The only way to know is to see the software that produced these strings. What software did you use? These are not things that Bitcoin Core produces.
This program creates a short HASH, but the string with the fragment I'm interested in is the same. https://github.com/openwall/john/blob/bleeding-jumbo/run/bitcoin2john.pyI understand that the wallets shown in my two examples may not be real, but that's not the point. I want to make sure it's possible to generate a real wallet that has 5 characters in a HASH string. I'm also interested in the question of what information is encoded in this HASH fragment. Thanks! |
|
|
|
https://blockchain.com/btc/address/179ubgmB4sTRQSutRMovStFoAHxfoVnDK5$bitcoin$64$ 71fe0d4dc27b24dcd1ea6639d644e8daeff04c38e30d05f0a74b17d28f25667e$16$df6cabc03425d39a$ 35714$96$8c4ef4ce5ba442673a21d89afdc1810c653e0615c1e2537d7f61a0e03ecc152c47771b863d3b399894ba9086f1e7f261$130$04ffaa7a530a04504856eff814839320835cdec5dc446ee4811fc3db490a1a986013e6dff24d5f0c908e5dac7f0be8c7fd523de8e91eae27fba3e851dd0272daab 35714 - Why is this number 5 characters? What is the function of this number? If this is a date, then show me the converter program? https://blockchain.com/btc/address/1KDUcZh5Z6H1of4Pwoy5ojJtkQxcQBHhnH$bitcoin$64$ ff134f9f03da571e5b256dec561730aaa674ff37d8a698d3c2c5e66fdbb07335$16$125d64b2bab4c437$ 136217$96$e3e9e392c47b4547644c5941104405f33e007e017eb2803c13ffb42dfde63af941e0f9e9594a0f590991f69fcae41ad1$130$041ebfac69910efb17ab697db5f2a4ff815e1d37c05e40d56977031a3a36b80464ea6782ad2913e2a5ec33e187f0fee50675bc78a25d657846e08e8425f2384b2a 136217 - Why is this number 6 characters? What is the function of this number? If this is a date, then show me the converter program? Who can send me any empty wallet that has 5 characters inside the HASH? Thank you in advance. The wallet must be verified by you and I must know the password for it. I need it for experiments. All the wallets I've created these days have a HASH number inside that is 6 characters long. To better understand me, see my other topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5381492.0
|
|
|
|
|
youtube.com/watch?v=tsJvXTmPAWY
|
|
|
|
|
youtube.com/watch?v=tsJvXTmPAWY
|
|
|
|
|
youtube.com/watch?v=tsJvXTmPAWY
|
|
|
|
|
youtube.com/watch?v=tsJvXTmPAWY
|
|
|
|
|
youtube.com/watch?v=tsJvXTmPAWY
|
|
|
|
|
This is 100% genuine wallet! Your method incorrectly defines a fake.
110 BTC - 1NyEeyXu8ydNw67e3ZTUmkwQJ8QNd1o3cF
$bitcoin$64$f3c90b573111e06ff0f96ebf32921f5f3dd10ba219f391ab0fcc1adadd3e2000$16$9809070f76fa92c4$60692$2$00$2$00
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sir! Could you teach me how to use this tool, i need a simple software that can convert a number into human-readable format? [/quote] What i showed is only simple example of Python 3 (programming language) library. If you're looking for user-friendly/ready-to-use tool, you might want to use website such as https://timestamp.online/. [/quote] Thank you, you are a genius. I wish you good luck, happiness and a lot of money! |
|
|
|
According to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v22.0/src/wallet/transaction.h#L108-L117, "timesmart" uses timestamp. So all you need to do is finding or create script which convert timestamp to human-readable format (such as Date/Time). >>> # Simple example with Python 3
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> datetime.fromtimestamp(1613256165).isoformat()
2021-02-13T17:42:45
>>> from time import ctime
>>> ctime(1613256165)
'Sat Feb 13 17:42:45 2021
Thanks Sir! Could you teach me how to use this tool, i need a simple software that can convert a number into human-readable format? |
|
|
|
For example, if you open "wallet.dat" file (for example Notepad++)
we will see "timesmart 1613256165" and my question Is it possible
to convert a Bitcoin Core "timesmart" into human-readable format?
seconds since epoch? ... This value is probably somehow related to transactions and a converter is needed to analyze wallet files for their check genuine or not. |
|
|
|
Why would you want to convert your wallet.dat into human-readable format? It contains information that makes it difficult to write down with no mistakes, such as your transactions etc., even if it was encoded into a seed phrase. For instance, if it's 1MB then you need to encode those 1 million bytes (= 4 million bits) into a seed phrase. With a quick calculation it's 4,000,000 / 11 = 363,636 words.
