|
Auction Count Snapshot
Worldwide from Dropdown on top right
26,902
Manual Count of Countries/Unions (except Worldwide) on top right
12,687 (sum of below)
5,037 US
3,075 EU
284 EU (why twice?)
462 Denmark
781 China
600 Canada
875 Germany
516 Spain
43 Russia
1,014 UK
Manual Count of categories on Left
12,271 (Sum of # on bottom)
12,271 ~ 12,687 o.k.
so where are the other 14,000 Listings?
Is the Worldwide number a mistake?
Or are there 14,000 listings from "non-member" countries?
category count
19
115
151
322
549
70
1020
527
1457
1140
770
30
199
136
479
41
372
513
1232
559
126
1559
281
13
258
175
13
145
|
|
|
|
Joseph Vaughn Perling, the issuer of the New Liberty Dollar (not to be confused with Bernard von NotHaus’s NORFED Liberty Dollar) and regular Bitcoin Forum contributor announced during his speech on “Free Money” at OHM2013: Observe. Hack. Make conference on July 31st in the Netherlands that he will be issuing a new private minting of “anonymous” QR enabled silver medallions. http://bitcoinmagazine.com/new-liberty-dollar-silver-qr-coin-obtains-live-bitcoin-prices/ |
|
|
|
"Live auctions will use blockchain escrow. On-chain escrow will enable refunds (i.e. release of escrow) without fees. The stroke of genius is that since the money is not held by the merchant or platform, but rather by the blockchain itself, this reduces if not eliminates fiduciary risk and likely the regulatory compliance requirements (e.g. money transmitter licenses) for facilitating escrow transactions. " From Bitcoin's Watershed Moment http://bitcoinmagazine.com/bitcoins-watershed-moment-an-open-source-cryptocurrency-ecosystem/ |
|
|
|
At “Inside Bitcoins the future of virtual currency” Bitcoin Conference in New York held on July 30th, Adam B. Levine, senior fellow with the Bitcoin Education Project and Editor in Chief and Co-host of Let’s Talk Bitcoin! announced his ambitious project codenamed “Watershed” (watershed.launchrock.com) in a well received speech, “Win-Win-Win-Win-Win: Rethinking Content Monetization with Bitcoin.” http://bitcoinmagazine.com/bitcoins-watershed-moment-an-open-source-cryptocurrency-ecosystem/ |
|
|
|
How do you feel being exactly 1 year ahead of the curve on this one? Re: Van Eck Proposal Above see Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF May Not be Redeemable in Bitcoins for Individual Investors
Although it doesn’t appear that ETFs are convertible into the underlying asset at the individual investor level, there are ETFs that are trying to let investors do just that. Van Eck is one of those companies. Kitco Metals Reports in “Proposed Van Eck Gold, Silver ETFs Would Allow Redemptions Of Metal” that:
"Several analysts told Kitco News that it appears the main factor differentiating this planned product from the majority of the existing ETFs in North America is the ability of investors to get their hands on physical gold or silver whenever they choose to exit, although they could also cash out." http://letstalkbitcoin.com/post/55120007013/winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-may-not-be-redeemable-in |
|
|
|
|
"I don't know why it deserved an article."
Did you read the article?
Or did you read the title of the article?
|
|
|
|
|
but the AP would have to buy at least a 50,000 block from the trust.
Then the AP would have a separate deal with retail investor(s) - --- an added value service -- separate from the trust..
this is what the article is saying.
The burden would be on the AP if they want it---if they can find profit in that type of premium svc
|
|
|
|
|
@retep
how do you think Van Eck is going to do it as stated in the article?
The article proposes that the Authorized Participant could facilitate this (not the Trust)---
do you think that would be possible?
|
|
|
|
Largest patent suit in India's IT and telecom space goes to??? ...Drumroll... http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-26/news/38040592_1_micromax-patent-infringement-standards-essential-patents
---Warning Spoilers Below--- "They also point out that the litigation was not unique to Micromax as Ericsson had recently filed a similar suit against South Korea's Samsung for failure to license 'standards-essential' patents. Executives close to Micromax claimed that Ericsson, which is no longer a player in the handset space after it exited its JV with Japan's Sony, was now trying to extort what they termed "irrational and inequitable licence fees"." |
|
|
|
|
@empoweoqwj
seems to be duly noted as such in the article
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
Though Bitstamp seems over represented..
