|
please pm me. I will pay $82 PP/Skrill at most for 0.1btc
i will not go first, though an escrow is fine.
completed, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
not much, it would simply move into black market economy for that sector with extremely high cost and rare to come across
|
|
|
|
|
WTSC / 120000 / 0.0000225 BTC / 2.7BTC
sad that I have to offload have some offline matters to take care of
|
|
|
|
A service I use is offering a discount for renewals with Bitcoin. I need around $110 in Bitcoin. I have an Amazon balance I would like to trade for the BTC. I have Prime for about 4 years now, so you would get free 2 day shipping with the order (US Only). I haven't been on the forums much but am a trusted seller/trader. No hassles, quick order. If you have less positive feedback then I, you have to send the Bitcoin first. You can also check out my rep on the WOT (not sure if anyone still uses it) https://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=Rawted&sign=ANY&type=RECVedit: I would use coinbase, but the service's discount for BTC will be long over by the time it clears. |
|
|
|
1. You're completely incorrect. This is the college's MSDN account. They pay for a limited amount of keys for a limited amount of products. I have a personal MSDN account, and also manage one for my employer.
2. It's theft.
Why do you seem to always stick up for the scammers? Very odd behavior.
You mentioned you have a personal MSDN account. How exactly do you know these users don't have their own and that they paid the fee themselves? Just assuming that they stole them from colleges is not appropriate. What scammers do I always seem to stick up for? I guess I am a stickler for people having a fair debate and not just summary execution of neckbeard mob justice at any speculation posted. This behavior is also destructive to legitimate sellers that get harassed and drives people away from Bitcoin. The user posted in one of his other threads that it was his college's MSDN account. While I totally understand and support your mentality towards mob justice, I think it's misguided at times. You're going out of your way to defend this user, who is wrong and a thief, and you did the same recently for the guy who claimed to hand carve those wooden items. It's not that you're just supporting them, it's that you go over the top to support them, for seemingly no reason (which leads people to deduce that you are in cahoots). Heck, you stand up for them more than they do themselves, as people like the wood artist guy STILL hasn't produced the verification that he hand carves the items to this day. Perhaps you don't realize what it looks like to outsiders. |
|
|
|
I think the neighborhood scambusters are confusing a violation of a contractual agreement with criminal activity. What the OP is doing is NOT criminal activity, however he is potentially liable under a lawsuit from Microsoft for not obeying the terms of his agreement with them. Please learn the difference before you go around enforcing Microsoft contract law for them.
Don't be so obtuse. He is stealing from the college, plain and simple. It's also a violation of Federal Anti-Piracy laws. Ok. A couple things... 1. Educational versions of software are not paid for by colleges, they are discounts offered from the manufacturer. No one is stealing from colleges. 2. It is NOT a violation of any law. Wost case it is a violation of contract law by breaking the TOS agreement with Microsoft which makes it a CIVIL matter NOT a criminal matter. If you are SO ASSURED that selling legally obtained registration keys is illegal, you should not have any trouble citing the statute under which such activities are deemed a criminal act. So far no one has actually referenced a law that applies to this. 1. You're completely incorrect. This is the college's MSDN account. They pay for a limited amount of keys for a limited amount of products. I have a personal MSDN account, and also manage one for my employer. 2. It's theft. Why do you seem to always stick up for the scammers? Very odd behavior. |
|
|
|
I think the neighborhood scambusters are confusing a violation of a contractual agreement with criminal activity. What the OP is doing is NOT criminal activity, however he is potentially liable under a lawsuit from Microsoft for not obeying the terms of his agreement with them. Please learn the difference before you go around enforcing Microsoft contract law for them.
Don't be so obtuse. He is stealing from the college, plain and simple. It's also a violation of Federal Anti-Piracy laws. |
|
|
|
For the record, selling keys from a MSDN account is not allowed.
Also you might want to remove the negative feedback you rashly left on Tomatocage. Leaving it there while he has been more than accommodating to you is kind of a dick move.