I can't find this timesmart value you're saying when I open my wallet.dat. Where exactly is it? I can't read anything from my wallet file as it's not readable from text editors.
Keyword search will help you (see screenshot) |
|
|
|
For example, if you open "wallet.dat" file (for example Notepad++) we will see "timesmart 1614347716" and my question Is it possible to convert a Bitcoin Core "timesmart" into human-readable format?  Also see topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5381925.0 |
|
|
|
|
NOTE: They have been marked as "Doubtful" all wallets whose hashes end in:
- ...$60692$2$00$2$00
- ...$38193$2$00$2$00
- ...$62210$2$00$2$00
- ...$131578$2$00$2$00
- ...$37167$2$00$2$00
- ...$37698$2$00$2$00
- ...$35714$2$00$2$00
- ...$42586$2$00$2$00
- ...$83181$2$00$2$00
- ...$106645$2$00$2$00
- ...$234847$2$00$2$00
- ...$76753$2$00$2$00
[/quote]
We checked HASH and found no such fragments.
Does this mean that all of our wallets are genuine?
|
|
|
|
You can tell this to someone who has just gotten into crypto and is unaware of all these BS maximalist narratives. Only a newcomer would fall for it, seriously XD. Not hating on BTC or LTC but come on man XD BTC and LTC are the basis, and you do not like them, because you did not buy for a pittance or did not mine from 2009 to 2010 on a processor. This is not a reason to question my words. Facts cannot be ignored.
Therefore, you better pay attention to Litecoin Cash. This coin is protected by Hive mining + SHA256 + CPU mining Soon its price will reach 1% of the Litecoin value. |
|
|
|
We have learned to identify only such fake wallets that have exist outgoing transactions.
If there have never been outgoing transactions from the wallet, then we have not found a method that will reliably determine the authenticity of the wallet.
Hello. Can you explain how to identify fake wallets? Greetings and Merry Christmas. Thank you for your question and wish you a Merry Christmas! We observed that in any wallet that had outgoing transactions there are addresses to which these outgoing transactions were made, if there are no such addresses inside the wallet file, then the wallet is fake. When there were no outgoing transactions in the wallet, and there are only incoming ones, then we are not yet able to recognize the authenticity of such a wallet. |
|
|
|
We have learned to identify only such fake wallets that have exist outgoing transactions.
If there have never been outgoing transactions from the wallet, then we have not found a method that will reliably determine the authenticity of the wallet. |
|
|
|
Hello folks,
where are those dudes who claimed that RTM was a 100% clone of BTC?
RTM was a fork of RAVENCOIN and that one is basically BTC + asset-platform.
However, RTM was forked from Dash afterwards. And the devs wanna do smart-contracts via smartnodes (well the spark engine needs to be implemented too).
And btw, BTC does not have masternodes. I don't see how RTM is a 100% clone of BTC 🤣
So whoever those guys are, they were clearly bullshitting and should just stfu and burn RVN while it lasts.
They should get their heads checked because they are misinforming other folks for no reason.
If we talk about forks, then there are only two main forks: gold is bitcoin and silver is litecoin. All other forks have no chance of success. And if jumping on the golden train of the Bitcoin fork is risky, then it is a great success for those who have time to accumulate and mine the coins of the Litecoin fork, because the price of the LCC project is not less than 1% of the LTC cost, this is the law. |
|
|
|
this scam coin falled in price significantly - any idea why? if it just copy BTC then I can buy btc and don't lose resources mining right?
You are absolutely right, look at the chart and you will see that from September 14 to November 14, the coin has grown in value 80 times.   I think Litecoin Cash (LCC) is much more promising than Raptoreum. Look at decentralization, you will also see that a lot of coins have been lost and have not moved for over 3 years. chainz.cryptoid.info/lcc/#!rich |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
