Uh, yes, negative trust is meant for anyone who has scammed someone, who has attempted to scam someone, or who is believed to be a scammer:
That's not true and you know it. If that were the case then why did you post each of these feedbacks, none of which stating that the user was a scammer or was believed to be: 
And my personal favorite:  You were right for tagging that guy. What sort of a lowlife would deceive another party in a deal by acting as both a part of the deal and the escrow?
You tagged these people using the trust system because you do not trust them, as you explicitly said in several of your ratings. This is no different to what Lauda or Lutpin is doing in my opinion. Please stop holding people do a double standard simply just because you dislike them, it's obvious and is extremely childish. If its "childish" then I must not have gotten feedbacks after I left them . This is indeed true and this is the case . If you follow the forum , them why are you escaping this one ? Unless you accept, no one can make you understand this . |
|
|
|
|
Dude, you can not wear any avatar till you become a full member . Bettter join some fixed rate campaigns to get more money .
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not choose bad and fickle minded people like Lauda, Lutpin and yahoo for these positions . They will ruin your campaign . Better choose any other campaign manager for this .
|
|
|
|
You know where do you guys make mistake ? You guys are not giving a red trust back . This is the major problem, if you believe he/she is a shit (which is likely) then just spoil their trust back. Its all about their creepy mindset.
Are you now coming to every thread about Lauda, yahoo or me to cry and give your bs?
You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.
Being in a campaign, being paid to post, all that stuff is a privilege, not a right. You should handle it like that. LAUDA MUST BE REMOVED IN FROM DT AND STAFF
There's 2 people you should talk to about that. The first is theymos, who decided to make Lauda part of staff. The second is Blazed, who currently puts Lauda into DT. Good luck with your endeavours. I will do whatever I want to spoil your non sense posts but seems like you are coming to every thread to justify yourself . |
|
|
|
give an opportunity to someone to prove themselves innocent?
You just admitted you were guilty... And he just apologized for it too which is invisible to most of you guys . |
|
|
|
|
You can count me in . If you do not rely on me then check out what some bullshit guys like Lauda, Lutpin and yahoo have written . They have no relevance with the scamming part . They do not understand why do they do it but they keep doing it over and over again. Feel free to pm me .
|
|
|
|
|
You know where do you guys make mistake ? You guys are not giving a red trust back . This is the major problem, if you believe he/she is a shit (which is likely) then just spoil their trust back. Its all about their creepy mindset.
|
|
|
|
there are no signature campaign who's accept negative trust account
There are few . For example till february , secondstrade used to accept negative trust users. |
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, please let me know if you get any info about such signature campaign.
|
|
|
|
Lauda , Lutpin and yahoo are weird guys.
guys? girls? apache helicopters? They will misuse their trust ratings and will destroy your trust ratings.
Even yahoo who isn't in any relevant DT level currently? They are the real criminals.
For realz? By what laws? Might wanna think about crowd-funding a lawsuit against us in that case. Real criminals belong into jail or at least sentenced. Their trust ratings should also be spoiled.
I get the pitchforks, you bring the torches, ok...wait, what? 1. Nope , no apache, Antonov 2. You are not sure about what you are saying. 3. Yeah you all should be hanged till death. 4. Yeah seems a good idea, lets go for it. |
|
|
|
|
Lauda , Lutpin and yahoo are weird guys. They will misuse their trust ratings and will destroy your trust ratings. They are the real criminals. Their trust ratings should also be spoiled.
|
|
|
|
|
I am now getting good no. Of signups and I have set 60% cash back for the referrals. Amount will be shared according to the activity of the referral. You can now enjoy good earning. Remember to daily roll and increase your own pipeline too.
|
|
|
|
Hey boy now listen,
Trust rating is only to save people being scammed. Yes what you have done is a trust abuse. Trust system has only been made to protect people from scamming.
Hey boy now listen, If this is the case, then your negative feedback on our profiles means that you consider us scammers, is that correct? You presumed that we were scammers because we left a negative trust rating on your profile because of your ban evasion. Is this logical? If I had to scam then you would have never seen me working hard for signature campaign.
Of course my several accounts have been banned and the only reason was the quality of posts.
Working hard you say? You mean... working hard enough to be banned for poor post quality? And for that jail stuff, yes everything is possible. Make a plastic surgery, change your name and welcome to the earth. Hope this time the society will not judge you instantly. Meanwhile did you notice one thing, the guy might have been jailed for the wrong reason(a case of fault by police). So you should take your time judging others.
Of course my several accounts have been banned and the only reason was the quality of posts.
You admit that you have been banned multiple times due to the quality of your posts and yet you still think that you deserve a second (fifth?) chance. Do we allow thieves to continue stealing again and again only to pardon them? It's right for criminals to assume new identities and continue doing the same as they were before? The problem with you guys is that you judge people too early. I don't think that there can be anything to argue about ban evasion. This was not judged too early. This was probably judged too soon. 1. Obviously not. You are just viewing a Bad me. 2. You did not get my point. Post quality is just a guess, they had not warned me even. Moreover I forgot to tell you one thing. I used to post referral links too. So this may be another strong reason. 3. How about the fact if you are not sure you are actually a thief ! 4. Not sure what is the difference between last two lines but as far as I remember, alts were claimed too earlier but still I survived just because of the improvement I had. |
|
|
|
And I have accepted that in front of you all. But what now? Hey why I am not banned?
