It should be pretty easy to prove you're Satoshi and Craig Wright couldn't prove he's Satoshi so that means he's not.
Did not. This is not could not.
Wright also did not fix the claim that he faked his academic qualifications. We have verified at least 8 (likely more but we cannot get a response) post grad degrees including a PhD and a professional doctorate.
Wright has several IDs at each uni. At Charles Sturt he has the following student IDs as well as a staff account:
11293457A
11293457B
That is a little strange, but they are all the same person. So Wright is allowing (actively promoting) the lies that he has no academic quals...
Next, the tax claim is spurios.
Wright does not owe the tax office. He also did not recieve the money. More, the sale would have been a taxible supply linked to the return. IF the tax ppl had accepted wright's claims, wright would have paid tax. that 54 mill was an offset. there is 35% tax on business is aus, so a gain of 300 mill would be offset. That is 105m tax - 54 m offset or 51m to be paid to the gov. With wright NOT believed, he pays ZERO tax.
This arguement, Wright invented patents to make the fraud seem real... Really? He invented a 300 million USD company to cover up a fraud? If he could do that, why the fraud in the first place?
No, the reality for the tax is (as we see it):
1. Wright wants the tax ppl to thik he is not involved and a fake. This has allowed him to avoid having to sell BTC or pay tax. IF wright has those BTC and the tax ppl treat it as currency, australian law means that he needs to mark to market on an annual basis [1]. That means he has to pay tax EVEN if he does not sell. There are no claims on wright UNLESS he is Satoshi. Company debts do not flow through even if he has some. Wright CAN walk (and did) away from those companies. IT IS ONLY if wright is Satoshi that he needs to pay tax!
Next:
1. Core are biased. They cannot have a Satoshi who supports large blocks.
2. That computer was real, but it was involved witnh a company that does gambling online... The US gov indicted a few of the people who ran the servers last year. They are on trial.
None of this proves nor disproves wright is or is not satoshi, but that some have a reason for him not to be, wright has a reason to let people think he is not and wright is not fixing the lies that are said abpout him.
wright could EASILY send a copy of his transcripts. We have verified 6 masters degress and two doctorates. He has poist grad quals in law, finance, computer science, game theory, coding, management, info sec, maths and statistics/probability theory.
if wright REALLY wanted to prove he was Satoshi... why would he NOT just debunk the claims that his degrees are fake?
Wright has a tax thing. He wants the tax ppl to think he is NOT.
Some of the degrees we have verified wright holds:
- Masters in Statistics (dissertation on Levene's theory)
- Masters Science (Information Management)
- Masters Science (Information Engineering)
- Masters Network and Systems Engineering
- Masters Information Systems Security
- Masters Law (International Commercial Law)
- PhD (Computer Science, Game theory, Behavioral Economics)
The others are not related in any way we can see.
[1]
http://www.ifrsbox.com/ias21-foreign-exchange-rates/
Show Posts
