The tips are nice but I think there is an advice lacking in it. IMO, another tip you can give them is not following the hype most of the time since some newbies follow expert's views blindly. It might not make them lose all of their money but if they always listen to what the general public say about the market, then them losing a substantial amount of money from the mistakes they will make is very likely.

It would not be easy for it to go down but if things go on as is, it is very likely that it will become less valuable. It can lose value real fast like what happened to other currencies in the past that has been long forgotten.
people get into this FOMO because they personally believe bitcoin itself, like gold or any other commodity, can be a safe haven for the speculated upcoming economic crisis of US.

This bottom will not go up so long as the main problem(as indicated in the quote below) is still there. Therefore the price will keep swinging over it until the main concern is solved. Nevertheless, I believe we are not seeing the bottom yet because there are no signs of the main problem being solved soon even with all the upcoming ETF approvals.

You've already answered the question. I believe the text in the bold on the quote makes others really excited for the ETF since it will mean more profit to come and is the reason why ETF's have an appeal to the bitcoin community as a whole. Just the thought of speculating how much money institutional investors and other organization will put on it is very appealing, and the thought of price skyrocketing because of it is very enticing.

Also, it wouldn't hurt if you will try holding POS coins with potential to last long or grow in the future. That way you would profit while saving electricity since it can run 24/7 even if your gaming PCs are off. Just be careful though, most coins in the market nowadays goes down in value and the chance of them becoming a future shitcoin is high. Research a lot first about POS coins before buying one.

They might lose a lot of power but I think established billionaires will still be rich even if that happens. Also, I don't think corporations will truly serve the people, they will still serve the rich people with money(in form of crypto) and cater to their needs even if that time comes.
Personally, I think the two might coexist but I think crypto will be able to put a scratch over the stock market if ever both cannot coexist with each other.

Maybe you have missed this part? I am pretty sure that it is suggesting that Coinbase is turning into a scammy exchange:
Even if that event did not cause any exit scam accusations, it is hinting that coinbase is a scam based on the author's way of presenting the news.
People pumping and dumping coins is not coinbase's fault, it's the opportunistic traders who make the call. Upon reading the article on the OP, I have concluded that those 40 coins coinbase is planning to add are not that much of a shitcoin and most of them can have a real world use cases in the future.

Market cap is computed by multiplying total supply of all coins times the current prices of each coin. Since most of the market dumped or have gone down in value when compared to their peak prices in December 2017, it is a given that market cap will also decrease. The number of exchanges does not affect the computation of market cap.

I'll try to explain it to you using layman terms as much as possible. To those who will reply after me, just correct me if I am wrong. For now, Let's just say that blockchain in a sense is like a digital logbook which is always distributing information. That information (which is a data about a transaction) is always being broadcasted to a network of computers who validates it. Take note that those computers validating the transaction is not owned by a single entity or group, it is owned by many people in the community and the owners of those computers are called miners. After they validated the information, that verified data(which is permanent and cannot be altered by anyone) will be added to the existing data in the blockchain(the digital logbook) and will be stored on those network of computers. That's how blockchain works.

The crowd does not have wisdom, but predicting prices is easier when looking at their opinions when compared to not having a general opinion to base your prediction on. At the very least, you can know what is the current sentiment of the public in the market and you can somehow predict what moves they will take sooner or later. Even if it is inaccurate, it is better than speculating without another basis.

You are right but they are talking about bitcoin being risky in a different scale. They think that it is "very risky" wherein they thought that risk is higher than the chance of them getting returns from their investments when in fact it also has the same risk with putting your money in the bank or investing it into stocks, commodities, real estates and businesses that they can think of.