Concerning level of inactivity on the ranks of global moderators and higher. And you are here to pick candidates not to select them on the basis of elegibility. What if I would have come entirely differently ? If you can not tell the reason, you are not doing your job correctly.
I don't owe you an explanation why I don't want you to be part of my campaign. It's not my job to give that explanation either. Selecting participants, making sure they post constructively, counting their posts, making the payments, those are my areas of operation. No part of my job says I need to stand and defend my decisions. They are mine to make and yours to accept. Standing over ? Lol, like all other campaign managers were fool and you are the only.
I'm not talking about campaign rules, I'm talking about forum rules, which you are in open violation of. What is this, if not a clear sign that you think you are not bound by the rules and can act like you want to? Hired campaign managers work bad than owners.
It's "worse". If you want to criticize my work, feel free to do so. I can take it. But don't hold your breath for me giving a shit about your opinion. I won't. 1. So that means there are chances for my account ti stay alive. 2. Trust me , you do. Else there will be a dis-satisfaction spreading over. People will say you bribe and its justificable. 3. Rules are made for the convenoence of people and not for creating a problem. 4. I know but I tried to minimise your guilt. You will have to take it, as you deserve it. I am not going to giva adamn about your shit. Better understand what you are doing. If I am a problem for forum, I will eventually get banned but who the hell are you to decide someone's future ? You have got no right to do this. |
|
|
|
Hey boy now listen
Way to start a discussion, juvenile attempts at belittling the other party. How nice. And for that jail stuff, yes everything is possible. Make a plastic surgery, change your name and welcome to the earth.
I think you're running a bit to deep into that rough comparison. Hope this time the society will not judge you instantly. The problem with you guys is that you judge people too early. Of course my several accounts have been banned and the only reason was the quality of posts.
You have been banned several times. Independently. With different accounts. That is not being judged instantly. You've shown again and again the same habits. Now I am still alive due to the fact that I add value to this forum.
You are "still alive" because nobody bothered to look into you. I did. I found your past. At that second, you fell back and since you're posting like you did back then. Being a Sr. Member I do not feel bossy, that is what people should understand. Yes what you have done is a trust abuse. Trust system has only been made to protect people from scamming.
You're deceitful, you've shown yourself to believe standing over the rules, you have obvious troubles judging a situation. All reasons for which I do not trust you. 1.I believe it is definitely better than what you guys do. 2. I am not, you have missed points as expected. 3. And I have accepted that in front of you all. But what now ? Hey why I am not banned ? May be I am adding value. 4. And you are here to pick candidates not to select them on the basis of elegibility. What if I would have come entirely differently ? If you can not tell the reason, you are not doing your job correctly. 5. Standing over ? Lol, like all other campaign managers were fool and you are the only. You know what, my conclusion is: Hired campaign managers work worse than owners. |
|
|
|
|
I have heard that Germany has blocked bitcoin but I am not sure why would a country do this as bitcoin is exploding the market. Soon the market will get hacked by bitcoin as it is wild and have less of a feedback system unlike those of commodity exchanges in which supply and demand controls market.
|
|
|
|
|
I have got a friend who can do this. Let me know if you are willing to proceed with this.
|
|
|
|
Sure I will.
Well I have already done it. Lutpin and Lauda you two guys are responsible for negative trust without any valid scamming reason. If I am a trust abuser, so are you two.
Wrong. You have provided negative trust for the reason of "trust abuse". In what way have our feedbacks been false? You yourself have admitted that you have currently banned accounts, and therefore are evading a ban. I do not trust you because of that. If you are banned for whatever reason in a real-world location, would you be able to assume a new identity and then simply go back in there? That's simply illogical. The same thing applies here.
Remember the previous analogy to prison: if you are given a jail sentence of life, you cannot simply walk out and get a new name. It simply doesn't work that way. The trust we have given you is justified in that matter. In fact, you should even be banned right now. What is your justification? Hey boy now listen, Trust rating is only to save people being scammed. If I had to scam then you would have never seen me working hard for signature campaign. And for that jail stuff, yes everything is possible. Make a plastic surgery, change your name and welcome to the earth. Hope this time the society will not judge you instantly. Meanwhile did you notice one thing, the guy might have been jailed for the wrong reason(a case of fault by police). So you should take your time judging others. The problem with you guys is that you judge people too early. Of course my several accounts have been banned and the only reason was the quality of posts. Now I am still alive due to the fact that I add value to this forum. Being a Sr. Member I do not feel bossy, that is what people should understand. Yes what you have done is a trust abuse. Trust system has only been made to protect people from scamming. |
|
|
|
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .
Look clearly before making any statement. I have already looked. May be you need to wear spectacles . All accounts were enrolled in same signature campaign that has a special rule: - "No alts allowed" and he still joined it without noticing rules. And by joining signature campaign, participant agrees to follow every rule which he didn't. Feedback is accurate and there is no doubt about it. In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .
Look clearly before making any statement. I thought , DT member only will give red trust rating only if they doing scam activity Is scamming is the only reason for a red trust?  one might be cheating giveaway also. There are pretty many ways in which users have got a red trust. I think you have lost it. No alt accounts means I do not have authority to post from any other alt account which I followed seriously. Giveaway cheat is also a scam and it can be mentioned there. |
|
|
|
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .
Look clearly before making any statement. I have already looked. May be you need to wear spectacles . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
