Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 10:16:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: What happend to mintpal? on: September 29, 2014, 01:09:42 AM
Quote
If not MP, which exchange(s) do you propose we should try out?

For altcoins I am very satisfied with Poloniex and Bter.
22  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: What happend to mintpal? on: September 28, 2014, 08:04:01 PM
Quote
hmmm this is annoying. I had a lot of coins on there. How long will this be off line?

It is not offline. I withdraw just a few minutes ago my xbc (incoming at Polo) and my xmr (not yet incoming, but hopefully will).
In worst case I will loose my btc, which I tried to withdraw just when mp went under maintenance (as usual without any announcement) These stuck as pending and Iam unable to confirm or cancel. No reaction from support.

But again: obviously it is actually possible to withdraw. I recommend to, because of the lack of information.
23  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: What happend to mintpal? on: September 28, 2014, 07:48:43 PM
Quote
It seems that Moolah is having issues with the V2 release. It's been delayed a few times now.

Sorry, but that is no excuse for this lack of information.
24  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: What happend to mintpal? on: September 28, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
Well, time will come for my next post at my thread  "quality comparison of the exchanges' support" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=743446.0

After I have cooled down...
25  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: What happend to mintpal? on: September 28, 2014, 06:58:40 PM
what really sucks is the information policy of MP.

Nor official statement of the actual situation, neither of planned solutions. Nothing!

I did a ticket because I a had a stucking withdrawal, no reaction, not even a confirmation of the ticket.
I looked at #mintpal, trying to get any answers - nothing.

Very annoying and for sure the best way to loose customers (at least their confidence).
26  Economy / Service Discussion / The support of Poloniex on: August 24, 2014, 08:28:37 PM
As announced, this time the report on the support of Poloniex. Here we go:

19/07/2014, issue: unable to use the trollbox:

10 hours after the request I received a first reaction: "Clear you cookies, log out then log back in, alternatively try it in another browser. If the Problem persists just reply to this message.."
I did so, the problem persists. 2 minutes after informing the support I got the reply, the ticket would be escalated to another technician. 24 hours later I received the message that the problem was solved and I could login.

Comment: It was definitely too long until the first response. Luckily it was only a small problem and not time-critical.

19/07/2014, issue: duration of deposit:


that was the real reason I ever wanted to use the Trollbox. Since at the time it was not possible, I have made a ticket, as deposits of XMR lasted at that time extremely long. 34 hours later I received a reply: "I'm afraid there is nothing we can do about this right now, as it is a limitation of the XMR API. We are working with the developers to get the API changed. The reason it does not take so long on other exchanges is precisely because they do not have as much volume as we do. We have to go through every payment ID one-by-one, and this takes a long time because we have so many."

Comment: Once again, it took too long until I got a first response. Although it was not satisfying, I could understand that the support could not solve the problem in these circumstances. But in fact a revised API soon became provided by the developers. Since the transactions are much faster.

07/23/2014, issue: missing xmr deposit

In this problem, I have made myself for the first time use of the great advantage of Trollbox: The direct address of mods. We then discussed the problem on IRC and only after the mod had exhausted its possibilities, I made a ticket.
After 19 hours, the first response: ticket is forwarded to a technician. How to read in the previous post, the cause was hitbtc and the credit could be made only after there had been recognized and investigated the problem.
Two and a half hours later, I received message that the problem is now solved and the missing xmr would soon be credited. Another six and a half hours later, the message about the credit. One credit was still missing (of another exchange), this was credited 22 hours later.

Comment: Once again, it took too long to the first reaction. The duration of the actual problem solution is not to blame Poloniex, there the support depends on the assistance of other participating exchanges.

07/31/2014, issue: missing deposit of xmr

First reaction within an hour: Transaction is not in the block chain.

Comment: The cause was another exchange, there was the withdrawal incorrect. No possibility for the Support of Poloniex to solve the Poblem. Very fast first reaction.

Conclusion:
Up to the first response to a ticket, mostly it takes a relatively long time, then the issues are done quickly. Compared to other exchanges Poloniex offers the great advantage of being able to speak directly with mods in the Trollbox. For smaller problems and information request these can then help immediately. In addition, it is possible via IRC issues to discuss. This division of labor (small problems directly by mods and serious problems per ticket by technician) is indeed very efficient. The anytime possible rapid request for a mod and the announcements visible in a prominent position, give the user the feeling of being well informed. I find this exemplary.

