 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
Why do you write "alleged creator" instead of "established fraudster"?
Wright has show himself to be a fraudster beyond any doubt
I used to think that too... then I started lsienting to gmin.. explain all this? https://medium.com/@MADinMelbourne/welcome-to-the-ministry-of-truth-in-the-wiki-age-601ec28a2504Maxwell has links to wiki and others... So, all those fake things... they all seem less and less fake... and it all seems more and more AXA and B-S grasping to kill off anything that does not allow them to be in control! |
|
|
|
so bitcoin is deflation and real money is inflation.
gold was real money and not inflationary fuk nut. bitcoin is real money - dah. |
|
|
|
|
one thing wright was right about when we worked for him is that people in this group think small.
there are over 100,000 computer science phds and peer systems that scale and bitcoin thinks it has all the good people.
what qualifications do they have in core?
adam back is a compiler theorest for tech that went nowhere
does maxwell even have a degree?
as much as wright was a dick who got angry when we did not deliver
we did more in hotwire before he shut it down than core has done at all.
if wright had not taken a injunction on us it would have benn out as well already
and what - fukin satoshi not profitin... really are you all that fukin daft.
he has a billion usd worth!
as for this crap about enough
wright is not in it for money - do you think that 300 mil USD will be enough - his type are in to do whatever they are driven by and money will not stop him just as you think it is enough
wright destoryed himself as he wanted nothing to do with this peanut gallery of socialists who think profit is evil.
he was a libertairian you fuks. that means he wants corporations - dah
do you think having 60 phds and devs is not expensive?
wright has more ppl than core and you are all too shite scared to think about what he may be doing
you are playing into HIS hands
he paid off Hotwire and the debt is non-existant. The ATO stuff all gone away. he got away with telling them and then having them NOT believe - you are all so small minded.
|
|
|
|
wright traded small amounts that were linked to staff he had a few sock puppet accounts for his own stuff going to os accounts. |
|
|
|
i have a serious question to gauge your mindset..
are you the kind of person that gets a mortgage and thinks the house is yours free and clear?
or are you the person that knows the bank owns the house and as long as you repay the mortgage you are allowed to live in and maintain the house.
neither. false choice- it is not either one. you have rights to the house and can redeem ownership if you do what you agree in the mortage contract and you generally do not "GET a mortgage" you have less than you need to buy a p;lace and do a deal to buy it over time. So, you do not generally own it, you are saving to own it. i learnt that one way early on - then with ex's (multiple) one tries to stay away from owning. |
|
|
|
NOT HIS MONEY
its money from the shell games that all started from lies
So you say... but it is not VC and money was NOT recieved from the tax ppl and there are staff .... |
|
|
|
It should be, but wasn't Gavin Andresen tricked somehow when Craig Wright met him. IIRC Wright brought in a "brand new" computer, and supposedly signed something with Satoshi's key. Gavin said he was convinced, then later said he was no longer so sure CW was Satoshi. So it wasn't so simple for Gavin for reasons one can speculate on  No Gavin did not say he was unsure, he said we should leave wright alone - not the same. Either he was Satoshi, but really wants the world to think he isn’t, so he created an impossible-to-untangle web of truths, half-truths and lies. And ruined his reputation in the process.
http://gavinandresen.ninja/either-or-ignoreAnd from the things I read, gavin said he setup the computer and it was gavin's usb stick - not wrights again - wright HAS money Wright has degrees - he has money and he wants us to ignoire him! |
|
|
|
There were some ideas that he shouldn't use the Bitcoin he has from initial mining (I think it was around 1 million BTC.
Also if he ever wanted to convert that, he'd have to do it in small amounts (less than 1% a time in order to not negatively effect the market).
WRIGHT HAS MONEY! http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/13/company-behind-bitcoin-creator-sold-to-private-investors.htmlHe does not need to convert anytiem soon. he has more than blockstream - satoshi or not - he was a miner in early 09 and he has 100s of millions USD at his disposal! Thiink! what better way to hide than private equity. a company owned by a fund owned by a fund owned by a gorup of trusts... |
|
|
|
I didn't even hear about this guy until you made the post. If he was truly "the" Bitcoin guy, I'm sure the community would be well aware of it by now.
