Default Trust (DT) is highly controversial and I will not even go there now, as others surely will. The thing is, if you value your DT score, you have to be pragmatic: - DT is apparently here to stay
- Some DT accounts are giving negative feedback if you show any kind of support for ponzis even openily declaring themselves as such.
If you value your DT score more than you value showing any kind of support for ponzis games, then deal with it: make a public statement about it (create a new topic), then PM the 2 accounts in question, point them to that post and ask them to amend their feedback. At least one of the guys openly says he will remove neg if you do that, so it's worth a try. |
|
|
|
 ils ont du courage pour laisser des fonds pareils ... à un moment charnière. Sûrement qu'ils ont déjà laissé des plumes dans BTC-e et qu'ils sont plus à ça près... et/ou ils se tamponnent complètement du BCash  |
|
|
|
Comme le disait un membre sur le "wall observer" ... mais comment il peut y avoir autant de volume si les exchanges sont fermées ?  A ce que je sache ce ne sont que les dépôts et retraits qui sont fermés, le trading reste ouvert |
|
|
|
Anyone having transaction problems? I bumped a transfer with a $8 fee 4 hours ago and it still hasn't gone through. I did this because it had been waiting for 11 hours with a normal fee.
Don't forget that it's the fees/byte ratio, not the absolute fee, that matters here. So I would check the total size of your tx to learn more. If it uses hundreds of inputs, chances are you will have to spend even more to get it through. The mempool is currently almost empty: $ bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
"size": 5387,
"bytes": 7325274,
"usage": 16250208,
"maxmempool": 300000000,
"mempoolminfee": 0.00000000
}
So there must be some specific problem / delay with your tx. Another typical reason is if your tx uses unconfirmed inputs. |
|
|
|
If i install the ABC wallet, do i really need to download the whole chain again? Or can i make a copy of my BTC Core chain?  If you are already running 0.14.x you should be able to safely clone the Core chain. |
|
|
|
You'd better be careful with such comments:
next day feds will fill a report about bitcointalk users openly discussing drug sale.
You know the feds have been here already, right? |
|
|
|
|
AFAIK there is currently no block explorer that is readily available and guaranteed to follow the BCash UAHF. Most likely, some will pop up soon after the fork. If you aren't lucky enough to have access to your own full node on the UAHF, your best bet is probably following the zillion threads on this forum.
Also, theymos will post a sticky post-fork follow-up.
|
|
|
|
Just wondering how they will fork. Normally on a bitcoin address tomorrow there are btc and bcc. Same amount.
Yes. When does the coins divide?
August 1 12:20 UTC When sending he bitcoins from there then the bcc would move together with them since the btc-transaction would also valid on the bcc-chain?
Also when sending bcc from a btc-address you would move the btc also since the bcc-transaction would be valid on the btc-chain also both coins?
There is reasonable replay protection in place, but malicious wallets fed with "common" private keys (pre-fork) could still tamper with your coins on the other chain, so the best is to split coins to a new wallet after the fork. |
|
|
|
I'm cross-posting this question here because I haven't found any answer to this yet: New SigHash Type - As part of the replay protection technology, Bitcoin Cash introduces a new way of signing transactions. This also brings additional benefits such as input value signing for improved hardware wallet security, and elimination of the quadratic hashing problem.
How so? I have checked the UAHF technical specs but it seems that it only addresses the replay protection issue. |
|
|
|
You're asking this question on bitcointalk? lol
Actually I was expecting to find the answer there, but it only addresses replay protection. Care to elaborate? Hint: I'm not looking for opinion or debates, only science and facts. They're missing from BitcoinCash.org ATM. |
|
|
|
In the end, this story tell me, never trust and never put your asset at internet, after all verturelize is still verturelize; hard working money is the solid stuff that could really fulfill my life.
Attaboy! |
|
|
|
Seriously, every transaction in the world ever, stored locally on everyone's smartphone so they can buy a beer with Bitcoin Cash? I suspect the popcorn manufacturing industry to be the mastermind behind Bitcoin Cash The fact is, I'm not against Bitcoin Cash per se (only against its confusing name FWIW), but I'd like to know more about this: New SigHash Type - As part of the replay protection technology, Bitcoin Cash introduces a new way of signing transactions. This also brings additional benefits such as input value signing for improved hardware wallet security, and elimination of the quadratic hashing problem.
