Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 02:35:37 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 »
201  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin only Businesses that reject all fiat on: May 10, 2015, 03:51:19 PM
I think, www.LocalBitcoins.com & www.100bit.co.in can be added to the list. Both are trading platform that does not accept FIAT.

Thanks, but those both accept Fiat.

Quote
100bit.co.in provides a platform to buyers and sellers to directly exchange FIAT and Alt coins with each other against bitcoin. Joining is free and exchange cost per trade is 0.1% of the trade amount.

Your suggestion is rather odd as those 2 exchanges Raison d'être is to exchange fiat for cryptocurrencies.

You would have to suggest exchanges like shapeshift.io which only deal in crypto, which I suppose I can start adding.



As a business, neither LocalBitcoins nor 100bit.co.in accept FIAT. Users can exchange FIAT through them.
I would agree. They both will only ever hold customer bitcoin, and will both never touch customer fiat. The fiat involved in transactions will only be sent directly from the bitcoin buyer to the bitcoin seller
202  Other / Meta / Re: Why Did Quickseller add this negative trust without any reason? on: May 07, 2015, 06:56:12 PM
It is interesting that the OP has positive trust from rony_90 (giving positive trust to himself). Not only that but he also sent negative trust to alts of puzzel.me that were outed by BadBeat months after being outed (and probably after she thought the chances of getting the negatives removed were zero).

This chic sounds psycho to me.
203  Other / Off-topic / Re: Ask TF thread on: May 07, 2015, 03:13:17 PM
You had posted negative trust on tspacepilot that he defrauded coinchat. Do you have any evidence of him doing so? If so can you post such evidence?

TL;DR: he made a bot that copied stuff from wikipedia or something to collect the free BTC, and defrauded coins.

here's an email exchange where he wastes my time.

tspacepilot banned
14 messages
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:41 AM
To: admin@glados.cc
Hi admin,

I seem to have been banned from coinchat.  What a shame, I was having such a lovely time.  Can I ask what happened?

--TSpace
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:43 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

#Spacechat
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:57 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Hi admin,

In #spacechat, I was trying to test out a bot.  What was the problem?

In any case, I enjoyed the site a lot and had a lot of fun chatting with others and playing with moobot.  If you don't want me around anymore, that's ok, I'll get over it.

I guess I might remind you that I asked several times about whether there were any rules I should know about.  You never got back to me on that.  Seems like I've broken some rule or made you angry in some way.

Still not sure what went wrong.

Best,
--TSpace
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn since you started running the bot.
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:

a) I don't know what the rules are
b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or how you came to that conclusion.

Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

Best,
Tspace
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:11 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not earn tips.

b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is fraudulent, and it may also have infringed the copyright of whatever site you copied it from, as you were using it for a commercial purpose.

I'm not interested in wasting my time with BSing with you. You know exactly what you did wrong, and if you play dumb it's the last time I'll be talking to you.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Below:

On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
    earn tips.


That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?  Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.


    b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
    fraudulent,


I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/governmental process, not "common sense".  Seems like you want to accuse me of something, but you won't go ahead and say what it is that you want to say.  Not sure why you're being evasive.

    and it may also have infringed the copyright of whatever site
    you copied it from, as you were using it for a commercial purpose.


I haven't copied anything.  I'm not sure what you mean here.  Several times you and I had conversations about your API and I told you that I was working on a bot.  I'm a relatively good programmer, and I enjoyed learning about node.js and experimenting with robots on your site. Given that I discussed what I was doing with you several times, I'm not sure why you're trying to accuse me of copying or "commercial purposes".  What sort of commerce to you suppose I'm involved in?  I'm not sure where you're going with this.

For all your crytic allegations here, you still haven't talked about how much you think I owe you or how you arrived at that number.  From what I can tell, your site gives out BTC for chatting.  I got some of that BTC and now you want it back.  Please let me know what I'm missing.


    *I'm not interested in wasting my time with BSing with you. You know
    exactly what you did wrong, and if you play dumb it's the last time I'll be
    talking to you.*


Also not interested in wasting time.  Seems like you got angry about something and you don't want to discuss it plainly.  If you change your mind, I'm all ears.  I really did enjoy your site and the community there.