Already removed -_- Also no one is asking you to buy  So mind your own business kiddo Well, I assume you will stop selling MSDN keys immediately or face negative feedback, since selling them is against the rules. Your move. Check out the marketplace, 60% sellers sell MSDN. There is no rule against selling MSDN on the forums that I know off Being legendary doesn't mean you are the God at the forums. At least give us a chance. Once again, because you seem to have a comprehension problem, this is illegal to do. No one gives a crap about these forums, they hold no authoritative power. You will face serious federal charges and a software piracy suit from Microsoft if caught (and you will be caught). |
|
|
|
Fucker you spoiled my REP. This is a clear warning, post it anywhere you want, you will be dealt with. Karma will deal with you asshole. I never sold any illegitimate key. My MSDN subscription was from my college and not from buyers present here, that is why I didn't sell my admin account dickhead.
You just come out of nowhere and start messing with me -_-
Seriously dude get a life. And stand up to your bullies at school.
Dipshit asshole. I'll talk to theymos about this. Enough is enough. Enough of you nuisance. Also my self moderated thread is not a new one. It was created about a week ago. Check you facts asshole. I sent you this PM. Let it be public. Let everyone know what kind of screwed up personality you are. . Read your EULA. Or google it. I concede that your self-moderated thread is over a week old. It doesn't change much though. I throw back that I did not ruin your reputation. I've made the same comments in threads for other sellers, yet they're still actively running their illegal business. You can ask yourself what you did different from them to get a different result. Never mind I'll just ignore you. You are one screwed up person. I'm NOT asking you to buy from me these MSDN keys. Just leave it. Have a good life ahead. So you are selling your college's MSDN keys, and he is the screwed up one here? You realize that's not only a violation of Microsoft's TOS, but also a federal crime? What if someone were to contact one of your buyers, and acquire one of your sold keys? You realize how easy it is to track this, correct? |
|
|
|
Please can you loan me , i will return in 3 days max once i get some orders , which i get regularly My first question would be why not wait 3 days and not have to take out a loan? If someone is asking around for multiple ~$10 loans, chances are they're scamming. |
|
|
|
|
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. This guy knew what he was doing all along, and he needs to serve time. Regrets is either in on the scam now or just a gullible idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
Just placed my fourth order with Bees Brothers! The people I gift the premade boxes to absolutely love them. Everything is always packaged well and shipped quickly.
A+ company.
|
|
|
|
Where does this stand? Segvec, has any of HBO's victims contacted you?
He isn't going to pay me or anyone else back Have you paid your victims back yet? |
|
|
|
|
Where does this stand? Segvec, has any of HBO's victims contacted you?
|
|
|
|
A couple of suggestions would be either wiki leaks or wikimedia. Neither of these are my projects and neither is directly connected to Bitcoin/crypto currencies however they do support freedom of speech and the free flow of information.
Another suggestion would be dabbs's food for children donation thread.
Thanks! Any chance you might have a link handy? |
|
|
|
|
Let me clarify a bit further. Your project MUST go towards the betterment of cryptocurrencies or humanity. I am not interested in promoting your altcoin, service, or goods that produce a profit for you. See Sean's Outpost in my signature? I am looking for another along the same lines to support.
|
|
|
|
Can I get it? Can you promote altcoins?
Did you even read my post? |
|
|
|
|
I have no use for the space with my IRC web of trust rating link anymore, and I thought I could make better use out of that area. I would like to offer up space in my signature, for free, for any company involved with the betterment of cryptocurrencies or humanity in general. You will most likely need to be a NFP, and must currently be active in the community in some capacity.
Post here or PM with any questions.
|
|
|
|
Is escrow ready or not? I'm otw home from work to submit the report and upload some pics to Devthedev I absoloutely can't stand people who make assumptions and false pretenses
No assumptions or false pretenses here. I've been through the DOD screening process before. I've worked for the DOD in both a GS and active duty military status. I have a top secret clearance. You would not pass initial eval with that attitude and lack of professionalism. Every report you're pushing on users here is nothing more than an automated scan, and it's quite clear from how you post them, that you do not understand the information you're regurgitating. It's dangerous at best, and a scam at worst - and we like to keep those things out of the community here, hence my 'harsh' words (read: truth). |
|
|
|
atomic-trade.com (23.101.121.25)
HTTP server signature Microsoft-IIS/8.5
Downgrade attack prevention = No, TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV not supported
This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. = RC4 Yes WEAK
Downgrade attack prevention = No, TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV not supported - Only matters if they are strictly supporting ssl3, and they are not. They are not vulnerable to poodle, this is a false flag. This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. = RC4 Yes WEAK - Great, so they can disable RC4 and be done with it. It's not needed. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
