 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
Updated wallet graphics is looking nice   |
|
|
|
Is the Wallet update only for the graphics or something else ? Because it should be better to know for the linux daemon users, so they know to install or not install Graphics only. |
|
|
|
-Dev to update wallet and post pic here
Tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, just to clarify, it's not possible to mine via POW. This coin is 100% POS.
|
|
|
|
i have create pool.
But have problem with compille wallet
r -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/checkpoints.d -o obj/checkpoints.o checkpoints.cpp
In file included from txdb.h:9:0,
from checkpoints.cpp:10:
txdb-leveldb.h:15:24: fatal error: leveldb/db.h: No such file or directory
#include <leveldb/db.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Error 1
You need to get leveldb. Execute this from src directory git clone https://github.com/google/leveldb leveldb |
|
|
|
I'm currently working on Master Nodes.
pls say that on main thread Just sent you at good size. But seriously,please say this on main thread !  Which one? There are 3 now |
|
|
|
|
I'm currently working on Master Nodes.
|
|
|
|
Dev, is this the right size ?
If not, pls tell me the size you want. If yes, pls update wallet and send me a link and a pic.
No, I need 1490x1000 |
|
|
|
It looks nice, but resolution is incorrect. Also, top left orange block is slightly oversized. |
|
|
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.  BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. It can be but the fees would have to be higher than the subsidy to reduce the 5000 reward to less than that. It calculates the subsidy, adds the lucky block amount if you draw a number less than 3 (5000 in this case), and then returns the subsidy plus the fees. If the fees passed in were higher than your subsidy before the lucky block was added, your overall reward will get reduced. Probably makes more sense to simply return the reward (exact amount) if you hit one. Yes, it's lower because fees are accounted incorrectly, but it's minor problem and probably not worth fixing (it would require hard-fork) |
|
|
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block. BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. Of course it is. http://107.170.57.24/tx/f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd55k on input, 60k on output = 5000 WOCX bonus Yes, it's missing few BTX because POS reward is added little bit differently then one would expect, but that's not really a problem. |
|
|
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. 1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png2- https://i.imgur.com/WePEbxl.pngIt looks really good! |
|
|
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block. BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! |
|
|
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? |
|
|
|
|
