 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
Hello,
We are a team of crypto devs and programming experts. We're looking to gather a team to make an online Bitcoin-based business (like Gambling, etc). Any ideas and team ups are welcome.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
So ? Anything new here or is this thing dead ?
|
|
|
|
|
I like to collaborate if you provide a little more info on the matter.
|
|
|
|
|
I like to collaborate if any effort is to be taken.
|
|
|
|
|
we need some marketing about our new wallet release. people should notice this.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Excuse me if this is a noob question, what is a multipool?
|
|
|
|
|
How do we upload a picture ? I notice some members have them.
|
|
|
|
Oops !  Awww, don't worry ! Here's what you will do: 1. Find a guy 2. Suck his dick 3. Get $5 4. Pay cryptos.us *AGAIN* to remove the comment. 5. Come back here 6. Spam ! |
|
|
|
sub-linear traceable ring signatures could operate on the same principle as what they are implying, but chandran signatures aren't linkable/traceable
This is the CryptoNote whitepaper: https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdfBy combining both methods (unlinkable public keys and untraceable ring signature) Bob achieves
new level of privacy in comparison with the original Bitcoin scheme.
Please read section 4.4 and 4.5. A ring signature doesn't have to be 'traceable' for anonymizing transactions. I'm not even talking on a vaporware, this is CryptoNote. Jamming technical words you don't understand together doesn't make you look smart.
But you sure as hell are going to give it a go right!? it has to be traceable, so you have like a public tag, otherwise the same ringsignature could just be created again, and they could double spend. Linkable: (in the context of ring sigs) seems to mean that the same tag can't be used twice in the same ring traceable means the tag can't be used twice regardless of the keys in the ring. Read that whitepaper !! In section 4.4 in the LNK scheme you can find how CryptoNote is doing this without a tag. Sub-linear traceable ring signatures could operate on the same principle as what they are implying, but chandran signatures aren't linkable / traceable You are sad. |
|
|
|
sub-linear traceable ring signatures could operate on the same principle as what they are implying, but chandran signatures aren't linkable/traceable
This is the CryptoNote whitepaper: https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdfBy combining both methods (unlinkable public keys and untraceable ring signature) Bob achieves
new level of privacy in comparison with the original Bitcoin scheme.
Please read section 4.4 and 4.5. A ring signature doesn't have to be 'traceable' for anonymizing transactions. I'm not even talking on a vaporware, this is CryptoNote. Jamming technical words you don't understand together doesn't make you look smart.
But you sure as hell are going to give it a go right!? it has to be traceable, so you have like a public tag, otherwise the same ringsignature could just be created again, and they could double spend. Linkable: (in the context of ring sigs) seems to mean that the same tag can't be used twice in the same ring traceable means the tag can't be used twice regardless of the keys in the ring. Read that whitepaper !! In section 4.4 in the LNK scheme you can find how CryptoNote is doing this without a tag. |
|
|
|
sub-linear traceable ring signatures could operate on the same principle as what they are implying, but chandran signatures aren't linkable/traceable
This is the CryptoNote whitepaper: https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdfBy combining both methods (unlinkable public keys and untraceable ring signature) Bob achieves
new level of privacy in comparison with the original Bitcoin scheme.
Please read section 4.4 and 4.5. A ring signature doesn't have to be 'traceable' for anonymizing transactions. I'm not even talking on a vaporware, this is CryptoNote. Jamming technical words you don't understand together doesn't make you look smart. |
|
|
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ?
Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread. Lets just assume these facts: 1. CryptoNote is a way to implement ring signatures into a blockchain 2. Chandran signature is a ring signature scheme with less space requirement So, you are either saying: 1. CryptoNote is a scam, ring signatures could not be implemented ! 2. Chandran signature paper is a lie, it doesn't provide a ring signature model ! 3. Implementing Chandran signatures instead of normal ring signatures require more requisites. If you are not completely retarded, your objection is number 3. Read this paper and tell me that requirement, as I haven't found any: http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~sahai/work/web/2007%20Publications/ICALP_Chandran2007.pdfIf you can't, just fuck off |
|
|
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ?
Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
Do I need to repeat this ? |
|
|
|
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ?
Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
|
|
|
|
It's a waste of time trying to speak with circle jerkers. Have fun waiting on your vapor. I'll check back in around the same time NASA launches its proposed manned exploration of Mars.
The fact that you FUD is sad. The fact that you are paid to FUD is sad. You are sad my friend, get a life. |
|
|
|
Looks like we are going to the permanent bottom  sell your coins to me before it's too late Already done. |
|
|
|
|
Such a massive dump and the price bounced right back, I LOVE this coin
|
|
|
|
|
Are you even going to do anything new ?
|
|
|
|
 Passwordless wallet with next gen authentication Man, this thing is gonna crash hard, the designs look awful |
|
|
|
|