So far my personal experiences with Poloniex up to now.
Feel free to comment and/or tell us about your own experiences with the support of whatever exchanges you are using.

The topic of my next post will be the support of Mintpal.

Thanks for reading!

27  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Monero (XMR) Speculation thread on: August 21, 2014, 09:51:49 PM
I'm trading at hitbtc too, maybe for 6 weeks. In the beginning there were very profitable opportunities for arbitrage, but in the last 3 weeks it seems like bots are ruling: with a 5-digit-precision hitbtc mirrors the prices of Poloniex. Not always, but nearly always.


28  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Help with trading tips on: August 20, 2014, 08:28:15 PM
Who is as a trader or trodler on the go at exchanges, will get caught sooner or later: A problem occurs. Failed withdrawals/deposits, false balances etc. are every-day-events.

Then you need support and find that there are large differences in the quality of support. This has motivated me to open a thread "quality comparison of the exchanges' support":

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=743446.0

I want to encourage all of you to report your experiences with the support of the exchanges, as a helpful support for other user and inspiration for the exchanges.



29  Economy / Service Discussion / the support of hitbtc on: August 19, 2014, 11:39:53 PM
Thank you, smooth, for your report, even if it does not show the actual situation. As mentioned in my above post, it were reported experiences like yours, that lead me to the prejudice - as it turned out. Furthermore it shows, that there was obviously a positive improvement at BTER.

But now, as announced, to the today's topic: the support of hitbtc

Originally I wanted to write this report yesterday, but due to a currently ongoing issue I was so upset that the report would probably not have been very objectively.

Meanwhile, though the problem is not solved, I got at least I little more information and found my contenance again. But more on that later.

Let's start with my first use of the support of hitbtc:

07/04/2014 issue: deposit of XMR at hitbtc not possible

First answer about 20 minutes after my request with explanation of how I would make a deposit (payment id etc.). I confirmed that I had done in the described way.
3 hours later I got on Mintpal (from there I had the XMR sent) the status message that the withdrawal was unsuccessful, so I hitbtc communicated. After another 2 hours, I received the message that the Technical department would look at the issue.
At that time XMR was just listed on hitbtc and I had the impression the handling was not yet mature. I decided not to proceed for the moment and to let expire a week or two before I would actively use hitbtc.

Comment: Very positive I found the quick initial response and the open admission that a more comprehensive problem exists. Otherwise, I would not have been returned to hitbtc.

07/22/2014 issue: balances suddenly invisible

First answer in less than 15 minutes: asking for a screenshot. This I sent and also informed that a test-trade worked, although balances not visible.
10 minutes later I received answer: probably it was because of my browser. That seemed unlikely to me, but I have yet rebooted and sure enough: all right. I notified hitbtc immediately.

Comment: Once again, very prompt response and also quick fix. (That I thought the suggested cause was unlikely, only shows what I'm a noob sometimes)

07/22/2014 issue: several withdrawals did not arrive and are not to find in the block chain

I had done that day very many transactions and was a little messed up, so I had to add my request an hour later with a missing deposit. In the meantime, I had made inquiries as well in the exchanges, to whom I had sent the missing XMR.
First response I received 9 hours after my initial request: demand, whether the withdrawals were for private wallet or other exchanges. I immediately sent the precise details of the individual transactions and asked in a further mail to send me the transaction ids.
4 hours later told me the support that the cause was found and the problem will be resolved soon and gave me the affected transaction ids.
It then took another 17 hours before the support told me, that after the last update of the XMR-wallet the transaction-IDs were not sent to the block chain. hitbtc had informed the other exchanges and that I should contact their support to get credited the missing XMR.

Comment: It was clearly too long until the first response. I also would have liked more timely information on the state of the problem solution, as it was are larger amount I missed in total and I was very worried therefor. That in the transaction-history of hitbtc only internal operational ID is displayed and not transaction-ID, proved to be very cumbersome for my research on the other exchanges. That should hitbtc change in any case!

