Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 04:10:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
21  Economy / Economics / Re: Banks are more decentralised than Bitcoin? on: December 06, 2015, 06:59:31 PM
ha ha ha... indeed!  Grin
22  Economy / Economics / Re: Why has the world agreed that an ounce of gold is worth 50 U.S. dollars? on: October 28, 2015, 03:27:30 PM
Because the quantity of dollars is 50 times bigger than the quantity of gold. For example if the total gold in the world is 50.000.000 ounces and the total dollars are 2.500.000.000 then 1 ounce of gold = total dollars/total gold = 50 dollars.

There are actually five billion US dollars in the world, not counting the 1340 billion dollars in U.S. federal reserve notes. And there are 3,8 billion ounces of gold in the world. So the price should be 365 dollars per ounce of gold. But I guess other countries money supply should be included too, since we are talking about the entire worlds gold then we should also include the worlds total supply of money. Which makes gold worth a lot more...

I gave you an explanation about how parities should work based on logic. But there is no logic in the banking scam system.
23  Economy / Economics / Re: Why has the world agreed that an ounce of gold is worth 50 U.S. dollars? on: October 28, 2015, 09:50:43 AM
Because the quantity of dollars is 50 times bigger than the quantity of gold. For example if the total gold in the world is 50.000.000 ounces and the total dollars are 2.500.000.000 then 1 ounce of gold = total dollars/total gold = 50 dollars.
24  Economy / Economics / Re: Good animation to show how money being is created? on: October 22, 2015, 12:43:59 PM
The Secret of Oz - Bill Still
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN2M3qQlMXI
25  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: October 18, 2015, 07:26:03 PM
Communism = Centrally planned economy = Only FED prints money.
Capitalism = Free Market/Free competition = Many banks print money.

Wake up! We are living in a communistic system.
26  Economy / Economics / Re: commodities vs fiat (martin armstrong question) on: October 18, 2015, 02:18:45 PM
Adapt or adopt?

The butcoin system is different from fiat in two way: 1) a government doesn't control it, and 2) it can't be manufactured to control it's value (inflation or deflation).

Would it be better, yes? But are the ppl in power likely to try to control it if the world were to adopt it? Yes...they're human. For this reason i think it's best to keep bitcoin as an alternative rather than a replacement to bitcoin.

Also, a government doesn't control a crypto-fiat coin. It inflates and deflates automatically with mathematics.
27  Economy / Economics / THE GREATEST FRAUD OF THE LAST 300 YEARS ... on: October 16, 2015, 12:41:43 PM
THE GREATEST FRAUD OF THE LAST 300 YEARS ...

Aristotle had said thousands of years ago, that would be disastrous if once the money itself being turned into a commodity ....
The construction of money is a very cheap labor, since in order to issue a bill of 500 euros, if only a little paper, little ink (worth some dimes) and appropriate equipment (the cost of which any country is minimal). So while all commercial, construction and other companies working with margins of 3 ~ 10%, a money construction business would have space margins. This would result in the trader's money to be gained enormous economic power and sometime fatal to prevail over all financial market sectors.

Obviously those who drafted the first constitution of the United States had understood his words, and for this reason the first article of the constitution of the USA writes Magaliou letters:
"The Congress shall have the power to issue currency and to determine its value."
Namely that the state will issue and have the necessary money for the operation of the economy.

The Federal Reserve.

The above article today in the US Constitution not observed. The FED, the federal US central bank, is a multi PRIVATE COMPANY. As a result, the American people have lost more from the hands of the power to issue money.

Instead, the US government issues bonds, giving as security an individual, and the individual borrows money to the American people with interest.

The money-cared for each time to lend to each Member so much money that it can not repay the debt. Today America owes tens of trillion dollars, and pays every year too many dissekatomyria in INDIVIDUALS, simply because they used their printer to issue money rather than buy their own printer.

