I don't think you'll get a mod speaking to him. Perhaps you could try it (or I, if you'd rather not)?
Just look at anyone who uses that quote in their own post where it's evident that they haven't looked at the actual post that was made by the original/first user.
Normally I don't post here but that type of false quote is simply poor behavior on cuteman's behalf. |
|
|
|
this is a false quote: the Dragonmint is supreme.
Sure, because they use 10nm chips produced by Samsung, while Bitmain uses 16nm chips. But I wonder why efficiency is so low - 16TH/s , comparing with Bitmain's 14Th? 10nm should have at least 60% performance over 16 mn, doesn't it? real post below @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ That doesn't change that these are more efficient than the S9 so will give you more BTC for every $ you spend on electricity. That's the only thing that should matter.
You realize that the efficiency is so close that your arguement is null and void right?At 10 cent power you are talking about a $5/month difference in power for similar hashrates and the Dragon costs literally twice as much to purchase new. It would take the miner running 10 years for things to even out. You need to look at the big picture and not at one small data point. This term, "more than" is being used quite a bit about these miners, to justify it's shortcomings. To further the justification, the resident Bitmain Haters, ignore these shortcomings in a spiteful bliss. There's no changing their minds about it. 1 out of the 5 they ACTUALLY received, hashes near or slightly above spec, so it's instantaneously proven, to them, the Dragonmint is supreme. Nevermind the other 4, that have to be tinkered with, just to come close to the 1, with a efficiency loss. These consumers are oblivious, simply for the bragging rights of having this miner. <-------insert face palm here!!! [/quote] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ######################################################################## the Dragonmint is supreme.
Sure, because they use 10nm chips produced by Samsung, while Bitmain uses 16nm chips. But I wonder why efficiency is so low - 16TH/s , comparing with Bitmain's 14Th? 10nm should have at least 60% performance over 16 mn, doesn't it? I'd prefer you not snip my post, making it look as if I feel they are supreme. They are not and that's my point. Thank you!!! ################################################################################## @ mods I believe cuteman should be talked to via for doing the above to Shazam [/quote] Other people on the thread have already quoted the false quote giving it a more wrong look.. |
|
|
|
only people that have zero understanding of the economics of mining will buy it. most likely it is a losing guess if you buy it even if it is real. It will be forked to death |
|
|
|
And unlike the Halong Dragonmints, miners from Bitmain, Canaan's Avalons, and the eBits will run on ANY sha256D pool you point them at.
that is the biggest knock against them. and the question remains why won't more pools add it the software is not that hard. I know the answer to that for most major pools.
Moderator's note: This post was edited by frodocooper to remove a nested quote. |
|
|
|
|
5% dead gear is common for bitmain.
so you got 20 good and 1 bad
A rma will cost you $$ consider it part of the cost of doing business.