Sa panahon ngayon, marami nang scam na ICO's ang naglalabasan at ilan na sa mga ito ay ang GigaHashMiner na kung saan pati mga participants ng kanilang bounty ay nadamay sa pagkakaroon ng red-trust. Ika-nga ng iba, prevention is better than cure. Hihintayin pa ba nating magka-red trust ang account na ating iniingatan bago tayo umiwas sa mga scam na bounties? Pano nga ba natin maiiwasang magkaroon ng red trust ng dahil lang sa pagaadvertise ng scam/fraudulent bounties? Naito ang ilang tips para makatulong sa inyo mga kabayan:
1. Laging tandaan na ang pagsali sa bounties ay parang pag-iinvest din. Alamin kung scam ba ang isang ICO bago sumali sa bounty nito, kung meron.
2.  Para malaman kung scam ang isang bounty o hindi, ugaliing matuto sa pagkakamali ng iba at sa history ng mga scam ICO's. Magbasa basa ng threads mula sa scam accusation board para maging pamilyar sa typical na galawan ng mga ICO dev scammers.
3. Ang tip na ito ay connected sa number two. Ugaliin din natin ang pagbabasa ng mga announcement thread ng mga known scam ICO's. Kung naiscam ka na ng kahit isang beses lang, gamitin ang iyong mga natutunan sa karanasang iyon sa pagpili ng bounty.
Kung sa tingin nyo ay kulang pa ang tips na aking mga nabanggit, sabihin nyo lang sa inyong mga post at ating susubukang isasama ang ilan dito sa original post.

For your information, using VPN(or any other methods to anonymize oneself) to evade an IP ban is a common knowledge to everyone who can fluently use a computer and the internet. You being able to post here is not a good enough proof to prove that your original IP hasn't been banned.
They are not paying to spam the forum. The answer to your question(and the reason why they still are not banned) is already answered a while ago:

You can learn more about the forum as a member of it because there are a lot of rules and regulations that you must learn. Also, YOU CANNOT JOIN TWO SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS IN YOUR ACCOUNT AT THE SAME TIME! Nevertheless, you can join two social media bounty campaigns or more simultaneously but it would make your account more susceptible to ban.

It is possible for bitcoin to reach the speculated price if it rose to 15,000$ in the start of September. The impact of that statement is not definite because a co-founder of a project would not affect the price of bitcoin at all.
Not being in a bullish trend doesn't mean that it would be very difficult to hit 10,000$. In fact, it is possible that we would reach it sooner than expected and the chance of it happening is higher when bitcoin has been on a prolonged bearish trend.

Just add a little bit from it like giving him 0.02 BTC instead of 0.01 BTC. At the very least, I can say that it will either be worth ten times more or greater than it's worth now or it will be worthless in the future because of unforeseen factors. Either way, just the thought of it being planned now will surely make your nephew happy when he becomes 18 years old in the future.

I believe this article that I am about to mention will answer your question. According to statistics, roughly 80% of ICO's nowadays are scams and only 8% reaches an exchange. Another source claims that 81% of ICO's eventually become scam but since the former one is the more credible source, let's stick with it but for comparisons' sake, feel free to read both articles.

They would just eat up a portion of A's order and it will remain there so long as A does not cancel it. A's funds(in this case, A's bitcoins that are equals to 1 billion$ at 6000$)  will be put on hold and he would be given USD for every successful buy order(equivalent to what the buyer have paid for minus fees) until it is all sold and if ever A canceled it, the exchange would return those bitcoins that haven't been bought by buyers.

It just shows how banks(some of them) fear that bitcoin will take away a lot of profit from them. I do hope they will follow Switzerland's move to take advantage of crypto(by liberalizing cryptocurrency banking access of crypto-related business) instead of trying to ban it.
The parliament will create a legal environment for cryptocurrencies if they really want to, whether they like it or not(and vice-versa). Thus, I see no reason for them to pressure the parliament about it.

Just use the references given by the user above to explain blockchain to the point where a 5th grader can understand it, just be sure to use layman terms instead of using words that are difficult to understand for them to understand it better. For example, instead of using peer-to-peer, use person-to-person because it would be easier for a 5th grader to understand it. Ao