Best,
tspacepilot
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:23 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html

You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from coinchat.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Thanks this reply is much more to the point Smiley

On 08/29/2013 04:23 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

    See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html


I will review these rules.  Thanks!


    You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that
    is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from
    coinchat.


Well, I don't believe that's correct, a very small percentage of my chatting was autogenerated and none of it was done with bad intentions.
Secondarily, I only started experimenting with autogenerated chatting over the last week, and I think I've been a member for over a month.

Oh well, it seems my love affair with coinchat was brief and passionate.

Best of luck in your endeavors.  If you ever change your mind...

tspacepilot



    On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>wrote:

        Below:


        On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

            a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
            earn tips.


        That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?
          Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know
        about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely
        given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.



            b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
            fraudulent,


        I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/**governmental
        [Quoted text hidden]


            On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.**com<traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

                wrote:


              Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:


                a) I don't know what the rules are
                b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

                If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules
                again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not
                breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or
                how you came to that conclusion.

                Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

                Best,
                Tspace


                On 08/29/2013 04:01 PM, gladoscc wrote:

                  I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if

                    you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn
                    since you started running the bot.





JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
I reviewed the rules.  It certainly would have been helpful to have seen this *before* you banned me.

Also, nice style on that page.  I really like the notepad.

I'd look forward to coming back if you ever want to unban me.

Best,
Tspacepilot

On 08/29/2013 04:23 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

    See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html

    You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that
    is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from
    coinchat.


    On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>wrote:

        Below:


        On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

            a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
            earn tips.


        That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?
          Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know
        about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely
        given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.



            b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
            fraudulent,


        I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/**governmental
        [Quoted text hidden]


            On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.**com<traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

                wrote:


              Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:


                a) I don't know what the rules are
                b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

                If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules
                again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not
                breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or
                how you came to that conclusion.

                Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

                Best,
                Tspace


                On 08/29/2013 04:01 PM, gladoscc wrote:

                  I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if

                    you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn
                    since you started running the bot.





gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:02 PM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

Return the BTC if you want to be unbanned.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Emailing with you is a little like chatting with a bot.  How do I know this exchange isn't automated.  Smiley

Cheers!

(gladoscc replies: 'return the BTC or be destroyed!')

Thanks for the info. However his arrogance in the situation allowed me to find a thread where he essentially admitted to scamming you/coinchat. He still denies the allegations and is trying to weasel his way out of being held responsibility however he is now labeled a scammer.
204  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk account on: May 07, 2015, 02:39:36 PM
[]The reason people can buy/sell/farm accounts is because the forum believes in the right to freedom of speech. The forum wants people to be protected if/when they make an unpopular statement (or in your case to look like an idiot).

Nonsense. There is zero need to buy an account to speak. This account was neither bought nor sold. It was made by clicking on the "register" button.
Case in point.
Trotting out freedom of speech to defend your profiteering on this forum is fucking repulsive.
Stop.

It pains me to provide you this opportunity to make a few "relevant" posts with an account you're farming, but so it goes Sad
The fact that the forum believes in the freedom of speech means that people can have as many accounts as they wish. The trading of accounts is not against any rules, and the restriction of the sale of accounts would violate the forums policy of having a free market. The community at large generally believes that the pros outweigh the cons of the trading of accounts and generally finds this practice acceptable and as a result it is done in the open.
205  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk account on: May 07, 2015, 02:09:38 PM
[]
You can own/create/farm/buy/sell/lend as many accounts as you wish, just as long as you make decent posts/contributions from them.

This is why we can't have nice things.
What are you talking about? I think most people on here believe in the free market and people who participate in this kind of activity is doing nothing more then taking advantage of the market.

This is also ironic that you are creating so many accounts making shit/troll posts arguing against account farming while the reason you are allowed to create so many accounts is because of these rules. 