THE EURO AND THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Unfortunately, as we have said, for many years, the central banks of countries (that have the ability to issue notes) are private companies. The same is true for years to countries like the USA, the M. Britain, Germany, Greece ....

Especially in the European Union, not suddenly wake up no country wants to issue its own currency in its own independent central bank, cared and made the euro, we were put into the "zone of the strong euro" and now no member country can not escape from this horrible trap, since EU member states They agreed to grant the permit issuing money in the ECB (European Central Bank).

The ECB's Governing Council in accordance with its statutes consists of the governors of the central banks of member countries. This creates suspicions existence of a gang (called ESF) has placed a member of every member state and thereby manipulates the movement of money across europe.

What are the money changers?

The International Bankers, or global banking cartel, controlled by a number of very small number of powerful people. The dynasty Rothschild, the dynasty Schiff, Warburg dynasty and the Rockefeller dynasty are some of the money changers. The gang complement people like Soros, Kissinger and others.

Around hard this core are the major banking giants like Goldman Sachs, the Morgan Stanley, the JP Morgan Chase, the Citigroup, the Bank of America and Wells Fargo that regime type refers to as "speculators" or "markets".

Finally, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank and the IMF It is somehow central bank of central banks. They are private companies controlled by the banking cartel and their mission is to coordinate attacks that lead to bankruptcy and poverty of nations.

HOW manipulated THE NATIONAL ECONOMIES.

This is a very simple trick. So simple that the human mind rejects as unlikely and seeks something more complex in its place. As follows:

Through the central bank, the ECB under the guidance of the World Bank, relaxes lending criteria and essentially gives the green light to create inflation. Banks are beginning to put advertisements for free credit cards, diakopodaneia etc. Home Loans without strict control. This leads many people to get a loan from the bank, to channel money to the market, resulting in a growth and jobs, what one word we call inflation.

Instead, on the occasion of a sad event (typically in America - see Leeman Brothers) the central bank (again under the guidance and tutelage of the ECB and global central bank) hardens the lending criteria, and banks with the excuse that they can not cope the crisis and that they need liquidity stopped giving new loans. When banks normally collects the installments of the loans already given and do not give new loans, essentially removing money from the market and we have now what we call recession (crisis).

Yes it's that simple. What we call recession and inflation is 100% manipulated.
All other include macroeconomics and the like, is simply nonsense that used to cover this very simple trick.


The result today in Europe is the same as in America, since in order to receive money the member countries, issue government bonds (debt), to give the international financial markets (home argyramovon) and take the money.

RECENT EXAMPLE MANIPULATION.

The Leeman Brothers (as well as Goldman Sachs, h Morgan Stanley, etc.) belonging to money changers. The money-they put the parrots to tell that Leeman Brothers is in trouble and in danger of collapse. Shareholders run to sell their shares to escape destruction. The share price falls now really. Displays the deus ex machina Obama says he will not allow the collapse LB . He charges the American people by example 100 billion dollars, the money-(through Leeman Brothers) get their hands on more debt from the American people, the Leeman Brothers survives. The european looking 'fearful' America. The media constantly parroting that we transfer the crisis from America to Europe. The ECB gives instructions. The central bank implements them in member countries. The banks stopped giving new loans and collects the installments and the interest for the old. Money is dwindling market and recession begins ...

Especially in our case, these were combined with two financial speculative attacks: http://thalamofilakas.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post_2472.html

Think a little and you will see that it is. The crisis that built banks (removing cash from the market) in harmony with the media (which scared us properly).

Not only are these.

The amazing thing is not only the fact that people are charged an individual for not issue the money they need. The amazing thing is that this individual may under banking legislation, to "create" money from thin air (at matched by the bond took as "guarantee") to 10 times the value of this bond. The money is channeled to citizens in the form of loans.

I will talk about the CDS and derivatives (which are racecourse where betting the money-that a bond will not be paid). Something like that go bet, only the horse you bet is the misfortune of an entire people.

