 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
My EOS tokens are already being shown in myetherwallet and I already see the token symbol as well as the amount that I have. Based on that does it mean that they have been registered? How can I verify if they are registered?
Did you get your tokens through crowdsale? Exchange? If exchange, did you register them? I recommend this site: Www.eoscollective.org Go to resources tab then “crowdsale and registering page” - there’s a link for an article that’ll show you how to cofirm confirm registration through MEW if it’s already been done. And if it’s not, the first link on that page is sandwich’s complete guide. Step 3 of the time guide is the registration process. |
|
|
|
I got my tokens from Shapeshift on the Exdous wallet. Can anyone tell me when EOS goes into production are these exchangable into some sort of new EOS token?
they will be exchangeable. FAQ on https://www.eoscollective.org/ should explain how the transition happens and link you to resources on steps you need to take. |
|
|
|
I'm seeing a pattern here: the addresses below (and many more; below is a sample) receive ETH from Bitfinex, send ETH to EOSCrowdsale address, receive EOS from crowdsale, then send EOS back to Bitfinex. One explanation is arbitrage. But according to https://eosscan.io/ the price for period #146 (which ended 25 min ago) was $1.72, and even tho Bitfinex received a ton of EOS right after period #146, the price didn't drop from $1.78 (it may have dropped 2 cents from $1.80). If this pattern were just arbitrage, I'd expect the crowdsale price to be closer to the exchange prices. I have witnessed this many times--ICO price a bit below exchange price, but the exchange price doesn't drop right after the period ends. In other words, this pattern is probably not part of an arbitrage strategy. If somebody is accumulating EOS, there is no need to send to Bitfinex. https://etherscan.io/address/0x4e8c49fab23532ef2ed14058639f55cf45bade1ehttps://etherscan.io/address/0x59438809e11ef3a9e197de965abbfd6792092b76https://etherscan.io/address/0x9fad7a730ba976ea8cbcf8fcd6e4c217386520a8https://etherscan.io/address/0x188fb986e8932e8469578430acaa5a2c12f5c48bhttps://etherscan.io/address/0xe3c2e9512ea8026b68f69012944e89238a011ac7https://etherscan.io/address/0x71d8b9755bbca15fc491e6520c21e319a574680bhttps://etherscan.io/address/0xeae47e717bb68f80180382e954320bed9072676bhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x8c63dfba829060122225d22c9d1d33841d8468d0https://etherscan.io/address/0x47fcb6d294aad242088b026ad87867166c375207https://etherscan.io/address/0xe777cde17e532f78227554607872adbb36597f06also, EOS seems to be maybe the most transacted token at finex: https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0x1151314c646ce4e0efd76d1af4760ae66a9fe30f&p=1I am a huge fan of Dan Larimer, Steemit is a wonderful platform, and I really like the EOS project. However, I cannot come up with a legitimate reason for the pattern I am seeing above. The only explanation I can come up with is that ETH is being recycled into the ICO, and Bitfinex is being used to hide this recycling. I hope I am wrong about this. I trust Dan, and I would assume he's probably not involved in handling ICO funds. Furthermore, suppose recycling of ETH was occurring. The above behavior is exactly what you would expect to see. Who has access to EOS ICO funds?
block.one claims the ICO is being audited.. when can I review this audit?I've seen this: https://eos.io/faq.html but I don't blindly trust, especially with no way to verify. 26. Will block.one be contributing to the EOS Token distribution?
No, during the entire EOS Token distribution period, block.one will not do any of the following:
block.one will not purchase EOS Tokens by any means;
block.one will not pay any dividends to its shareholders; and
block.one will not perform any share buybacks.
block.one intends to engage an independent third party auditor who will release an independent audit report providing further assurances that block.one has not purchased EOS Tokens during the EOS Token distribution period or traded EOS Tokens (including using proceeds from the EOS Token distribution for these purposes). This report will be made available to the public on the eos.io website. Maybe I'm missing some other possibility but it seems like either: |
|
|
|
What's the best way to communicate support for better anonymity / privacy in EOS?
FWIW, the developers seem to be aware that many folks in the community support privacy within the platform for 1) personal reasons, and 2) practicality of certain d'apps that folks want to build. It's generally been suggested by the development team that there will be the ability to build privacy into the protocol, though likely at higher bandwidth requirements for d'apps. Overall, I'm not sure how to best advocate for anonymity/privacy in EOS but I am with you in supporting it! |
|
|
|
If I buy EOS at Bitfinex and I want to transfer them to my registered wallet. Then I use the ETHEREUM wallet address as deposit addresse, right?
correct. they're Ethereum ERC-20 tokens so they are held in ethereum addresses. |
|
|
|
what would be the danger? Is it not possible for the team to edit the amount of Ethers collected just to get higher market value for their tokens, there are alot of shady things in this space imo, they stand more to gain by honoring the crowdsale honestly than they do through unethical actions like that. i don't see the motivation. also, fwiw, block.one has pledged transparency on this issue and they're in process of engaging a third party firm to conduct an audit. note: i'm not saying it will happen - simply reporting block.one's assertion. |
|
|
|
what would be the danger? |
|
|
|
Does anyone know if snapshot will be part of dec 4 testnet launch? GitHub has the milestone for the snapshotting moved from 2.0 to “sometime” in the future.
