ok fixed. Thanks for letting me know.

You have to risk 110 to win 100, how could it work?
Even if you do the NBA with higher stakes and find odds of 1.96 (only 4% juice/fee/vig) - how can you make profits by losing 4% of your bankroll regardless of who wins each game?
Doesn't make any sense.

You can make a channel in the telegraph, where people will offer their options for improving the project, this is a very good idea, there are many of the options to choose the best

I expected for you to wait for the answers to be conveyed by OP and not to take a conclusion from the results of the answers of others who did not necessarily know it. As you know, every gambling place has a different concept, especially in terms of investment. It could be that they have a way that really gives profit to their investors, it's worth waiting for an answer from OP.

Site is been operating for long time ago and their dice is a new project but lacking of promotions and low bankroll like you guys know is a big problem to his site. Their game is not that bad as I can say but with lower bankroll players can maximize their play so most of them are getting out from here. They should need to increase their bankroll or may be open up some investment to gather more bankroll for playing

Popularity in social networks is not very important for such projects, it’s more important to decide the amount of the fund money, this is much more important than likes and subscribers.

It totally depends on how much the casinos earn from players in terms of house edge and traffic. I've invested around $300+ in BTC on another site, and the returns are pretty negligible, more to negative actually.

Recently I tried leveraged trading for the first time at Bitmex, and ended up in a loss. It seemed similar to a gamble, where you deposit, place a bet and either win (and double) or lose everything. In leveraged trading, if you deposit & place an order and it reaches your liquidation level, you lose everything.

Gambling can't be compared to regular trading, as in regular trading, you don't win much and don't lose much either. However, if you're trading with leverage, then that trading can be considered something similar to a gamble.

Not an interesting concept. Also I do not think that it is the good way to use some ICOBench "experts" as the advisors, because everyone now that almost of them are scammers which have been involved in a different types of shady activities.

Hi, I'm sorry but we don't have any roadmaps because we cannot mention anything future related to prevent speculation. Plus, the space+blockchain ecosystem is constantly changing and because of a lot of NDAs. We only have a "roadmap" till Nov to showcase our milestone/achievements.  Hope you understand the sensitive nature of space and blockchain fusion.

AFAIK the main problem on this site is about low bankroll, if owner decide to add many altcoins but he has no good amount of bankroll then it will be useless addition because he needs to split his low bankroll into some altcoins. It means that the max allowed bet will be much more lower for each altcoins and it wont attract players.

if there is no roadmap, then this means, that the team is not set to work. so it can not be, because if the team does not even have such time, it means ,that it is not very much on the full development of its project.