WHY BANKS AND PROSPERITY IN INFLATION AND RECESSION?

Because they have huge profit margins without taking risks!

The thing works much like the poker tables where the dealer takes a percentage as commission profit by each player each time money changes hands. Players can win or lose, but the dealer wins all the time.

WHAT PURPOSE IS ALL THIS?

Most loans are masked "in rem", ie mortgage your house, your land your business. The tale that banks are not interested in houses and land, are big lie. It is no coincidence that banks only accept collateral and their purpose is actually to get you home, land, business. Banks are not interested in the colored papers or checks and promises. Money can make that time want with digital recordings on their computers.

Inflation and recession is the tide and the low tide where every time you pulled the water, someone loses his business, his house, his fields.

The ultimate goal is to make banks megalotsiflikades which will eventually owned all the land, mineral resources, public infrastructure.

The whole game is a power game that wins the strongest and has the ultimate goal of dianomki power globally.

The recent global financial crisis was not caused accidentally. Designed and implemented by the money changers. And it will not stop but will continue and will be much worse than the crisis of 1929. The aim is to cause a global recession and generalized impasse. Then it will be proposed as a unique solution the creation of the Global Currency, Global Central Bank controlled by the same and World Government.

And we have good reason to believe that these people will not hesitate at nothing in front of the profit and intoxication of power. Their World Government will be global dictatorship.

HOW WE KNOW ALL THIS?

The internet today has zero distances and the information is transmitted instantly. This game managed and kept hidden for over 300 years with the Masonic lodges and secret clubs. But today with the huge spread of the Internet and the exchange of information, we are able to know the terrible plans.

All the information can be crossed with a little searching on the internet. Look 'central bank Statute "in google and download the statutes of the Bank of Greece to PDF. Look «European central bank memorandum» will find the ECB statutes. Look 'shareholder banks composition "and try to find the shareholding structure of the central bank. You will not find it. There for all banks, except the central.


THE POLITICIANS KNOW?

Of course. Today's politicians are not interested or represent the interests of the people. They are agents of bankers, and their interests serve. With great ease will allocate billions for defense equipment market, meaningless textbooks for the purchase of expensive surveillance systems, for anything useless and expensive. They waste furiously public wealth and bring the country in need for even more lending.

Think a little. The GAP is working on our own interests or run to ensure the banking cartel?

WHY WE DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING?

The money changers control directly or indirectly all the media, newspapers, television, radio, magazines. They have agents who do other work but to promote media information should control the election of rulers at local and national level, taking care not to expose to public view the corrupt this monetary system.


How can we resist?

The only way to resist an enemy so powerful as banking cartel (which controls the media, banks, politicians and through them the army, police, telecommunications ....) Is the civil disobedience.

Gandhi with civil disobedience and complete Lack of arms succeeded and expelled the then mighty British Empire from India, and I'm sure that if not murdered, now India will be a much stronger country in the International chessboard.

The question then is what to do as the Greek people. One option is to become slaves of International Bankers and their domestic agents.

The other option is the resistance which could be done in the box below:

1. Pause payment until check debt from reputable scientists and not by lamogia every week we announce another number.
2. Refusal of payment of the public external debt of fraud if it proved.
3. Termination of the global banking cartel.
4. Exit from the euro and return to the drachma if needed.
5. Borrowings from other countries not addressed lamogia.
6. Establishment "banking complete inventory» (full reserve banking).
7. Nationalisation of the Central Bank of Greece.
8. Create at least three public banks will not charge interest, but only their expenses.

All this may seem innovative or weak. You ask me who would find the money to pay salaries and pensions. You ask me how to avoid bankruptcy. For all questions, there are answers ...
http://thalamofilakas.blogspot.com/2010/06/blog-post_25.html

It is certain that we will have difficult years. But it is even more certain that if we do not resist, we will have infinitely more difficult for many more years.