08/17/2014 issue: unable to withdraw XMR

First answer by 31 hours (!): "We have forwarded an info on this issue to our Tech Department and they will take a deeper look into this problem." In the meantime, I did sent several reminder emails and additional informations on further attempts of a withdrawal.
46 hours after my first request still nothing, except the mentioned first answer. I was more than annoyed, because I at least expected some intermediate information in response to my multiple requests for the state of things. (In that mood I wanted not to write the experience report on the support of hitbtc)
Today (55 hours after the first request) I received the information that the technicians had discovered the problem at the weekend and since then they were investigating. I would be notified by mail when the problem is solved.
After another 2 hours, I received another message: The problem solution is somewhat complicated and would still take some time.

Comment and conclusion: I have to admit, I was really angry. Less, because there is a problem (which is still unsolved). What annoyed me was the long wait before I ever got a response or any information about the progress of the problem solving. I have full understanding that in a complex coin like the XMR technical problems might arise , but the feeling of talking into the void is really frustrating. My impression was, that the support at hitbtc is a 9-5-job, on 5 days a week. If so, hitbtc has to change it, because the need of support is 24/7. But I might be wrong with my assumption.
What hitbtc definitely has to change: its information policy. And please add the transaction-Ids in the history!

So far my personal experiences with hitbtc up to now.
Feel free to comment and/or tell us about your own experiences with the support of whatever exchanges you are using.

The topic of my next post will be the support of Poloniex.

Thanks for reading!


Update:
Today (08/21/2014) I got the information from hitbtc that the issue was finally fixed, but the transactions will still be monitored, to react immediatly, if the issue occurs again. It is also noteworthy that yesterday I received an intermediate information, possibly in response to this thread. Hitbtc will improve obviously. Keep it up!
30  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: August 18, 2014, 12:40:58 AM
As traders and trodlers know, sometimes the handling of Monero seems to be a bit special for exchanges and users. Forgotten payment-id, blockchain not syncronized etc. are every-day-events, as I know, because most of my own trading is with Moneros.

Then you need support and find that there are large differences in the quality of support. This has motivated me to open a thread "quality comparison of the exchanges' support":

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=743446.0

I want to invite all of you to report your experiences with the support of whatever exchange you are using, as a helpful support for other users and - hopefully - inspiration for the exchanges to improve their support.
31  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [XMR] rpietila Monero Economics thread on: August 18, 2014, 12:38:56 AM
As traders and trodlers know, sometimes the handling of Monero seems to be a bit special for exchanges and users. Forgotten payment-id, blockchain not syncronized etc. are every-day-events, as I know, because most of my own trading is with Moneros.

Then you need support and find that there are large differences in the quality of support. This has motivated me to open a thread "quality comparison of the exchanges' support":

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=743446.0

I want to invite all of you to report your experiences with the support of whatever exchange you are using, as a helpful support for other users and - hopefully - inspiration for the exchanges to improve their support.
32  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Monero (XMR) Speculation thread on: August 18, 2014, 12:30:34 AM
As traders and trodlers know, sometimes the handling of Monero seems to be a bit special for exchanges and users. Forgotten payment-id, blockchain not syncronized etc. are every-day-events, as I know, because most of my own trading is with Moneros.

Then you need support and find that there are large differences in the quality of support. This has motivated me to open a thread "quality comparison of the exchanges' support":

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=743446.0

I want to invite all of you to report your experiences with the support of whatever exchange you are using, as a helpful support for other users and - hopefully - inspiration for the exchanges to improve their support.
33  Economy / Service Discussion / experiences with bter support on: August 17, 2014, 08:48:15 PM
I will start with my personal experience. So far I needed the support of 6 exchanges - in some cases more than once. Today I want to begin with my experiences with BTER:


23/06/2014, issue: deposit of XMR not arrived


After 24 hours, the missing XMR were credited. Friendly support.

Comment:
I must admit that I did not expect to ever get a response, because I had previously read everywhere that the support on Chinese exchanges for non-Chinese is hardly usable. A prejudice as it turned out.

30.06.2014, issue: My mistake, I withdraw XMR with BTER code without understanding what had happened.

After less than 2 hours I got reply on my ticket. I was very relieved that I had the XMR only posted to my account BTER code and easily could book back. I found the prompt response was so positive that I had to report it in the XMR thread to put something contrary to the permanent Chinese-bashing.