OHAI Quickseller. Taking your alts out for a morning romp around the forum?
Cheesy

Edit:
>This is also ironic that you are creating so many accounts making shit/troll posts arguing against account farming...
Did not buy or farm this account - I've made it. Myself.
Not sure what account farming/selling/buying has to do with this Huh
The reason people can buy/sell/farm accounts is because the forum believes in the right to freedom of speech. The forum wants people to be protected if/when they make an unpopular statement (or in your case to look like an idiot). If the rules regarding multiple accounts were to be removed then you would be breaking the rules by creating accounts in the way that you are (this is of course ignoring the fact that you are breaking the rules by posting for reasons other to appeal your ban after you have been banned multiple times).
206  Other / Meta / Re: Imposter Warning for Newbies! (thank you) on: May 07, 2015, 01:39:30 PM
The difference between this change and the forum banning scammers is that this change generally will prevent scams from happening in the first place while banning scams would force the forum to make determinations that it is really not equipped to make.
207  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk account on: May 07, 2015, 01:34:14 PM
[]
You can own/create/farm/buy/sell/lend as many accounts as you wish, just as long as you make decent posts/contributions from them.

This is why we can't have nice things.
What are you talking about? I think most people on here believe in the free market and people who participate in this kind of activity is doing nothing more then taking advantage of the market.

This is also ironic that you are creating so many accounts making shit/troll posts arguing against account farming while the reason you are allowed to create so many accounts is because of these rules. 
208  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: May 3rd to May 14th diff thread. OPEN for picks NOW! on: May 07, 2015, 05:37:46 AM
I would guess -3.51% to 3.75%. The stagnant price of BTC plus the lack of availability of new hardware (especially that of more/better efficiency) means that little new hardware is going to be brought online and some amount of hardware will be taken offline because of costs, warmer weather, ect
209  Economy / Auctions / Re: Full Member Bitcointalk Account on: May 06, 2015, 02:21:38 PM
.075 BTC, if the previous buyer doesn't pay up.

Still no response and no payment from the previous highest bidder. They've got a few hours left.

If there is still no response/payment the auction continues at 0.075 (your bid) and it'll end in 24 hours. Negative trust will be left for all those who bid (and win) and don't pay or make any effort to contact me.
Why is the auction continuing at .075 btc? If someone is bidding that high but is not paying then their bid should be invalid and it would make more sense for the current high bid to go back to the next highest bid (which would be no bid).
210  Other / Meta / Re: Did Vod just get rep fucked? on: May 05, 2015, 04:09:19 PM
Good Photoshop skill!

Or he just trusts a load of people who left negative on vod.
This is his trust list
Code:
Depth 1
smooth (-1)
Vod (-1)
DefaultTrust (1)
rhkazani1 (1)
He most likely is using trust depth of 3 or 4. Either way Vod has positive trust in pretty much anyone who has their head on halfway straight's eyes
211  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Be Vigilant on Compliance, Coinbase Warns Bitcoin Startups on: May 04, 2015, 05:42:52 AM
This is true. Bitcoin is a magnet for regulators and law enforcement. If you are doing bitcoin related business and are not following the letter (and spirit) of the law to the "t" then you are at risk.

Hopefully the regulatory landscape will change in the future, and it probably will over time when regulators see the economic benefits of bitcoin being part of the economy
212  Economy / Auctions / Re: Hero Account 490 activity (neutral trust) on: May 03, 2015, 09:32:26 PM
I bid .35

Winner. Sending PM.  Congratulations.
Wow. This is probably the lowest selling price for a hero account on record. This goes to show the importance of getting a signed message when buying an account as I do not doubt this played a role in the sales price.
213  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: [EDU] Faucet risks on: May 03, 2015, 09:10:07 PM
Thanks for taking the time to make this thread. Maybe talk about the (few) benefits of faucets?

Are there any besides "free" bitcoin? I mean thats the obvious one, you get some coins for work that can be done by almost everyone. I know some people argue that faucets are a good way to understand bitcoin by using and testing them, but I dont see the point to be honest. My main problem with this benefit is that bitcoin behaves differently at different amounts you have available. I used to grind faucets as well and thought bitcoin had a rather highish fee scheme (see risk #1). I think its better to invest a small amount of your local currency into bitcoin in order to see how it behaves, feels and works with everyday amounts.

