fuze0000
|
|
November 17, 2014, 03:59:13 AM |
|
I decided to take a small chance on MWC and picked up about 10,000. Probably pick up another 40,000 to 90,000 depending on the Development of this coin.
Welcome I am sure you will be most pleased with your investment! Thanks and good luck to you too!
|
|
|
|
Crestington
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
|
|
November 17, 2014, 07:02:04 AM |
|
I decided to take a small chance on MWC and picked up about 10,000. Probably pick up another 40,000 to 90,000 depending on the Development of this coin.
Welcome I am sure you will be most pleased with your investment! Thought I'd drop in and say hi, I'm still here and part of this as well. Once you guys are close to release you should talk to fire rabbit about some promo videos, he likes making videos and likes coins but being pre-emptive will get the best results since you can refine the videos and have them ready for when you need it.
|
|
|
|
Lovethecoins
|
|
November 17, 2014, 06:01:19 PM |
|
Little buy support/sell if you want
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 18, 2014, 12:34:54 AM |
|
MWC added to the cryptsy voting list! be sure to hop on over there and vote for the coin!
|
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
November 18, 2014, 11:07:25 AM |
|
yes we need some more patricipation till we get what we want.
|
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 18, 2014, 11:40:34 AM |
|
Thats nice to see. Is it possible that they have seen that we are working on the in wallet trading and that we will also add Cryptsy?
|
|
|
|
fuze0000
|
|
November 18, 2014, 05:33:16 PM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736705.msg9567004#msg9567004twitter.com/PHIRECORE/status/534722846300577793 It seems that the dev team for multiwalletcoin wants to review supercoin's source code when the Supercoin creator makes it open source. There have been many claims that supercoin has anonymous transactions with multisignature but it has never verified because it was not opened source. If and when the source can be released to one of the multiwalletcoin devs which by the way worked on ecccoin as well and the code is truly anonymous that can fast track the anonymous features for multicoinwallet and make Supercoin even better with multi cryptocurrency wallet deposits and trading with exchanges from within the wallet. Both coins are around 300 satoshi at the moment. I say buy both to make sure all bets are covered.
|
|
|
|
Pickleninja
|
|
November 18, 2014, 05:54:31 PM |
|
yes we need some more patricipation till we get what we want. Voted -Pickle
|
|
|
|
fuze0000
|
|
November 18, 2014, 05:59:04 PM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736705.msg9567004#msg9567004twitter.com/PHIRECORE/status/534722846300577793 It seems that the dev team for multiwalletcoin wants to review supercoin's source code when the Supercoin creator makes it open source. There have been many claims that supercoin has anonymous transactions with multisignature but it has never verified because it was not opened source. If and when the source can be released to one of the multiwalletcoin devs which by the way worked on ecccoin as well and the code is truly anonymous that can fast track the anonymous features for multicoinwallet and make Supercoin even better with multi cryptocurrency wallet deposits and trading with exchanges from within the wallet. Both coins are around 300 satoshi at the moment. I say buy both to make sure all bets are covered. Btw don't forget to vote on cryptsy https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotes
|
|
|
|
sovie (OP)
|
|
November 18, 2014, 06:10:28 PM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736705.msg9567004#msg9567004twitter.com/PHIRECORE/status/534722846300577793 It seems that the dev team for multiwalletcoin wants to review supercoin's source code when the Supercoin creator makes it open source. There have been many claims that supercoin has anonymous transactions with multisignature but it has never verified because it was not opened source. If and when the source can be released to one of the multiwalletcoin devs which by the way worked on ecccoin as well and the code is truly anonymous that can fast track the anonymous features for multicoinwallet and make Supercoin even better with multi cryptocurrency wallet deposits and trading with exchanges from within the wallet. Both coins are around 300 satoshi at the moment. I say buy both to make sure all bets are covered. Btw don't forget to vote on cryptsy https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotesOh wow and i just happen to have 10k super stored away, having forgotten about supercoin due to all its problems. As part of the mwc dev team i personally welcome this news as supercoin was always one of my favourite coins. I hope things work out!
