. It is not a clone like the VAST majority of cryptocurrencies. Hop on IRC if you want to try to get more in depth. Sorry, I don't want to expose my IP by going on IRC. I think it's most likely that these particular claims of vanillanewsbits are mistaken. It should be clarified whether or not this is an official VanillaCoin account (i.e. whether it is supported by the dev or not) and corrections made if so. To clarify, I'm taking about this part: Can be compiled on any platform, including Windows, Mac OS, Linux, Android, iOS, game consoles, etc. No other cryptocurrency can do this. No that is not the official twitter. The truth is that it can be compiled for any of those platforms but I really doubt anyone is too worried about compiling the code on their xbox. A shame -- It would have been great if wallet code could finally practically be compiled on and for these platforms. Then we wouldn't have the problem where iOS users don't know what code they're running. Anyway, I hope it gets corrected soon then  |
|
|
|
If you're not a developer, you will not be compiling it at any time. It's listed because it is something that is unique to this coin's code.
I am a developer, though not really a crypto developer. I would be interesting in hearing about what properties of this code make it compilable on platforms that other cryptocurrency wallets are not compilable on. I understand that VNL is apparently more energy-efficient in some way? One wouldn't expect that to affect compilation though! The code is a complete rewrite of bitcoin and peercoin. It is not a clone like the VAST majority of cryptocurrencies. Hop on IRC if you want to try to get more in depth. Sorry, I don't want to expose my IP by going on IRC. I think it's most likely that these particular claims of vanillanewsbits are mistaken. It should be clarified whether or not this is an official VanillaCoin account (i.e. whether it is supported by the dev or not) and corrections made if so. To clarify, I'm taking about this part: Can be compiled on any platform, including Windows, Mac OS, Linux, Android, iOS, game consoles, etc. No other cryptocurrency can do this. |
|
|
|
If you're not a developer, you will not be compiling it at any time. It's listed because it is something that is unique to this coin's code.
I am a developer, though not really a crypto developer. I would be interesting in hearing about what properties of this code make it compilable on platforms that other cryptocurrency wallets are not compilable on. I understand that VNL is apparently more energy-efficient in some way? One wouldn't expect that to affect compilation though! |
|
|
|
No other coin can be compiled on Android or iOS. What does this mean for you? It means you can take the wallet off your iOS device or Android wallet and use it on your desktop wallet. The iOS wallet is used by a number of people and it's on Apple TestFlight. If you want to use the iOS wallet, just hop on IRC and ask xcore or tom_ewok for an invitation. I'm not really sure what you mean sorry. Perhaps you mean that the wallet.dat is portable between desktop and mobile OSs? When I use Apple TestFlight, am I actually compiling code? I just looked up Apple TestFlight and I don't see any mention that it lets you compile code. Yes, you can put your wallet.dat on your desktop and use it with your desktop client. Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Apple TestFlight is like Apple's Appstore for beta programs. Did you get an invite to use the wallet from IRC? I didn't get any invites. It's good that the wallet.dat is portable :-) I'm asking about the specific claims made in the graphic that the vanillanewsbits Twitter account has posted: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CH-w6jtUcAASWcS.png:largeCan be compiled on any platform, including Windows, Mac OS, Linux, Android, iOS, game consoles, etc. No other cryptocurrency can do this. |
|
|
|
No other coin can be compiled on Android or iOS. What does this mean for you? It means you can take the wallet off your iOS device or Android wallet and use it on your desktop wallet. The iOS wallet is used by a number of people and it's on Apple TestFlight. If you want to use the iOS wallet, just hop on IRC and ask xcore or tom_ewok for an invitation. I'm not really sure what you mean sorry. Perhaps you mean that the wallet.dat is portable between desktop and mobile OSs? When I use Apple TestFlight, am I actually compiling code? I just looked up Apple TestFlight and I don't see any mention that it lets you compile code. |
|
|
|
Assuming it wasn't just a scam, I'd guess they were relying on being on 'trex as a lot of 3rd party services use 'trex's APIs. Perhaps they were waiting for a social media login from will7am and delayed a little too long  |
|
|
|
Symantec WS.Reputation.1  Please google "WS.Reputation", to know what is "WS.Reputation.1". I see  Stupid Symantec!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