How so? |
|
|
|
|
So long BTC-e, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|
En fait si tu n'achète qu'un rig que tu fais tourner à la cave et que tu paies moins de 0.15€/kWh, avec les conditions de marché et de difficulté actuelles, tu pourrais potentiellement le rentabiliser et même être profitable.
Le problème se pose quand tu commences à faire de sérieux investissements, que tu as des baux à payer, que tu dois éteindre toute ton install car le marché n'a plus rien à offrir et que tu dois payer les charges. Au bout d'un moment pas le choix tu liquides tout à perte et tu t'es brûlé les ailes. Toute ressemblance avec une situation vécue serait parfaitement fortuite.
Si j'avais gardé mes bitcoins plutôt que de faire le con, je serais quasi-millionaire en € aujourd'hui. "Sad.", comme dirait Trump.
|
|
|
|
|
Si tu es geek et que tu veux t'amuser potentiellement à perte, lance-toi dans le minage.
Si tu veux spéculer sur le fait que les crypto vont t'offrir bien plus de retour que les banque centrales quand elles se la jouent Jésus-et-la-multiplication-des-pains, achète des crypto, surtout du BTC pour le profil le moins spéculatif.
Le minage rentable, c'est maintenant réservé aux chinois qui veulent brûler du fuel sale pas cher et super polluant.
Si tu peux "voler" ton électricité sans conséquences fâcheuses pour toi, tu peux mesurer ton risque et aller pour du minage rentable après tout. Mais il est rare de pouvoir "voler" plus de quelques milliers de kWh par année sans risque...
Sinon, épisodiquement il arrive que le minage en GPU sur de l'ETH typiquement puisse être temporairement rentable même en Europe, mais c'est très temporaire et probablement insuffisant pour rentabiliser.
Si tu utilises l'argument que le produit de ton minage peut potentiellement monter en valeur, refais le scénario en investissant la thune dans des crypto plutôt que dans du matos de minage, regarde l'écran de la calculatrice et constate que mathématiquement tu gagneras toujours plus si tu avais directement acheté les crypto plutôt que le matos.
|
|
|
|
The safe way to do it is the following: - Don't move your coins before the fork, leave them in your wallet, let's call it it BTC-OLD
- After the fork, create a new wallet, let's call it BTC-NEW, get an address from BTC-NEW
- Move all your BTC from BTC-OLD to the address of BTC-NEW
- Install a BCH wallet, and create a new wallet, let's call it BCH-TRANS
- Export your private keys from the (now BTC-empty) BTC-OLD to the BCH-TRANS wallet
- Your BCH 1:1 from BTC-OLD will "appear" in your BCH-TRANS wallet
I believe this is the safest way to split your BTC / BCH in a way that even a harmful/rogue wallet fed with your private keys will not affect the other chain, because both BTC-OLD and BCH-TRANS had to share the same private keys to make the split possible. Of course there is replay protection but this is enforced by consensus, and that wouldn't prevent a rogue wallet with unencrypted private keys to craft transactions that would be sent to the other chain. |
|
|
|
The most likely outcome is not that people will complain, it's just that people will sell their free BCC for real BTC, bringing BCC exchange rate quickly close to IXCoin and Devcoin levels, for those who remember That we have to wait and see, eh? Maybe the "real" bitcoin will bet BCC at the end, it is a fork and both have the same history behind. If there is one thing we can be sure about is that nobody can predict the future. Well, you can place your bets then |
|
|
|
if its like etc its a good way to get 1/10 more real bitcoin for no work. for this i wont complain.
The most likely outcome is not that people will complain, it's just that people will sell their free BCC for real BTC, bringing BCC exchange rate quickly close to IXCoin and Devcoin levels, for those who remember |
|
|
|
While the idea of a hardfork in spite of BIP91 can be materialized into real software, to the tune of "because I can", well, why not. But the name "Bitcoin Cash" seems unfortunate. It will only confuse newcomers as BTC and BCC will obviously become two completely different currencies, i.e. not interoperable. Let's see how it's goes, though  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
