Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
Suppose for a second that Chinese miners were being "subsidized" by the Chinese government in more ways than just free electricity?
But... but... why would they do that?? What advantage could China gain over the long term with Bitcoin?? What could the Chinese miners possibly be giving their Government in return for such generosity?
My understanding is there's very little generosity. If the going stories are true, some of these megamines are set up right next to the spillways of hydro stations, which have insufficient demand due to ghost cities, shitty planning, vast distances to span with ultrahighvoltage powerlines, etc., etc. Taxes and greased palms are better than the alternative, which is zip ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) @Elmo re. "There is no greed": There is, just as much, but they have the decency not to turn it into a virtue. Greed is shit, Elmo, greed is bad. That price, tho... https://youtu.be/1ytCEuuW2_A
|
|
|
A: They start turning off mining rigs. Hashrate falls. Just like Satoshi's model predicts. Then an equilibrium on mining production is found vs. demand = exchange rate.
Ah, I misunderstood what you were saying, my mistake. The thing about "shutting off rigs" = "going out of business," and miners with serious money might want to keep mining at a huge loss, to bankrupt the competition.
|
|
|
1. Bitcoin is an equity, not a consumer good. There are other sellers besides miners who hold 16,000,000 coins. 2. The mining cost is a variable which can go to 0. 3. Miners can and will sell at a loss to cover equipment costs or if they have a negative outlook.
That is what i am trying to tell :-) It is just so many hooked up with this myth that mining costs somehow influence bitcoin prices. They are not. Don't be stupid. There is a major difference between selling at a 'small' loss (i.e., just in the red), vs. selling for nothing. Miner costs absolutely put a floor on what miners will be willing to sell coins on the market. Just ask gold miners or oil producers how far they are willing to sell below production costs, and for how long. OK, let's say you're a miner, and it costs you $1,000 to mine 1BTC, on the average. 1. Miners try to sell coins for $1,000 to cover their costs. 2. No one buys. 3 ? ? ? Wat do?
I'll tell you wat do. 1. You go out of business, go bankrupt, like KNC is doing. 2. You dropping out drops the difficulty (eventually). 3. This drops "production costs" for other miners. 4. When enough miners (1), the miners which didn't drop out are able to sell their coins for what the market is willing to pay, reestablishing equilibrium, per Satoshi's design ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
1. Bitcoin is an equity, not a consumer good. There are other sellers besides miners who hold 16,000,000 coins. 2. The mining cost is a variable which can go to 0.
With you up to here. 3. Miners can and will sell at a loss to cover equipment costs or if they have a negative outlook.
What do you mean by "at a loss"? Not below the price of electricity it takes to mine the coin, that just drives you deeper into the red. There could be some Mexican standoffs where miners may mine at a total loss, to bankrupt the competition, but this is strictly a short-term thing.
|
|
|
This whole concept of "production cost must equal/below product value" is fishy, failed labor theory thinking, marxist bs, totally debunked and failing basic logic since 100+ years. And you were doing so well up to here ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) The cost of production does need to below retail price, otherwise you're losing money. "Value" is a different variable altogether, so having price (cost) on one side and "value" on the other is comparing apples to oranges. Nothing Marxist about any of this. That is labor theory of value thinking what you are saying, if you think that as a macroeconomic phenomenon: " The cost of production does need to below retail price, otherwise you're losing money" A whole industry can only be "unprofitable" if they produce mud pies. If i am losing money, that means i made a bad speculation about future demand, and i oversupplied the market, With you thus far... AND my production costs are greater than the guy next to me.
That's where you loose me. If you're making hula hoops & you need to sell 10k hulas/day @$5 to make ends meet, and your buddy, the other hula manufacturer needs to do the same, you're both up shit's creek. Him going out of business won't help you much either -- you both grossly overestimated hula demand ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Not that the market does not appreciate my precious product and too evil to buy it from me for the "fair price". I either go bankrupt hence reducing the supply on the market totallity or make demand for my product.
How could the definition of value be different on the production side, and on the consumer side? Price (cost) is just the numerical expression in some unit of account of the value of anything that can act as an economic good.
I denominate cost in $, how do you denominate value? Or are you using "value" as just another word for cost?
|
|
|
This whole concept of "production cost must equal/below product value" is fishy, failed labor theory thinking, marxist bs, totally debunked and failing basic logic since 100+ years. And you were doing so well up to here ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) The cost of production does need to below retail price, otherwise you're losing money. "Value" is a different variable altogether, so having price (cost) on one side and "value" on the other is comparing apples to oranges. Nothing Marxist about any of this. @TERA, which exchange are you watching?
|
|
|
still no buying panic. very good sign.