Think about it.

The choice is ours.

THALAMOFYLAKAS....

See more: https://alithinapsemata.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/%CE%B7-%CE%BC%CE%B5%CE%B3%CE%B1%CE%BB%CF%85%CF%84%CE%B5%CF%81%CE%B7-%CE%B1%CF%80%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B7-%CF%84%CF%89%CE%BD-%CF%84%CE%B5%CE%BB%CE%B5%CF%85%CF%84%CE%B1%CE%B9%CF%89%CE%BD-300-%CE%B5%CF%84/
28  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: October 11, 2015, 09:36:26 AM
There is no free market. The banking system is centralized, so it is communistic. Also bitcoin is centralized and communistic.
29  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] NODE Revolution: "Money is a means of payment, not speculation" (с) on: October 10, 2015, 02:25:33 PM
Proof Of Activity sounds good, but you need to add a 5% demurrage, like Freicoin, to ensure its circulation.
30  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [Pre-ANN] ThePirateBayCoin (TPB) +Torrents on the blockchain+Built in downloader on: September 30, 2015, 05:56:12 PM

ThePirateBayCoin is a service that will eventually replace The Pirate Bay. Our goal is to create a blockchain based torrent database. Mining as we know it will not be used. TPB is Proof of Upload or POU. Coins are created like proof of stake but to get a stake you must upload a file, once that file gets 20 downloads or donations your address begins to earn coins. You continue to earn coins as long as people are downloading your torrent. To get more coins you can seed torrents. Every 1GB uploaded you receive 1TPB, and inversely for every 1GB downloaded you pay 1TPB. Seed back 1:1 on a file and you will net 0, nothing paid nothing earned. Seed back 2:1 and earn 1TPB. Uploaders will be given the option to charge per download, charge for the new game you just created, or the song your wrote and produced.

I have the skills to make this happen myself but we all know that a group would get it done faster, so I'm looking for talented individuals that would like to help me with this project. PM me if you are interested.

Website/Forums
http://thepiratebayco.in
 
Under Construction...





The economic theory behind this is wrong. There is no need to pay. You need only a demmurage (like Freicoin) to ensure the circulation. The Proof of Seeding is good.
31  Economy / Economics / Re: Can economies grow ad infinitum? on: September 28, 2015, 12:43:02 PM
Yes, because the needs of the people are for ever.
32  Economy / Economics / Re: Our financial problems are derived from money? on: September 27, 2015, 04:55:40 PM
The problem is usury.

"The Usury Problem Remains"

"Several Hundred Years Later Aristotle (384-322 Bc) Formulated The Classical View Against Usury. Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn’t beget more money the way cows  beget more cows. He knew that “Money exists not by nature but by law”:

“The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the natural object  of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), which means the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent. Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth, this is the most unnatural.”  (1258b, POLITICS)"

http://www.monetary.org/the-usury-problem-remains/2010/12
33  Economy / Economics / Re: Our financial problems are derived from money? on: September 26, 2015, 10:03:40 PM
Money and debt are 2 different things. There are monetary systems, (in the academic books), without debt.
34  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: September 21, 2015, 08:57:56 AM
Capitalism is good ONLY in combination with Keynesian mathematics.

If so, wouldn't that part (which is good in Capitalism by means of Keynesianism) have more to do with Socialism, being socialistic due to economic planning and public ownership (if I got your point right)?

Keynesianism is not a political system. It is a mathematic method to create and destroy money. It is not related to the question: "Who controls the means of production?" You can combine it with anything:
Keynesianism + Capitalism
Keynesianism + Socialism
Keynesianism + Communism

Okay, but in this case wouldn't they "who control the means of production" turn into the ones who control the "method to create and destroy money"? Further, since it is a mathematical construct (i.e. a set of predetermined rules and routines), it is opposed to the free market regulation (of, say, money creation and destruction), right?

