Lol... the shopping list is getting longer... those sparkfun guys are going to love me.
The advice/recommendations are very much appreciated.
Hehe since your pictures are good if you wouldn't mind showing what this looks like after you have cut the traces and soldered anything that would be cool. Just in case I need to do this in the future id like to see how its actually done. |
|
|
|
All you should need in your interface file for a static ip is below. One last edit reading back it looks like a few of just need to add the last line for DNS to make this work. Without the DNS it has no idea where to go thats why the dhcp is fixing it, its adding the DNS from the router  #Put you own IPs here these are just examples auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.0.2.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.0.2.254 # This is for dns, my example is using the open-dns ips dns-nameservers 208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220 |
|
|
|
|
Received my two units last night, both running fantastic. I must say they truly are a work of art, great Job Burnin.
I have them running at 435mhz, 1335 mv, 28m. Im not sure I understand the timing part ill have to read back to find where that was discussed but it definitely fixes the rejected duplicate work issue I started with.
Running them any higher seems to run up the heat quite fast, so I think I need to find a better way to cool them before I go any higher.
cgminer version 3.4.0 - Started: [2013-08-27 08:43:54]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):16.65G (avg):17.36Gh/s | A:47640 R:192 HW:28 WU:242.5/m
ST: 5 SS: 0 NB: 26 LW: 51648 GF: 0 RF: 0
Block: 0008364f2e676659... Diff:65.8M Started: [11:43:02] Best share: 130K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BTB 0: 52C 435 1366mV | 6.831G/8.641Gh/s | A:23204 R: 80 HW: 9 WU:120.7/m
BTB 1: 51C 435 1365mV | 9.696G/8.714Gh/s | A:24436 R:112 HW:19 WU:121.7/m
|
|
|
|
The default assumptions on that calculator need to be questioned. It basically says by the end of the year no ASICs out there will be returning a profit. If that is the case then people will simply switch them off and the difficulty will stop rising. They won't switch them all off at once, the Avalon and ASICminer chip based ones will be the first, as they are the least power efficient. I appreciate it, I just wanted to know where it was from so I could mess with it, pretty nice. Doff Yeah, I was just answering the question. I'm not happy with that calculator either. Among other things, it assumes a constant rate of increase in difficulty. At the default settings, that means the difficulty a year from now would be 200x the current value. I think that's a tad extreme, and probably unrealistic. Lowering the Difficulty Increase/month from 62% to 52% means it would be 100x the current difficulty after a year. A small change can make a big difference when compounded over a year. Aside from that, it limits its profitability calculations to one year. |
|
|
|
just a fyi to all..  If they deliver in sept.. but who knows sept could be sept 31st still the longer we wait as a community for stuff the harder it is to make an ROI.. not impossible, esp people who pay for power.. So what ever company Knc, company b, c or d.. so prices need to come down on hardware.. I know boxes dont cost 7k to make anyhow.. Where do I find that really nice calculator? |
|
|
|
Great calculator, thanks for this and I agree no matter how I ran it ROI was pretty quick. |
|
|
|
|
I am really want to know how overclocking will work with these, it appears that 2.7 was a speed tested when you look at the reel Link, and I have seen 3.4, back a little bit in the post. Moving from 1.5 stock to 3.4 with proper cooling would be a nice boost. I am guessing you guys will be selling cooling kits at a later date as add on? I am sure you don't have that info to give right now Dave but I cant help being curious and wanting to ask.
Also do I understand correctly that if you buy one of the kits you can add H boards to it at any time?
Doff
|
|
|
|
|
1Q9FavHENPK7sATGm8ebthxG9EhQmaamw2
Sure
|
|
|
|
Is there going to be an OCT batch for the 25s or will there be more offered soon? I missed it by an hour it seems. |
|
|
|
|
I am missing my first batch of 30 on the login, I sent an email via the contact form with more details.
Thanks,
Doff
|
|
|
|
|
Doff; 10; 0.86; 19LyHBgwkxciecEHSNonJPqSpvifwXr4UY
Thanks!
Doff
|
|
|
|
Yes they arrived with Makomk 200 on them.
Would I expect a better result with the dynamic clocking if so where can i find that?
thanks btw, day 2 and the learning continues !
Yes you will get better results with the dynamic clocking bitstream from glasswalker, mine has run for months stable on the glasswalker bitstream at 215-229 m\hash. However there is a problem with Bfgminer where they aggressivly downclock, some sort of wierd bug., if this bug wasent there Id use Bfgminer. I use MPBM Miner instead since thats what Glasswalker built them to run on and it works great other than failover. For whatever reason when MPBM failover accurs a few times the cm1 Downclock and you have to reboot MPBM. |
|
|
|
hi
I have same problem on raspberry pi when I try run cgminer i have this error:
Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB0: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
thanks for any advice
br
malin
This most likely a bad USB cable, or your Bitstream needs to be reloaded. Is this a Cainsmore or an actual Icarus? if its an Icarus then cable and or USB hub is probably the issues. With the Cainsmore it really wants a Powered USB hub, and good cable, also make sure you are putting the bitstream on with a good cable and a laptop with a powered USB or an external powered USB. Hope this helps. Doff |
|
|
|
|
Looks like I gave the wrong Address, I am actually 19n18f4D1cSRHJH5cMVxBV5LobmJk64hqX and TX ID ecb8000b7dd585cc171102b79e507d52bd646795ad43315a051963b6177683f2 Sorry for the confusion zefir.
|
|
|
|
|
I am in for 30
Doff; 30; 2.58; 1Q9FavHENPK7sATGm8ebthxG9EhQmaamw2
|
|
|
|
|
You can use Bfgminer, Luke's version of Cgminer.
|
|
|
|
|
Id be interested, my Cainsmore 1 still running strong.
|
|
|
|
|
I dunno I still get paid in USD, so that means I need to earn now $6536 USD to purchase. I wont argue the value of the Avalon because I still think its worth it however I wont be able to earn one any time soon.
Sad part is I planned on buying one at the 1499 price, and had the money saved to do so.
Id rather the BTC prices stayed tied to whatever we get Paid in, until maybe one day we get paid in BTC, or heck maybe you already are getting paid in BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
My question is how Much BTC is my Icarus Trade in now worth? Is it still tied to the 300USD, or do I get a BTC value for it?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