The MSM spoke about this guy quite a lot recently, but I don't think Nakamoto ever wanted his identity to be revealed. If he's the real creator, he should have some old BTC plans and prove the way he created it or so. He probably only wants to get his 'BTC Creator' status just for the money he wants to earn from it.. wright HAS money he has more than blockstream and miners now |
|
|
|
you know what the worst part about argument about "... is or is not Satoshi Nakamoti" is
the worst part is that, this discussion is so dumb and at the same time it has a very simple solution.
step one of proving someone is Satoshi is if that someone signs a message (a cryptography proof). it is very simple that it makes me laugh even thinking about people who are still talking about it.
IF the person WANTS to prove - urgh Prove and pay taxes. It is not proving, satoshi never wanted to prove - it is getting evoidence on a satoshi that does not want to be that is difficult |
|
|
|
the aussie government thing has not yet got to the point of criminal yet, to invoke extradition
and they are not chasing him so they never will the case was never wright, they did not like wright and it was all the companies So, there is noting. AND Civil means they COULD take propoerties and wright is not selling so it seems... He stiil owns multiple p[roperties whether he is in Aust or NOT and wright was before the gaar pannel and he won... so what to thast. He has left and it is not a fraud if he said it and they rejected and as for deported, they can revoke a passport - they do not need criminal for that They could bankrupt him if it was him and not a co he owned... so, you say all this and it is all crap So  |
|
|
|
Real Satoshi must have thousands of way to prove that he is Satoshi.Not unlike Craig who is dying to prove it but failed miserably.
Again. You fail to see that wright has to pay tax IF he is shown to be - 1. Not a fraud, or 2. Satoshi, ... He is KNOWN to have been mining in Mar - May 2009. That was in an Aust court case. Wright, satoshi or not was mining in 2009 and that means he holds a lot of control later and he DOES NOT want to pay tax. |
|
|
|
Wrigth had planned a move BEFORE the raid. The raid was AFTER he left and they were too late. The tax ppl wanted to get him but just misswed when they figured it out
craig recieved legal documents of demands from AU gov about going court/repaying, with deadlines and dates and such.. well well BEFORE the raid craig then emailed gizmodo to spark the rumours of him being satoshi before the raid because he knew that not dealing with the legal actions would result in a raid Wright recieved NOTHING. The companies did... Guess what. wright and companies are not the same. Wright can walk away from a tax bill - are you that stuck on a meme that is flawed? Wright STILL owns multiple properties in Aust If there was something on HIM, he would just sell and get nothing left Wrigth in the UK and the Aust passport he has means that they COULD get him. There is no fled, they can grab him if they want to - they just cant., |
|
|
|
anyway
hotwire was about tax refund
Seems you did not read. Hotwire was the gst claim. It was also a deduction that only existed IF wright had BTC. It was also a move of 31000 BTC from Australia into Sg. demorgan was about "credit" for advanced R&D for certain industries where the industry gets 45% of their research spending.
And here it is a rebate - you only get that money after tax. I may not like wright, but I worked at the co.s long enough to see what was going on. Wright also did not file the tax as is claimed, it was a senior partner at KPMG. I still think the ruse was wright moving it all OS so there is no tax. Wrigth had planned a move BEFORE the raid. The raid was AFTER he left and they were too late. The tax ppl wanted to get him but just misswed when they figured it out People involved with the tax filing Andrew Sommer, Partner Nicholas Mavrakis, Partner - Clayton Utz Van Bergen, Partner Carl Gunther, Partner - KPMG Michael Garcia, Partnet - EY there are others I did not get to see names from but these are all partner level ppl at top law and accounting firms wright did not just scam this... wright let it fail so he could move OS with NO Tax... Why is this hard for ppl to see! a 300 mill USD sale is a big tax bill... Wright has NO tax... Wright did build something and he now gets away not paying a cent! |
|
|
|
He could have easily avoided beeing attacked by simply NOT stating he is Satoshi Nakamoto.
He was being attacked well before that. If you are already being attacked - what better way that to fail publically. As a strategy, it does not mean he is or is not. It just means that nobody will believe anythinhg. If you have a 300 million USD company... do you want people digging and looking into you? it is also a good tax strategy. He left Au with zero tax owing... The tax people think it is fakle, write it off... wright wins on all fronts. |
|
|
|
No, it's just a false assumption. There are no reliable facts about the fact that this person is the creator of bitcoin, this is a fraudster.
What there is is LOTS of invested people who do not want wright to be... Ones who manipluate the truth and lie to hide anything that supports wright. That is not proof either way, but it means that there are a lot of people with a reason to attack wright.... |
|
|
|
|
