Looks good, waiting for the LISK ipo.  |
|
|
|
Read this update carefully then.
.
.
.
- It's my birthday in two days. I don't have a social life or holiday. I'll be working on this, that's how indifferent I've been this year.
.
.
.
Happy Birthday Rofo! I don't have a social life since crypto killed my relationship, so I know the feeling man! Isn't it today , HAPPY BIRTHDAY ROFO and all the best wishes. |
|
|
|
we need a competent promotion team  We need more a clear, constant and structured communication, then we will see.It is important to motivate the community. Just as a hint what actually can be optimized .. |
|
|
|
I'd be very careful buying before any code is uploaded to git.
Anything new here? |
|
|
|
Has anyone experienced a problem trying to get the send button to work? I'm trying to withdraw my investment out of this underachieving project, and the send button won't even work when submitting the transaction, using the desktop app, and the online block access as well.
I'm remembering, if you are doing more transactions in a specific timeframe, you have to wait a little bit until the "send" button is active again (depending on processed blocks, sometimes i takes longer to form a block, maybe because one transaction is not enough) |
|
|
|
|
News, news, news .. is the new test-client already available?
|
|
|
|
we need a competent promotion team We need more a clear, constant and structured communication, then we will see. It is important to motivate the community. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, i'm not up to date but my question is: are we are already able to do sth. with the siafunds?
|
|
|
|
I'm remembering in the win client there are not all nodes visible, should be fixed. |
|
|
|
From may 14 'till now, TheRealSilk post one word: yes! Good to know he is still positive! 
is this test client or a real client?
yes A classical "silk", i love it However here i see a need of a clear and structured communication about what is going on. |
|
|
|
To be perfectly honest I don't remember anyone forcing the PoS route on you, though I guess day after day of people suggesting it would get tiring.
I am sorry that you did it this way rofo, if you had just said that you wouldn't stick around after the PoS swap because of X reasons we would 100% have changed what we were doing, including not going to PoS. So to me this seems like a veiled way of you deliberately stepping down from Noble to me. But hey, I have ended up almost as cynical as you after all of this, so who knows.
But don't anyone question eagleflies motives, he has done all of this and asked for nothing in return. The reason for not burning the premine yet was that we were going to ask permission in here to pay back some of C-Cex's losses with a very small percentage of it seeing as it was our fault for not informing them of the wallet swap. That was why we delayed the burning, it was a conscious decision, nothing scammy.
It is depressing. |
|
|
|
I'll go a ahead and say that the biggest found cluster consisted of over 200 accounts.
Now imagine someone comes to you with plausible data that indicate such clusters ? What would you have done ?
I'm pretty sure noone would have said "Well we said we wouldn't do another investigation. So no, let em have it".
Regarding the question of whom to contact - Just contact me. Prefferably only with questions but sure if you need to blow of some steam go ahead.
 if he really has 200 stakes he should be kicked for sure 200 stakes really... come on, such suspicious conglomerations of stakes can destroy a project (i mean BTT registrations and not in the NXT-AE accumulated). |
|
|
|
NODE Rewards Update:All rewards for qualifying nodes were sent out last night for 3/1-3/7: Windows: node - reward
1980549457983802507 - 520
3287632914591020592 - 525
13418869599879933498 - 190
8972433069625705159 - 500
7118753233736244543 - 315
10090617351173840892 - 480
3233608428688988179 - 235
15423600423983397130 - 525
14345269226628079214 - 525
8753706127351647160 - 475
10256784480357772548 - 525
1024213902811042288 - 470
7112543067514336648 - 85
13859763253566439401 - 525
16706151427682188460 - 60
11993447274130959091 - 525
7034223719321700292 - 430
6897193431440189343 - 65
11950925367816452339 - 375
11920306554878216330 - 470
9577957835821983512 - 190
388507031247855324 - 230
14511940610091238317 - 240
12592538098524814326 - 70
1048390297754728901 - 525
Linux node - reward
16289548867307658612 - 525
11363936448759590364 - 525
6311547611944765216 - 500
6193586351772469929 - 525
7981595429821076186 - 525
3772492656932306527 - 525
15808521961712022434 - 520
12217132594948244800 - 475
16570391779901095218 - 510
3764360764095397809 - 415
6655681698812215051 - 525
1596636997542545302 - 525
16603580133678771270 - 500
463699249715670803 - 525
9281456965884126134 - 525
17691109459456464561 - 450
@LemonAndFries You are doing a great job, thanks. |
|
|
|
Finally got around to doing the final round of payments for the PoA campaign. Sorry it has taken so long, I just haven't had a moment free this weekend. So, for the scheme: Total coins paid: 484,000 Total entrants: 71 Thanks to all those that entered, tweeted etc. So we have 759061 NOBL left in the community fund. Does anyone have any thoughts on what we could do with these next? I would save the coins for a "development" fund for future purposes, i wouldn't make a bounty for a multipool, because if NOBL is interesting enough, there will be multipools for sure (or already). The nice thing in switching to pure POS is that the Nobl community now will have time to build something nice. Just my 2 cents. |
|
|
|
external miner was working great until I found a block (err.. share):
DEBUG: [3 thread] Found share!
- info about block that was found here, snipped out--
HTTP resquest failed: The requested URL returned error: 500 Internal Server Error
submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
...retry after 30 seconds
Any idea what's wrong? Is this just a typical orphaned block or might I have some settings misconfiguration?
I fixed the above, so no help needed on that. But I have now another question, please tell me if I am misunderstanding how stake rewards work - I remember the Dev estimating in this thread that after the POS switch, Coin emission should drop from about 7.2 MM NOBL/day under POW, to about 0.5MM/day under POS-II. But there seem to be many rapid and huge stake payouts being generated, much much faster than that. What's going on? I tried the external miner, but have the problem, that the miner won't connect. I set a rpc pass and username in the conf file (is "noblecoin.conf" correct or is it "noblecoinpos.conf"?) Should the miner exe be in the same directory as the nobleqt? And how you fixed your issue? |
|
|
|
Yes i was ready, but choosed the easy way. Luckily i did one transaction before the exchange wallets were in maintenance, so i'm minting and mining since last night. Really great job , you have no noble donation adress for a small tip ? I'm happy that you're happy Here's my address: 9acVmwMxq8nKfpvvfwtKu7Vp6xE5dhHx7o Thank you! That's nice , little tip should be there. Thank you ! |
|
|
|
Yes i was ready, but choosed the easy way. Luckily i did one transaction before the exchange wallets were in maintenance, so i'm minting and mining since last night. Really great job , you have no noble donation adress for a small tip ? |
|
|
|
If we are going to be approaching exchanges, I think the best bet would be to start only with Poloniex and then move on to voting on Mintpal.
Those two are all you need - even Crapsy is no longer nearly as important as it used to be. Polo to start, then Minty when things get rolling....
Mintpal doesn't exist anymore!! No the new owner of mintpal scammed all. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe the devs should mention, what they would like to outsource?
Too bad that koop4u and nodeclub are having no time, because i think they did a very good job.
|
|
|
|
Ready for the swap |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
