Hello everyone! Just wanted to give a quick update. Once Click Verify seems to have been pretty popular, judging from the server logs. I just finished some major updating of the Wiki, with sections for tutorials and usage scenarios. Feel free to browse that and refer people to the wiki if they need more info about the SmartChain. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Radium_SmartChainAll the back end code for 2.4 is working, I just need to get the rest of the GUI where I want it. GUI work seems to take the most time :/ May the Force be with you! JJ What language are you using to make the GUI? -Pickle |
|
|
|
|
How is air drop going to work if there's no wallet dl?
|
|
|
|
Any news on dev? It's been quiet lately  Yeah it has, hope he didn't go MIA or anything. Panic! |
|
|
|
Any news on dev? It's been quiet lately |
|
|
|
Bought some and holding. Can't wait to see what's coming up  |
|
|
|
I've been following and holding for multiple months. I'm certain we'll be seeing great things from these coins in the future -Pickle |
|
|
|
I would like to say though that even though I may be a little critical at times, I do have a lot of respect for you guys. There isn't many developers that stick around and keep developing, I still think you should think about some of the suggestions I have posted and great job with your multi-trade platform nonetheless.
This is the exact reason why I'm still holding. -Pickle |
|
|
|
Still here. Still eager -pickle |
|
|
|
In wallet trading update We are in the final stage from the development for the in wallet trading fase1. Al the code has been written from "0", we are now testing the whole trading module for the Cryptsy Exchange on Windows, Mac and Linux, hoping to find some bugs that accure for the different operating systems, that we than can try to resolve. Now that we have written the complete code for the Cryptsy Exchange, we can adapt that easy for other Exchanges. Most of the Exchanges have minor differences that can be adapted and then tested. We have decided to launch the first version with 2 Exchanges (Cryptsy and Bittrex). This means we need to launch a new wallet. Additional Exchanges require again a new wallet, unless we make wallets with and wallets without the in wallet trading. We would like to hear from you all, what Exchanges you would like to see added to the MWC wallet. This was 2 months ago ... sounds like it was almost ready ... it worked on linux only about a month and a half ago. it wouldnt load the data received from cryptsys incredibly shitty api into the tables for the other operating systems. it now does load the data and after a few gui improvements, should be all set to go So you're saying the wallets done? Along with in wallet trading? Sorry I've been out of it since Christmas time, but I'm still holding  -Pickle |
|
|
|
Merry Christmas |
|
|
|
Just a little update about what is happening with the in wallet trading.
All the code is made on a Linux machine and is working as it should be. We can choose the coin that we want to trade, give buy/sell orders, cancel the orders and the buy and sell in the order book is updated as we want.
Today we are starting debugging on a windows operating system, because windows and mac are still buggy, we expect it to be some linking to the required libraries, but the debugger will let us know.
Thanks for all the patience,
Michael
Still holding. Thanks for the update |
|
|
|
That's awesome! Congrats Griffith! -Pickle |
|
|
|
In wallet trading update We are in the final stage from the development for the in wallet trading fase1. Al the code has been written from "0", we are now testing the whole trading module for the Cryptsy Exchange on Windows, Mac and Linux, hoping to find some bugs that accure for the different operating systems, that we than can try to resolve. Now that we have written the complete code for the Cryptsy Exchange, we can adapt that easy for other Exchanges. Most of the Exchanges have minor differences that can be adapted and then tested. We have decided to launch the first version with 2 Exchanges (Cryptsy and Bittrex). This means we need to launch a new wallet. Additional Exchanges require again a new wallet, unless we make wallets with and wallets without the in wallet trading. We would like to hear from you all, what Exchanges you would like to see added to the MWC wallet. I think Cryptsy is a good choice, I have my reservations about Bittrex and their ICO's, I also think Poloniex and Bter are good. For now I would just get the wallet with in wallet trading working... then create a wallet without it. -Pickle |
|
|
|
The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.
Dogecoin was a really shitty name too. |
|
|
|
yes we need some more patricipation till we get what we want. Voted -Pickle |
|
|
|
400th follower on Twitter Woot! |
|
|
|
|
One thing that would be cool (not to add requirement creep); but a 1 week/1 month/1 year % change would be pretty cool.
-pickle
|
|
|
|
Update in wallet trading.
We are working on the Cryptsy exchange, the 24hr % change is now calculated and the BID and ASK fields are now also filled. These gave a big problem, because there are ~450 different coin pairs on Cryptsy and the BID and ASK can NOT be retreived like the rest of the information i this screen. They need to be retreived 1 by 1 and then matched. The problem is that we can make only a few API calls a minute....NOT 450 at max speed. We now will make some minor changes in the lay-out, make the links to the ordering screen and start to retreive data there as well. The lay-out for the ordering screen will be the first thing we need to do, this will be a template for all the Exchanges we going to add link for bigger image: https://i.imgur.com/f5FL0t0.pngNice! Great work! |
|
|
|
|
It should be obvious by now that the developers are serious about this coin. However I would advise you guys to be a little more cautious about saying you're holding x-million coins until it hits $1/coin.
It leads people to believe that as soon as a coin gets close to $1, you're going to dump, game over, thank you for playing. I think a better strategy would be to say "once the coin gets to $1, we will plan on phasing out our coin supply to further the developement of the coin, and even out the distrobution of wealth".
If satoshi nakamoto dumped his coins now, it would plummet the price of bitcoin, and possibly destroy the coin simply because it would be seen as "the creator doesn't have faith in the coin".
Just a thought,
-Pickle
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
