[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[parker928]

1000 blocks downloaded, 103k to go 
If this does not get the thing to work, I DON'T care if it would be even a golden coin.
Dev team should think about it BEFORE they even started publishing anything.
And if dev team fails - success is equal to zero.

Failure to cross-platform serialize was an internal failure from the ByteCoin code, hence we updated our codebase to include mnemonic seeds to generate keys that function easily across platforms.

Unfortunately, we inherited a lot of bad code, but we're doing our best to fix it now.

Can see that.
I've been downloading a blockchain from 0.
It took me about 12 hours to finish it.
After I did, I started my wallet and all was fine.

BUT, now, again, the same problem is present.
I have backup of blockchain I've downloaded(updated) and I tried to replace the existing one, but nothing change that state.
Can anyone explain what the real problem could be?

If you type set_log 2 or set_log 3 into the daemon command window you can increase the logging messages it displays, that might show what is causing the problem.

Yes, I tried that, and here are (is) result(s) from the .log file:

Code:

2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.112671 [P2P1][94.244.155.113:18080 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOKED OK
2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.114625 [P2P4][94.244.155.113:18080 OUT]CONNECTION HANDSHAKED OK.
2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.117554 [P2P4]Random connection index=6(x=14, max_index=20)
2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.119507 [P2P4]Selected peer: 18170737938260944790 178.41.54.60:18080[white=0] last_seen: d0.h0.m7.s16
2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.124390 [P2P4]Connecting to 178.41.54.60:18080(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m7.s16)...
2014-Jun-29 20:59:26.889039 [P2P6][94.244.155.113:18080 OUT]NOTIFY_REQUEST_CHAIN: m_block_ids.size()=27
2014-Jun-29 20:59:27.242554 [P2P6][94.244.155.113:18080 OUT]-->>NOTIFY_RESPONSE_CHAIN_ENTRY: m_start_height=100914, m_total_height=106847, m_block_ids.size()=5933
2014-Jun-29 20:59:27.247437 [P2P6][94.244.155.113:18080 OUT] post struct cryptonote::NOTIFY_RESPONSE_CHAIN_ENTRY -->
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.127320 [P2P4]Failed to connect to 178.41.54.60:18080, because of timeout (5000)
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.140992 [P2P4][sock 4294967295] Socket destroyed without shutdown.
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.152710 [P2P4][sock 4294967295] Socket destroyed
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.162476 [P2P4][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 178.41.54.60:18080
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.170289 [P2P4]Random connection index=1(x=8, max_index=20)
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.176148 [P2P4]Selected peer: 9506295159526218340 46.229.50.42:18080[white=0] last_seen: d0.h0.m0.s21
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.186890 [P2P4]Connecting to 46.229.50.42:18080(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m0.s21)...
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.294312 [P2P4]Connected success to 46.229.50.42:18080
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.305054 [P2P4][sock 872] new connection from 46.229.50.42:18080 OUT to 192.168.0.101:51883, total sockets objects 11
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.323609 [P2P4][46.229.50.42:18080 9d3cf0d6-659e-41d7-aedb-6eaaab3b4324 OUT] NEW CONNECTION
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.848023 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]REMOTE PEERLIST: TIME_DELTA: 4, remote peerlist size=252
2014-Jun-29 20:59:31.861695 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]REMOTE PEERLIST: 35627ce00922a0aa	97.94.210.82:18080 	last_seen: d0.h0.m0.s0

Code:

2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.791382 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 106847 -> 107148 [301 blocks (0 days) behind] 
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.802125 [P2P2]Remote top block height: 107148, id: <7a32a4d3735f0cd3be23cad8a3d80b8669550c2a2f9d9baa1f05292cfc3ca1e2>
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.810914 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]requesting callback
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.816773 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT] request_callback
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.821656 [P2P2][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOKED OK
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.828492 [P2P4][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]CONNECTION HANDSHAKED OK.
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.834351 [P2P4]Random connection index=17(x=19, max_index=20)
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.839234 [P2P4]Selected peer: 7870288044270691678 188.239.94.255:18080[white=0] last_seen: d0.h0.m30.s43
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.848023 [P2P4]Connecting to 188.239.94.255:18080(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m30.s43)...
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.828492 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT] fired_callback
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.860718 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]callback fired
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.866578 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]-->>NOTIFY_REQUEST_CHAIN: m_block_ids.size()=27
2014-Jun-29 20:59:32.874390 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT] post struct cryptonote::NOTIFY_REQUEST_CHAIN -->
2014-Jun-29 20:59:33.444703 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]NOTIFY_RESPONSE_CHAIN_ENTRY: m_block_ids.size()=302, m_start_height=106846, m_total_height=107148
2014-Jun-29 20:59:33.468140 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT]-->>NOTIFY_REQUEST_GET_OBJECTS: blocks.size()=200, txs.size()=0
2014-Jun-29 20:59:33.479859 [P2P8][46.229.50.42:18080 OUT] post struct cryptonote::NOTIFY_REQUEST_GET_OBJECTS -->
2014-Jun-29 20:59:34.936890 [P2P9][1.57.95.76:18080 OUT]NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS
2014-Jun-29 20:59:34.969117 [P2P9]tx <8eede40872a1885835eb8d87dcead63676462f1fa70f9e579efe1073d7949aec> already have transaction in blockchain
2014-Jun-29 20:59:34.981812 [P2P9]tx <d3e5aa32f15d57f9cb1699d95de824d63c31e73670f48d20acddfd612b0a46a8>already have transaction in tx_pool
2014-Jun-29 20:59:34.991578 [P2P9]tx <ff909c064770d8bce9eb5fde9c60a63dd1d179a1f314fa493317c1ca5d19a0b6>already have transaction in tx_pool
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.089234 [P2P9]tx with id: <793bde1b414a7c8b04c696fba8b8b980cc569891a61d86bd36296707654bd73f> in block id: <525e0e014351ff15b2d199e8f9ed42557a00785bd74816ed0139aff7d0530853> already in blockchain
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.100953 [P2P9]Block with id: <525e0e014351ff15b2d199e8f9ed42557a00785bd74816ed0139aff7d0530853> failed to add transaction to blockchain storage
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.110718 [P2P9][1.57.95.76:18080 OUT]Block verification failed, dropping connection
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.117554 [P2P5][sock 924] Some not success at read: A request to send or receive data was disallowed because the socket had already been shut down in that direction with a previous shutdown call:10058
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.129273 [P2P5][sock 924] Some problems at read: A request to send or receive data was disallowed because the socket had already been shut down in that direction with a previous shutdown call:10058
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.140015 [P2P5][sock 924] Socket destroyed
2014-Jun-29 20:59:35.143921 [P2P5][1.57.95.76:18080 d2fb375f-38b5-4640-8ff0-c31e6e1eead5 OUT] CLOSE CONNECTION

you need to run the "save command in the daemon and you wont have to redownload it every time. it is either save or save_bc i cant remember off the top of my head.

[liteon]

you need to run the "save command in the daemon and you wont have to redownload it every time. it is either save or save_bc i cant remember off the top of my head.

I'm not that dumb. I type exit, and it auto-save's it.

[RentaMouse]

In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:

Code:

cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh

It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.

I tried this script twice, it did not work for me.
Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:

/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.

[RentaMouse]

you need to run the "save command in the daemon and you wont have to redownload it every time. it is either save or save_bc i cant remember off the top of my head.

I'm not that dumb. I type exit, and it auto-save's it.

Yeah, your bitmonerod isnt starting that many blocks behind so looks like it saved the blockchain ok. At least two P2P connections (6 & appear to be trying to sync the blockchain for you, anything show up in the log later for them? Equipoise's suggestion about low disk space/RAM seems most likely, except you say it isnt, so its getting a bit baffling. You could be brave and try the "set_log 4" for maximum log spam....

[equipoise]

Hi,

I just compiled bitmonerod and simplewallet and for warm-up did some small transaction back and forth between my wallet and poloniex. Works a charm :-)

Now, my problem: after a while, bitmonerod throws lots of error msgs like this:

..../bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection

I wouldn't care really, but I suspect this has something to do for one of my transactions from poloniex to my wallet not showing up in my wallet for more than an hour.
When I restarted bitmonerod and simplewallet, my missing transaction was there imediately, so it looks like the daemon (bitmonerod) "hang" somehow...

Any hints, maybe I should configure something in a certain way to reduce probability of such hangs?

Thanks!

There is no connection between this error message and your transaction from poloniex. Ignore the error. Enter 'refresh' in the wallet (after your daemon is synchronized) and if your transaction is not there (and in the blockchain - monerochain.info) contact poloniex support with the details.

[firedoner]

I was wondering if you could help me

i recently updated my cryptonote wallet as ive had XMR in cold storage for the past month and a half or so... as more updates came out i thought i should update... however i type my password i created on the old wallet and it now says invalid password and closes..

i have not forgotten my password as i saved it on a txt doc ... i checked 5 previously saved versions of the txt doc for the last 2 months to make sure nothing had changed....it says my password has remained the same since i created it, yet it is invalid using the updated simplewallet using my .keys file   ...


thanks guys

[whoknowsthisnose]

In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:

Code:

cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh

It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.