08/16/2014, issue: deposit of XMR not arrived

Two and a half hours after my request personal first answer with the question, whether I had given my payment ID. I did. 12 hours after my first request I wrote a reminder and another after 24 hours. Then I received a reply that I should be patient "... Our dev will fix it as soon as possible ..."
30 hours after my first request the missing XMR were credited to my account.

comment: First reaction promptly, the solution to the problem took too long. However, it was the 16/08/2014, when NXT was hacked on BTER, and I confess the technical staff to give priority to this problem.

conclusion:
The support of BTER is certainly better than its reputation. Yet I see a need for improvement: My impression was, that the technical support is not available 24 hours, which is neccessary at an exchange used from all over the world.



Feel free to comment and/or tell us about your own experiences with the support of whatever exchanges you are using.
The topic of my next post will be the support of hitbtc.

Thanks for reading!
34  Economy / Service Discussion / quality comparison of the exchanges' support on: August 17, 2014, 08:36:41 PM
Welcome to my threat, which is dedicated to the quality comparison of the exchanges' support!

More like a guppy as a whale, I try as well as some other to expand my small portfolio through a little trading. We traders, trodlers or whatever are reliant on the stock exchanges function properly and that they respond quickly when things do not. Then the support is needed.

Who - like me - acts on different exchanges, has certainly found that there are large differences in the quality of support. This should be the theme here.
However, this threat is not intended for exchanges-bashing. Rather, experiences should be exchanged and - in the best case - the exchanges be inspired to improve their support.

My personal criteria are
- promptness in the first reaction (this does not mean the automatic reply mail!)
- Information policy about the process of problem solving
- Speed of problem solving
- kindness

Feel free to add some more criteria, if you find the need of completion.

Once again:
This thread should not be the dumping ground for personal anger, but a guide for other users and inspiration for the exchanges. Insults are unwanted, please try to practice objective criticism, it can also be positive.

I hope to encourage extensive participation, perhaps we can make a difference.
35  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 30, 2014, 01:05:57 AM
I have to say a word of praise and as it relates to XMRs, seems to me this is the right place:

I wanted to send XMR from BTER to Poloniex and had accidentally activated BTER code - without noticing it. When I had confirmed the withdrawal , then it occurred to me that neither address nor Payment ID standing in the history. Panic!!! I thought I lost my XMR and wrote to the support.
Less than 30 minutes later I received an answer: All right, I just needed my BTER code change again in XMR.

Why do I tell this here?

There is so much railed against the Chinese and everyone talks about how terrible the support on Chinese exchanges is, as I have just for the sake of fairness even hold it.

My experiences (it's the second time) are - at least as far as the support of BTER - so far very positive!

Must be told sometimes ...
36  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 29, 2014, 10:01:23 PM
gcc-4.8-base:
  Installiert:           (keine)
  Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
  Versionstabelle:
     4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages

OK. Disclaimer: I have never tried this myself. But if you have your virgin snapshot and still want to try it:

Code:
sudo apt-get install gcc-4.8-base

Not sure if this will deinstall 4.9, though. Try the gcc --version again after apt-get is finished.

Edit: You may have to do the same with g++-4.8
Meanwhile I deinstalled 4.9, installed 4.8 and got: a complete mess. Arrgh!

Anyway, never surrender.
I'll just unpack a new virgin and play with it.
So far, many thanks for your suggestions. Once I have results, whether positive or negative, I'll get back here.
37  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 29, 2014, 09:35:22 PM
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
Code:
gcc --version
?
I get this:
Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?
Okay, I'll try that.
But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.
Quote
gcc-4.8-base:
  Installiert:           (keine)
  Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
  Versionstabelle:
     4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
Hmm. What is the output of
Code:
apt-cache policy gcc-4.8-base
on your machine?
38  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 29, 2014, 09:06:16 PM
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
Code:
gcc --version
?
I get this:
Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?
Okay, I'll try that.
But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.
39  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 29, 2014, 08:52:35 PM

In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:
Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.
I tried this script twice, it did not work for me.
Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.
No, the necessary folders are created, I can see them after the make command has halted because of the shown errors. Therefor I am quite sure, that these errors cause the abort.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
Code:
gcc --version
?
I get this:
Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
40  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency [CPU/GPU(NVIDIA+AMD)] on: June 29, 2014, 08:41:32 PM
^How much RAM the virtual machine have? It could run out of RAM when compiling.
2 G RAM. At an earlier trial I had only 1 G RAM, this was not enough. But the shown errors were completly different: I got a message, that it runs out of memory.
Now I get this:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;
Obviously it has nothing to do with RAM.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!