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
|
|
November 18, 2014, 06:17:18 PM Last edit: November 18, 2014, 07:01:57 PM by doc12 |
|
I know you dont like to copy code from other coins, but maybe you should consider to copy the rapidsync and lite/full wallet feature from Pandacoin (PND), take a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568529.7800The chain sync is inceredibly fast, just did a full chainsync in ~15mins. And in the mean time you can use the wallet in lite mode .... If you consider adding many coins in the feature, this is a must have for Multiwalletcoin IMO: I dont know how many coins you want to add in the future. But lets say we have 20 coins in one wallet, thats quite a big amout of blockchain data to download. It would be cool, if the user could choose weather to use a lite or full wallet for each coin. Maybe you can implement the code from PND and add PND as the third coin IMO this feature is really essential if you want to handle many coins and if you dont want to copy you should consider to implement something like that in the future. P.S. PND is NOT the Wolong scamcoin.
|
|
|
|
fuze0000
|
|
November 18, 2014, 06:45:53 PM |
|
I am all for a fast blockchain sync time PND. I am all for anonymous transactions with multisignature from Supercoin if it passes the review. I have a tv from Japan , furniture from India, China, USA, etc, everything is from something or somewhere else. We want to own the most unique cryptocurrency!
|
|
|
|
Lovethecoins
|
|
November 18, 2014, 07:22:38 PM |
|
I love this coin!!! Can't wait for more!!
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
|
|
November 18, 2014, 09:04:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
dewdeded
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
|
|
November 18, 2014, 11:17:13 PM |
|
The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
|
|
November 19, 2014, 01:30:39 AM |
|
The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.
reasons?
|
|
|
|
Pickleninja
|
|
November 19, 2014, 02:11:59 AM |
|
The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.
Dogecoin was a really shitty name too.
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 19, 2014, 08:02:07 AM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736705.msg9567004#msg9567004twitter.com/PHIRECORE/status/534722846300577793 It seems that the dev team for multiwalletcoin wants to review supercoin's source code when the Supercoin creator makes it open source. There have been many claims that supercoin has anonymous transactions with multisignature but it has never verified because it was not opened source. If and when the source can be released to one of the multiwalletcoin devs which by the way worked on ecccoin as well and the code is truly anonymous that can fast track the anonymous features for multicoinwallet and make Supercoin even better with multi cryptocurrency wallet deposits and trading with exchanges from within the wallet. Both coins are around 300 satoshi at the moment. I say buy both to make sure all bets are covered. id like to clarify this claim. the WHOLE mutliwallet team wouldnt be immediately involved at the start. it would just be me and mdtspain. this is why i refered to us as GG-Dev team in the other thread instead of multiwallet team. i also read on one of the posts about the fast sync from PND. that is interesting, and i will look at that. The Multiple-Coin wallet i am working on doesnt quite work the way someone commented. you would actually be able to disconnect from a coins chain if you dont want that wallet to be online without shutting off the whole thing. basically. say your trying to sync BTC LTC and MWC. but you mostly just want MWC. there will be an option to pause syncing on other coins. so that the coins you want to sync first will sync first. but right now (since im still making it) the fine details for that wallet are kind of sketchy. the most direct link to MWC with that wallet is that it was made by me who is on the MWC team and features it. the multiple coins arent actually going to be built in to the current MWC wallet as it is, hence why i am making a new wallet. there are many reasons behind this. mostly being that Scrypt, SHA256 and x11 coins dont use the same code base and are made differently. but dont worry too much. it will all come together. and MWC holders will get a bonus out of it. most of the picture updates and stuff for the multiple coin wallet will be posted on this thread, but here as well: https://www.startjoin.com/Multi_Walletmore in depth questions pertaining too... well anything can be PMd to me or posted here. although PM is probably a way to get a faster response.
|
|
|
|
fuze0000
|
|
November 19, 2014, 08:43:47 AM |
|
Thanks for clarifying. So it is the "GG-Dev Team" that's working on reviewing supercoin's code and if is promising you work on it as a separate coin or will attempt to incorporate features from mwc and other cryptocurrencdoes?
|
|
|
|
|