I tried this script twice, it did not work for me.
Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:

/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.

No, the necessary folders are created, I can see them after the make command has halted because of the shown errors. Therefor I am quite sure, that these errors cause the abort.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.

[equipoise]

^How much RAM the virtual machine have? It could run out of RAM when compiling.

[zechiel]

In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:

Code:

cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh

It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.

I tried this script twice, it did not work for me.
Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:

/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.

No, the necessary folders are created, I can see them after the make command has halted because of the shown errors. Therefor I am quite sure, that these errors cause the abort.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

[whoknowsthisnose]

^How much RAM the virtual machine have? It could run out of RAM when compiling.

2 G RAM. At an earlier trial I had only 1 G RAM, this was not enough. But the shown errors were completly different: I got a message, that it runs out of memory.
Now I get this:

/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

Obviously it has nothing to do with RAM.

[whoknowsthisnose]

In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:

Code:

cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh

It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.

I tried this script twice, it did not work for me.
Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:

/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
     typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
                      ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
     uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
     ^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
     low = (uint64_t) res;

I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.

No, the necessary folders are created, I can see them after the make command has halted because of the shown errors. Therefor I am quite sure, that these errors cause the abort.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

I get this:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

[zechiel]

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

I get this:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that

Code:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1

works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?

[ltcnim]

after beeing unable to sync, I deleted the complete blockchain yesterday and it worked afterwards. however, today, the same problem appeared:

Code:

2014-Jun-29 22:59:23.080790 [P2P1][194.150.103.58:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 106607 -> 107262 [655 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.594392 [P2P2]tx with id: <81f4b8b388136110aec5dc58d2cacf45dce5c65c56e78bcf124eedae121d78db> in block id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> already in blockchain
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.604392 [P2P2]Block with id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> failed to add transaction to blockchain storage
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.611393 [P2P2][194.150.103.58:18080 OUT]Block verification failed, dropping connection

this is beeing spammed all over again. I can't completely resync every day...

[whoknowsthisnose]

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

I get this:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that

Code:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1

works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?

Okay, I'll try that.
But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.

[liteon]

^You are running out of RAM.

But (while running it) I have about 1GB free *0.8-1.1

It eats all my RAM, if I look at task manager>Free
But, I still do have 25% (~750MB) free, as I can open more files and programs while it's running.
Problem is strange, as it does affects SOMETHING about RAM, but I cannot findout what it is.

Will try in a couple of days with and system upgrade and RAM upgrade as well, so I hope it will resolve the current problem.
I just don't like how it works... My Video Editor does not eats that much!

[zechiel]

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

I get this:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that

Code:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1

works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?

Okay, I'll try that.
But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.

Hmm. What is the output of

Code:

apt-cache policy gcc-4.8-base

on your machine?

[whoknowsthisnose]

Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of

Code:

gcc --version

?

I get this:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]

That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that

Code:

gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1

works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?

Okay, I'll try that.
But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.

gcc-4.8-base:
  Installiert:           (keine)
  Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
  Versionstabelle:
     4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages

Hmm. What is the output of

Code:

apt-cache policy gcc-4.8-base

on your machine?

[zechiel]

gcc-4.8-base:
  Installiert:           (keine)
  Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
  Versionstabelle:
     4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages

OK. Disclaimer: I have never tried this myself. But if you have your virgin snapshot and still want to try it:

Code:

sudo apt-get install gcc-4.8-base

Not sure if this will deinstall 4.9, though. Try the gcc --version again after apt-get is finished.

Edit: You may have to do the same with g++-4.8

[whoknowsthisnose]

gcc-4.8-base:
  Installiert:           (keine)
  Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
  Versionstabelle:
     4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages

OK. Disclaimer: I have never tried this myself. But if you have your virgin snapshot and still want to try it:

Code:

sudo apt-get install gcc-4.8-base

Not sure if this will deinstall 4.9, though. Try the gcc --version again after apt-get is finished.

Edit: You may have to do the same with g++-4.8

Meanwhile I deinstalled 4.9, installed 4.8 and got: a complete mess. Arrgh!

Anyway, never surrender.
I'll just unpack a new virgin and play with it.
So far, many thanks for your suggestions. Once I have results, whether positive or negative, I'll get back here.

[yvg1900]

moneropool.com blacklisted and blocked in Russia by government.

Can be checked by entering its IP address at http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/en/ (blocked by IP address)

I think owner of moneropool.com shall file complain to them.