The price is going up but without any reason.
This is due to MGM's retarded way to trading of buying high and selling low. He stated that he set buy support from the coins that he sold low, so those buy support are "fake." By the way, I have eyes on all the channel in arch's slack. even the 100k room. hahaha, nice try, but it doesn't exist anymore. And FYI, BTCArchitect wasn't even a member himself! Also, you'd never have enjoyed the convo, just hookers and blow talk. What a highly intelligent remark. |
|
|
|
Nobody is FUD-ing, but we want to know what happened with btca and his project?
Nothing has changed really. |
|
|
|
Welcome to the $ARCH Thread! The most un-moderated moderated thread in the whole of Bitcointalk, where only trolls post and say how bad really Archcoin is.  Thank you for stopping by and don't forget to come back for more FUD spreading. Don't troll drei. |
|
|
|
I understand peoples' grief over the current situation. Regardless of Edgar's silence, I still have faith that this is his "baby" and he will do whatever it takes to make this succeed. It seems as though a lot of people need to have their hands held requesting updates daily. However this is a long-term project as made clear from the get-go. Would you rather him be tied to his computer answering questions constantly? Or would you rather him actually work on the project at large?
Truth is, no "CEO's" at this point deserve to be updated daily on the progress being made. We don't have the title yet, we are simply early investors at this point.
Actually this is not true. If a manager can't handle his investors, he will suffer first. I'm sure your Edgar doesn't want people to dump, the coin may not get up again. If he is OK with this, something is wrong. Man I'd love a personal Edgar. Meh the prototype isn't that great yet, needs some updates. The prototype tends to drink too much and go on vacation too often. |
|
|
|
Lol, vacation. he's a funny guy.
I want my money back from this scam. Where can I go to file a complaint?
 |
|
|
|
Floating furniture? No one will buy this and the only people who bought the idea were the ceo's who all got scammed by some nobody architect with a shitty cloned coin.
That is likely going to end up being the case unfortunately. I'm sure they all did well on that scare though, if they were smart. Yes I'm sure many people did well and failed to get caught in the trap. Good for them too. The big bagholders tho thoses are the sad ones. -Sent from my CIRC wallet-The drama is quite funny. -Sent from my laptop which I put on your mothers back- |
|
|
|
 bitcointalk, u so funny  |
|
|
|
Is there anything exciting going on?
Did you read the OP? Everyone investing here expects a return on their investment from successful trades leading to buy pressure for burning coins, increasing the value of the remaining coins. I think that is as simple as I can tell it - there is a lot more to it, you just need to invest a little time to read the info that is presented here and you find your answer. Unless of course, you did not come here to find answers but only to troll and spread negativity, then you won't find answers here. Let me ask one more question. We have taken care of supply side by burning the coins but what are we doing for generating demand? Where can we use this coin other than staking. I would like to see discounts on services like Coinigy, coingecko & other trading & chart related services while paying with GAM. Personally if there is a discount for cloud mining, i will be all for it. I think that's what SecretOfCrypto might be asking. We have all seen coin with very little supply but no demand, that only kills liquidity but didn't help much with price/demand. Someone didn't read OP.  |
|
|
|
Any reason to be worried about the price drop or just people taking some profits?
Traders trading, Fudders fudding, Investors buying. Some people get upset if you don't hold their hand and give them new updates every day, which is not realistic in any real business. |
|
|
|
I am trully amazed, however you didnt consider BTC's price change, which may take serious dip in 4 years, or serious jump...
Everything looks nice just on paper, reality is quite different, and many things may happen.
People will get emotional reading such numbers, however I would be more thoughtful.
I am supporter of ARCH, because I think it's the one legit coin here, considering all scams.
Good luck with your project BTCA, I hope you will realize your plans, and will make this crypto world better.
