Another request, make the fields in the asset evaluator highlightable for copy/pasting and quick web searching. I would also make the top left banner linked to the front page.
|
|
|
Launch of NXTinfo.orgWe are happy to announce the official launch of NXTinfo.org version 1. NXTinfo provides a number of crucial services for NXT Asset Exchange traders and investors, including an average price calculator, a performance calculator and an asset evaluator. The latter two services are linked to our ‘historic Nxt dividend database’ which should certainly help to guarantee added value for users of our ecosystem. http://nxter.org/launch-of-nxtinfo-org/ Has anyone done an asset performance calc that did dividend history before? That's really neat. I think the date selection could use one of those slick javascript calendar popouts. At the very least the expected date format should be listed outside the box because it disappears as soon as you click the entry field. The average price calculator seems a lot less useful and may not deserve the "priority" spot right next to the "What is NXT?" link. In fact you may want to reconsider the placing of the links at the top bar because wouldn't you assume someone visiting your site is already familiar with NXT?
|
|
|
Considering the price is currently scraping .001 I'd say put the floor somewhere between .0005 and .00075
|
|
|
BIP 101 is a laughably stupid and irresponsible proposal. An exponential block size limit increase is a bad idea built on pie-in-the-sky expectations. Bitcoin is not going to handle the world's transactions. The block target of 10 minutes makes sure of that. XT is BIP 101 plus handing the keys to the client to an arrogant fuck. If you still support XT you should really consider what it would mean if it was successful.
|
|
|
Fuck XT and fuck Coinbase. If you want to promote a fork, come up with something better than BIP 101 and Hearn's crap.
|
|
|
Hahaha this thread
|
|
|
Your anxiety about the lineage of your bitcoins is subtracting from its fungibility. If you'd like bitcoin to be fungible, don't worry about it.
|
|
|
23.8 kH/s
Latest Firefox, i5-2500K at 4.5GHz
|
|
|
There's good reason for increasing mining difficulty. If difficulty never increased, the 21 million bitcoins would have already been mined years ago. Difficulty keeps the block target averaged to about 10 minutes per block. Keep reading about bitcoin.
|
|
|
That's the last from me. Telling you what equipment I'm using would be pointless because they're not operating at full efficiency. Seems using 1x to 16x PCIe risers with oclvanitygen gimps performance, plus the board has PCIe 1.0.
|
|
|
Pattern: xJDCLAMZ Address: xJDCLAMZBRAhGZognJfhqa5YpAobQGNTXT PrivkeyPart: LgZo4jYamBKkqBhYvQkMKHgPnJ5br21s6vTQP9vcgrrijndTjsTS
|
|
|
Address: xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr PrivkeyPart: LmJh4LN9E83XRnMTfiGjDz8Z6Y9xw1huAvkSk7UGB5CzJyJdShE3
|
|
|
Pattern: xJDCLAMZ Address: xJDCLAMZPRxN7YHfRQmyq7rho8EBSYkDFQ PrivkeyPart: LpNxRG6qB2CVn5hN2UcZKiuDn5uU8F5EEp7FsbvSSnnfQn9hQmTm
|
|
|
*Cracks the whip* Back to work little GPUs!
|
|
|
Pattern: xJDCLAMZ Address: xJDCLAMZw7oNy2cUXAwnxbrkqyimL54zto PrivkeyPart: Lhr6H7pEy8C4h7Y5NLM9GR8uVD7LDDDghjxi8WWQAaVa76CxHeJe
|
|
|
Yeah somehow the Z got cut from the copy/paste, woops!
|
|
|
Difficulty: 15318045009 Pattern: xJDCLAM Address: xJDCLAM9HbYDopf7x2DHqm2jwGJrFFoSq1 PrivkeyPart: LkY1Ea3yevAEywfxjg6UzyTwHEqBvbtkAabG3qRTzmuGXi349MiH
|
|
|
Nifty. Good luck.
What distribution method will this token have?
|
|
|
Public warning message, water is wet.
|
|
|
Recently a LTC ponzi was partly responsible for its rise to ~0.03 BTC. I wonder what effect this ponzi is having and will have on the BTC/fiat market. The guy has a pretty good track record of "success."
|
|
|
|