Money is not a commodity. It is outside of the market.

I was referring to endogenous money creation and destruction through credit (as opposed to a planned method of doing the same, by mathematical model or otherwise), which is regulated by free market mechanisms, that is, through the laws of supply and demand void of any intervention from outside...

I m talking about the money creation and destruction without credit. Why you need credit? Print money and give it free. This is the Keynesian way.

And what's good in it? Isn't what you say looks more like Socialism, or, rather, Communism, the point that I made at the start?

By giving money for free you disincentivize those who are hard earning it 

No it is not Communism. Your property remains private. Keynesianism is a mathematical game of balance. You give free money ONLY when it needed to create balance or for funding, and you remove money for the same reason. Maybe you dont understand it and my english is not good to explain to you.
35  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: September 21, 2015, 08:27:37 AM
Capitalism is good ONLY in combination with Keynesian mathematics.

If so, wouldn't that part (which is good in Capitalism by means of Keynesianism) have more to do with Socialism, being socialistic due to economic planning and public ownership (if I got your point right)?

Keynesianism is not a political system. It is a mathematic method to create and destroy money. It is not related to the question: "Who controls the means of production?" You can combine it with anything:
Keynesianism + Capitalism
Keynesianism + Socialism
Keynesianism + Communism

Okay, but in this case wouldn't they "who control the means of production" turn into the ones who control the "method to create and destroy money"? Further, since it is a mathematical construct (i.e. a set of predetermined rules and routines), it is opposed to the free market regulation (of, say, money creation and destruction), right?

Money is not a commodity. It is outside of the market.

I was referring to endogenous money creation and destruction through credit (as opposed to a planned method of doing the same, by mathematical model or otherwise), which is regulated by free market mechanisms, that is, through the laws of supply and demand void of any intervention from outside...

I m talking about the money creation and destruction without credit. Why you need credit? Print money and give it free. This is the Keynesian way.
36  Local / Ελληνικά (Greek) / Re: Bitcoin: Και επίσημα ως εμπόρευμα το αναγνωρίζουν οι ΗΠ& on: September 20, 2015, 10:30:38 PM
Το χρημα δεν ειναι εμπορευμα. Ειναι ασχετοι απο οικονομικα.
37  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: September 20, 2015, 10:24:02 PM
Capitalism is good ONLY in combination with Keynesian mathematics.

If so, wouldn't that part (which is good in Capitalism by means of Keynesianism) have more to do with Socialism, being socialistic due to economic planning and public ownership (if I got your point right)?

Keynesianism is not a political system. It is a mathematic method to create and destroy money. It is not related to the question: "Who controls the means of production?" You can combine it with anything:
Keynesianism + Capitalism
Keynesianism + Socialism
Keynesianism + Communism

Okay, but in this case wouldn't they "who control the means of production" turn into the ones who control the "method to create and destroy money"? Further, since it is a mathematical construct (i.e. a set of predetermined rules and routines), it is opposed to the free market regulation (of, say, money creation and destruction), right?

Money is not a commodity. It is outside of the market.
38  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: September 20, 2015, 08:09:16 PM
Capitalism is good ONLY in combination with Keynesian mathematics.

If so, wouldn't that part (which is good in Capitalism by means of Keynesianism) have more to do with Socialism, being socialistic due to economic planning and public ownership (if I got your point right)?

Keynesianism is not a political system. It is a mathematic method to create and destroy money. It is not related to the question: "Who controls the means of production?" You can combine it with anything:
Keynesianism + Capitalism
Keynesianism + Socialism
Keynesianism + Communism
39  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: September 20, 2015, 01:02:47 PM
Capitalism is good ONLY in combination with Keynesian mathematics.
40  Economy / Economics / Re: Inflation Would KILL Bitcoin Dead on: September 17, 2015, 09:55:00 AM
Fixed supply is bullshit. Bitcoin will change or will dye.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!