BTC price has 0 influence on Moby sales since the people who are buying the mobys have nothing to do with crypto. They will pay their mobys in fiat. Even if Bitcoin goes to 0, it will change nothing about the sales of mobys, the only thing it might have influence on is Blocktrust which is a seperate entity and it's clearly stated that the capital of the other ventures are not in those calculations |
|
|
|
It looks like the btc is not being held by BayAreaCoins until the end of ICO, please correct me if otherwise.
So how do we know that Viral team is not buying the majority of their own coin by reusing the btc over and over?
Some assurance on that part would be nice.
Correct, I'm not holding BTC until the end of the ICO. I released the Bitcoins once I received the 2.5 million VIRAL as agreed. Only assurance I can offer is exactly what you can see on the Blockchain too. I'm not Detective BAC this week or Dev BAC. I'm Escrow BAC  all I can assure people is that they will get their fair share of the 2.5 million coins I have. And why have you released the BTC before the crowdfunding ended? Does not make any sense to do that cause the swap of the Viral coins and BTC should have been made at the end of crowdfunding!! So now who will guarantee us that Viral team did not inflate the price buying coins with our BTC? Are you surprised? If you work with scammers, prepare to be scammed. I think everyone was warned plenty of times. Also the wallet will be released after ICO, which means there can be plenty of hidden things in the code, hidden premine, trojan,... I wouldn't be surprised with any of those. The one-two punch of BTC released to devs early and updates to the crowdfund ledger being behind a full day (on the very last and most important day no less) makes this entire project very, very dangerous. The devs could easily throw our 100+ bitcoin back at the crowdfund anytime today and we'd be none the wiser. Don't be surprised to find out tonight that 500+ bitcoin ended up getting donated. The uncertainty in this whole thing makes it a perfect scam opportunity. Couple that with Adam Guerbuez, BobSurplus, a "super elite" club of early IPO investors that get first-mover knowledge of important developments (i.e., a self-implemented pump group), and a heavily moderated Ann thread (I've personally seen at least 15 legitimate criticism posts deleted within seconds right before my eyes) and you've got a recipe for scam of the century. I would stay far, far away from all this. A guaranteed bite in the ass. Just remember, Adam Guerbuez is the asshole who flat out lied about big bitcoin news that would "turn heads"...turns out he was just being an attention whore. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924474.0This. |
|
|
|
Does this new release enforce password encrypting of the wallet? Anyone able to confirm that the new wallet enforces encrypting the wallet as a default condition on install? it doesn't, wallet security is something personal. The option is there, if you don't use it, your fault. It's the same with 2FA on exchanges, it's there but if you don't activate it, it's your own fault your account got hacked. If you would force people to encrypt their wallet after a few days people will cry that they forgot their password and have now lost all their coins. Thanks. Reminds me of when wifi routers first came out. Security was turned OFF by default. Now security is turned ON by default as the industry realised that end users can not be expected to find and turn on security features to protect themselves from hackers. Security is now default ON. ARCh wallet is therefore still failing the customers as it does not require the customer to implement what you all consider a minimum level of security and puts the end customer in a position of suffering a greater loss than would otherwise occur if the ARCH wallet had enforced the minimum security level of password protection defaulted to ON in the event the ARCH software is obtained by a third party. It would appear that ARCH is quite comfortable with having legitimate shareholders tokens taken from their supplied software and those stolen shareholder tokens passed on or sold to parties who are not entitled to hold those tokens and acknowledges that the holders of those tokens may be accepted to management positions within the ARCH business. Very interesting business model there as ultimately you may end up with management comprising a unknown number of criminals having obtained positions by way of obtaining stolen tokens either knowingly or unknowingly. The tokens are traceable by ARCH if they so desire are they not? Class Action Suit anyone for losses incurred to date?  |
|
|
|
Does this new release enforce password encrypting of the wallet? Anyone able to confirm that the new wallet enforces encrypting the wallet as a default condition on install? it doesn't, wallet security is something personal. The option is there, if you don't use it, your fault. It's the same with 2FA on exchanges, it's there but if you don't activate it, it's your own fault your account got hacked. If you would force people to encrypt their wallet after a few days people will cry that they forgot their password and have now lost all their coins. |
|
|
|
What makes a password strong (or weak)? A strong password: - Is at least eight characters long.