You could ask them for a good coupon maybe they would give you a 300 to spend on a s9i
|
|
|
|
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJrsetting to performance is not a wise choice. Miner 1 set to efficiency { "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr", "hashrate1m": "20.9T", "hashrate5m": "16.4T", "hashrate1hr": "13.9T", "hashrate1d": "14.1T", --------------------- and about 1300 watts "hashrate7d": "49.2T", "lastshare": 1525873183, "shares": 341906266, "bestshare": 325769144.0, "lns": 28583918390.98017, "luck": 1.0, "herp": 28723026371.94339 }, Miner 2 set to efficiency { "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.1", "hashrate1m": "15.5T", "hashrate5m": "13.8T", "hashrate1hr": "13.1T", "hashrate1d": "13.3T", ------------------- and about 1280 watts "hashrate7d": "12.8T", "lastshare": 1525873176, "shares": 333194064, "bestshare": 392611794.0, "lns": 6326590818.692278, "luck": 1.0, "herp": 6338100635.641331 }, Miner 3 set to efficiency { "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.3", "hashrate1m": "20.4T", "hashrate5m": "17.5T", "hashrate1hr": "16.1T", "hashrate1d": "14.8T", "hashrate7d": "13T", "lastshare": 1525873184, "shares": 398015879, "bestshare": 165293179.0, "lns": 6333900650.355097, "luck": 1.0, "herp": 6362414262.233357 }, Miner 4 set to efficiency { "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.4", "hashrate1m": "18.2T", "hashrate5m": "14.8T", "hashrate1hr": "14.4T", "hashrate1d": "13.7T", "hashrate7d": "13.4T", "lastshare": 1525873184, "shares": 345179172, "bestshare": 323662901.0, "lns": 6692791107.986832, "luck": 1.0, "herp": 6680330436.925059 }, Miner 5 set to balance it drops a board on efficiency { "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.2", "hashrate1m": "19T", "hashrate5m": "16.1T", "hashrate1hr": "15.3T", "hashrate1d": "15.3T", -------------- pulls 1400 watts "hashrate7d": "8.13T", "lastshare": 1525873179, "shares": 385089579, "bestshare": 225511876.0, "lns": 2029606852.62518, "luck": 1.0, "herp": 2032193242.181918 }, If you insist on performance you will need a cooled room 70f or so and a bigger psu like the delta 2400 watt or the hp 2450 watt. Or do my settings and get better results.
Moderator's note: This post was edited by frodocooper to trim the quote from comby.
|
|
|
|
|
So have many paid for the z9 brick?
|
|
|
|
Also tell me how you can brick a GPU with a fork.
power up the GPU and start mining. While mining, drag your fork across the exposed pins/leads of components on the board, soon all the magic smoke is released, et voila, GPU==brick.  Thanks for the laugh |
|
|
|
I was very disappointed when I heard that release a miner for the extraction of ZEC. It will be very good if the ZEC team changes the algorithm to support miners on GPU and altcoin decentralization.
Don't know if you guys just haven't read the news but, Zcash devs have made it clear that they will make Zec's ASIC resistance an "immediate technical priority." Wait till the news hits the fan. ZEC value will probably rise in the coming days. Could be a good opportunity to buy some today. My source: https://www.ccn.com/zcash-foundation-to-make-asic-resistance-immediate-technical-priority/Did I get to say told you so to those that spent hard cash on the z9 |
|
|
|
zcash is laying a trap to fuck all those asic buyers hard once gear hits network that will commit with this announcement we wanted to fuck asic buyers hard so screw off you piece of shit asic miners. We lied on purpose to suck in morons to buy asics that we bricked . We don't need your stinking asics  Now between you and me I doubt this happens but there is zero liability from bitmain if it happens. |
|
|
|
I don't think Bitmain is hurting for money, but I could be wrong. More people than not say they mine with the hardware and release it to the public once they kill the rate and make money off of them. I wonder if they do mine on all the machines if there profit is based on the coins they mined or is the 3-4 billion in profit from straight sales?
This article from cointelegraph.com (maybe reliable, maybe not) says
"the four-year-old Bitmain reportedly made between $3 and $4 billion in operating profit in 2017, whereas Nvidia, founded 24 years ago, made about $3 billion during the same period. "
they were holding 30000 btc in dec 2016 1000 and in dec 2017 coins were 19950 plus add 30000 bch worth 2000 so 30000 x 1000 = 30,000,000 became 30,000 x 22,000 = 660,000,000 that is a 630,000,000 profit of a traceable set of accounts they have. |
|
|
|
Whats wrong with a ZEC asic?
10k sols = about 24 GTX 1070s at stock settings.
24 GTX 1070s at stock settings use ~3600 watts + 100w for the rest of the machine.
ZEC asic = 300 watts.
So you need $10,000 worth of parts to make the same hashrate and you burn 12x the power.
This will be a nice quiet machine you can run in any home off any cheapo ATX power supply.
This is a win/win for anyone wanting to mine equihash without breaking the bank.
