Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
Has anyone tried syncing linux node from start? how fast is it? I think it will be an issue later on if new miners and exchanges will list us.
I tried to resync my linux machine and its taking a bit slow from the very bottom. @adaseb can this be addressed?
Are you talking about the linux server daemon or the linux gui wallet? probably both. what i did was remove the directory of blocks and tried to re-index. its syncing but its slow.
|
|
|
Remember this guy? I wonder how many coins he has? He gets huge sum of the supply. he's using his own pool. There is a post of him on original using that miner name.
|
|
|
Has anyone tried syncing linux node from start? how fast is it? I think it will be an issue later on if new miners and exchanges will list us.
I tried to resync my linux machine and its taking a bit slow from the very bottom. @adaseb can this be addressed?
|
|
|
Pascal Lite Rich List
Pretty sure the linked accounts are inter-related just by looking at the account # and balances. Those at the bottom is dedmaroz with 10k each, new node are with 50k and 43k accounts. olorin is account 310-81 and you have about 40k by my estimate. all others are dispersed on small amounts. well you are all early adopters. care to sell some? We need the network to grow to at least 1 THS to be stable. and xiphon is correct. More pools. @xiphon, any plan of publishing pool source code?
|
|
|
Cheaters gonna cheat... Calling New Node 2017/2/2: Pls donate to project developments. You have almost 20% of supply.
|
|
|
Which FPC did you use? The one with "sudo apt-get install fpc" or did you download the one that's required found in the FAQ?
I install Lazarus and FPC manually. I download fpc_3.0.2-170225_amd64.deb, fpc-src_3.0.2-170225_amd64.deb and lazarus-project_1.6.4-0_amd64.deb. I'm quite sure this is done correct. And it is the newest stable versions. I'm not aware of any FAQ telling me to do otherwise. However both PascalCoin and Pascal Lite compile and run perfect when I correct the two functions in UTime.pas. This is how it should look: Function DateTime2UnivDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin // Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE}
----------- Function UnivDateTime2LocalDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); // Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE}
Then everything works Good to hear that it works now. Please give feedback on how fast syncing from start. Many thanks.
|
|
|
I've sent them a request. We'll see. That is good news.
|
|
|
I think there is a bug in UTime.pas. I got banned several times for having the wrong time although I was quite sure my computer's clock was correct. I UTime.pas I found a function Function "DateTime2UnivDateTime": Function DateTime2UnivDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); // Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE} It returns local time + 2 hours not the local time Give us more info about your location, operating system, etc. You I think are having this issue also with Pascal Coin correct? First let me correct myself it returns local time + 1hour, sorry! I live in Denmark and my computer is set to central european time zone as it should be. But this is not the problem. The function DateTime2UnivDateTime should retur Universal time, that is what the name says but it calls a fpc function that returns local time. Another function seems to be wrong too: Function UnivDateTime2LocalDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin // Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end;
{$ELSE} It is supposed to return local time but calls a fpc function that returns universal time I set my time specifically to your local timezone. Closed my node then re-open. Not having any issues at all. got no problem on both linux and windows machine. How did you compile your wallet?
|
|
|
I think there is a bug in UTime.pas. I got banned several times for having the wrong time although I was quite sure my computer's clock was correct. I UTime.pas I found a function Function "DateTime2UnivDateTime": Function DateTime2UnivDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); // Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE} It returns local time + 2 hours not the local time Give us more info about your location, operating system, etc. You I think are having this issue also with Pascal Coin correct? I think hes using modded wallet. Well thats not allowed in here.
|
|
|
I think there is a bug in UTime.pas. I got banned several times for having the wrong time although I was quite sure my computer's clock was correct. I UTime.pas I found a function Function "DateTime2UnivDateTime": Function DateTime2UnivDateTime(d:TDateTime):TDateTime; {$IFDEF FPC} begin Result := UniversalTimeToLocal(d); // Result := LocalTimeToUniversal(d); end; {$ELSE} It returns local time + 2 hours not the local time You can always change your timezone. try changing it to any time zone and check if you will still get banned. Unless you manually put 2 hours forward then you'll have problems.
|
|
|
Buying coins also. Pm me. 1200sat.
Edit: I already received an offer. Thanks for all the PM.
|
|
|
I didn't ask them. Its just some post I read somewhere that they require that much BTC to get a coin listed.
I see no chance of having this listed at all if we all go by the same passive approach. What a waste of electricity to all these miners. Better mine pascal coin or other shit that pays for your bill then.
|
|
|
@adaseb, have you looked into listing requirements at bittrex? lets get this listed. Last I heard Bittrex requires like 5 BTC or so to list a coin. 5 btc? the whole available supply is not even worth 5btc at the price he is asking in here. Interested in getting some pasl. Offering pay $50 per 10000 pasc. Any reputed escrow
PM me about pasl and pasl accounts.
Interested too. There might be someone selling. Pm me also. 288 blocks a day @ 50 coins = 14400$50 for 10000 means $ 72 for 14.4K. 72/1250(btc current price) = 0.0576 day for all mined coins in a day. not so hard to subsidize for a period. Hmmm.. Maybe there is an exemption to that 5btc. Are there other requirements they ask?
|
|
|
@adaseb, have you looked into listing requirements at bittrex? lets get this listed.
|
|
|
Interested in getting some pasl. Offering pay $50 per 10000 pasc. Any reputed escrow
PM me about pasl and pasl accounts.
Interested too. There might be someone selling. Pm me also. 288 blocks a day @ 50 coins = 14400$50 for 10000 means $ 72 for 14.4K. 72/1250(btc current price) = 0.0576 day for all mined coins in a day. not so hard to subsidize for a period. Hmmm..
|
|
|
@xiphonPlease use real time timestamp on your pool. demaroz already fixed his software. All miners are now on real time except the pool. I still haven't found a block on wolf0 miner.
|
|
|
We have now minimum this - Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago Is in possible to block old wallets?
As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network. Only the nodes have to have the latest software. But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage. Not correct. Any timestamp is accepted. Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp. Partially true, wetpussy and new node still shows negative. Anyone tried wolf0 sgminer solo and found a block? started mining a few hours ago and not so lucky with 2 470rigs.
|
|
|
We have now minimum this - Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago Is in possible to block old wallets?
As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network. Only the nodes have to have the latest software. But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage. Not correct. Any timestamp is accepted. This coins are exploited heavily already and big stakes are already in hands which are just waiting to dump. The coin is not mature in its current state for any use, it's a pure speculators (and fpga miners) coin with custom pools and hacked / modded nodes / wallets Agree. Eventually we'll get there on fixing this issues. I think PASL might open for your suggestions. right adaseb?
|
|
|
|