Creative Mining dividend payouts will continue as per contract.

It simply means We are using the profit We have made so far to expand our mining facility. Yes, the living quarters were initially created for the operators to stay overnight. The space was also used as storage room for boxes and spare equipment.

No, we have not been acclimatized to it.  No, we don't want one person to fix it.  No, we don't want to elect our king.

The ABUSE of executive power by Obama is widely acknowledged and is completely unprecedented.

Yes, the nobel committee asked for it back, essentially revoking it

http://www.thefinaledition.com/article/nobel-committee-asks-obama-nicely-to-return-peace-prize.html

This was the 2nd result (below wikipedia) when searching google for 'obama nobel peace prize'

But, he revealed the committee members were all “legless drunk” the day they voted, as it was the start of Norway’s annual aquavit-tasting festival. The “totally toasted” members listened over and over to replays of Obama’s Cairo speech, tearing up and drinking shots to the glorious future: a black man leading America and the world into a new era of peace, hope and goodwill. “For a few hours we were all 18 year-old students again at the beautiful, occasionally sunny University of Bergen! Oh, how we cried for joy!”

I dont agree with the fact that its invented to keep population down because they are not helping at all population is still growing nonstop.

Monetary gain, within the context of “loaning,” is, traditionally, realized via positive interest—which is an artificial scarcity. Artificial scarcity reserves, for itself, resources that, without its imposition, could be allocated to greater machinations.

Dear Shareholders,

Creative Mining management team held initial meeting last friday regarding the future of our mining facility in Bochum. We have decided we will use our mining profit and re-investment funds to expand mining operation in to living quarters of our underground facility. This will give us about 40m2 of space and allow us to use the full advantage of free electricity grid. We have already purchased the racking system, fire suppression unit, 3x 12" server extraction units, electrical wiring and power strips. We are currently in the process of evaluating our power usage to maximize the outcome.

We are considering launching our own cloud mining service after the Initial Public Offering shares are sold. Creative Mining board meeting will be scheduled for next week.

Additionally, we have just received our 5 (five) AntMiners S3 from Mariusz and another order was placed with BitmainTech re-seller for 12 (twelve) AntMiners S4. These will be deployed once We have the 2nd server room ready. More updates will follow.

We have engaged in conversation with one of the leading marketing firms. Creative Mining will soon be launching it's own marketing campaign. Stay tuned.

Creative Mining

"The future is bright"

I don't know about laws, but stuff similar to this doesn't happen only in Florida. Wasn't it in the UK that some people started installing anti-homeless spikes on the ground outside the buildings? And something like it was going on in Chicago as well.

There are similar "spikes" under bridges and benches are designed so it is not possible to sleep on them in many cities across the US. These kinds of things are going to give people incentives to get "off the street"

The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against

While both parties are somewhat similar as neither party wants to have any kind of radical changes to the US they are different on many issues and there are also many public officials that do not affiliate with either party

The dems actually outspent the republicans overall and outspent them in many competitive races that the republicans ended up winning.

The reason why democrats cry wolf about "evil money" is because it comes from corporations and business groups when it goes to republicans, however the large sums of money that democrats receive generally come from labor groups which is not considered "evil money" in the eyes of democrats

AIDS and Ebola are engineered diseases to keep the population down or to make the drug companies rich.

One person died ever 15 seconds in World War I.

I sort of agree. If you look at the Soviet Union for example, it was pretty far from what a socialist society is supposed to be. Workers had no control over means of production, or much of anything else really. It was more of a totalitarian state. But you have to remember there are several ways to achieve socialism, not just through state socialism. Libertarian socialism for example, specifically rejects the idea of using existing state structures to achieve socialism, tries to avoid large concentrations of power, and instead focuses on more direct forms of democracy.

A lot of confusion there. As the previous user said, you can have personal property in socialism and you can most certainly have privacy. What you can't have is private ownership of the means of production. Workers would own and manage their work places. And production would be directed for consumption, and not for gaining profit. In this sense, socialism isn't incompatible with democracy but simply a different way to run a society, while trying to minimize inequality.

The only good law is the common law. France is not a common law nation, except that if one wanted to get to the core division between civil law and natural law, he would wind up with common law. But this is a hard thing to do in a civil law nation.

So, what is common law... the common law of the people? It is law that allows freedom among the people in every form as long as a person's freedom does not:
1. harm another person;
2. damage the property of another person;
3. break a contract.
That's it.

Make the government do only one thing among the people it governs. Make it to judge the above 3 things fairly and rightly. That's it. No other laws.

The way to make it happen is to give the common people the best guns, lots of ammo, and training on how to use their guns. If this is done, here's what will happen.

The people will get rid of the only thing that wants to make trouble for them, their own government. THEY will FORM the new government that does nothing except to judge between petty arguments and disagreements between the people.

The benefit will be wealth for all, because the people will not have to pay the taxes that are used to support the wealthy who get rich by being the civil law government.

"Knowledge puffeth up, but love builds up."

How high do you want to be built, Decky?

 

EDIT: How does an atheist know that he is an atheist? He doesn't, since he has no proof that God doesn't exist. But, he confirms that God exists by taking on the role of a god when he says that God doesn't exist. In other words, he is placing himself in the position of a god by making a determination that only God can make.

Atheists are ignorant hypocrites, and they don't even know it.

EDIT: If atheists were simply atheists, because nobody told them about God or atheism, they might stand a chance of being atheists. But when they make the claim, they are putting themselves up as a god by have the god-like quality of making some kind of a claim for anything, even for atheism.

So you're telling me the FSM is not made of spaghetti, can't fly, and is not a monster, all of which would invoke conditionality and therefore render it impossible of being a monotheistic god?  And when Richard Dawkins asks us to imagine the assertion of a teapot existing in some unknown extra-planetary orbit that he's talking about an abstract teapot around some abstract orbit?

The ways in which we are asked to consider the FSM and teapot are irrelevant to the debate about the existence of God.  They aren't asserted to be some conditional form, like Jesus, that an omnipotent God would be able to assume if it chose.  The FSM and teapot would make better analogies for Jesus than God.

So yes, it's a bad analogy.  It's a dead argument before it even gets off the ground.  You're better off just arguing against the assertion of what God actually is according to whoever it is you're arguing against.