All in all they have nothing to do with Facebook Meta and are simply standalone "games" which try to profit from the hype? Isn't metaverse simply used here in the context of "sandbox game" or "open world"?
Its Mr. Zuck who is trying to profit from the hype, not the other way round. Metaverse as a concept is about owning digital goods with blockchain linked identities and interacting in a virtual environment using avatars. Beyond that there hasn't been much development as far as decentraland and sanbox are concerned. They are just blockchain versions of games like Second Life or even minecraft. The "Metaverse", for the time being, is really just a farce. Yeah got it! But honestly Second Life delivered much more and is already 20years old. Looks like pure crap to me (Decentraland & Sandbox)
|
|
|
the facebook that the company will re-named as "Meta" and is total different with Decentraland and Sandbox in fact because of facebook says metaverse there bunch play to earn and metaverse project so enjoy the hype
True but the hype is literally about nothing. The ppl I've a feeling don't even get this. Like ICO moon ...
|
|
|
Well, it's just an umbrella term to describe anything that is hosted on the blockchain that allows for mass modal interactions.
So all of the projects that you have mentioned are indeed metaverse projects. There is no central metaverse that is the be all and end all.
Meta/FB is simply trying to get that first mover advantage with the branding and the name change right now.
Thank you for the clarification! I don't see a sense in buying property in "the sandbox" or "decentraland", just standalone project. Might hype might not. I hope Meta will actually make "the one world" and projects which will enable the interacation between (maybe other metaverses) or simply virtual goods will pump. Doubt this early projects will hold for long, just by pushing their own worlds. Like back in the early days with SecondWorld - one world made sense to invest.
|
|
|
Hey guys!
the Metaverse announced by the Reptiloid Mark Zuckerberg doesn't exists in any form right now? Correct? What exists are fully independet projects, like Decentraland.
All in all they have nothing to do with Facebook Meta and are simply standalone "games" which try to profit from the hype? Isn't metaverse simply used here in the context of "sandbox game" or "open world"?
Or am I missing a link?
Thank you guys!
|
|
|
there are alot of shitcoins which trade on uniswap. (ETH) Someone needs to provide the liquidity for the pool, how can I check the liquidity of the pool? So the amount of other tokens there. And if the pool is locked or not?
Why don't you just use dextool? it will be like this https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xa29fe6ef9592b5d408cca961d0fb9b1faf497d6d This tool can also be used in another blockchain like BSC and polygon. You can check how much tokens that already pooled and how much liquidity that available in your shit token. This will help you to know more about whether you can sell your tokens or not. I think that you can check on through their smartcontract by verifying it through etherscan. You can also ask the developers about this and they will give you the link to the locked pool. Thank you! That dextool was exactly what I was looking for! When it comes to looking the pool, that means that the devs. look the initial amount of e.g. eth/shitcoin, every increase of eth in the pool above is then due to the price change. Shitcoin example: https://www.team.finance/view-coin/0xBC7250C8c3eCA1DfC1728620aF835FCa489bFdf3?name=GM&symbol=GMHow many ETH did they in reality looked in the beginning once they setup the pool?
|
|
|
Liquidity pools are token reserves that are locked in DEX smart contracts and are available to users for token exchange. In the majority DEX, based on a liquidity pool, automated market makers (AMM) are used, which is a mathematical function that algorithmically determines asset prices depending on supply and demand. You should just look for the pool and it will be said how much liquidity it is there.
Thank you! I understand the stuff theoretically, but I don't get how to find it out practically? Can you give me an example with ETH/shitcoin?
|
|
|
The question is which stable do you trust the most? USDC? Dai which is also backed 60% by USDC, Binance? or Tether?
|
|
|
Hey guys!
there are alot of shitcoins which trade on uniswap. (ETH) Someone needs to provide the liquidity for the pool, how can I check the liquidity of the pool? So the amount of other tokens there. And if the pool is locked or not?
Thank you in advance!
Uniswap is working in the following way. A liquidity provider choose the pair and lock coins in different proportions and in the price range that he considers to be more reasonable. So as to check how much is liquidity, you are to find the pool where the coins you need is traded. Maybe you want to swap ETH to this coin, but there is no pool ETH/this coin, so there is a chain of transactions such as ETC-USDT-this coin. Thank you! And is there some type of chain analysis tools which exactly can give the insight into ETH-...-This coin? So somehow to analyze the pools indepth?
|
|
|
Hey guys!
there are alot of shitcoins which trade on uniswap. (ETH) Someone needs to provide the liquidity for the pool, how can I check the liquidity of the pool? So the amount of other tokens there. And if the pool is locked or not?
Thank you in advance!
|
|
|
There's a way to check it but this might be a bit complicated for you but if you wanna get the easiest way to check it and then you should go to the CMC and then search what coin that you are looking for. You can check it whether the contract already audited by auditors like certik and hacken or not. That's to make sure that if the smartcontract didn't contain suspicious code like self-destruct function and backdoor to be used to take all of liquidity. You can try another way like try to copy and pasting the smartcontract address on etherscan and you will be seeing the smartcontract code tab but it's better to use the first step consider smartcontract audit platform like hacken and certike have very good reputation among the smartcontract users and so many platforms have been using certik and hacken to audit smartcontract. You didn't need a complicated way to check the smartcontract and that can save a lot of your time.
Sounds like a great idea! But for example wrapped ETH 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2 Can't really find anything (for sure it's audited?) And is there a way before we do the transaction (to check if it's ledgit) https://app.uniswap.org/#/add/0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2/0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48/3000To provide the liquidity that we for example don't pick up a fake domain of uniswap and a fake lp contract: https://app.unisvap.org/#/add/0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2/0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48/3000
|
|
|
Hey guys!
Is there anyway how I can check if the contract address is ledgit or not? For the Uniswap pool when providing liquidity?
Thank you!
|
|
|
Hey guys!
What I don't get is, how was it possible to set up a pool but make it impossible for the users to swap back to their native tokens. Like was it ever possible to swap the tokens back or not? Like how do they setup a oneway pool?
Thank you!
|
|
|
Hey guys, in the following tutorial https://jamesbachini.com/new-token/ the guy explains how to deploy your own ERC20 token on the Ethereum network. In the end he simply mints them without any limit. But how do they usually do it that the minting is only done once, so ppl who deploy the contract won't use the function over and over again and increase the amount of tokens? Thank you
|
|
|
Hey guys!
Any idea how the ppl are minting on ArtBlocks new projects? Do they really use MetaMask with very high gas fees? Or are they using some scripts which enable to be even faster?
Btw is possible somehow to check on the chain, which transactions were successful and which not?
Thy!
|
|
|
Hey coole Idee Willi! Wie oft habt ihrs bisher gemacht und wie oft hats dann geklappt ?
|
|
|
Hey guys would in a potential Airdrop from Metamask the Account 1 receive the tokens where it was swapped or the Wallet? So if I've a wallet and made 5 swaps with 5 different Accs would I be still eligable for the drop with the 5 Accs or just once for the entire wallet?
And if someone is using his trezor/ledger with Metamask will he be eligable too?
Thank you!
|
|
|
Can the following happen? After depositing
What about the following scenario: Deposit 100USDT 1000Shitcoin
Is it possible that in the end I will withdraw 80USDT 1200Shitcoin
Because of something? Is this "slippage"
|
|
|
It should be understood that curve is the market leader and there are relatively low percentages in it. Therefore if reliability is important to you then choose curve and if you want to get a large percentage then take into account that you will bear much higher risks.
Thy Is there actually somewhere an overview over the APY for different providers?
|
|
|
|