You can also take this misinformed idea that ASICs promote centralization when that is so not the case. This machine makes it easy for anyone to get into mining without the complications of multiple unreliable GPU rigs.
the bold is wrong my equihash has 99% uptime with gpu's my gpu gear has 3 year warranty from real companies like evga msi intel corsair. my gpu's have resale value. and they still earn money on equihash. one more thing buy that asic and have then zcash/dev change algo on July 1 with the simple statement we wanted to fuck asic buyers hard so screw off you piece of shit asic miners. We lied on purpose to suck in morons to buy asics that we bricked . We don't need your stinking asics Now between you and me I doubt this happens but there is zero liability from bitmain if it happens. So do you feel lucky? |
|
|
|
If you're in a deferred position when a block is found, the HERP is added to the next round - and it can effectively double the herp by doing so. If you are in the top 100 with the added herp the next time around you're guaranteed to get paid. If not, you will be in the interleaved group.
All of this shows you are much better off sticking to the one address. You'll get paid more regularly and are more likely to get the full payout with each block find. Additionally it means other miners get a look in sooner so it is nice manners to do so.
Makes perfect sense. Thanks for explaining. Yeah I have two addresses. I will not add a third and I will let the 1Jd address die. |
|
|
|
Thanks to the very few of you that have donated. Id spend some time to write a GUI version, except I would need to create a custom firmware version from scratch, since there is no way to edit the web GUI without updating the whole bitmain firmware. Figured this way would be easier and not require you to update the firmware at all. I know the command line seems scary to some but this is super easy to do, and there is very little risk of screwing up your antminer, even if you accidentally delete the whole root directory :p Bitmain's firmware is pretty good in that regard since they unpack the whole kernel and stock filesystem on each reboot. It was easy on terminal via mac I just was fooled about password because I have not done it since 2014 with s-1's. first down load your file https://github.com/jstefanop/bitmain-tools/releases/download/v.1/set_voltage.zipthen open terminal on a mac when is asks for password type in admin Last login: Mon May 7 11:10:06 on ttys002 macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ scp /Users/macmini/Downloads/set_voltage root@192.168.0.165:/config The authenticity of host '192.168.0.165 (192.168.0.165)' can't be established. RSA key fingerprint is 12:41:2a:98:5e:19:4f:dc:5e:16:f8:b0:e6:07:46:9a. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yesWarning: Permanently added '192.168.0.165' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. root@192.168.0.165's password: adminset_voltage 100% 9204 9.0KB/s 00:00 macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ ssh root@192.168.0.165root@192.168.0.165's password: adminroot@L3antMinerNine9:~# cd /config root@L3antMinerNine9:/config# ./set_voltage 1 fe version = 0x03 reading voltage voltage = 0x80 setting voltage reading voltage voltage = 0xfe Success: Voltage updated! root@L3antMinerNine9:/config# ./set_voltage 2 fe version = 0x03 reading voltage voltage = 0x80 setting voltage reading voltage voltage = 0xfe Success: Voltage updated! root@L3antMinerNine9:/config# ./set_voltage 3 fe version = 0x03 reading voltage voltage = 0x80 setting voltage reading voltage voltage = 0xfe Success: Voltage updated! root@L3antMinerNine9:/config# ./set_voltage 4 fe version = 0x03 reading voltage voltage = 0x80 setting voltage reading voltage voltage = 0xfe Success: Voltage updated! root@L3antMinerNine9:/config# Write failed: Broken pipe macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ macs-Mac-mini-4:~ macmini$ |
|
|
|
|
@ yankees yes that math is correct.
I try to keep my L3+ at 0.0500 or lower
which means of every 10,000 usd I earn I lose 5 usd to errors.
|
|
|
|
good numbers no worries see below  |
|
|
|
Title.
(Sorry if off topic or against the rules - if so, please delete)
I have brand new, never opened Dragonmint T1, B29, and a B52. They all come with power supplies. I'm in the states and I would prefer not to use eBay. Where could I sell them?
belongs here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=75.0I asked for it to be moved there. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
