Sorry, didn't mean to get personal. I'm still getting used to this cryto coin world where owners of exchanges aren't very transparent.

I've been trying to answer questions in threads as best I can based on info you have posted there.

Zip... questions about continuity.

Is this a 1 man show? What happens if you get hurt or sick? Do you have silent partners to step in and keep things running?

ziplibrary, I am saddened by your reply to my last post (which I didn't even expect but as long as you did , thank you).
You highlighted my post but gave no answers to questions that seem to me very relevant to the very existence to sharecoin.
Multipool organization - weak point (by that I mean execution) yes multipool is there but I hardly can say that it serves its purpose.
New investors - what will make them want to hold sharecoins?
Trading BTC received from multipool the way you did is just unprofessional (to say the least) and unethical to dump at prices that are higher then what is at the market at that moment, and telegraphing to everyone who is market participant what your intentions are is plain ridiculous (you said you would support price at 400, while spread right before that declaration was 387 - 350 (roughly)).
Now in your would be reply you said that price is unexpectedly high (?).
So I sold my last 10k "expecting" of what you are expecting - which is lower price.
TBH, i find that you are guys very good ppl, but as they say "good felow is not a profession".

P.S. Will monitor pricing and rebuy later (if I still like direction of sharex team) and BTW if you are so community oriented, why FEESHARES? Why not let everyone who holds
sharecoins to have 50% of what you get from sharex? I mean did you actually gave it a thought? Why support only those members of community who has problem with basic math (understanding ROI)? Why not just give 50% staked in wallets money?, that would in itself would shoot the price of sharecoin quite high (I would expect it to), instead you are just stomping your feet and saying 20k for FEESHARE IT IS and fighting bad publicity that surrounds this issue.

If the echange owner want to earn some bucks and get investments from people.. He should put those shares cheap so people could buy and that would motivate people to trade there. OR WAIT to have a good volume so the shares can have a better price. And not start with expesive shares when there is still low volume in a new exchange.. Logic man..

Thanks, and will FeeShares be continue to be offered at that time, or will that first round close?

Zip... can you answer this? When does the Share interest start paying.

Also, when will the FeeShare sale be discontinued. Or will it stay open until 5000 FEE have been sold?

Multipool part should be of great importance , because that is where BTC should flood and raise (in best case scenario) price of sharecoin or any POS coin. When I look at
20Mh/s multipool I don't see how that can influence pricing for sharecoins upwards, there is simply not enough volume for it. Now put yourself in shoes of a guy who stumbled upon sharecoin website and decides if he/she should support the coin (by mining other coins and dumping them for sharecoin, by creating bussiness that can generate revenue in sharecoins, by advertising or anything or other means ).  
99% of ppl who decide to "support" coin are miners (and not ppl who call others idiots). So what do I see? 20Mh/s? That doesn't feel like winning combination to me.
Why developers not looking into creating best possible scenario for potential miners(supporters) of their coin? Instead they are busy placing new coins on Sharex. (redflag for coin, green flag for sharex).
Why 1 day ago they pretty much dumped all mined in multipool coins at 400? Why??? (I actually was watching market at that time and sold THEM for 400 instead of 300 and something that I had a few minutes before they declared to the whole world that they are gonna dump for 400, so I had a few minutes to remove my sell order below that price, wait when their 400 order appeared on market, watch how quickly it started to evaporate, sold to them my shares)
Thoughtful (again about fate of their currency) developer would create a bot which would scalp on both sides of spread creating and adding positive pressure on price of the coin and of course NEVER declare about at how much they are about to buy back their coins using OUR money (multipool is us - miners). Again -  huge red flag for coin, still green for sharex.
i can go on but these examples are big enough for me to actually make a decision that sharecoin is just a stopgap for developers between unknown entity to the owners of exchange of cryptocurrency.
But if they were a bit smarter, they should understand that without successful coin their sharex bussiness will fade into obscurity.

i don't think it is a good idea for developer to buy sharecoin from his own sharecoin
with 10 btc to buy in sharecoinex, the price can drive sharecoin to almost 900 sat.
while now nothing change in price
The aim of multipool does not work now

a suggestion is maybe we can develop multiple multipools..

Also I just received sharecoins from multipool, looks good. Lately I mine on my own and then trade to sharecoin (through BTC though). Pricewise sharecoins received from multipool were a bit more expensive then I could buy on Sharex, though not by much.