Bitcoin and BTCeanies, my friend. Lack of buying panic is one of the things the two have in common. I, too, remain cautiously optimistic. Let's see how this plays out. Things are much different than 2013. I'm sure you're right. This time it's totally different ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
still no buying panic. very good sign.
Bitcoin and BTCeanies, my friend. Lack of buying panic is one of the things the two have in common. I, too, remain cautiously optimistic. Let's see how this plays out.
|
|
|
Sold my house this week. My mortgage was the last thing requiring me to have a bank account. Last mont my landlord started taking bitcoins for rent. He is happy.
So all this time you've been telling us your landlord accepts BTC, you were just lying? And I trusted you... ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) I paid my rent in bitcoin. Bitwa.la allows you to send a SEPA transfer. He was ok with that. Now it's direct. Let me understand this. You convert your paycheck from the US army into bitcoins via BitWage, and then you use Bitwa.la to pay your landlord via a SEPA transfer. BitWage charges you a fee, Bitwa.la charges you a fee, and the SEPA itself is a bank service. So you've added 3 middlemen, fees, and ridiculous complications for what us Luddites do via a seamless p2p cash-in-hand, 0-fee exchange ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Why do I feel you're playing me? Other than you never mentioning that you were paying off the filthy fiat loan you got from bankster j00z to buy a house? BitWage charges 1%. Biwala charges 1%. I am paid in dollars. My rent is in euros. The exchange fee the guys at work pay is 4 to 5 percent. BULLSHIT. Go wash your mouth out with soap. You can't even lie right. (unless you work with retarded people. Do you work with retarded people?) Plus bitcoin is my main currency. It is made to gain value over time as opposed to federal reserve notes which are built with the purpose of losing value over time. Losing 1% up front does not keep me up at night.
How is it that you still can't understand that it doesn't matter what money does over time when you pay your bills with it? Once the bill is paid, that money is out of your hands, don't worry about it. You get paid monthly, you pay your rent monthly. What's wrong with you?
|
|
|
Every time something Classic was brought up, market dumped. Now that the smoke has cleared, Bitcoin is mooning. Hmm... wonder what the market wanted.
Another bitcoin expert was telling me that the price is going up because halving, but ...you tell me it ain't so?
|
|
|
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown: Only 34 more days!
And only hours to the (>$15) drop. Not trading advice, have been wrong before. But not often ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Sold my house this week. My mortgage was the last thing requiring me to have a bank account. Last mont my landlord started taking bitcoins for rent. He is happy.
So all this time you've been telling us your landlord accepts BTC, you were just lying? And I trusted you... ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) I paid my rent in bitcoin. Bitwa.la allows you to send a SEPA transfer. He was ok with that. Now it's direct. Let me understand this. You convert your paycheck from the US army into bitcoins via BitWage, and then you use Bitwa.la to pay your landlord via a SEPA transfer. BitWage charges you a fee, Bitwa.la charges you a fee, and the SEPA itself is a bank service. So you've added 3 middlemen, fees, and ridiculous complications for what us Luddites do via a seamless p2p cash-in-hand, 0-fee exchange ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Why do I feel you're playing me? Other than you never mentioning that you were paying off the filthy fiat loan you got from bankster j00z to buy a house?
|
|
|
'The etymology of tangibility shows that in the late 14th century it was used as a “tangible thing, something perceived or presented to the senses”.' ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Someone should tell this intilecshual about common/technical/contextual usage, and why it often different from the word's origin. See "intrinsic value" in phil. vs. "intrinsic value" in econ. @Asrael999: Get back to me about permanence & temporality after Bitcoin has been around for a meaningful length of time. As it is, 7 years is laughably short, even when compared to the worst of fiat currencies. Fiat money is not meant to be a good long-term store of value, by design. It's meant to facilitate frictionless commerce. Normal, IRL people do not keep their wealth in their mattress, because that's how you get poor. No more than they use banks of capacitors for long-term electricity storage. The fact that caps will leak down over time doesn't make them worse than batteries, it's a different thing. Why is this so difficult to explain? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
Bitcoin isn't tangible
Yes it is... its information! .. I can print it on paper, on metal copper sheets so I can have them in 2000+ years to my ancestors, I can write it on a CD, store it on a USB / SSD, and from what I know you can also print it on a coin... And all of those can be multiplied with the same copy of the same thing in case something happens. Armageddon? You can also print "I got Assburgers" on a piece of paper or stamp it on a coin, and, while your retardation is almost palpable, it, nevertheless, isn't tangible. The paper is, your Assburgers aren't. You must learn the words you use before using them, starting with the word "tangible." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) buy your arguement a USD is not tangible either being simply a symbol stamped on a coin or printed on a piece of paper. Backed by the ability of a nation to collect taxes, or backed by an encrypted decentralised ledger - take you pick Of course USD isn't tangible, lrn to fiat. You guys are like some savage tribe that time forgot, "if I can't eat it/smoke it/fuck it touch it, it ain't worth shit." ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) USD is backed by "ability of a nation to collect taxes," i.e. jackbooted thugs, i.e. the military/industrial might of my country. Bitcoin is "backed by an encrypted decentralised ledger," which is to say NOTHING ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Do you even own any coins? Do u even know how Bitcoin works?