If you have any specific benefit in mind I can certainly write a paragraph about it and add it.
One "benefit" to using faucets is that if you use some kind of faucet rotator, or other site that lists a large number of faucets, then you are bound to come across a faucet that actually has a good amount of information about bitcoin and how it works. This is somewhat different from someone actually receiving a small amount of bitcoin to get to "play around with" when they receive the "earnings". IMO this is really just a way to get people to click more links (which involve in viewing more ads), however it would be a real benefit IMO.
214  Economy / Gambling / Re: Hufflepuff Making 2k BTC On PrimeDice Nov 2014. March 2015 Update: He Cheated on: May 03, 2015, 06:50:43 PM
Was he able to cash out the btc or was he stopped?

He was able to cash out 2000+ btc as hufflepuff but his next withdrawal as robinhood was blocked because Stunna has found out that he is using exploit to win

I don't think Stunna actually found out until Robinhood apparently made it obvious by getting like 140 wins in a row at 50/50 chance , which tipped everyone off. So it might just be him, who purposely did that to show the flaw. But even now, without Stunna's comment on the situation we still don't know if Robinhood was actually Hufflepuff.
Stunna had mentioned above (which have since been edited, but the quotes of his posts remain) that they used the same exploit.

You are probably correct to say that stunna did not know about the exploit until it was made blatantly obvious by robinhood.

It was mentioned above that Hufflepuff had withdrawn to 14iS2UvcLK33xkC1K1qL1dhEbp49aiNfNp, and it is known that robinhood was able to withdraw ~20 BTC before his additional withdrawals were stopped, and there do not appear to be any transactions in the amount of 20 BTC to the above address, so it would be reasonable to conclude that it would be possible they are different people.
215  Economy / Gambling / Re: Important announcement from Primedice on: May 03, 2015, 06:08:47 PM
Why this is a problem for some US players? there are so many dice sites out there

Because primedice is one of the most trusted sites out there. After seeing other dice sites disappear, why trust any other? Dadice could end up like the rest....

Watch out from all the new scammy dice sites popping up over the next few days. Someone will take advantage of this. Inexperienced users should also be very careful with TOR.

This will end badly for US players.
PrimeDice really should have a .onion mirror that TOR users can access in order to prevent these kinds of MITM attacks (similar to what bc.i and bitmixer did), and then outright block access to primedice.com via tor (they would need to access it via the .onion mirror).

It would probably be better to access PD via a VPN anyway, the lag times would likely be much better
216  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Appraisal: Hero account on: May 03, 2015, 05:40:18 PM
I would say that if it has near or above 700 activity then it should sell for over 1 BTC as it can potentially become legendary in the near future. Lower level hero accounts are selling for the .5 to .7 BTC range because there are so many farmed hero accounts available now.

The market for accounts is overall not very good as there are a huge number of people trying to sell, and hero accounts tend to take a long time to sell so if you try to wait out for a good offer then the value of your account may decline
217  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★ BitPoker.io - A New Poker Experience! - Levelled Faucet - LAUNCH GIVEAWAY ★ on: May 03, 2015, 02:54:54 AM
Interesting site. Does anyone know if they allow players in the US to play?
218  Economy / Services / Re: [6 OPEN SLOTS] Rollin.io Signature Campaign - Earn up to 0.14 BTC Per Month! on: April 30, 2015, 01:21:15 PM
I'd like to continue.
Senior member
ACCTseller
572 posts
1Hh3z5rGTcKLU1gUYs6x3YAL1WfS2HtG4y
219  Economy / Services / Re: Re: cracking private keys on: April 26, 2015, 06:49:30 AM
Send the funds to the escrow first.  Smiley

Get an escrow and I'll do it
not quickseller because he'll be off default trust soon enough

I would be willing to escrow for this kind of deal
shutup quickseller
If you won't use me as escrow, then why don't you use Spekulatius or akka?
220  Economy / Services / Re: Re: cracking private keys on: April 26, 2015, 06:42:30 AM
Send the funds to the escrow first.  Smiley

Get an escrow and I'll do it
not quickseller because he'll be off default trust soon enough

I would be willing to escrow for this kind of deal
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!