- Does not contain your user name, real name, or company name.
- Does not contain a complete word.
- Is significantly different from previous passwords.
Contains characters from each of the following four categories: Character category Uppercase letters: A, B, C Lowercase letters: a, b, c Numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Symbols found on the keyboard (all keyboard characters not defined as letters or numerals) and spaces: ` ~ ! @ # $ % ^ & * ( ) _ - + = { } [ ] \ | : ; " ' < > , . ? / A password might meet all the criteria above and still be a weak password. For example, Hello2U! meets all the criteria for a strong password listed above, but is still weak because it contains a complete word. H3ll0 2 U! is a stronger alternative because it replaces some of the letters in the complete word with numbers and also includes spaces. For Crypto I suggest at least 10 chars. |
|
|
|
Would you leave a safe closed but unlocked? It's no different than leaving a wallet unencrypted.
When the safe is located in your locked house and surrounded by a security fence you might leave it open. Not quite the same as if the safe has been left on the street is it? Your house is your computer so obviously your computer (or house in this example) seems to have a lot of open windows, else noone gets in. The safe (encrypted wallet) is last line of defense. |
|
|
|
Still no response from anyone as to why these coins ended up in the #2 Wallet and who it belongs to. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/arch/address.dws?AL8PwmG2wC5Kjq9SfsTCmVVvKJqrg2bWWc.htmBTCArchitect ignored PM about this. Arch support has provided no answers. ARCH management has not provided any help whatsoever in tracking down the stolen coins even though they can be clearly seen in the block explorer. Very poor response from people who claim to care about they are above everyone else and looking after their shareholders etc. Anyone else care to follow those transactions and shed some light on the coins would be appreciated as ARCH management are unwilling to help? They are not unwilling to help, since blockchain transactions are irreversible nothing can be done. But despite that I'm pretty sure https://chainz.cryptoid.info/arch/address.dws?AUjc5ZUHh666x9mDDJ1pdKiwXgrf9eedq9.htm is bittrex but you can ask them about it. |
|
|
|
Maybe now would be a good time to ask for some of that Moby money up front and use it to do a market buy :-/
That would stabilize the price, remove coins from the market, and most importantly it would show the crypto world that Arch is the real deal and not another URO.
Many of us bought in above 60k and it's frankly nauseating to see the floor continue to drop and drop...
Price stabilization was the wrong term to use. Obviously there will be volatility, and yes volatility is good for swing trading, but volatility is one thing, price imploding on itself it quite another.
there is 50% up front but how would you buy all materials then? the marketbuys will happen when they happen, no need to rush it. And actually consider this: the lower the price when the marketbuys hit, the more coins will be off the market  Price isn't really imploding, there is only a small amount of coins on the open market but they are doing a shakeout to get big holders to dump to get more themselves |
|
|
|
I'm already thinking about version 2 for open sea use and tropical shark infested waters.
Moby is a boat built like a playhouse, with a one-foot freeboard, a huge sail that cannot be taken down, and cleats that will break before the anchor slips. I cannot imagine what Moby 2 "for open sea use and tropical shark infested waters" would look like... If you don't know about boats, stay off the water architect, or people will get hurt. After such a delusional comment, I actually hope Moby just is what it looks like: vaporware. P.S.: Add a line in the manual saying that the front hatch should not be opened if the wind picks up, or it will go flying in a bang. Can you please show me on the picture where the sail is? But yes btcarchitect doesn't have plenty of experience and didn't consult a lot of nautical engineers since this is a shitcoin with some highschool/university dev right? Go back to the pond that you came from SittingDuck and watch out for hunters since you're obviously not the smartest duck around. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