Do i own any coin?! Bite your tongue, child! Sure, played with bitcoin in the past, but we all did some stupid shit when we were young.
|
|
|
Bitcoin isn't tangible
Yes it is... its information! .. I can print it on paper, on metal copper sheets so I can have them in 2000+ years to my ancestors, I can write it on a CD, store it on a USB / SSD, and from what I know you can also print it on a coin... And all of those can be multiplied with the same copy of the same thing in case something happens. Armageddon? You can also print "I got Assburgers" on a piece of paper or stamp it on a coin, and, while your retardation is almost palpable, it, nevertheless, isn't tangible. The paper is, your Assburgers aren't. You must learn the words you use before using them, starting with the word "tangible." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Bitcoin isn't tangible, forget stone. Just a bunch of bleeps and bloops, 1s and 0s, memory/gate states in a bunch of Chinese 'puter gear: it's literally *nothing*.
Do you prefer American confetti paper? Sure. Use that worthless government scrip every day. Granted, BTC fandom is more fun, but ignore the lel, and it's USD all the way ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
The thing is that Bitcoin is comparable with Moses tablets! ...
- Can't be changed;
Was hard-forked already, will be soft or hard-forked again in the near future. Easy as pie. - Set in stone;
Bitcoin isn't tangible, forget stone. Just a bunch of bleeps and bloops, 1s and 0s, memory/gate states in a bunch of Chinese 'puter gear: it's literally *nothing*. - It can be almost physical but it can also be not;
- And it spreads like the "Word of God".
You eat a lot of acid, Miller, back in the hippie days?
|
|
|
p.s. yea i mad. I've just been fucking robbed out of $91 by these cocksucking motherless bastards at ebaypaypal
Don't like eBay? Vote with your feet & use Craigslist. Or keep your shit. Or sell it on the roadside, don't care. Next time find out how much shit costs b4 using it, lrn 2 free market ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Oh aren't you the cute witty one with the smiley face. How about you come over my house and I'll downvote your post with my fist? I just sold something on craigslist by the way. There's always a wise ass witty cocksucker like you who has to chime in with your smiley faces and your clever comments. People like you are so lonely. There's no need to be upset, I like your idea. How about you pay for my time to come over to your shitty house, and if you behave and I like you, I'll let you suck my dick, how would that be? Or are you gonna backpedal and claim you're too broke? Where your shitshack at, let's have the addy ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
p.s. yea i mad. I've just been fucking robbed out of $91 by these cocksucking motherless bastards at ebaypaypal
Don't like eBay? Vote with your feet & use Craigslist. Or keep your shit. Or sell it on the roadside, don't care. Next time find out how much shit costs b4 using it, lrn 2 free market ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I don't know why this thread is so appealing to new members. By all means you guys, keep posting whatever you want. I can't moderate the posts anyway. I'm just weirded out by the amount of new accounts replying here.
I think its funny. I may consider selling 5 of my MT's for 30 times the crowdsale. But no less. So any offers let me know. Can use trusted escrow. I personally feel they will hit over 100 times the crowdsale price. x30, you say? lessee ... 5000 btc is 5% of the wallet, so x20 is 100000 BTC ... you're expecting x30 profit so * 30 makes it 3000000 BTC ... how much is that in USD, I wonder? 3000000 * 570 = $1,710,000,000. Did I get that right? Mycelium wallet needs to be worth one billion seven hundred and ten million US dollars? Don't let anyone tell you your goals aren't realistic, that one's like money in the bank, bro! BTW, how's that Lisk investment of yours doing? All good?
|
|
|
|