the dev working on the snapshot (sandwich) has been conducting test snapshots along the way. he just did one last week and posted some statistics about what it revealed. I'm not sure what the change in the milestone is referencing... there's additional work going into the snapshot code to help provide tokens to people who either 1) didn't register, or 2) accidentally send tokens to the contract address (effectively burning them). Perhaps these contingency mechanisms is why it's being pushed back? |
|
|
|
I've been watching the last round and it was scary because nether eosscan.io nor eos.io/distribution/ showed correct amount of contributed ETH
so I was "blind" and did not participate
is there other way to check current contribution?
yeah, the data pulls for those mess up occasionally. they're not as good, imo, but you can also check out: eoschart.com eosprice.io |
|
|
|
Question, does anyone know if performance testing will be done before mainnet launch to make sure it will perform as expected? Or will performance be optimized over time (ie after production launch)?
it'll likely occur as part of the multi-node public testnet that will launch in december. |
|
|
|
Why does it matter if you are in the snapshot if eos contribution? Is it better to be or does it not matter?
Any blockchain that honors the genesis block, will award you native eos tokens on a 1:1 basis with the EOS ERC-20 tokens you hold. The snapshot is what enables this to happen. As a result, you need to register your ETH address (that holds your EOS ERC-20 tokens) with an EOS key that you generate so that you can claim your native EOS tokens when the blockchain launches. |
|
|
|
does all accumulated EOS tokens in a registered wallet have a claim to the new blockchain or just the ones purchased through the contract address?
all. Note: once you register an eth address to an eos address once, you don't have to do it again if you add more erc-20 tokens to the eth address. |
|
|
|
the revolution will not be televised  |
|
|
|
I feel like jordan peterson is a fascinating guy, regardless of whether one is ideologically aligned with him or not. |
|
|
|
the analysis in that thread (along with everywhere else, tbh) is suspect  I don't understand what do you mean but the group on telegram EOS traders is not scam or something illegal activity it is like this forum to share new information about the analysis technical or fundamental of EOS, on there no one push to follow their analysis to other members and it is not investment suggesting too, it is good be considered as community of traders EOS on telegram. I think you misinterpreted my comment. I'm in the telegram group and have been for months. It's a fantastic group of folks. My comment was speaking to my skepticism about market prognosticating and technical analysis in general. In other words, regardless of what coin or forum we're talking about |
|
|
|
I transfer my EOS Token from Exodus to MEW. Is this ok or i need to register also?
Yes, you need to register your ETH address to be paired with an EOS address that you generate. Google "registering my eos address" and you'll see a few Steemit guides written by Sandwich (the dev who is responsible for writing the snapshot code) |
|
|
|
Hi guys, got my first batch of EOS there, got a quick question. They are in MEW with nano, do I only have to register the ETH address once, and then I can can continue to accumulate in that address and they will all be accounted for in the snap shot?
That is absolutely correct. Register your ETH address (that your Nano controls the private keys for) once and then once that's paired with an EOS address, you can keep adding ERC-20 tokens to hte ETH address. At the time of the snapshot, whatever is in that paired ETH address is what you'll receive in native EOS tokens. |
|
|
|
I'm would like to read your white paper - sounds super interesting. Can you link me to it? (Note: sorry if it's already been shared upthread or elsewhere. I'm a newb and probably missed whatever original post you made sharing the Github link or other posting location of the paper)
Considering your derogatory comment to me upthread, do you think I am stupid enough to release my technology before it is launched so that EOS or Vitalik can copy it. EDIT: I note you asked me about Urbit after that, so perhaps that prior comment was just joke. In any case, decided not to release the technology until after launch. We’re not preselling tokens to speculators and are not attempting to build a community of speculators to give us some speculation and capitalization market advantage, thus we must keep our technology closed until we have gained an insurmountable adoption advantage. Then we will open source everything. Users do not care about the technological details any way. Apologies if I am not really in the mood either for pleasantries in this thread. FWIW, the "Please don't" comment was indeed a complete joke, hence the smiley face. As it relates to the Urbit question and the white paper question, they were both intended to be honest, face-value questions coming from a place of genuine interest. That said, I respect your decision WRT to withholding information about your project until after launch. I'll look forward to reading the white paper at that time. Carry on... |
|
|
|
The dickhead (not referring to Dan, unless he is a sockpuppet troll here) is going to learn something about reality soon[within a few months].
Furthermore, I (claim I) solved the problem of how to do a million+ transactions per second, entirely decentralized, no voting, no proof-of-work, no proof-of-stake, back in Q4 2016 when I wrote 30+ page white paper. My recent blog which afaics strongly evidences that Dan is not thoroughly qualified, was excerpted from that white paper. Hi Shelby, I'm would like to read your white paper - sounds super interesting. Can you link me to it? (Note: sorry if it's already been shared upthread or elsewhere. I'm a newb and probably missed whatever original post you made sharing the Github link or other posting location of the paper) Cheers, key_z |
|
|
|
|
